1. Developmental Biology
  2. Evolutionary Biology
Download icon

Divergent mechanisms regulate conserved cardiopharyngeal development and gene expression in distantly related ascidians

  1. Alberto Stolfi
  2. Elijah K Lowe
  3. Claudia Racioppi
  4. Filomena Ristoratore
  5. C Titus Brown
  6. Billie J Swalla
  7. Lionel Christiaen  Is a corresponding author
  1. New York University, United States
  2. Michigan State University, United States
  3. Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Italy
  4. University of Washington, United States
Research Article
  • Cited 49
  • Views 2,927
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2014;3:e03728 doi: 10.7554/eLife.03728

Abstract

Ascidians present a striking dichotomy between conserved phenotypes and divergent genomes: embryonic cell lineages and gene expression patterns are conserved between distantly related species. Much research has focused on Ciona or Halocynthia spp. but development in other ascidians remains poorly characterized. Here we surveyed the multipotent myogenic B7.5 lineage in Molgula spp. Comparisons to the homologous lineage in Ciona revealed identical cell division and fate specification events that result in segregation of larval, cardiac, and pharyngeal muscle progenitors. Moreover, the expression patterns of key regulators are conserved, but cross-species transgenic assays uncovered incompatibility, or "unintelligibility", of orthologous cis-regulatory sequences between Molgula and Ciona. These sequences drive identical expression patterns that are not recapitulated in cross-species assays. We show that this unintelligibility is likely due to changes in both cis- and trans-actingelements, hinting at widespread and frequent turnover of regulatory mechanisms underlying otherwise conserved aspects of ascidian embryogenesis.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Alberto Stolfi

    New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Elijah K Lowe

    Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Claudia Racioppi

    Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Napoli, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Filomena Ristoratore

    Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Napoli, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. C Titus Brown

    Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Billie J Swalla

    University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Lionel Christiaen

    New York University, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    lc121@nyu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Margaret Buckingham, Institut Pasteur, France

Publication history

  1. Received: June 18, 2014
  2. Accepted: September 5, 2014
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: September 10, 2014 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: September 30, 2014 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2014, Stolfi et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,927
    Page views
  • 201
    Downloads
  • 49
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, Scopus, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Meike E van der Heijden et al.
    Research Article

    Preterm infants that suffer cerebellar insults often develop motor disorders and cognitive difficulty. Excitatory granule cells, the most numerous neuron type in the brain, are especially vulnerable and likely instigate disease by impairing the function of their targets, the Purkinje cells. Here, we use regional genetic manipulations and in vivo electrophysiology to test whether excitatory neurons establish the firing properties of Purkinje cells during postnatal mouse development. We generated mutant mice that lack the majority of excitatory cerebellar neurons and tracked the structural and functional consequences on Purkinje cells. We reveal that Purkinje cells fail to acquire their typical morphology and connectivity, and that the concomitant transformation of Purkinje cell firing activity does not occur either. We also show that our mutant pups have impaired motor behaviors and vocal skills. These data argue that excitatory cerebellar neurons define the maturation time-window for postnatal Purkinje cell functions and refine cerebellar-dependent behaviors.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Baruch Haimson et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Peripheral and intraspinal feedback is required to shape and update the output of spinal networks that execute motor behavior. We report that lumbar dI2 spinal interneurons in chicks receive synaptic input from afferents and premotor neurons. These interneurons innervate contralateral premotor networks in the lumbar and brachial spinal cord, and their ascending projections innervate the cerebellum. These findings suggest that dI2 neurons function as interneurons in local lumbar circuits, are involved in lumbo-brachial coupling, and that part of them deliver peripheral and intraspinal feedback to the cerebellum. Silencing of dI2 neurons leads to destabilized stepping in posthatching day 8 hatchlings, with occasional collapses, variable step profiles, and a wide-base walking gait, suggesting that dI2 neurons may contribute to the stabilization of the bipedal gait.