A novel N-terminal extension in mitochondrial TRAP1 serves as a thermal regulator of chaperone activity
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, San Francisco, United States
- University of California, San Francisco, United States
Figures
Figure 1
A temperature-dependent barrier separates the apo and closed state of TRAP1.
(A) Negative stain electron microscopy (EM) images of hTRAP1 in the presence of AMPPNP at increasing temperatures for 1 hr. While the population at equilibrium appears to remain in an apo conformation at room temperature (RT), conversion to the closed state appears to be intermediate at 30°C and nearly complete at 37°C and 42°C. (B) Negative stain EM images of reactions incubated at 23°C and 37°C from A after returning the sample to RT and incubating overnight. Both populations remain apo and closed (respectively) demonstrating the large kinetic barrier that limits the conformational transition from apo to the closed state. Scale bar is 100 nm.
Figure 2
A large energy barrier to the closed state is modulated by the NTD-strap.
(A) SAXS distributions at equilibrium for hTRAP1 (left) and zTRAP1 (right) (84% identical to hTRAP1) in apo and in the presence of saturating AMPPNP at indicated temperatures for 1 hr. The closed-state population substantially increases at and above 36°C for hTRAP1 while zTRAP1 maintains a higher level of % closed at even lower temperatures, consistent with the differences in physiological temperatures of the two species. (B) SAXS distributions of Δstrap in matching conditions from A showing that removal of the strap mitigates the temperature-dependent barrier between the apo and closed states. (C) Quantification of percent closed for both TRAP1 species ± the strap region. Apparent is the different temperature dependence of hTRAP1 and zTRAP1 and the loss of temperature response of the chaperone in the case of Δstrap. (D) A plot of percent closed state verses temperature of WT hTRAP1 (left) and Δstrap hTRAP1 after closure has completed at each given temperature (solid bars as in (C). These samples were then cooled for 2 hr at 20°C (stripped bars). The data suggest a highly stable closed state.
Figure 3
NTD-strap regulates ATP hydrolysis rates.
WT and strap mutants for hTRAP1. Removal of the strap (Δstrap) results in a ∼30-fold increase in ATPase rate, while truncations before the previously reported salt bridge contact Δ60–69 (Lavery et al., 2014) show no change in activity. Average steady-state hydrolysis rates (min−1) above each bar, standard deviation of triplicate measurements can be found in Table 2.
Figure 4 with 2 supplements
The NTD-strap regulates closure rate of TRAP1.
(A) Steady-state FRET scans at 23°C for apo and AMPPNP reactions after closure with AMPPNP reached completion illustrating the anti-correlated change in FRET upon closure as measured by ‘dimer closure’ between protomers (left, Inter FRET) and rotation of the NTD from apo to the closed state within one protomer ‘NTD:MD Rotation’ (right, Intra FRET). (B) Temperature-dependent closure rates for WT hTRAP1 measured by both the dimer closure and NTD rotation FRET probes from A. Closure rates are comparable between these two sets of FRET probes as indicated in the table to the right. The predicted increase in rate at higher temperatures is apparent. (C) Closure at 30°C of WT compared to heterodimers lacking one or both NTD strap residues measured by dimer closure FRET (left) and NTD rotation FRET (right). Closure rates are found in the table for each experiment. (D) Temperature-dependent closure rates of Δstrap protein measured using the dimer closure probes from A (Inter FRET) illustrating both a rate acceleration and a dramatic loss of temperature dependence compared to WT (B, left panel). (E) Arrhenius plot of WT and Δstrap plotted using data from panels (B) (left) and (D). From the difference in activation energies Ea between WT and Δstrap, the strap contributes approximately 60% of the measured Ea for WT hTRAP1 (48.8 kcal/mol Ea for WT; 29 kcal/mol Δstrap). These data are consistent with the steady-state SAXS and ATPase and show that removal of the strap region lowers the energy barrier between apo and the closed state.
Figure 4—figure supplement 1
Alternative view of curve fits for Figure 4B,D.
(A) Kinetics of FRET closure at lower temperatures (23°C, 30°C, 32°C) with fits shown for full measured curve. All reactions were taken to completion. (B) Data from Figure 4D plotted to focus on the smaller difference in closure rate for Δstrap at increasing temperatures.
Figure 4—figure supplement 2
Arrhenius plots for Hsp90 homologs plotted using data from reference (Frey et al., 2007).
Calculated Ea for each homolog is listed in figure legend parentheses.
Figure 5
Lid Closure rate is regulated by the NTD-strap.
(A) Continuous Wave (CW) EPR scans of cysteine Free WT (top) and Δstrap zTRAP1 (bottom) labeled with a spin-probe on the NTD-lid (green) in order to observe changes to the lid in the apo and closed states (‘Materials and methods’). In the apo state the lid probe shows signal for both mobile and immobile states, although crystallographic data indicate that even in the mobile state, the majority of the lid is still reasonably well ordered. After addition of AMPPNP, the observed signal shifts indicating a predominantly mobile state of the lid, which corresponds to changes in lid dynamics that accompany NTD rotation and dimerization. Only subtle differences are seen in the mobile:immobile peak ratio upon strap deletion. (B) CW-EPR scans at ∼23°C taken for the cysteine-free WT (red) and Δstrap zTRAP1 (blue) over time after addition of AMPPNP. The percent change in peak height (final vs start) over time is plotted for both the immobile (squares) and mobile (circles) components, showing a clear anti-correlation. The mobile and immobile populations were jointly fit with a single exponential process (‘Materials and methods’) having a rate constant of 0.014 min−1 for WT and 0.075 min−1 for Δstrap, demonstrating a strong coupling between the strap and the NTD-lid.
Figure 6 with 1 supplement
The NTD-strap plays a smaller role in additional steps of the ATPase cycle.
(A) Schematic of dimer closure and re-opening upon addition of AMPPNP (PNP) using the dimer closure FRET probe (left). Re-opening of WT hTRAP1 and Δstrap was induced by 20-fold excess ADP after closure with AMPPNP. Re-opening was accelerated by ∼eightfold upon removal of the strap as determined by the ratio of the rates (table inset). (B) Steady-state FRET scans of dimer closure FRET in apo and plus ATP in the absence of Mg2+. Without Mg2+ a closed state accumulates, whereas subsequent addition of Mg2+ (‘+ATP & Mg2+’) allows hydrolysis to proceed thereby shifting the population to the apo state. (C) Schematic of a kinetic experiment using the Mg2+ dependence to separate the rate of hydrolysis from rate of closure. By omitting Mg2+, the population can be synchronized in a closed state that is unable to hydrolyze ATP. Subsequent rapid addition of Mg2+ leads to ATP hydrolysis, which has now been decoupled from the closure step. (D) Kinetic experiments measuring closure and (E) ATP hydrolysis. No closed state accumulates if Mg2+ is included in the closure reaction. Again we observe that removal of strap residues leads to an accelerated closure rate, whereas the difference in ATP hydrolysis is small. Kinetic rates for each are listed in the table insets.
Figure 6—figure supplement 1
ATP Hydrolysis at 25°C.
(A–B) Kinetic experiment designed to decouple ATP hydrolysis from the preceding closure step at 25°C outlined in Figure 6C–E. The measured rates for WT agree well with previous single turnover measurements (Leskovar et al., 2008), however, we find that decoupling the closure rate from hydrolysis results in a reassignment of the previous rates with closure being the slowest step. Kinetic rates for each are listed in the table inset.
Figure 7
Evolution of Hsp90 NTD-strap sequences.
Alignments were generated individually for each Hsp90 isoform using a conserved portion of the N-terminal domain and the NTD-strap region. The variable signal sequences for TRAP1 and Grp94 were removed before aligning the 10 divergent sequences. Helix one (H1) of the NTD is annotated above the alignments and begins just after the strictly conserved Phe residue that structurally appears to separate the β-strand region of the NTD from H1. This alignment clearly shows the divergence of both length and sequence within the NTD-strap region and also reveals that residues are more conserved amongst Hsp90 isoforms within H1 and the region following H1. TRAP1 has a much longer strap region than cytosolic Hsp90 and conservation does not pick up until the structural region, as made evident in the TRAP1 crystal structure (Lavery et al., 2014). Both yHsp90 and bHsp90 lack a significant strap sequence and Grp94 clearly has an extended and well-conserved strap region.
Figure 8
Model for the conformational cycle and unique energy landscape of TRAP1.
(A) In the absence of nucleotide the chaperone is in equilibrium between various open conformations (for simplicity we only show the most open) with the strap folded back onto the cis protomer. Upon binding of ATP, conformational changes necessary for the transition to the closed state are initiated. Here, we propose that the cis contacts of the strap are broken allowing the lid and NTD to undergo conformational changes towards the closed state. After the slow closure step the chaperone assumes the previously reported asymmetric conformation (Lavery et al., 2014). Sequential hydrolysis leads to changes in symmetry rearranging the unique MD:CTD interfaces and client binding residues (red) before sampling the ADP conformation and resetting the cycle to the apo state equilibrium. (B) Model for the unique energy landscape of TRAP1. Solid lines illustrate the energy landscape of WT TRAP1, and the dashed lines depict the change in landscape upon the loss of the extended N-terminal strap sequence in TRAP1. By stabilizing both the apo and closed states, the strap increases the effective height of the energy barrier. This modulates the conformational landscape, and in the case of hTRAP1 provides pronounced temperature sensitivity.
Author response image 1
Adapted from Figure 4B (Intra FRET probe data set).
Videos
Video 1
Conformational dynamics of the Hsp90 cycle.
A morph between known conformations throughout the activity cycle of Hsp90 (PDB codes with no order dictated: 2O1V, 2CG9, 2IOP, 2IOQ, 4IPE, 4IVG).
Video 2
NTD-strap anti-correlated lid conformational changes.
A morph between two conformations of Hsp90, from the Apo state with cis-protomer interactions between NTD and strap, to the nucleotide bound closed state where the strap makes trans-protomer interactions. This morph demonstrates the significant number of contacts that are lost and then reformed to accommodate movement of the NTD to form the NTD-dimerization interface. (PDB codes 2IOQ, 4IVG, 4IPE).
Video 3
Movement of the lid to accommodate the NTD-dimerization interface.
A morph between two conformations of yHsp90 NTD, either in the APO state or nucleotide bound closed conformation. This morph demonstrates the coordinated movement and changing contacts between both the β-strand (pink) and NTD lid (red) to facilitate the NTD-dimerization interface of a dimerized Hsp90 molecule. (PDB codes 4AS9, 2CG9).
Tables
Table 1
Quantification of percent closed using SAXS data for both TRAP1 species ± the strap
| Temperature (°C) | Protein | % Closed state | R |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | WT hTRAP1 | 0.5 | 0.042 |
| 23 | WT hTRAP1 | 2 | 0.042 |
| 30 | WT hTRAP1 | 31 | 0.024 |
| 32 | WT hTRAP1 | 41 | 0.019 |
| 36 | WT hTRAP1 | 74 | 0.011 |
| 40 | WT hTRAP1 | 83 | 0.010 |
| 43 | WT hTRAP1 | 84 | 0.012 |
| 20 | WT zTRAP1 | 36 | 0.015 |
| 23 | WT zTRAP1 | 48 | 0.011 |
| 30 | WT zTRAP1 | 75 | 0.027 |
| 32 | WT zTRAP1 | 81 | 0.033 |
| 36 | WT zTRAP1 | 80 | 0.030 |
| 43 | WT zTRAP1 | 69 | 0.016 |
| 20 | hTRAP1 Δstrap | 66 | 0.015 |
| 23 | hTRAP1 Δstrap | 68 | 0.014 |
| 30 | hTRAP1 Δstrap | 69 | 0.014 |
| 32 | hTRAP1 Δstrap | 68 | 0.015 |
| 36 | hTRAP1 Δstrap | 67 | 0.018 |
| 40 | hTRAP1 Δstrap | 69 | 0.016 |
| 43 | hTRAP1 Δstrap | 71 | 0.015 |
| 20 | zTRAP1 Δstrap | 60 | 0.016 |
| 23 | zTRAP1 Δstrap | 64 | 0.014 |
| 30 | zTRAP1 Δstrap | 61 | 0.015 |
| 32 | zTRAP1 Δstrap | 62 | 0.014 |
| 36 | zTRAP1 Δstrap | 55 | 0.016 |
| 43 | zTRAP1 Δstrap | 76 | 0.011 |
Table 2
Steady-state ATP hydrolysis rates at temperatures and buffer conditions of assay specified (i.e., EPR is under EPR buffer and temperature conditions). If not noted (top four reactions), conditions are the same as reference (Lavery et al., 2014)
| Protein | zTRAP1 ATPase (min−1) | hTRAP1 ATPase (min−1) |
|---|---|---|
| WT (30°C) | ||
| salt bridge point mutants (30°C) (Lavery et al., 2014) | ||
| Δstrap (30°C) | ||
| Δ60-69 (30°C) | ||
| WT FRET (30°C) | ||
| Δstrap FRET (30°C) | ||
| CFree WT EPR (23°C) | ||
| CFree Δstrap EPR (23°C) | ||
| CFree WT (Inter FRET) (30°C) | ||
| CFree Δstrap (Inter FRET) (30oC) | ||
| CFree WT (Intra FRET) (30°C) |
-
Red text indicates WT or strap truncated protein with native cysteine and label free, while Blue indicates labeled protein used in FRET and EPR experiments (each in indicated buffer conditions). EPR samples are cysteine free except for the desired probe position and are spin-labeled. Inter FRET and Intra FRET samples are cysteine free except for the desired probe position and are labeled with Alexa Fluor dyes (Life Technologies, see ‘Materials and methods’). Note that ‘Intra FRET’ refers to both probe positions on the same promoter, whereas ‘Inter FRET’ refers to one probe position per promoter. Errors represent the standard deviation of triplicate experiments.
Table 3
Kinetics of conformational changes as measured by FRET. Errors represent the standard deviation of triplicate experiments
| Protein | Temperature (°C) | FRET probe position | Kclose (min−1) | Kreopen (min−1) | Khyd (min−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFree WT hTRAP1 (Intra FRET) | |||||
| CFree WT hTRAP1 (Inter FRET) | |||||
| CFree Δstrap single (Inter FRET) | |||||
| CFree Δstrap double (Inter FRET) | |||||
| *CFree WT hTRAP1 (Inter FRET) *ATP used | |||||
| *CFree Δstrap double (Inter FRET) *ATP used | |||||
-
*
Denotes ATP was used for closure. Relates to Figures 4,6 and Figure 6—figure supplement 1. All other reactions used AMPPNP as the ATP analog. Note that ‘Intra FRET’ in red refers to both probe positions on the same promoter, whereas ‘Inter FRET’ in blue refers to one probe position per promoter.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
A novel N-terminal extension in mitochondrial TRAP1 serves as a thermal regulator of chaperone activity
eLife 3:e03487.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03487
