Orbitofrontal neurons acquire responses to 'valueless' Pavlovian cues during unblocking

  1. Michael A McDannald
  2. Guillem R Esber
  3. Meredyth A Wegener
  4. Heather M Wied
  5. Tzu-Lan Liu
  6. Thomas A Stalnaker
  7. Joshua L Jones
  8. Jason Trageser
  9. Geoffrey Schoenbaum  Is a corresponding author
  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse, United States
  2. University of Pittsburg, United States
  3. University of Maryland School of Medicine, United States
  4. National Taiwan University, Taiwan
  5. Johns Hopkins University, United States

Abstract

The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) has been described as signaling outcome expectancies or value. Evidence for the latter comes from the studies showing that neural signals in the OFC correlate with value across features. Yet features can co-vary with value, and individual units may participate in multiple ensembles coding different features. Here we used unblocking to test whether OFC neurons would respond to a predictive cue signaling a 'valueless' change in outcome flavor. Neurons were recorded as the rats learned about cues that signaled either an increase in reward number or a valueless change in flavor. We found that OFC neurons acquired responses to both predictive cues. This activity exceeded that exhibited to a 'blocked' cue and was correlated with activity to the actual outcome. These results show that OFC neurons fire to cues with no value independent of what can be inferred through features of the predicted outcome.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Michael A McDannald

    National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Guillem R Esber

    National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Meredyth A Wegener

    University of Pittsburg, Pittsburg, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Heather M Wied

    University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Tzu-Lan Liu

    National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Thomas A Stalnaker

    National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Joshua L Jones

    University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Jason Trageser

    Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Geoffrey Schoenbaum

    National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, United States
    For correspondence
    geoffrey.schoenbaum@nih.gov
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Rats were tested at the University of Maryland School of Medicine and the NIDA-IRP in accordance with SOM and NIH guidelines (12-CNRB-108).

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 2,036
    views
  • 199
    downloads
  • 55
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Michael A McDannald
  2. Guillem R Esber
  3. Meredyth A Wegener
  4. Heather M Wied
  5. Tzu-Lan Liu
  6. Thomas A Stalnaker
  7. Joshua L Jones
  8. Jason Trageser
  9. Geoffrey Schoenbaum
(2014)
Orbitofrontal neurons acquire responses to 'valueless' Pavlovian cues during unblocking
eLife 3:e02653.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02653

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02653

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Cassandra Avila, Martin Sarter
    Research Article

    Turning on cue or stopping at a red light requires attending to such cues to select action sequences, or suppress action, in accordance with learned cue-associated action rules. Cortico-striatal projections are an essential part of the brain’s attention–motor interface. Glutamate-sensing microelectrode arrays were used to measure glutamate transients in the dorsomedial striatum (DMS) of male and female rats walking a treadmill and executing cued turns and stops. Prelimbic–DMS projections were chemogenetically inhibited to determine their behavioral necessity and the cortico-striatal origin of cue-evoked glutamate transients. Furthermore, we investigated rats exhibiting preferably goal-directed (goal trackers, GTs) versus cue-driven attention (sign-trackers, STs), to determine the impact of such cognitive-motivational biases on cortico-striatal control. GTs executed more cued turns and initiated such turns more slowly than STs. During turns, but not missed turns or cued stops, cue-evoked glutamate concentrations were higher in GTs than in STs. In STs, turn cue-locked glutamate concentrations frequently peaked twice or three times, contrasting with predominately single peaks in GTs. In GTs, but not STs, inhibition of prelimbic–DMS projections attenuated turn rates and turn cue-evoked glutamate concentrations and increased the number of turn cue-locked glutamate peaks. These findings indicate that turn cue-evoked glutamate release in GTs is tightly controlled by cortico-striatal neuronal activity. In contrast, in STs, glutamate release from DMS glutamatergic terminals may be regulated by other striatal circuitry, preferably mediating cued suppression of action and reward tracking. As cortico-striatal dysfunction has been hypothesized to contribute to a wide range of disorders, including complex movement control deficits in Parkinson’s disease and compulsive drug taking, the demonstration of phenotypic contrasts in cortico-striatal control implies the presence of individual vulnerabilities for such disorders.