Variance predicts salience in central sensory processing

  1. Ann M Hermundstad  Is a corresponding author
  2. John J Briguglio
  3. Mary M Conte
  4. Jonathan D Victor
  5. Vijay Balasubramanian
  6. Gašper Tkačik
  1. University of Pennsylvania, United States
  2. Weill Cornell Medical College, United States
  3. Institute of Science and Technology Austria, Austria

Abstract

Information processing in the sensory periphery is shaped by natural stimulus statistics. In the periphery, a transmission bottleneck constrains performance; thus efficient coding implies that natural signal components with a predictably wider range should be compressed. In a different regime - when sampling limitations constrain performance - efficient coding implies that more resources should be allocated to informative features that are more variable. We propose that this regime is relevant for sensory cortex when it extracts complex features from limited numbers of sensory samples. To test this prediction, we use central visual processing as a model: we show that visual sensitivity for local multi-point spatial correlations, described by dozens of independently-measured parameters, can be quantitatively predicted from the structure of natural images. This suggests that efficient coding applies centrally, where it extends to higher-order sensory features and operates in a regime in which sensitivity increases with feature variability.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ann M Hermundstad

    University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    For correspondence
    annherm@physics.upenn.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. John J Briguglio

    University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Mary M Conte

    Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Jonathan D Victor

    Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Vijay Balasubramanian

    University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Gašper Tkačik

    Institute of Science and Technology Austria, Klosterneuburg, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Ethics

Human subjects: The human subjects research (visual psychophysics) was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Weill Cornell Medical College, and was in accord with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from each subject prior to the experimental sessions, and consent to publish was obtained from Mary Conte (MC), the one subject who is potentially identifiable by the initials since she is also an author.

Copyright

© 2014, Hermundstad et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,425
    views
  • 534
    downloads
  • 77
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Citations by DOI

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ann M Hermundstad
  2. John J Briguglio
  3. Mary M Conte
  4. Jonathan D Victor
  5. Vijay Balasubramanian
  6. Gašper Tkačik
(2014)
Variance predicts salience in central sensory processing
eLife 3:e03722.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03722

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03722