(A) Structure of the TOG2:αβ-tubulin complex (TOG2: slate, α-tubulin: pink, β-tubulin: green), with the important binding residues W341 and R519 represented as spheres. The semi-transparent gray …
(A) Sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation of polymerization competent yeast αβ-tubulin does not show signs of self-association between 80 nM and 1 μM concentration. The main plot …
(A) Cartoons illustrating three different possible arrangements of a TOG1-TOG2:(αβ)2 complex: independent (left) denotes that an αβ-tubulin:αβ-tubulin interface does not provide additional stability …
(A) Yeast carrying plasmid-based rescue constructs coding for dimerization-competent variants of Stu2p were plated at serial dilutions on media that was unmodified (control) or that contained 500 μM …
Rescue assays were performed as in Figure 4, using dimerization-impaired rescue constructs. (A) Stu2p variants with ‘shuffled’ (randomized) linker sequences rescue the depletion of endogenous Stu2p …
The model posits that MT plus-end recognition occurs through TOG-mediated recognition of curved (black outline, ‘kinked’ αβ-tubulin cartoon), not straight (gray outlines), αβ-tubulin on the MT end, …
We developed a kinetic model for microtubule elongation and altered it to explore models for the polymerase. (A) Cartoon of the cylindrical microtubule (left; pink and green spheres represent α- and …
(A) A grid search identified parameters capable of recapitulating the concentration dependence of microtubule elongation rates measured by Walker et al. (1988). The black line summarizes the trend …
The microtubule end has multiple sites where αβ-tubulin can associate, but elongation is largely dominated by additions into the few, high-affinity ‘corner’ sites (left panel) because pure …
Data collection and refinement statistics
Data collection | |
Space group | C2 |
Cell dimensions | |
a, b, c (Å) | 111.91, 89.57, 135.51 |
β (°) | 112.31 |
Resolution (Å) | 50.0–2.81 (2.92–2.81)* |
Rsym | 0.143 (0.924) |
<I>/<σI> | 9.6 (1.1) |
Wilson B-value (Å) | 48.9 |
Anisotropy (Å) relative to best direction (001) | |
ΔB in (100) direction, ΔB in (010) direction | +29.95, +8.38 |
CC1/2 in high resolution shell | 0.542 |
Completeness (%) | 98.2 (91.3) |
Redundancy | 4.1 (3.2) |
Refinement | |
Resolution (Å) | 2.81 |
No. reflections | 26,235 |
Completeness(%) | 86.5† (35.3) |
Rwork/ Rfree (%) | 21.8/25.9 (33.0/41.3) |
Maximum likelihood estimated coordinate error (Å) | 0.42 |
No. atoms | 8524 |
Protein (non-hydrogen) | 8437 |
Ligand/ion | 66 |
Water | 21 |
B-factors | |
Protein | 44.7 |
Ligand/ion | 52.0 |
Water | 27.3 |
Rms deviations | |
Bond lengths (Å) | 0.003 |
Bond angles (°) | 0.66 |
Ramanchandran plot | |
Favored (%) | 95.0 |
Allowed (%) | 4.25 |
Disallowed (%) | 0.75 |
Rotamer outliers (%) | 3.2 |
Molprobity clash score | 1.5 |
Highest resolution shell is shown in parenthesis.
The data were corrected for anisotropy in HKL2000. This treatment eliminated weak reflections and reduced the completeness of the data used for refinement compared to the completeness reported for data collection.