Side-binding proteins modulate actin filament dynamics

  1. Alvaro H Crevenna  Is a corresponding author
  2. Marcelino Arciniega
  3. Aurélie Dupont
  4. Naoko Mizuno
  5. Kaja Kowalska
  6. Oliver F Lange
  7. Roland Wedlich-Söldner
  8. Don C Lamb
  1. Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Germany
  2. Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Germany
  3. Technische Universität München, Germany
  4. University of Münster, Germany

Abstract

Actin filament dynamics govern many key physiological processes from cell motility to tissue morphogenesis. A central feature of actin dynamics is the capacity of filaments to polymerize and depolymerize at their ends in response to cellular conditions. It is currently thought that filament kinetics can be described by a single rate constant for each end. Here, using direct visualization of single actin filament elongation, we show that actin polymerization kinetics at both filament ends are strongly influenced by the binding of proteins to the lateral filament surface. We also show that the pointed-end has a non-elongating state that dominates the observed filament kinetic asymmetry. Estimates of flexibility as well as effects on fragmentation and growth suggest that the observed kinetic diversity arises from structural alteration. Tuning elongation kinetics by exploiting the malleability of the filament structure may be a ubiquitous mechanism to generate a rich variety of cellular actin dynamics.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Alvaro H Crevenna

    Physical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry and Center for Nanoscience, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
    For correspondence
    alvaro.crevenna@cup.uni-muenchen.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Marcelino Arciniega

    Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Aurélie Dupont

    Physical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry and Center for Nanoscience, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Naoko Mizuno

    Cellular and Membrane Trafficking, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Kaja Kowalska

    Cellular Dynamics and Cell Patterning, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Oliver F Lange

    Department of Chemistry, Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Roland Wedlich-Söldner

    Institute of Cell Dynamics and Imaging, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Don C Lamb

    Physical Chemistry, Department for Chemistry and Center for Nanoscience, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Copyright

© 2015, Crevenna et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,857
    views
  • 772
    downloads
  • 25
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Alvaro H Crevenna
  2. Marcelino Arciniega
  3. Aurélie Dupont
  4. Naoko Mizuno
  5. Kaja Kowalska
  6. Oliver F Lange
  7. Roland Wedlich-Söldner
  8. Don C Lamb
(2015)
Side-binding proteins modulate actin filament dynamics
eLife 4:e04599.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04599

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04599

Further reading

    1. Physics of Living Systems
    James E Hammond, Ruth E Baker, Berta Verd
    Research Article

    Vertebrates have evolved great diversity in the number of segments dividing the trunk body, however, the developmental origin of the evolvability of this trait is poorly understood. The number of segments is thought to be determined in embryogenesis as a product of morphogenesis of the pre-somitic mesoderm (PSM) and the periodicity of a molecular oscillator active within the PSM known as the segmentation clock. Here, we explore whether the clock and PSM morphogenesis exhibit developmental modularity, as independent evolution of these two processes may explain the high evolvability of segment number. Using a computational model of the clock and PSM parameterised for zebrafish, we find that the clock is broadly robust to variation in morphogenetic processes such as cell ingression, motility, compaction, and cell division. We show that this robustness is in part determined by the length of the PSM and the strength of phase coupling in the clock. As previous studies report no changes to morphogenesis upon perturbing the clock, we suggest that the clock and morphogenesis of the PSM exhibit developmental modularity.

    1. Physics of Living Systems
    Emmanuel Akabuogu, Victor Carneiro da Cunha Martorelli ... Thomas A Waigh
    Research Article

    Bacterial biofilms are communities of bacteria usually attached to solid strata and often differentiated into complex structures. Communication across biofilms has been shown to involve chemical signaling and, more recently, electrical signaling in Gram-positive biofilms. We report for the first time, community-level synchronized membrane potential dynamics in three-dimensional Escherichia coli biofilms. Two hyperpolarization events are observed in response to light stress. The first requires mechanically sensitive ion channels (MscK, MscL, and MscS) and the second needs the Kch-potassium channel. The channels mediated both local spiking of single E. coli biofilms and long-range coordinated electrical signaling in E. coli biofilms. The electrical phenomena are explained using Hodgkin-Huxley and 3D fire-diffuse-fire agent-based models. These data demonstrate that electrical wavefronts based on potassium ions are a mechanism by which signaling occurs in Gram-negative biofilms and as such may represent a conserved mechanism for communication across biofilms.