Large-scale filament formation inhibits the activity of CTP synthetase

  1. Rachael Barry
  2. Anne-Florence Bitbol
  3. Alexander Lorestani
  4. Emeric J Charles
  5. Chris H Habrian
  6. Jesse M Hansen
  7. Hsin-Jung Li
  8. Enoch P Baldwin
  9. Ned S Wingreen
  10. Justin M Kollman
  11. Zemer Gitai  Is a corresponding author
  1. Princeton University, United States
  2. McGill University, Canada
  3. University of California, Davis, United States

Abstract

CTP Synthetase (CtpS) is a universally conserved and essential metabolic enzyme. While many enzymes form small oligomers, CtpS forms large-scale filamentous structures of unknown function in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. By simultaneously monitoring CtpS polymerization and enzymatic activity we show that polymerization inhibits activity and CtpS's product, CTP, induces assembly. To understand how assembly inhibits activity, we used electron microscopy to define the structure of CtpS polymers. This structure suggests that polymerization sterically hinders a conformational change necessary for CtpS activity. Structure-guided mutagenesis and mathematical modeling further indicate that coupling activity to polymerization promotes cooperative catalytic regulation. This previously-uncharacterized regulatory mechanism is important for cellular function since a mutant that disrupts CtpS polymerization disrupts E. coli growth and metabolic regulation without reducing CTP levels. We propose that regulation by large-scale polymerization enables ultrasensitive control of enzymatic activity while storing an enzyme subpopulation in a conformationally restricted form that is readily activatable.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Rachael Barry

    Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Anne-Florence Bitbol

    Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Alexander Lorestani

    Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Emeric J Charles

    McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Chris H Habrian

    University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Jesse M Hansen

    McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Hsin-Jung Li

    Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Enoch P Baldwin

    University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Ned S Wingreen

    Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Justin M Kollman

    McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Zemer Gitai

    Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    For correspondence
    zgitai@princeton.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Copyright

© 2014, Barry et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,049
    views
  • 574
    downloads
  • 149
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Rachael Barry
  2. Anne-Florence Bitbol
  3. Alexander Lorestani
  4. Emeric J Charles
  5. Chris H Habrian
  6. Jesse M Hansen
  7. Hsin-Jung Li
  8. Enoch P Baldwin
  9. Ned S Wingreen
  10. Justin M Kollman
  11. Zemer Gitai
(2014)
Large-scale filament formation inhibits the activity of CTP synthetase
eLife 3:e03638.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03638

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03638

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Alejandro J Brenes, Eva Griesser ... Angus I Lamond
    Research Article

    Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) have great potential to be used as alternatives to embryonic stem cells (hESCs) in regenerative medicine and disease modelling. In this study, we characterise the proteomes of multiple hiPSC and hESC lines derived from independent donors and find that while they express a near-identical set of proteins, they show consistent quantitative differences in the abundance of a subset of proteins. hiPSCs have increased total protein content, while maintaining a comparable cell cycle profile to hESCs, with increased abundance of cytoplasmic and mitochondrial proteins required to sustain high growth rates, including nutrient transporters and metabolic proteins. Prominent changes detected in proteins involved in mitochondrial metabolism correlated with enhanced mitochondrial potential, shown using high-resolution respirometry. hiPSCs also produced higher levels of secreted proteins, including growth factors and proteins involved in the inhibition of the immune system. The data indicate that reprogramming of fibroblasts to hiPSCs produces important differences in cytoplasmic and mitochondrial proteins compared to hESCs, with consequences affecting growth and metabolism. This study improves our understanding of the molecular differences between hiPSCs and hESCs, with implications for potential risks and benefits for their use in future disease modelling and therapeutic applications.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Jie Luo, Jeff Ranish
    Tools and Resources

    Dynamic conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes play a central and ubiquitous role in the regulation of protein function, yet it is very challenging to study these changes, especially for large protein complexes, under physiological conditions. Here, we introduce a novel isobaric crosslinker, Qlinker, for studying conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes using quantitative crosslinking mass spectrometry. Qlinkers are small and simple, amine-reactive molecules with an optimal extended distance of ~10 Å, which use MS2 reporter ions for relative quantification of Qlinker-modified peptides derived from different samples. We synthesized the 2-plex Q2linker and showed that the Q2linker can provide quantitative crosslinking data that pinpoints key conformational and structural changes in biosensors, binary and ternary complexes composed of the general transcription factors TBP, TFIIA, and TFIIB, and RNA polymerase II complexes.