Cells are surrounded by a membrane that acts like a barrier to many molecules. This membrane either stops molecules from entering or exiting the cell, or at least slows their movement. However, it is important that cells can remove some molecules, such as toxins, and that nutrients and certain other molecules can get into cells. As such, cells rely on ‘transporter’ proteins embedded within the membrane to move these molecules through the membrane.

Transporters called ‘Multidrug ABC exporters’ are found in almost all living things, and use the energy released by breaking down molecules of adenosine triphosphate (ATP for short) to pump toxins out of cells. Although the three-dimensional shapes of many transporters are known, it is not clear how the energy released from ATP molecules allows the transporter to move a toxin from one side of the membrane to the other.

Here, Mishra et al. have looked at how the shape of an ABC exporter from a bacterium called Bacillus subtilis changes as it interacts with ATP. Most bacterial ABC exporters are made from two copies of the same protein, but the B. subtilis exporter is made from two slightly different proteins, one of which is less able to bind to and break down ATP. Mishra et al. found that those parts of the two proteins that bind to ATP can adopt a range of different shapes that had not been seen before. Moreover, the parts of the proteins that extend across the cell membrane face into the cell when the ATP binds, and switch to face out of the cell when the ATP is broken down. This movement of the proteins would allow toxic molecules inside the cell to enter the exporter, and then be pushed to the outside of the cell.

The findings of Mishra et al. show that not all ABC exporters work by the same mechanism. Future work could extend this new understanding to multidrug ABC transporters from humans, which remove waste and harmful molecules from our cells and have been implicated in resistance to chemotherapy in cancer cells.

ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporters harness the energy of ATP to traffic a wide spectrum of molecules across cell membranes. In prokaryotes, ABC importers drive accumulation of nutrients in the cytoplasm against their concentration gradients while ABC exporters remove toxic substrates out of the cytoplasm and may function as flippases of lipids (Higgins and Linton, 2004; Rees et al., 2009; Sharom, 2011; George and Jones, 2012). Mammalian ABC transporters, such as P-glycoprotein (Pgp) and cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), are exclusively of the exporter class, play critical physiological roles and are associated with disease (Higgins and Linton, 2004). Importers and exporters share a modular molecular architecture featuring two nucleotide binding domains (NBDs or ATP binding cassettes) that turnover ATP and two transmembrane domains (TMDs) that are presumed to form a translocation pathway across the bilayer. The four modules of ABC transporters can be encoded by separate genes and assembled as homo- or hetero-dimers, or expressed as a single polypeptide chain (Higgins and Linton, 2004; Rees et al., 2009).

Mapping the conformational motion that transduces the energy of ATP binding and hydrolysis in the NBDs to the mechanical work of substrate translocation in the TMDs is central to understanding the mechanism of ABC transporters. Crystallographic snapshots of ABC importers have revealed inward- and outward-facing states (Locher et al., 2002; Hollenstein et al., 2007; Oldham et al., 2008; Korkhov et al., 2012) in the nomenclature of Jardetzky's alternating access model (Jardetzky, 1966). Determined in the presence of substrates, substrate binding proteins and/or nucleotides, these structures were cast as representing catalytic intermediates in the ATP binding and hydrolysis cycle. In contrast, the proposed structural mechanism of ABC exporters is less elaborate invoking two states captured by crystallography: Inward-facing devoid of substrates and/or nucleotides (referred to as apo) (Ward et al., 2007; Aller et al., 2009; Jin et al., 2012) and outward-facing with bound nucleotides (Dawson and Locher, 2006, 2007; Ward et al., 2007). While these structures highlight the possible range of conformational motion, there is no consensus regarding the suite of conformational steps that couple ATP hydrolysis to substrate translocation (George and Jones, 2012).

The quest for a unified mechanism of transport by ABC exporters has been hampered by seemingly conflicting structural and biochemical models. Inward-facing structures of the bacterial homodimer MsbA (Ward et al., 2007) and eukaryotic Pgp (Aller et al., 2009; Jin et al., 2012) have inverted V-shapes wherein the two leaflets of the transporters are separated by a large chamber open to the cytoplasm and the bilayer. In these nucleotide and substrate-free structures, the two NBDs are disengaged and separated by 10–50 Å. In contrast, nucleotide-bound, outward-facing structures of MsbA (Ward et al., 2007) and its homolog Sav1866 (Dawson and Locher, 2006, 2007) have the two NBDs in close contact, bringing together the ABC signature motif from one subunit and the Walker A and Walker B sequences from the other subunit to form the nucleotide binding sites (NBSs). Inward- and outward-facing exporter structures were interpreted to imply that transport entails cycles of association and dissociation of the NBDs powered by ATP binding and hydrolysis. In this model, substrate partitions into the large chamber cradled by the two TMDs and is pushed along to the outer membrane leaflet by ATP-induced alternating access of the chamber. However, central elements of this model are considered inconsistent with mechanistic studies, primarily of the mammalian ABC exporter Pgp, implying catalytic asymmetry between the two NBSs and constant contact between the NBDs during transport (Tombline and Senior, 2005; Siarheyeva et al., 2010; George and Jones, 2012). Furthermore, it would appear that an apo state, devoid of nucleotides, is unlikely to be populated or is transient under cellular ATP concentrations which are typically an order of magnitude above the K_m of ATP. The ‘alternating site hydrolysis’ model posits that the two NBSs turnover ATP in an alternating manner constantly holding an intact ATP molecule in one of the NBSs (Tombline and Senior, 2005). The conjecture that the large inward-facing cavity observed in the apo structures is required to accommodate the large substrates of exporters has also been challenged (George and Jones, 2012) by the observation of smaller openings in the outward-facing conformations of MsbA and Sav1866 (Dawson and Locher, 2006, 2007; Ward et al., 2007).

Further confounding the structural perspective, a recent structure of an ABC heterodimer TM287/288 from the hyperthermophile Thermotoga maritima offered the first view of an ABC exporter in an inward-facing conformation where the two NBDs are partially engaged (Hohl et al., 2012). Unlike MsbA, Sav1866 and Pgp, TM287/288 is a heterodimeric ABC transporter with non-canonical sequences in the Walker B and switch motifs of one subunit resulting in a catalytically impaired NBS. In the TM287/288 structure, the impaired NBS, also referred to as the degenerate NBS, is bridged by an AMP-PNP molecule while the intact NBS, referred to as the consensus NBS, is more open creating an asymmetric NBD interface. Despite the partially engaged NBDs, the TMDs still form a chamber open to partitioning of substrates from the cytoplasm but does not appear to be accessible from the bilayer (Hohl et al., 2012). This structure is consistent with biochemical studies of bacterial ABC heterodimers (Lubelski et al., 2006; Zutz et al., 2011) that suggest catalytic asymmetry between the NBSs. However, while the TM287/288 structure provides a structural basis for asymmetric nucleotide binding, it does not elucidate the mechanistic role of such an intermediate in the transport cycle in the presence of substrate and under conditions of ATP turnover. Importantly, the broader question of how the mechanism of homodimers and heterodimers differ as a consequence of impairment of an NBS remains unanswered. In addition to their importance to understanding the fundamental mechanism of transport, addressing these questions provides insight into the role of catalytic asymmetry in mammalian ABC transporters such as CFTR and TAP1/2, which play fundamental physiological roles and have been directly associated with diseases (Abele and Tampé, 2004; Aleksandrov et al., 2007).

Here, we have investigated the conformational changes associated with specific steps in the substrate-coupled ATPase cycle of an ABC heterodimeric transporter, BmrCD from Bacillus subtilis (Torres et al., 2009; Galián et al., 2011). Similar to other ABC heterodimers, sequence modifications in the consensus motifs of the NBDs, including the replacement of the Walker B catalytic glutamate by an aspartate in BmrD, suggest that ATP turnover is impaired. BmrC and BmrD genes are upregulated in the response of B. subtilis to antibiotics exposure and BmrCD confers multidrug transport activity on inside-out Escherichia coli membrane vesicles (Torres et al., 2009) and in reconstituted giant unilamellar vesicles (Dezi et al., 2013). Spin label pairs were introduced at strategic locations to monitor the movement of the NBDs and TMDs by Double electron–electron resonance spectroscopy (DEER) (Jeschke and Polyhach, 2007; Mchaourab et al., 2011). The experimental design reconstructs the conformational dynamics of the transporter by comparing distance distributions obtained under turnover conditions with those measured in trapped catalytic intermediates. Our results reveal structural asymmetry at the NBSs presumably reflecting asymmetric binding and hydrolysis of ATP. The ATPase cycle proceeds through multiple conformations of the NBD dimer while the TMDs undergo an inward- to outward-facing transition powered exclusively by ATP hydrolysis. These are distinct mechanistic steps compared to ABC homodimers where a two-state association/dissociation cycle of the NBD is tightly coupled to the transition of the TMD from inward- to outward-facing conformations with ATP binding providing the power stroke (Dong et al., 2005; Zou and Mchaourab, 2009). To our knowledge, this is the first study to define the structural dynamic consequences of the selective impairment of an NBS and to uncover divergence in the conformational cycles within the ABC exporter superfamily.

To monitor conformational changes in BmrCD as it cycles between different states driven by substrate binding and ATP turnover, we introduced pairs of spin labels, consisting of one spin label in BmrC and one spin label in BmrD, at surface-exposed sites in the NBDs and TMDs. The native cysteines of BmrD were replaced by alanines to yield a cysteine-free construct. To guide in the selection of residues for spin labeling, a homology model of BmrCD was built using the crystal structure of AMP-PNP-bound TM287/288 (Hohl et al., 2012) as a template (Figure 1A, Figure 1—figure supplement 1). A subset of the spin label pairs was designed to be structurally similar to MsbA pairs previously demonstrated to ‘fingerprint’ the transition between inward- and outward-facing conformations (Borbat et al., 2007; Zou et al., 2009). We verified that cysteine-free and spin-labeled BmrCD mutants hydrolyze ATP in dodecyl maltoside (DDM) micelles and in lipid bilayers (Figure 1—figure supplement 2, Figure 4—figure supplement 2). Importanly, the rates of ATP turnover are stimulated by the transport substrate Hoechst33342 (hereafter referred as Hoechst) except for the 533/625 pair. Therefore, this pair will be interpreted only in the context of the overall data set describing the movement of the NBDs as a consequence of ATP hydrolysis.

Figure 1 with 5 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Distance distributions were determined by global analysis (Beechem, 1992) of the raw DEER data sets for each spin label pair by simultaneously fitting the distance components in the functional heterodimer and the background contribution from inter-dimer dipolar coupling as previously described (Brandon et al., 2012; Masureel et al., 2014) (‘Materials and methods’). This approach removes user bias in the baseline correction process which is critical for comparing populations under ATP turnover conditions. DEER distance distributions describe the distance probablilites between pairs of spin labels (Mchaourab et al., 2011). While the average distance can be related to the Cα-Cα distance between the two sites of spin label attachment (Islam et al., 2013), the distance changes deduced from shifts in the average distance can be interpreted as a direct measure of movement of the backbone (Mchaourab et al., 2011).

Conformational states of the NBDs

In the absence of nucleotide or substrates, hereafter referred to as the apo state, BmrCD NBDs are disengaged as evident from distances between spin labels that are larger than those predicted on the basis of the nucleotide-bound TM287/288 crystal structure and the BmrCD homology model (Figure 1—figure supplement 3). Featureless DEER decays at spin label pairs 533/625 and 555/647, which were designed to monitor the NBD dimer interface, firmly reflect distances longer than 50 and 70 Å, respectively (black trace, Figure 1B,C, Figure 1—figure supplement 4). The average distance and broad distribution at 533/625 are similar to those observed at the equivalent MsbA site 539 (Borbat et al., 2007). Accordingly, they report a relatively large separation between the NBDs in the apo state similar to that of inward-open apo MsbA (Borbat et al., 2007; Zou et al., 2009) and are suggestive of considerable conformational flexibility.

ATP turnover followed by Vanadate (Vi) trapping stabilizes the transporter in an otherwise high-energy post-hydrolysis state (HES), also referred to as the transition state of ATP hydrolysis (Sharma and Davidson, 2000). The energy input from ATP hydrolysis leads to a large relative movement that brings the two NBDs closer together as manifested by the reduction in the average distances at 533/625 and 555/647 to about 25 and 45 Å, respectively (red trace, Figure 1B,C). The narrower distance distributions indicate a restriction of NBD conformational flexibility. Compared to the equivalent sites in MsbA (Borbat et al., 2007; Zou et al., 2009) (539, 561), these distance distributions are consistent with the formation of a closed NBD sandwich similar to that observed in the AMP-PNP bound crystal structures of MsbA (Ward et al., 2007) and Sav1866 (Dawson and Locher, 2007).

Binding of the non-hydrolyzable ATP analog AMP-PNP stabilizes a conformation distinct from that observed under trapped or apo conditions (blue trace, Figure 1C) and well outside the range predicted by the crystal structure and the homology model (Figure 1—figure supplement 3). This is in stark contrast to the ABC homodimer, MsbA, where ATP binding and HES trapping stabilize the same conformation of the NBD dimer (Figure 1—figure supplement 5). The 555/647 pair suggests an arrangement of the NBDs where the spin labels are separated by a longer average distance than in the HES but not as disengaged as apo (Figure 1C). These characteristics suggest that ATP binding, mimicked by AMP-PNP, nucleates the formation of an NBD dimer distinct from the canonical closed NBD sandwich observed in the crystal structures of nucleotide-bound MsbA (Ward et al., 2007) and Sav1866 (Dawson and Locher, 2007). Remarkably, a similar distance is observed in the presence of ADP (Figure 1C) suggesting that both nucleotides stabilize this intermediate state of the NBD dimer.

ATP hydrolysis requires the assembly of the NBSs for optimal positioning of the catalytic residues of the conserved motifs (George and Jones, 2012). Therefore, we monitored the conformation of each NBS in the various catalytic intermediates of BmrCD outlined above. In order to measure distances across the NBSs, spin label pairs were introduced at non-symmetric sites in the BmrC and BmrD protomers. Three pairs of residues monitoring the degenerate and consensus NBSs (Figure 2) were selected to be structurally equivalent based on sequence alignment between BmrC and BmrD and verified by inspection of the structure of TM287/288 (Hohl et al., 2012) and the BmrCD homology model.

Figure 2 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

We found that nucleotide-induced changes in distance distributions reported at the NBSs (Figure 2) are consonant with those reported by the symmetry-related 555/647 which monitors NBD dimerization (Figure 1). Three distinct conformations for apo, AMP-PNP-bound and the HES intermediates are deduced from the shifts in distance distributions at the NBSs for all the pairs. However, the shape of the distributions uncovers fundamental structural differences between consensus and degenerate NBS. Consistently, spin labels reporting on the consensus NBS have overlapping distributions in the AMP-PNP-bound and trapped HES intermediates whereas at the degenerate site the distributions are by and large distinct (Figure 2, compare panels A, B, and C with D, E, and F). The breadth of the AMP-PNP distribution at the consensus NBS demonstrates that ATP binding enables a range of conformations to be populated that includes the HES. In contrast, ATP hydrolysis is required to observe an HES population at the degenerate NBS as inferred from the predominantly distinct distributions in the presence of AMP-PNP and ADP-Vi. In the presence of excess ADP, the degenerate NBS has a predominantly ATP-bound like conformation while the consensus NBS has a significant population of apo-like conformation (Figure 2, Figure 1—figure supplement 4). Both NBSs disengage in the absence of nucleotides consistent with the relative distance and conformational flexibility observed at the NBD interface (Figure 2, black traces). Addition of the transport substrate Hoechst (Torres et al., 2009) did not change the distance distributions of the AMP-PNP and ADP-Vi states (Figure 2—figure supplement 1).

Transition of the TMDs from an inward- to an outward-facing conformation requires ATP hydrolysis

Conformational changes in the TMDs, as a consequence of ATP binding and hydrolysis, were monitored by spin label pairs on the intracellular and extracellular sides of the transporter (Figure 3). These pairs were introduced at equivalent residues to MsbA spin label pairs which reported structural rearrangements associated with the inward- to outward-facing transition (Borbat et al., 2007). Specifically, the 55/146 pair monitors the extracellular loops between helices 1 and 2 at a structurally similar position to MsbA residue 61 while the pair 96/188 monitors the movement of the intracellular region of transmembrane helix 2 (TM2) similar to residue 103 in MsbA (Figure 3B,C).

Figure 3 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

The pattern of average distances observed in the apo state of BmrCD is consistent with an open intracellular side and a relatively more closed extracellular side (Figure 3B,C, black trace, Figure 3—figure supplement 1). Furthermore, the intracellular side of apo BmrCD appears to be more closed than that of apo MsbA consistent with TM287/288 structure and the homology model. For instance, the distance between the symmetry-related residues 103 in the MsbA homodimer (previous work Borbat et al., 2007 and see below) is outside the range of measurable distances by DEER, at least 10 Å longer than the distance measured at the equivalent BmrCD pair, 96/188.

While ATP binding, mimicked by addition of AMP-PNP, induces the formation of a distinct NBD intermediate in BmrCD, we found that this conformational change is not propagated to the TMD. Spin label pairs at the intracellular and extracellular sides have identical distance distributions in apo and AMP-PNP-bound (Figure 3, black and blue traces respectively). This finding suggests relative flexibility between the NBD and TMD that allows large independent movement of the former upon ATP binding. In contrast, when ATP is hydrolyzed and ADP subsequently trapped by the addition of Vi, we observed concomitant shifts in the average distance at the intra- and extracellular sides of the transporter. Coupled to the formation of the NBD closed dimer, ATP hydrolysis induces closing of the intracellular side and opening of the extracellular side consistent with an alternating access mechanism involving inward-facing and outward-facing conformations. Compared to MsbA (residue 103) (Borbat et al., 2007) the distance change at the intracellular side is of smaller magnitude (approximately 15 Å for BmrCD 96/188 vs 25 Å for MsbA 103) primarily due to a closer distance between the TMDs in the apo conformation of BmrCD (Figure 3). More importantly, while conformational changes in MsbA are induced by the binding of AMP-PNP, the inward- to outward-facing transition in BmrCD requires ATP hydrolysis revealing a distinct power stroke between homodimers and heterodimers.

Conformational dynamics in lipid bilayers

To test whether the substrate-coupled ATP turnover cycle in lipid bilayers involves the conformations identified in detergent micelles, we determined distance distributions in the NBD and TMD pairs following reconstitution of BmrCD double mutants in nanodiscs of PC/PA (Figure 4, Figure 4—figure supplement 1). This particular lipid mixture was selected on the basis of previous results showing optimal ATPase activity (Galián et al., 2011). Reconstitution in nanodiscs stimulated the ATP turnover rates of BmrCD-WT and BmrCD-WT* by 11–14-fold relative to detergent micelles (Figure 4, Figure 4—figure supplement 2). The rates were further stimulated two-fold in the presence of Hoechst.

Figure 4 with 4 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Distance distributions in nanodiscs reveal components almost identical to those in detergent micelles (Compare Figure 4 with Figures 1–3,). Spin label pairs in the NBD show distinct distances in the apo state, AMP-PNP bound state, and the HES consistent with three conformations of the NBDs (Figure 4, top panel, Figure 4—figure supplement 3). In contrast, distance distributions of spin label pairs in the TMD identify only two conformational states corresponding to inward and outward-facing conformations (Figure 4, lower panel, Figure 4—figure supplement 4). ATP hydrolysis is required to transition between these states whereas BmrCD bound to AMP-PNP- is in the inward-facing conformation, in agreement with the observations in detergent micelles described above (Figure 3). Thus, not only is there a correspondence between conformational states in detergent micelles and lipid bilayers but also the power stroke is essentially identical. Remarkably, the transition between inward- and outward-facing conformations in nanodiscs shows a more stringent dependence on the presence of substrate (Figure 4, Figure 4—figure supplements 3 and 4). Thus, although ATP is turned over in the absence of substrate, transmission of this hydrolysis step is enhanced by the presence of the substrate Hoechst.

Conformational dynamics under ATP turnover conditions reveal structural asymmetry at the NBSs

To frame the stable intermediates of the NBSs identified above in the context of the transport cycle, distance distributions were obtained under conditions that reflect cellular ATP concentrations and allow the transporter to sample intermediates associated with ATP turnover (Figure 5, Figure 5—figure supplement 1). Following incubation with ATP in the presence and absence of the substrate Hoechst, distance distributions were compared at two time points, where the ATP concentration is calculated to remain above the K_m. At the degenerate NBS, we observed predominantly two-component distance distributions that reflect two distinct transporter populations (Figure 5C). By comparing distance distributions for the same spin label pair in trapped intermediates and under turnover conditions, the two components are identified as arising from nucleotide-bound (ATP or ADP) and HES-like states. The population ratio of the two components shifts from the HES-like towards the nucleotide-bound state with little if any apo population observed at the two time points. In contrast, multicomponent distributions at the consensus NBS (Figure 5B) show, in addition to the HES-like and nucleotide-bound states, clear evidence of an apo-like population where the two NBDs are locally disengaged.

Figure 5 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Thus, the two NBSs cycle between conformational states as ATP is bound, hydrolyzed and Pi and ADP are released. However, the differences in the population amplitude of these states reveal that the two NBSs do not have to concurrently be in the same catalytic intermediate. For example, while a significant population of the consensus NBS is in apo-like conformation, the degenerate NBS is predominantly in either the nucleotide-bound or HES-like conformations. Such an asymmetric disengagement of the signature and Walker A motifs at the consensus NBS, which requires their separation by more than 20–40 Å, is not structurally compatible with an HES-like conformation at the degenerate NBS. Therefore, the distributions under turnover conditions imply the existence of a transporter intermediate wherein the degenerate NBS is ATP-bound while the consensus NBS assumes an apo-like conformation. Similarly, we can infer the presence of another state of the transporter wherein the degenerate NBS is in a HES-like state and the consensus NBS is in the ATP-bound conformation.

Longer incubation times shift the distribution towards the ATP/ADP-bound population at the degenerate NBS (compare 1 and 5 min time points in Figure 5C) while at similar incubation times, the consensus site shows a considerably larger population in the ATP-bound and the apo states (Figure 5B). The addition of the substrate Hoechst, which accelerates the rate of ATP hydrolysis (Figure 1—figure supplement 2), simply shifts the populations at both NBSs towards those obtained at the longer incubation time. Thus, the substrate-coupled ATP turnover cycle of BmrCD involves the same conformational states sampled in the absence of substrate.

Conformational dynamics under turnover conditions reveal a predominantly inward-facing conformation of the TMD

Coupled to the ATP hydrolysis cycle of the NBSs, the TMD undergoes an inward- to outward-facing transition as evidenced by the time dependence of the distance distributions (Figure 6, Figure 6—figure supplement 1). Similar to the NBSs, the TMDs show multi-component distance distributions. However, the equilibrium favors the inward-facing conformation as demonstrated by the ratio of the two populations at high ATP concentrations. This presumably reflects the failure of ATP binding to switch TMD accessibility from inward-facing to outward-facing (Figure 3).

Figure 6 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

MsbA inward- to outward-facing transition is driven by a two-state cycle of the NBDs

While the previous body of spin labeling data on MsbA establishes that ATP binding is the power stroke of transport (Dong et al., 2005; Zou and Mchaourab, 2009), we sought to conclusively investigate if the NBDs can adopt conformations besides the disengaged apo and the closed dimer stabilized by ATP binding or ADP-Vi trapping. Pairs of spin labels were introduced in each MsbA protomer with the purpose of monitoring the two NBSs following the design principles described above for BmrCD. Because MsbA is a homodimer, this strategy introduces four spin labels in the functional unit related by six distances (Figure 7A,B). If the NBD interface is twofold symmetric, three of these distances are unique (d1, d2, d3, in Figure 7B). Two distances relate labels at distinct sites: one is short range (d1) arising from pairs monitoring the NBS while the other represents symmetry-related sites that interact across the dimer interface and is considerably longer (d2). Therefore, in addition to considerations of ATPase activity (Figure 7—figure supplement 1) and surface localization, the two sites, 350 and 471, were selected to maximize the differences between spin labels reporting on the NBS conformation vs those reporting the distance between symmetry-related spin labels in the dimer. These selection criteria simplify the interpretation of the distance distributions and allow for the identification of the components that arise from dipolar coupling between spin labels across the NBS. However, the projection of the spin labels relative to the Cα breaks the symmetry leading to distinct distances in the 350/350 and 471/471 pairs. This complication does not affect the interpretation of the short component which monitors the NBSs.

Figure 7 with 2 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Distance distributions were obtained in the apo, AMP-PNP-bound, ADP-Vi trapped and under turnover conditions (Figure 7B,C,D). As expected, MsbA NBDs completely dissociate in the absence of nucleotides as evidenced by the absence of a short distance component that would be expected from the assembly of the signature motifs into a NBS. In contrast, this short distance component is present to the same extent in the AMP-PNP-bound and ADP-Vi intermediates supporting the previous conclusion that ATP binding is the power stroke of transport for MsbA (Dong et al., 2005; Zou and Mchaourab, 2009; Figure 7B). We verified that this component arises from the formation of the NBS by measuring distance distributions for the corresponding single mutants (Figure 7—figure supplement 2). No other short distance component is detected as would be expected if the NBS were structurally asymmetric; although the detection of such asymmetry is limited by the intrinsic width of the distance distributions. Thus, we conclude that the two NBSs are structurally equivalent in the HES. The longer distance components in the distance distribution can be accounted for by the other distances (d2, d3) relating the two pairs of spin labels in the homodimer (Figure 7—figure supplement 2).

The two conformations of the NBDs, that is the disengaged and closed, are coupled to inward- and outward-facing conformations of the TMD respectively (Figure 7C,D). As previously reported, spin label pairs at the intra- and extracellular sides of the transporter report concurrent but opposite changes in average distance upon ATP binding suggesting that there is tight coupling between the movements of the NBDs and TMDs (Borbat et al., 2007; Zou et al., 2009) in contrast to the relative flexibility between the two domains in BmrCD. Under turnover conditions, the distance distributions were distinctly bimodal in the presence of ATP consistent with a partitioning of the transporter between inward- and outward-facing bound conformations. In contrast to BmrCD, the equilibrium of MsbA favors an outward-facing conformation. The predominance of the outward-facing conformation of the TMD is consistent with the persistence of the NBS short distance component under turnover conditions (Figure 7B).

The major novel finding of this paper is that sequence asymmetry in the NBDs shapes the mechanism of energy transduction in ABC exporters. Modifications of the Walker B, signature and/or switch motifs sequences, which lead to selective catalytic impairment of one of the NBSs in a subclass of ABC exporters (Gao et al., 2000; Aleksandrov et al., 2002; Zhang et al., 2006; Procko et al., 2009; Boncoeur et al., 2012), are associated with fundamental differences in the conformational dynamics of the NBDs and in the power stroke of transport. In contrast to the ATP-induced association/dissociation cycle of NBDs in bacterial homodimers reported previously (Borbat et al., 2007; Zou et al., 2009) and further confirmed here, the NBDs of heterodimers form structurally asymmetric dimers as a consequence of ATP binding and its subsequent hydrolysis. We uncovered conformations wherein the impaired NBS holds on to an ATP molecule while the consensus NBS disengages enabling product release and rebinding of ATP. Asymmetric NBD conformations were hypothesized from the elegant mechanistic analysis of Pgp by Senior et al. but were not directly detected (Tombline and Senior, 2005; Tombline et al., 2005). We propose that the distinct mechanism of heterodimers requires a less efficient coupling between the NBD and TMD, a ‘conformational leak’, to enable NBD movement without transmission to the TMDs. This would require a tuning of the sequences and interactions of the IH1 and IH2 coupling loops and possibly the cytoplasmic extension of TMs, regions hypothesized to form the transmission interface between the NBDs and TMDs of ABC transporters (Hollenstein et al., 2007; Oancea et al., 2009; Loo et al., 2013). There is a substantial impact of lipids on the coupling between the NBD and TMD. Transmission of the conformational changes to the TMD is more stringently dependent on the presence of substrate in lipid bilyaers. This finding is consistent with previous work revealing that lipids can shift the conformational preferences of ion-coupled transporters (Hanelt et al., 2013).

This novel insight was derived from experiments that monitor transporter conformational states under turnover conditions. Unlike previous studies, which investigated exclusively stable intermediates (Borbat et al., 2007; Zou et al., 2009), here the mechanistic implications of these intermediates were challenged under substrate and nucleotide conditions that mimic those of the cell. Another unique experimental design is the selective monitoring of individual NBSs rather than the NBD interface facilitated by the heterodimeric nature of BmrCD. NBS distance distributions capture the interconversion of the transporter between conformations corresponding to those observed under trapped conditions, thereby establishing the direct relevance of the trapped conformations to the substrate-coupled ATPase cycle. Furthermore, the observation of a steady state population of apo-like conformation of the consensus NBS, even in the presence of excess ATP, prompts us to conclude that disengagement of this NBS is required for ADP-Pi dissociation and subsequent binding of ATP, thereby establishing the mechanistic significance of a local apo-like conformation.

Our results can be framed in a model of how asymmetric ATP binding and hydrolysis in the NBDs drive transition of the TMDs between inward- and outward-facing conformations (Figure 8A). Distinguishing features of this model include the formation of structurally asymmetric conformations of the NBDs and the association of the transporter power stroke with ATP hydrolysis. In the presence of cellular ATP concentrations, BmrCD will have at least one ATP molecule bound, most likely at the degenerate NBS as evidenced by the fact that an apo-like conformation was nearly undetectable at this NBS in the presence of excess ATP. Such an ATP-bound resting state does not hinder substrate access to the putative binding chamber at the TMD interface, since ATP binding does not induce closure of the cytoplasmic side of BmrCD. ATP binding to the consensus NBS yields an intermediate with two ATP molecules bound (‘1’ in Figure 8A). We refer to this conformation of the NBD dimer (Figure 2) as a pre-hydrolysis intermediate reminiscent of the pre-hydrolysis complex observed in a crystal structure of the maltose transporter, MalK (Oldham and Chen, 2011). In this conformation, the NBDs are engaged but the NBSs have not formed the canonical configuration and are therefore not catalytically competent. ATP turnover is initiated by fluctuations at the consensus NBS which enables transition to a hydrolysis-competent configuration (HES-like) as deduced from the overlapping distance distributions in Figure 2. This is a relatively minor population of the transporter which likely explains the relatively slow ATP turnover by BmrCD (Figure 1—figure supplement 2). ATP hydrolysis switches TMD accessibility thereby catalyzing the extrusion of the substrate. Turnover rates are stimulated if the substrate binds prior to hydrolysis but there is a considerable basal consumption of ATP (Figure 1—figure supplement 2). While there is evidence of ATP turnover by impaired NBSs, consideration of the reaction mechanism as well as previous biochemical studies of ABC heterodimers support an intrinsically slower rate at the degenerate NBS (Procko et al., 2006; Zutz et al., 2011; Boncoeur et al., 2012). Therefore, ADP and Pi are released from the consensus site prior to hydrolysis at the degenerate site enabling multiple rounds of asymmetric ATP hydrolysis without the complete disengagement of the NBDs to an apo conformation.

Figure 8

Download asset Open asset

Slow ATP hydrolysis at the degenerate NBS would require release of ADP and Pi and rebinding of ATP most likely through the population of a local apo-like conformation. Whether ATP hydrolysis at the degenerate NBS could occur prior or concomitant with release of ADP and Pi from the consensus NBS cannot be conclusively addressed from our data. However, the negligible population of apo-like degenerate NBS and the fact that ADP-bound NBDs form a partially engaged dimer argue against significant population of an apo state of the transporter where the two NBDs are separated by more than 50 Å. Thus, this ‘global’ apo state (as in Figure 1) appears not to be mechanistically relevant in the ATP hydrolysis cycle of ABC heterodimers. We propose that ADP-Pi release, as a consequence of infrequent hydrolysis at the degenerate site, occurs while ATP is bound at the consensus NBS.

If the degenerate site is not turning over ATP at levels comparable to the consensus NBS, how is the significant HES-like population observed under turnover conditions (Figure 5B) accounted for? We speculate that hydrolysis at the consensus NBS requires transition of the degenerate NBS to an ATP-occluded state along the lines of the model proposed for Pgp on the basis of experiments with catalytically impaired NBSs (Tombline and Senior, 2005). This state would relax to the nucleotide-bound conformation following hydrolysis at the consensus NBS (state 3 in Figure 8A).

The mechanistic elements of ATP turnover for ABC heterodimers and homodimers are contrasted in Figure 8. For the latter, the NBSs are identical in sequence and there is no experimental evidence of catalytic inequivalence. Analysis of MsbA conformational dynamics reported previously (Dong et al., 2005; Borbat et al., 2007; Zou and Mchaourab, 2009) and extended here is entirely consistent with a model of turnover that invokes engaged and disengaged NBD states, symmetric NBS conformations, and tight structural coupling between the NBDs and the TMDs. We conclude from the comparative analysis of BmrCD and MsbA conformational cycles that the controversy regarding NBD disengagement vs constant contact (George and Jones, 2012) is a consequence of extrapolation of models between mechanistically distinct classes of ABC exporters.

The structural mechanism of ABC heterodimers described here is a remarkable example of variations on a common conformational cycle in the context of conserved transporter architecture. While all ABC transporters derive energy from an ATP binding and hydrolysis cycle, fundamental differences exist in the regulation of ATP turnover by catalytic elements and/or structural intermediates as evidenced here. Although it was anticipated that the inward- to outward-facing transition of ABC exporters would follow the structural mechanics defined by the structures of MsbA (Ward et al., 2007), we show in this work that coupling of the TMD transition to the ATPase cycle is not identical between subclasses of exporters. Evidence of more variation in the coupling mechanism has emerged recently from a structure of a human ABC homodimer where the NBSs are disengaged even in the presence of AMP-PNP (Shintre et al., 2013). Finally, if indeed TMD conformational changes require hydrolysis of a single ATP molecule in heterodimers, it raises the conundrum of why two molecules are hydrolyzed in ABC homodimers to achieve what would appear to be similar type of mechanical work. Addressing these questions is the next frontier in understanding the mechanism of ABC exporters.

1. 1. Hohl M
   2. Briand C
   3. Grutter MG
   4. Seeger MA

   (2012) Crystal structure of a heterodimeric ABC transporter in its inward-facing conformation

   Publicly available at RCSB Protein Data Bank.

   http://www.pdb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=3QF4
2. 1. Ward A
   2. Reyes CL
   3. Yu J
   4. Roth CB
   5. Chang G

   (2007) Crystal Structure of MsbA from Salmonella typhimurium with AMPPNP, higher resolution form

   Publicly available at RCSB Protein Data Bank.

   http://www.pdb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=3B60

1. 1. Abele R
   2. Tampé R

   (2004) The ABCs of immunology: structure and function of TAP, the transporter associated with antigen processing

   Physiology 19:216–224.

   https://doi.org/10.1152/physiol.00002.2004

   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Aleksandrov AA
   2. Aleksandrov L
   3. Riordan JR

   (2007) CFTR (ABCC7) is a hydrolyzable-ligand-gated channel

   Pflugers Archiv 453:693–702.

   https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-006-0140-z

   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Aleksandrov L
   2. Aleksandrov AA
   3. Chang X-B
   4. Riordan JR

   (2002) The first nucleotide binding domain of cystic fibrosis conductance regulator is a site of stable nucleotide interation, whereas the second is a site of rapid turnover

   The Journal of Biological Chemistry 277:15419–15425.

   https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111713200

   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Aller SG
   2. Yu J
   3. Ward A
   4. Weng Y
   5. Chittaboina S
   6. Zhuo R
   7. Harrell PM
   8. Trinh YT
   9. Zhang Q
   10. Urbatsch IL
   11. Chang G

   (2009) Structure of P-glycoprotein reveals a molecular basis for poly-specific drug binding

   Science 323:1718–1722.

   https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1168750

   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Beechem JM

   (1992) Global analysis of biochemical and biophysical data

   Methods in Enzymology 210:37–54.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(92)10004-W

   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Boldog T
   2. Li M
   3. Hazelbauer GL

   (2007) Using Nanodiscs to create water-soluble transmembrane chemoreceptors inserted in lipid bilayers

   Methods in Enzymology 423:317–335.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(07)23014-9

   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Boncoeur E
   2. Durmort C
   3. Bernay B
   4. Ebel C
   5. di Guilmi AM
   6. Croizé J
   7. Vernet T
   8. Jault JM

   (2012) PatA and PatB form a functional heterodimeric ABC multidrug efflux transporter responsible for the resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae to fluoroquinolones

   Biochemistry 51:7755–7765.

   https://doi.org/10.1021/bi300762p

   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Borbat PP
   2. Surendhran K
   3. Bortolus M
   4. Zou P
   5. Freed JH
   6. Mchaourab HS

   (2007) Conformational motion of the ABC transporter MsbA induced by ATP hydrolysis

   PLOS Biology 5:2211–2219.

   https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050271

   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Brandon S
   2. Beth AH
   3. Hustedt EJ

   (2012) The global analysis of DEER data

   Journal of Magnetic Resonance 218:93–104.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2012.03.006

   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Dawson RJ
    2. Locher KP

    (2006) Structure of a bacterial multidrug ABC transporter

    Nature 443:180–185.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05155

    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Dawson RJ
    2. Locher KP

    (2007) Structure of the multidrug ABC transporter Sav1866 from Staphylococcus aureus in complex with AMP-PNP

    FEBS Letters 581:935–938.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2007.01.073

    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Dezi M
    2. di Cicco A
    3. Bassereau P
    4. Levy D

    (2013) Detergent-mediated incorporation of transmembrane proteins in giant unilamellar vesicles with controlled physiological contents

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110:7276–7281.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1303857110

    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Dong J
    2. Yang G
    3. Mchaourab HS

    (2005) Structural basis of energy transduction in the transport cycle of MsbA

    Science 308:1023–1028.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1106592

    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Galián C
    2. Manon F
    3. Dezi M
    4. Torres C
    5. Ebel C
    6. Levy D
    7. Jault JM

    (2011) Optimized purification of a heterodimeric ABC transporter in a highly stable form amenable to 2-D crystallization

    PLOS ONE 6:e19677.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019677

    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Gao M
    2. Cui HR
    3. Loe DW
    4. Grant CE
    5. Almquist KC
    6. Cole SP
    7. Deeley RG

    (2000) Comparison of the functional characteristics of the nucleotide binding domains of multidrug resistance protein 1

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 275:13098–13108.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.275.17.13098

    • Google Scholar
16. 1. George AM
    2. Jones PM

    (2012) Perspectives on the structure-function of ABC transporters: the Switch and Constant Contact models

    Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology 109:95–107.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2012.06.003

    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Hanelt I
    2. Wunnicke D
    3. Bordignon E
    4. Steinhoff HJ
    5. Slotboom DJ

    (2013) Conformational heterogeneity of the aspartate transporter Glt(Ph)

    Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 20:210–214.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2471

    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Higgins CF
    2. Linton KJ

    (2004) The ATP switch model for ABC transporters

    Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 11:918–926.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb836

    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Hohl M
    2. Briand C
    3. Grütter MG
    4. Seeger MA

    (2012) Crystal structure of a heterodimeric ABC transporter in its inward-facing conformation

    Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 19:395–402.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2267

    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Hollenstein K
    2. Dawson RJ
    3. Locher KP

    (2007) Structure and mechanism of ABC transporter proteins

    Current Opinion in Structural Biology 17:412–418.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2007.07.003

    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Islam SM
    2. Stein RA
    3. Mchaourab HS
    4. Roux B

    (2013) Structural refinement from restrained-ensemble simulations based on EPR/DEER data: application to T4 lysozyme

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 117:4740–4754.

    https://doi.org/10.1021/jp311723a

    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Jardetzky O

    (1966) Simple allosteric model for membrane pumps

    Nature 211:969–970.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/211969a0

    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Jeschke G

    (2002) Distance measurements in the nanometer range by pulse EPR

    Chemphyschem 3:927–932.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/1439-7641(20021115)3:11<927::AID-CPHC927>3.0.CO;2-Q

    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Jeschke G
    2. Chechik V
    3. Ionita P
    4. Godt A
    5. Zimmermann H
    6. Banham J
    7. Timmel CR
    8. Hilger D
    9. Jung H

    (2006) DeerAnalysis2006-a comprehensive software package for analyzing pulsed ELDOR data

    Applied Magnetic Resonance 30:473–498.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03166213

    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Jeschke G
    2. Polyhach Y

    (2007) Distance measurements on spin-labelled biomacromolecules by pulsed electron paramagnetic resonance

    Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 9:1895–1910.

    https://doi.org/10.1039/b614920k

    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Jin MS
    2. Oldham ML
    3. Zhang Q
    4. Chen J

    (2012) Crystal structure of the multidrug transporter P-glycoprotein from Caenorhabditis elegans

    Nature 490:566–569.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11448

    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Korkhov VM
    2. Mireku SA
    3. Locher KP

    (2012) Structure of AMP-PNP-bound vitamin B12 transporter BtuCD-F

    Nature 490:367–372.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11442

    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Locher KP
    2. Lee AT
    3. Rees DC

    (2002) The E. coli BtuCD structure: a framework for ABC transporter architecture and mechanism

    Science 296:1091–1098.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1071142

    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Loo TW
    2. Bartlett MC
    3. Clarke DM

    (2013) Human P-glycoprotein contains a greasy ball-and-socket joint at the second transmission interface

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 288:20326–20333.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.484550

    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Lubelski J
    2. van Merkerk R
    3. Konings WN
    4. Driessen AJ

    (2006) Nucleotide-binding sites of the heterodimeric LmrCD ABC-multidrug transporter of Lactococcus lactis are asymmetric

    Biochemistry 45:648–656.

    https://doi.org/10.1021/bi051276s

    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Marti-Renom MA
    2. Stuart AC
    3. Fiser A
    4. Sanchez R
    5. Melo F
    6. Sali A

    (2000) Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes

    Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure 29:291–325.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biophys.29.1.291

    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Masureel M
    2. Martens C
    3. Stein RA
    4. Mishra S
    5. Ruysschaert JM
    6. Mchaourab HS
    7. Govaerts C

    (2014) Protonation drives the conformational switch in the multidrug transporter LmrP

    Nature Chemical Biology 10:149–155.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.1408

    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Mchaourab HS
    2. Steed PR
    3. Kazmier K

    (2011) Toward the fourth dimension of membrane protein structure: insight into dynamics from spin-labeling EPR spectroscopy

    Structure 19:1549–1561.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2011.10.009

    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Oancea G
    2. O'mara ML
    3. Bennett WF
    4. Tieleman DP
    5. Abele R
    6. Tampé R

    (2009) Structural arrangement of the transmission interface in the antigen ABC transport complex TAP

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106:5551–5556.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0811260106

    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Oldham ML
    2. Chen J

    (2011) Crystal structure of the maltose transporter in a pretranslocation intermediate state

    Science 332:1202–1205.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1200767

    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Oldham ML
    2. Davidson AL
    3. Chen J

    (2008) Structural insights into ABC transporter mechanism

    Current Opinion in Structural Biology 18:726–733.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2008.09.007

    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Polyhach Y
    2. Bordignon E
    3. Jeschke G

    (2011) Rotamer libraries of spin labelled cysteines for protein studies

    Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 13:2356–2366.

    https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cp01865a

    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Procko E
    2. Ferrin-O'connell I
    3. Ng SL
    4. Gaudet R

    (2006) Distinct structural and functional properties of the ATPase sites in an asymmetric ABC transporter

    Molecular Cell 24:51–62.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2006.07.034

    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Procko E
    2. O'mara ML
    3. Bennett WF
    4. Tieleman DP
    5. Gaudet R

    (2009) The mechanism of ABC transporters: general lessons from structural and functional studies of an antigenic peptide transporter

    FASEB Journal 23:1287–1302.

    https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.08-121855

    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Rees DC
    2. Johnson E
    3. Lewinson O

    (2009) ABC transporters: the power to change

    Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 10:218–227.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2646

    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Sen KI
    2. Logan TM
    3. Fajer PG

    (2007) Protein dynamics and monomer-monomer interactions in AntR activation by electron paramagnetic resonance and double electron-electron resonance

    Biochemistry 46:11639–11649.

    https://doi.org/10.1021/bi700859p

    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Sharma S
    2. Davidson AL

    (2000) Vanadate-induced trapping of nucleotides by purified maltose transport complex requires ATP hydrolysis

    Journal of Bacteriology 182:6570–6576.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.182.23.6570-6576.2000

    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Sharom FJ

    (2011) Flipping and flopping–lipids on the move

    IUBMB Life 63:736–746.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/iub.515

    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Shintre CA
    2. Pike AC
    3. Li Q
    4. Kim JI
    5. Barr AJ
    6. Goubin S
    7. Shrestha L
    8. Yang J
    9. Berridge G
    10. Ross J
    11. Stansfeld PJ
    12. Sansom MS
    13. Edwards AM
    14. Bountra C
    15. Marsden BD
    16. von Delft F
    17. Bullock AN
    18. Gileadi O
    19. Burgess-Brown NA
    20. Carpenter EP

    (2013) Structures of ABCB10, a human ATP-binding cassette transporter in apo- and nucleotide-bound states

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110:9710–9715.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1217042110

    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Siarheyeva A
    2. Liu R
    3. Sharom FJ

    (2010) Characterization of an asmmetric occluded state of P-glycoprotein with two bound nucleotides

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 285:7575–7586.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.047290

    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Sievers F
    2. Wilm A
    3. Dineen D
    4. Gibson TJ
    5. Karplus K
    6. Li W
    7. Lopez R
    8. Mcwilliam H
    9. Remmert M
    10. Soding J
    11. Thompson JD
    12. Higgins DG

    (2011) Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega

    Molecular Systems Biology 7:539.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/msb.2011.75

    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Smriti
    2. Zou P
    3. Mchaourab HS

    (2009) Mapping daunorubicin-binding sites in the ATP-binding cassette transporter MsbA using site-specific quenching by spin labels

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 284:13904–13913.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M900837200

    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Stothard P

    (2000)

    The sequence manipulation suite: JavaScript programs for analyzing and formatting protein and DNA sequences

    Biotechniques 28:1102–1104.

    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Tombline G
    2. Muharemagić A
    3. White LB
    4. Senior AE

    (2005) Involvement of the “occluded nucleotide conformation” of P-glycoprotein in the catalytic pathway

    Biochemistry 44:12879–12886.

    https://doi.org/10.1021/bi0509797

    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Tombline G
    2. Senior AE

    (2005) The occluded nucleotide conformation of P-glycoprotein

    Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembranes 37:497–500.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10863-005-9498-4

    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Torres C
    2. Galián C
    3. Freiberg C
    4. Fantino JR
    5. Jault JM

    (2009) The YheI/YheH heterodimer from Bacillus subtilis is a multidrug ABC transporter

    Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1788:615–622.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2008.12.012

    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Ward A
    2. Reyes CL
    3. Yu J
    4. Roth CB
    5. Chang G

    (2007) Flexibility in the ABC transporter MsbA: alternating access with a twist

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104:19005–19010.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0709388104

    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Zhang DW
    2. Graf GA
    3. Gerard RD
    4. Cohen JC
    5. Hobbs HH

    (2006) Functional asymmetry of nucleotide-binding domains in ABCG5 and ABCG8

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 281:4507–4516.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M512277200

    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Zou P
    2. Bortolus M
    3. Mchaourab HS

    (2009) Conformational cycle of the ABC transporter MsbA in liposomes: detailed analysis using double electron-electron resonance spectroscopy

    Journal of Molecular Biology 393:586–597.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2009.08.050

    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Zou P
    2. Mchaourab HS

    (2009) Alternating access of the putative substrate-binding chamber in the ABC transporter MsbA

    Journal of Molecular Biology 393:574–585.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2009.08.051

    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Zou P
    2. McHaourab HS

    (2010) Increased sensitivity and extended range of distance measurements in spin-labeled membrane proteins: Q-band double electron-electron resonance and nanoscale bilayers

    Biophysical Journal 98:L18–L20.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2009.12.4193

    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Zutz A
    2. Hoffmann J
    3. Hellmich UA
    4. Glaubitz C
    5. Ludwig B
    6. Brutschy B
    7. Tampé R

    (2011) Asymmetric ATP hydrolysis cycle of the heterodimeric multidrug ABC transport complex TmrAB from Thermus thermophilus

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 286:7104–7115.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.201178

    • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Smriti Mishra

   Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States

   Contribution

   SM, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

2. Brandy Verhalen

   Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States

   Contribution

   BV, Conception and design, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

3. Richard A Stein

   Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States

   Contribution

   RAS, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

4. Po-Chao Wen

   1. Department of Biochemistry, College of Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, United States
   2. Center for Biophysics and Computational Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana, United States
   3. The Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois, Urbana, Unites States

   Contribution

   P-CW, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

5. Emad Tajkhorshid

   1. Department of Biochemistry, College of Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, United States
   2. Center for Biophysics and Computational Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana, United States
   3. The Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois, Urbana, Unites States

   Contribution

   ET, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

6. Hassane S Mchaourab

   Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States

   Contribution

   HSM, Conception and design, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article

   For correspondence

   hassane.mchaourab@vanderbilt.edu

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

• 3,491

  views

• 511

  downloads

• 115

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.