1. Cell Biology
  2. Developmental Biology
Download icon

Reversal of β cell de-differentiation by a small molecule inhibitor of the TGFβ pathway

  1. Barak Blum
  2. Adam N Roose
  3. Ornella Barrandon
  4. René Maehr
  5. Anthony C Arvanites
  6. Lance S Davidow
  7. Jeffrey C Davis
  8. Quinn P Peterson
  9. Lee L Rubin
  10. Douglas A Melton  Is a corresponding author
  1. Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Harvard University, United States
  2. University of Massachusetts Medical School, United States
Research Article
  • Cited 60
  • Views 6,405
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2014;3:e02809 doi: 10.7554/eLife.02809

Abstract

Dysfunction or death of pancreatic β cells underlies both types of diabetes. This functional decline begins with β cell stress and de-differentiation. Current drugs for T2D lower blood glucose levels, but they do not directly alleviate β cell stress nor prevent, let alone reverse, β cell de-differentiation. We show here that Urocortin 3 (Ucn3), a marker for mature β cells, is down-regulated in the early stages of T2D in mice and when β cells are stressed in vitro. Using an insulin expression-coupled lineage tracer, with Ucn3 as a reporter for the mature β cell state, we screen for factors that reverse β cell de-differentiation. We find that a small molecule inhibitor of TGFβ receptor I (Alk5) protects cells from the loss of key β cell transcription factors and restores a mature β cell identity even after exposure to prolonged and severe diabetes.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Barak Blum

    Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Adam N Roose

    Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Ornella Barrandon

    Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. René Maehr

    University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Anthony C Arvanites

    Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Lance S Davidow

    Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Jeffrey C Davis

    Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Quinn P Peterson

    Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Lee L Rubin

    Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Douglas A Melton

    Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
    For correspondence
    dmelton@harvard.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Animal experiments were performed in compliance with the Harvard University International Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) guidelines (protocol #93-15).

Human subjects: Institutional review board approval for research use of human tissue was obtained from the Harvard University Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Human islets were obtained from NDRI (The National Disease Research Interchange). Donor anonymity was preserved, and the human tissue was collected under applicable regulations and guidelines regarding consent, protection of human subjects and donor confidentiality

Reviewing Editor

  1. Hideyuki Okano, Keio University School of Medicine, Japan

Publication history

  1. Received: March 16, 2014
  2. Accepted: September 15, 2014
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: September 16, 2014 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: October 22, 2014 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2014, Blum et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,405
    Page views
  • 761
    Downloads
  • 60
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Scopus, Crossref, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Xiaoshan Shi et al.
    Research Article

    The selective autophagy pathways of xenophagy and mitophagy are initiated when the adaptor NDP52 recruits the ULK1 complex to autophagic cargo. Hydrogen-deuterium exchange coupled to mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) was used to map the membrane and NDP52 binding sites of the ULK1 complex to unique regions of the coiled coil of the FIP200 subunit. Electron microscopy of the full-length ULK1 complex shows that the FIP200 coiled coil projects away from the crescent-shaped FIP200 N-terminal domain dimer. NDP52 allosterically stimulates membrane-binding by FIP200 and the ULK1 complex by promoting a more dynamic conformation of the membrane-binding portion of the FIP200 coiled coil. Giant unilamellar vesicle (GUV) reconstitution confirmed that membrane recruitment by the ULK1 complex is triggered by NDP52 engagement. These data reveal how the allosteric linkage between NDP52 and the ULK1 complex could drive the first membrane recruitment event of phagophore biogenesis in xenophagy and mitophagy.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Tatsuhisa Tsuboi et al.
    Research Article

    Mitochondria are dynamic organelles that must precisely control their protein composition according to cellular energy demand. Although nuclear-encoded mRNAs can be localized to the mitochondrial surface, the importance of this localization is unclear. As yeast switch to respiratory metabolism, there is an increase in the fraction of the cytoplasm that is mitochondrial. Our data point to this change in mitochondrial volume fraction increasing the localization of certain nuclear-encoded mRNAs to the surface of the mitochondria. We show that mitochondrial mRNA localization is necessary and sufficient to increase protein production to levels required during respiratory growth. Furthermore, we find that ribosome stalling impacts mRNA sensitivity to mitochondrial volume fraction and counterintuitively leads to enhanced protein synthesis by increasing mRNA localization to mitochondria. This points to a mechanism by which cells are able to use translation elongation and the geometric constraints of the cell to fine-tune organelle-specific gene expression through mRNA localization.