Cells need to work together for a multi-celled organism, such as a plant or an animal, to thrive. Many complicated signaling pathways therefore exist that allow cells to communicate with one another and to control their own activity in response to the signals that they receive. One such pathway, called the Hippo signaling pathway, regulates when cells grow and divide, which allows organs and tissues to develop correctly and helps to prevent cancerous tumors from forming.

Signaling pathways often control the activity of cells by affecting how particular genes are expressed from DNA. One way of doing this is to activate or inactivate proteins called transcription factors, which bind to sections of DNA to alter the expression of nearby genes. In fruit flies, the Hippo signaling pathway stops cells from dividing by inactivating Yorkie, a protein that binds to and activates certain transcription factors. However, exactly how Yorkie is able to activate these transcription factors was unclear.

For transcription factors to function correctly, they must be able to reach the stretch of DNA where they bind. Therefore, another way to alter gene expression is to change how the DNA is packaged in a cell. This can be done by modifying the proteins that the DNA is wrapped around, which are called histones, for example by using enzymes called methyltransferases to add methyl groups to these proteins.

Qing, Yin et al. looked at the Hippo signaling pathway in the fruit fly Drosophila, and found that the Yorkie protein only activates transcription factors when another protein called Ncoa6—which is part of a methyltransferase—binds to it. Furthermore, when the Ncoa6 protein was bound directly to the transcription factor, the tissue grew normally even when the Yorkie protein was not present. These findings reveal the importance of histone modifications in controlling tissue growth, and could provide a new direction in the search for cancer treatments.

The Hippo signaling pathway has recently emerged as a central mechanism in organ size control, tissue regeneration, and stem cell biology (Harvey and Tapon, 2007; Badouel et al., 2009; Pan, 2010; Zhao et al., 2010; Halder and Johnson, 2011; Barry and Camargo, 2013). Initially discovered in Drosophila for its critical role in restricting imaginal disc growth, the Hippo pathway comprises several tumor suppressor proteins acting through a core kinase cascade that ultimately phosphorylates and inactivates the transcriptional coactivator Yorkie (Yki) (Huang et al., 2005). Consistent with its essential role in normal development and tissue homeostasis, YAP, the mammalian counterpart of Yki, encodes a bona fide oncogene and is overexpressed and/or activated in a wide spectrum of human cancers. Elucidating the molecular mechanism by which Yki functions as a transcriptional coactivator is not only relevant for understanding the fundamental mechanisms of growth control but also has important implications for the development of therapeutic strategies targeting the Hippo pathway in cancer and regenerative medicine.

Posttranslational modifications of histones are important features of transcriptional regulation in all eukaryotes. A particularly prevalent modification involved in transcriptional activation is histone H3 methylation. Drosophila contains three COMPASS (complex of proteins associated with Set1)-like histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4) methyltransferase complexes, each defined by a distinct methyltransferase subunit, namely, Trithorax (Trx), Trithorax-related (Trr), and dSet1 (Mohan et al., 2011). Previous genetic analysis has implicated Trx in the maintenance of Hox gene transcription and Trr in ecdysone receptor (EcR)-mediated gene transcription (Sedkov et al., 2003). Nuclear receptor coactivator 6 (Ncoa6) is a specific subunit of the Trr complex in both Drosophila and mammals (Mohan et al., 2011). Although its in vivo function remains undefined in Drosophila, the mammalian Ncoa6 orthologue (also known as NRC, ASC-2, TRBP, PRIP, and RAP250) is essential for embryonic development (Kuang et al., 2002; Antonson et al., 2003; Zhu et al., 2003; Mahajan et al., 2004). The mammalian Ncoa6 has been shown to potentiate the activity of nuclear hormone receptors and other DNA-binding transcription factors, at least in part, by recruiting the H3K4 methyltransferases (Mahajan and Samuels, 2008). Interestingly, like YAP, the mammalian Ncoa6 is a pro-survival and anti-apoptotic gene (Mahajan et al., 2004) and is amplified in multiple cancer types such as breast, colon, and lung cancers (Lee et al., 1999).

In this study, we identify Ncoa6 as a Yki-binding protein that is required for transcriptional regulation by the Hippo signaling pathway. We provide evidence showing that the transcriptional coactivator function of Yki depends on its ability to interact with Ncoa6 and that the Trr methyltransferase complex is functionally required for Hippo-mediated growth and gene expression. We further show that Yki, Ncoa6, and Trr are required for normal H3K4 methylation at Hippo target genes. Thus, Yki functions as a transcriptional coactivator, at least in part, by recruiting a H3K4 methyltransferase and altering the chromatin state of target genes.

We recently reported a genome-wide RNAi screen in Drosophila S2R+ cells using a luciferase reporter driven by a minimal Hippo Responsive Element (HRE) from the Hippo target gene diap1 (Koontz et al., 2013). Briefly, Drosophila S2R+ cells were transfected with Yki- and Sd-expressing vectors, together with HRE-luciferase reporter and Pol III-Renilla expression vector as an internal control. Transfected cells were then seeded into individual dsRNA-containing 96-well plates. After RNAi depletion, HRE-luciferase reporter activity was measured and normalized to the Renilla control. This RNAi screen allowed us to uncover both positive and negative regulators of the HRE-luciferase reporter. We have previously characterized a negative regulator from the screen, Tgi (Koontz et al., 2013). Here, we focus on the positive transcriptional regulators (Figure 1—figure supplement1).

One of the positive regulators identified in our primary screen is Nuclear receptor coactivator 6 (Ncoa6), which was confirmed by repeating the RNAi experiment in triplicate using re-synthesized dsRNA (Figure 1—figure supplement1). We were particularly interested in Ncoa6 since it contains three PPxY sequences (Figure 1A), which represent a well-established ligand binding motif for WW domains. Since Yki contains two WW domains, we hypothesized that Ncoa6 may potentiate Yki-mediated transcriptional activation through physical interactions with Yki. Indeed, epitope-tagged Ncoa6 and Yki coimmunoprecipitated with each other in Drosophila S2R+ cells (Figure 1B). This interaction was abolished by mutating the three PPxY motifs in Ncoa6 (Ncoa6^3m) or the two WW domains in Yki (Yki^WM) (Figure 1B), suggesting that the Ncoa6–Yki interaction was mediated by Ncoa6's PPxY motifs and Yki's WW domains. In agreement with this conclusion, we found that wild-type Ncoa6, but not Ncoa6^3m, promoted nuclear accumulation of Yki in S2R+ cells in co-transfection assays (Figure 1C). Of note, a recently published Hippo pathway protein–protein interactome included Ncoa6 as one of 245 proteins that were co-immunopreciated by Yki (Kwon et al., 2013).

Figure 1 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Consistent with our observation that RNAi knockdown of Ncoa6 reduced the HRE reporter activity, overexpression of Ncoa6, but not the PPxY mutant Ncoa6^3m, potently enhanced Yki/Sd-mediated HRE reporter activity in Drosophila S2R+ cells (Figure 1D). In addition, the enhancement of HRE reporter activity by Ncoa6 was significantly suppressed by co-expression of the kinase Wts (Figure 1D). These results further support the importance of Ncoa6–Yki interactions in Hippo-responsive transcriptional regulation. Consistent with this notion, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) revealed that Ncoa6, like Yki, binds to the HRE site in the endogenous diap1 gene locus in S2R+ cells (Figure 1E).

Since mutant alleles of Ncoa6 are not available, we used a previously validated transgenic RNAi line (Herz et al., 2012) to assess the role of Ncoa6 in tissue growth and Hippo target expression in vivo. Expression of UAS-Ncoa6 RNAi by the dpp-Gal4 driver resulted in a significant decrease in the width of the dpp-expression domain in adult wings, which corresponds to the region bordered by veins L3 and L4 (Figure 2A). Examination of third instar larval wing imaginal discs revealed a corresponding decrease in the expression of diap1 and four-jointed (fj), two well-characterized Hippo pathway target genes (Figure 2B–C,E–F). These results suggest that Ncoa6 is required for normal tissue growth and expression of Hippo target genes in vivo.

Figure 2

Download asset Open asset

Next, we examined genetic interactions between Ncoa6 and the Hippo pathway. Overexpression of Yki or RNAi of Wts by the GMR-Gal4 driver leads to increased eye size (Figure 3D,G). Both phenotypes were suppressed by RNAi knockdown of Ncoa6 (Figure 3E,H). Conversely, knockdown of Ncoa6 exacerbated the small eye size induced by Sd overexpression (Figure 3J–K). To further investigate the genetic interactions between Ncoa6 and the Hippo pathway, we used Mosaic Analysis with a Repressible Cell Marker (MARCM) (Lee and Luo, 1999) to examine the requirement of Ncoa6 in hpo mutant clones. Ncoa6 knockdown suppressed the overgrowth as well as the elevated Diap1 expression in hpo mutant clones (Figure 4A–D). In fact, hpo mutant clones with Ncoa6 knockdown showed a decrease in Diap1 expression, similar to wildtype clones with Ncoa6 knockdown (Figure 4C–D). These findings further implicate Ncoa6 in Hippo-mediated growth control and gene expression.

Figure 3

Download asset Open asset

Figure 4

Download asset Open asset

The physical interactions between Yki and Ncoa6, together with the requirement for Ncoa6 in tissue growth and Hippo target gene expression, suggest that Yki may function as a transcriptional coactivator by interacting with Ncoa6. Since Sd is the primary DNA-binding transcription partner for Yki (Koontz et al., 2013), we reasoned that fusing the DNA-binding domain of Sd with Ncoa6 may directly target Ncoa6 to Hippo target genes and therefore stimulate their transcription in a Yki-independent manner (i.e., bypassing the genetic requirement for Yki). We tested this hypothesis in Drosophila wing discs using the MARCM technique. As reported before (Huang et al., 2005), yki mutant clones grew poorly and the rarely recovered clones always showed decreased Diap1 levels (Figure 5A–B). MARCM clones expressing a fusion protein between the DNA-binding domain of Sd and Ncoa6 (SdDB-Ncoa6) resulted in rounded clone morphology and dramatically increased Diap1 levels (Figure 5C). Significantly, the SdDB-Ncoa6 fusion protein, but not wild-type Ncoa6, rescued the growth defect and the decreased Diap1 levels in yki mutant clone (Figure 5D–E). In fact, yki mutant clones with SdDB-Ncoa6 overexpression were indistinguishable in clone size and Diap1 expression compared to wild-type clones with SdDB-Ncoa6 overexpression (Figure 5C–D). Thus, the SdDB–Ncoa6 fusion protein exhibits gain-of-function activity in a Yki-independent manner. Consistent with this notion, the SdDB-Ncoa6 fusion protein robustly stimulated the HRE-luciferase reporter in S2R+ cells in a manner that was not suppressed by co-expression of Wts (Figure 5F), in contrast to Wts' ability to suppress the HRE-luciferase reporter activity stimulated by the co-transfection of Sd, Yki, and Ncoa6 (Figure 1D).

Figure 5

Download asset Open asset

The results presented above suggest that Yki activates gene expression, at least in part, by recruiting Ncoa6. Since Ncoa6 has been reported to be a specific subunit of the Trr methyltransferase complex, we examined whether Trr, the catalytic subunit of this methyltransferase complex, is also required for Hippo-mediated growth control and gene expression. Similar to Ncoa6, expression of UAS-trr RNAi by the dpp-Gal4 driver resulted in a significant decrease in the width of the dpp-expression domain in adult wings and a corresponding decrease in the Hippo target genes diap1 and fj (Figure 2A,D,G). Like Ncoa6, Trr knockdown suppressed eye overgrowth induced by Yki overexpression (Figure 3D,F) and aggravated the small eye phenotype caused by Sd overexpression (Figure 3J,L), although it did not visibly suppress eye overgrowth induced by Wts RNAi (Figure 3I). We also used MARCM to examine the requirement of Trr in hpo mutant clones. Similar to Ncoa6, Trr knockdown suppressed the overgrowth as well as the elevated Diap1 expression in hpo mutant clones (Figure 4E–F). Taken together, these results implicate the Trr methyltransferase complex in Hippo-mediated growth control and target gene expression.

The Trr methyltransferase complex in Drosophila mainly affects histone H3K4 monomethylation with subtle effect on H3K4 di- or trimethylation (Herz et al., 2012; Kanda et al., 2013). To determine if Yki, Ncoa6, and Trr regulate growth in the Hippo pathway by modulating histone H3K4 methylation, we first examined the global levels of histone H3K4 methylation in Drosophila wing imaginal discs. It was reported previously that RNAi knockdown of Trr (using the en-Gal4 driver) led to a strong decrease in H3K4me1 in the posterior compartment of the wing imaginal discs, while it had marginal effects on H3K4me2 and H3K4me3 levels (Mohan et al., 2011; Herz et al., 2012). It was also showed that RNAi knockdown of Ncoa6 in the posterior compartment of the wing imaginal disc resulted in a weak reduction in H3K4me1 levels (Herz et al., 2012), which we confirmed (Figure 6—figure supplement1). We further examined H3K4me2 and H3K4me3 levels in these imaginal discs, and observed a very subtle decrease in H3K4me3 levels and no detectable changes in H3K4me2 levels (Figure 6—figure supplement 1B–C). However, when we examined mutant clones of yki in the wing imaginal discs, we could not detect any changes in the global levels of H3K4me1, H3K4me2, or H3K4me3 (Figure 6—figure supplement1).

Given the negligible effect of Yki on global levels of H3K4 methylation, we investigated whether Yki modulates local H3K4 methylation on Hippo target genes. It is well established that H3K4 monomethylation marks enhancers and actively transcribed introns, while H3K4 trimethylation is enriched at active promoters and transcription start site (TSS)-proximal regions (Heintzman et al., 2007; Kharchenko et al., 2011). Interestingly, a previous genome-wide analysis in Drosophila S2 cells revealed that diap1 and ex, two well-characterized Hippo target genes, display such differential enrichment of H3K4me1 and H3K4me3 at the respective region of each gene (Herz et al., 2012) (Figure 6A). To examine the contribution of Yki, Ncoa6, and Trr to H3K4 methylation at these Hippo target genes, we knocked down each protein in S2R+ cells and performed ChIP analysis with antibodies against H3K4me1 and H3K4me3. RNAi knockdown of Yki, Ncoa6 or Trr resulted in a decrease of H3K4me3 in the TSS-proximal region of diap1 and ex (Figure 6B), which normally showed the strongest enrichment of H3K4me3 marks (Herz et al., 2012) (Figure 6A). RNAi knockdown of Yki, Ncoa6 or Trr also led to a decrease of H3K4me1 in the intronic HRE of diap1 and an upstream region of diap1 or ex which normally showed the strongest enrichment of H3K4me1 marks (Herz et al., 2012) (Figure 6C). Collectively, these data are consistent with the view that Yki activates target gene transcription by interacting with the Trr methyltransferase complex and modifying the chromatin state of the target loci.

Figure 6 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Despite the ever expanding complexity of upstream inputs into the Hippo pathway, all of them converge on the transcriptional coactivator Yki. Thus, understanding the molecular mechanisms by which Yki regulates tissue growth and target gene expression has important implications for developmental and cancer biology. Previous studies have established that Yki functions primarily as a coactivator for Sd and that Yki promotes tissue growth by antagonizing Sd's repressor function (Wu et al., 2008; Koontz et al., 2013). Our current study has extended the previous work by identifying Ncoa6 as a Yki-binding cofactor that is required for the expression of Yki target genes. The ability of the SdDB-Ncoa6 fusion protein to rescue the growth and transcriptional defects in yki mutant clones highlights the importance of Ncoa6 recruitment in the transcriptional output of the Hippo pathway. Our results further suggest that Ncoa6 recruits the Trr methyltransferase complex to Hippo target genes and that Yki regulates target gene transcription by modulating local H3K4 methylation. Consistent with this view, a recent genome-wide chromatin-binding analysis revealed a correlation between Yki-bound chromatin and peaks of H3K4me3 modification in Drosophila wing discs and embryos (Oh et al., 2013). We note that, besides the H3K4 methyltransferases, the mammalian Ncoa6 has been reported to potentiate the activity of transcription factors by interacting with histone acetyltransferase CBP/p300 and several RNA binding proteins (CAPER, CoAA and PIMT) (Mahajan and Samuels, 2008). Whether these additional mechanisms also contribute to the function of Ncoa6 in Yki-mediated growth control requires further investigation. Given the biological and clinical significance of the Hippo pathway, further studies into the molecular mechanism of Ncoa6 will advance our understanding of developmental growth control and facilitate the development of novel therapeutic strategies.

1. 1. Antonson P
   2. Schuster GU
   3. Wang L
   4. Rozell B
   5. Holter E
   6. Flodby P
   7. Treuter E
   8. Holmgren L
   9. Gustafsson JA

   (2003) Inactivation of the nuclear receptor coactivator RAP250 in mice results in placental vascular dysfunction

   Molecular and Cellular Biology 23:1260–1268.

   https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.23.4.1260-1268.2003

   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Badouel C
   2. Garg A
   3. McNeill H

   (2009) Herding Hippos: regulating growth in flies and man

   Current Opinion in Cell Biology 21:837–843.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2009.09.010

   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Barry ER
   2. Camargo FD

   (2013) The Hippo superhighway: signaling crossroads converging on the Hippo/Yap pathway in stem cells and development

   Current Opinion in Cell Biology 25:247–253.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2012.12.006

   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Bischof J
   2. Maeda RK
   3. Hediger M
   4. Karch F
   5. Basler K

   (2007) An optimized transgenesis system for Drosophila using germ-line-specific phiC31 integrases

   Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104:3312–3317.

   https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0611511104

   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Halder G
   2. Johnson RL

   (2011) Hippo signaling: growth control and beyond

   Development 138:9–22.

   https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.045500

   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Halder G
   2. Polaczyk P
   3. Kraus ME
   4. Hudson A
   5. Kim J
   6. Laughon A
   7. Carroll S

   (1998) The vestigial and scalloped proteins act together to directly regulate wing-specific gene expression in Drosophila

   Genes & Development 12:3900–3909.

   https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.12.24.3900

   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Harvey K
   2. Tapon N

   (2007) The Salvador-Warts-Hippo pathway-an emerging tumour-suppressor network

   Nature Reviews Cancer 7:182–191.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc2070

   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Heintzman ND
   2. Stuart RK
   3. Hon G
   4. Fu Y
   5. Ching CW
   6. Hawkins RD
   7. Barrera LO
   8. Van CS
   9. Qu C
   10. Ching KA
   11. Wang W
   12. Weng Z
   13. Green RD
   14. Crawford GE
   15. Ren B

   (2007) Distinct and predictive chromatin signatures of transcriptional promoters and enhancers in the human genome

   Nature Genetics 39:311–318.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1966

   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Herz HM
   2. Mohan M
   3. Garruss AS
   4. Liang K
   5. Takahashi YH
   6. Mickey K
   7. Voets O
   8. Verrijzer CP
   9. Shilatifard A

   (2012) Enhancer-associated H3K4 monomethylation by Trithorax-related, the Drosophila homolog of mammalian Mll3/Mll4

   Genes & Development 26:2604–2620.

   https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.201327.112

   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Huang J
    2. Wu S
    3. Barrera J
    4. Matthews K
    5. Pan D

    (2005) The Hippo signaling pathway coordinately regulates cell proliferation and apoptosis by inactivating Yorkie, the Drosophila homolog of YAP

    Cell 122:421–434.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.06.007

    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Kanda H
    2. Nguyen A
    3. Chen L
    4. Okano H
    5. Hariharan IK

    (2013) The Drosophila ortholog of MLL3 and MLL4, trithorax related, functions as a negative regulator of tissue growth

    Molecular and Cellular Biology 33:1702–1710.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01585-12

    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Kharchenko PV
    2. Alekseyenko AA
    3. Schwartz YB
    4. Minoda A
    5. Riddle NC
    6. Ernst J
    7. Sabo PJ
    8. Larschan E
    9. Gorchakov AA
    10. Gu T
    11. Linder-Basso D
    12. Plachetka A
    13. Shanower G
    14. Tolstorukov MY
    15. Luquette LJ
    16. Xi R
    17. Jung YL
    18. Park RW
    19. Bishop EP
    20. Canfield TK
    21. Sandstrom R
    22. Thurman RE
    23. MacAlpine DM
    24. Stamatoyannopoulos JA
    25. Kellis M
    26. Elgin SC
    27. Kuroda MI
    28. Pirrotta V
    29. Karpen GH
    30. Park PJ

    (2011) Comprehensive analysis of the chromatin landscape in Drosophila melanogaster

    Nature 471:480–485.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09725

    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Koontz LM
    2. Liu-Chittenden Y
    3. Yin F
    4. Zheng Y
    5. Yu J
    6. Huang B
    7. Chen Q
    8. Wu S
    9. Pan D

    (2013) The hippo effector yorkie controls normal tissue growth by antagonizing scalloped-mediated default repression

    Developmental Cell 25:388–401.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2013.04.021

    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Kuang SQ
    2. Liao L
    3. Zhang H
    4. Pereira FA
    5. Yuan Y
    6. DeMayo FJ
    7. Ko L
    8. Xu J

    (2002) Deletion of the cancer-amplified coactivator AIB3 results in defective placentation and embryonic lethality

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 277:45356–45360.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.C200509200

    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Kwon Y
    2. Vinayagam A
    3. Sun X
    4. Dephoure N
    5. Gygi SP
    6. Hong P
    7. Perrimon N

    (2013) The Hippo signaling pathway interactome

    Science 342:737–740.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1243971

    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Lee T
    2. Luo L

    (1999) Mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker for studies of gene function in neuronal morphogenesis

    Neuron 22:451–461.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80701-1

    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Lee SK
    2. Anzick SL
    3. Choi JE
    4. Bubendorf L
    5. Guan XY
    6. Jung YK
    7. Kallioniemi OP
    8. Kononen J
    9. Trent JM
    10. Azorsa D
    11. Jhun BH
    12. Cheong JH
    13. Lee YC
    14. Meltzer PS
    15. Lee JW

    (1999) A nuclear factor, ASC-2, as a cancer-amplified transcriptional coactivator essential for ligand-dependent transactivation by nuclear receptors in vivo

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 274:34283–34293.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.48.34283

    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Mahajan MA
    2. Das S
    3. Zhu H
    4. Tomic-Canic M
    5. Samuels HH

    (2004) The nuclear hormone receptor coactivator NRC is a pleiotropic modulator affecting growth, development, apoptosis, reproduction, and wound repair

    Molecular and Cellular Biology 24:4994–5004.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.24.11.4994-5004.2004

    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Mahajan MA
    2. Samuels HH

    (2008) Nuclear receptor coactivator/coregulator NCoA6(NRC) is a pleiotropic coregulator involved in transcription, cell survival, growth and development

    Nuclear Receptor Signaling 6:e002.

    https://doi.org/10.1621/nrs.06002

    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Mohan M
    2. Herz HM
    3. Smith ER
    4. Zhang Y
    5. Jackson J
    6. Washburn MP
    7. Florens L
    8. Eissenberg JC
    9. Shilatifard A

    (2011) The COMPASS family of H3K4 methylases in Drosophila

    Molecular and Cellular Biology 31:4310–4318.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.06092-11

    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Oh H
    2. Slattery M
    3. Ma L
    4. Crofts A
    5. White KP
    6. Mann RS
    7. Irvine KD

    (2013) Genome-wide association of Yorkie with chromatin and chromatin-remodeling complexes

    Cell Reports 3:309–318.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2013.01.008

    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Pan D

    (2010) The hippo signaling pathway in development and cancer

    Developmental Cell 19:491–505.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2010.09.011

    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Sedkov Y
    2. Cho E
    3. Petruk S
    4. Cherbas L
    5. Smith ST
    6. Jones RS
    7. Cherbas P
    8. Canaani E
    9. Jaynes JB
    10. Mazo A

    (2003) Methylation at lysine 4 of histone H3 in ecdysone-dependent development of Drosophila

    Nature 426:78–83.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02080

    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Villano JL
    2. Katz FN

    (1995)

    Four-jointed is required for intermediate growth in the proximal-distal axis in Drosophila

    Development 121:2767–2777.

    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Wang W
    2. Huang L
    3. Huang Y
    4. Yin JW
    5. Berk AJ
    6. Friedman JM
    7. Wang G

    (2009) Mediator MED23 links insulin signaling to the adipogenesis transcription cascade

    Developmental Cell 16:764–771.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2009.04.006

    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Wu S
    2. Huang J
    3. Dong J
    4. Pan D

    (2003) hippo encodes a Ste-20 family protein kinase that restricts cell proliferation and promotes apoptosis in conjunction with salvador and warts

    Cell 114:445–456.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00549-X

    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Wu S
    2. Liu Y
    3. Zheng Y
    4. Dong J
    5. Pan D

    (2008) The TEAD/TEF family protein Scalloped mediates transcriptional output of the Hippo growth-regulatory pathway

    Developmental Cell 14:388–398.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2008.01.007

    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Yin F
    2. Yu J
    3. Zheng Y
    4. Chen Q
    5. Zhang N
    6. Pan D

    (2013) Spatial organization of hippo signaling at the plasma membrane mediated by the tumor suppressor Merlin/NF2

    Cell 154:1342–1355.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.025

    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Zhao B
    2. Li L
    3. Lei Q
    4. Guan KL

    (2010) The Hippo-YAP pathway in organ size control and tumorigenesis: an updated version

    Genes & Development 24:862–874.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1909210

    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Zhu YJ
    2. Crawford SE
    3. Stellmach V
    4. Dwivedi RS
    5. Rao MS
    6. Gonzalez FJ
    7. Qi C
    8. Reddy JK

    (2003) Coactivator PRIP, the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-interacting protein, is a modulator of placental, cardiac, hepatic, and embryonic development

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 278:1986–1990.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.C200634200

    • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Yun Qing

   1. Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
   2. BCMB Graduate Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States

   Contribution

   YQ, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article

   Contributed equally with

   Feng Yin

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared.

2. Feng Yin

   Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States

   Contribution

   FY, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article

   Contributed equally with

   Yun Qing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared.

3. Wei Wang

   Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States

   Contribution

   WW, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared.

4. Yonggang Zheng

   Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States

   Contribution

   YZ, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared.

5. Pengfei Guo

   Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States

   Contribution

   PG, Acquisition of data

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared.

6. Frederick Schozer

   Department of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States

   Contribution

   FS, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared.

7. Hua Deng

   Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States

   Contribution

   HD, Acquisition of data

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared.

8. Duojia Pan

   Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States

   Contribution

   DP, Conception and design, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article

   For correspondence

   djpan@jhmi.edu

   Competing interests

   DP: Reviewing editor, eLife.

• 3,022

  views

• 358

  downloads

• 61

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.