Large-scale filament formation inhibits the activity of CTP synthetase

  1. Rachael Barry
  2. Anne-Florence Bitbol
  3. Alexander Lorestani
  4. Emeric J Charles
  5. Chris H Habrian
  6. Jesse M Hansen
  7. Hsin-Jung Li
  8. Enoch P Baldwin
  9. Ned S Wingreen
  10. Justin M Kollman
  11. Zemer Gitai  Is a corresponding author
  1. Princeton University, United States
  2. McGill University, Canada
  3. University of California, Davis, United States

Abstract

CTP Synthetase (CtpS) is a universally conserved and essential metabolic enzyme. While many enzymes form small oligomers, CtpS forms large-scale filamentous structures of unknown function in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. By simultaneously monitoring CtpS polymerization and enzymatic activity we show that polymerization inhibits activity and CtpS's product, CTP, induces assembly. To understand how assembly inhibits activity, we used electron microscopy to define the structure of CtpS polymers. This structure suggests that polymerization sterically hinders a conformational change necessary for CtpS activity. Structure-guided mutagenesis and mathematical modeling further indicate that coupling activity to polymerization promotes cooperative catalytic regulation. This previously-uncharacterized regulatory mechanism is important for cellular function since a mutant that disrupts CtpS polymerization disrupts E. coli growth and metabolic regulation without reducing CTP levels. We propose that regulation by large-scale polymerization enables ultrasensitive control of enzymatic activity while storing an enzyme subpopulation in a conformationally restricted form that is readily activatable.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Rachael Barry

    Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Anne-Florence Bitbol

    Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Alexander Lorestani

    Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Emeric J Charles

    McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Chris H Habrian

    University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Jesse M Hansen

    McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Hsin-Jung Li

    Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Enoch P Baldwin

    University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Ned S Wingreen

    Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Justin M Kollman

    McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Zemer Gitai

    Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    For correspondence
    zgitai@princeton.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Mohan Balasubramanian, University of Warwick, United Kingdom

Version history

  1. Received: June 9, 2014
  2. Accepted: July 15, 2014
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: July 16, 2014 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: August 11, 2014 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2014, Barry et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,037
    views
  • 567
    downloads
  • 145
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Rachael Barry
  2. Anne-Florence Bitbol
  3. Alexander Lorestani
  4. Emeric J Charles
  5. Chris H Habrian
  6. Jesse M Hansen
  7. Hsin-Jung Li
  8. Enoch P Baldwin
  9. Ned S Wingreen
  10. Justin M Kollman
  11. Zemer Gitai
(2014)
Large-scale filament formation inhibits the activity of CTP synthetase
eLife 3:e03638.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03638

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03638

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Kien Xuan Ngo, Huong T Vu ... Taro Uyeda
    Research Article

    The mechanism underlying the preferential and cooperative binding of cofilin and the expansion of clusters toward the pointed-end side of actin filaments remains poorly understood. To address this, we conducted a principal component analysis based on available filamentous actin (F-actin) and C-actin (cofilins were excluded from cofilactin) structures and compared to monomeric G-actin. The results strongly suggest that C-actin, rather than F-ADP-actin, represented the favourable structure for binding preference of cofilin. High-speed atomic force microscopy explored that the shortened bare half helix adjacent to the cofilin clusters on the pointed end side included fewer actin protomers than normal helices. The mean axial distance (MAD) between two adjacent actin protomers along the same long-pitch strand within shortened bare half helices was longer (5.0–6.3 nm) than the MAD within typical helices (4.3–5.6 nm). The inhibition of torsional motion during helical twisting, achieved through stronger attachment to the lipid membrane, led to more pronounced inhibition of cofilin binding and cluster formation than the presence of inorganic phosphate (Pi) in solution. F-ADP-actin exhibited more naturally supertwisted half helices than F-ADP.Pi-actin, explaining how Pi inhibits cofilin binding to F-actin with variable helical twists. We propose that protomers within the shorter bare helical twists, either influenced by thermal fluctuation or induced allosterically by cofilin clusters, exhibit characteristics of C-actin-like structures with an elongated MAD, leading to preferential and cooperative binding of cofilin.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Valentina Kugler, Selina Schwaighofer ... Eduard Stefan
    Research Article

    Protein kinases act as central molecular switches in the control of cellular functions. Alterations in the regulation and function of protein kinases may provoke diseases including cancer. In this study we investigate the conformational states of such disease-associated kinases using the high sensitivity of the kinase conformation (KinCon) reporter system. We first track BRAF kinase activity conformational changes upon melanoma drug binding. Second, we also use the KinCon reporter technology to examine the impact of regulatory protein interactions on LKB1 kinase tumor suppressor functions. Third, we explore the conformational dynamics of RIP kinases in response to TNF pathway activation and small molecule interactions. Finally, we show that CDK4/6 interactions with regulatory proteins alter conformations which remain unaffected in the presence of clinically applied inhibitors. Apart from its predictive value, the KinCon technology helps to identify cellular factors that impact drug efficacies. The understanding of the structural dynamics of full-length protein kinases when interacting with small molecule inhibitors or regulatory proteins is crucial for designing more effective therapeutic strategies.