1. Neuroscience

Corticothalamic phase synchrony and cross-frequency coupling predict human memory formation

  1. Catherine M Sweeney-Reed  Is a corresponding author
  2. Tino Zaehle
  3. Juergen Voges
  4. Friedhelm C Schmitt
  5. Lars Buentjen
  6. Klaus Kopitzki
  7. Christine Esslinger
  8. Hermann Hinrichs
  9. Hans-Jochen Heinze
  10. Robert T Knight
  11. Alan Richardson-Klavehn
  1. Otto von Guericke University, Germany
  2. University of California, Berkeley, United States
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05352
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Catherine M Sweeney-Reed
  2. Tino Zaehle
  3. Juergen Voges
  4. Friedhelm C Schmitt
  5. Lars Buentjen
  6. Klaus Kopitzki
  7. Christine Esslinger
  8. Hermann Hinrichs
  9. Hans-Jochen Heinze
  10. Robert T Knight
  11. Alan Richardson-Klavehn
(2014)
Corticothalamic phase synchrony and cross-frequency coupling predict human memory formation
eLife 3:e05352.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05352
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

The anterior thalamic nucleus (ATN) is thought to play an important role in a brain network involving the hippocampus and neocortex, which enables human memories to be formed. However, its small size and location deep within the brain have impeded direct investigation in humans with non-invasive techniques. Here we provide direct evidence for a functional role for the ATN in memory formation from rare simultaneous human intrathalamic and scalp electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings from 8 volunteering patients receiving intrathalamic electrodes implanted for the treatment of epilepsy, demonstrating real-time communication between neocortex and ATN during successful memory encoding. Neocortical-ATN theta oscillatory phase synchrony of local field potentials and neocortical-theta-to-ATN-gamma cross-frequency coupling during presentation of complex photographic scenes predicted later memory for the pictures, demonstrating a key role for the ATN in human memory encoding.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Catherine M Sweeney-Reed

    Department of Neurology, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
    For correspondence
    catherine.sweeney-reed@med.ovgu.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  2. Tino Zaehle

    Department of Neurology, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  3. Juergen Voges

    Department of Neurology, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  4. Friedhelm C Schmitt

    Department of Neurology, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  5. Lars Buentjen

    Department of Neurology, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  6. Klaus Kopitzki

    Department of Neurology, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  7. Christine Esslinger

    Department of Neurology, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  8. Hermann Hinrichs

    Department of Neurology, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  9. Hans-Jochen Heinze

    Department of Neurology, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  10. Robert T Knight

    Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  11. Alan Richardson-Klavehn

    Department of Neurology, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Howard Eichenbaum, Boston University, United States

Ethics

Human subjects: The measurements were approved by the Ethics Commission of the Medical Faculty of the Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, and all participants gave written informed consent.

Version history

  1. Received: October 27, 2014
  2. Accepted: December 22, 2014
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: December 23, 2014 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: January 22, 2015 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2014, Sweeney-Reed et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,908
    views
  • 377
    downloads
  • 63
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Catherine M Sweeney-Reed
  2. Tino Zaehle
  3. Juergen Voges
  4. Friedhelm C Schmitt
  5. Lars Buentjen
  6. Klaus Kopitzki
  7. Christine Esslinger
  8. Hermann Hinrichs
  9. Hans-Jochen Heinze
  10. Robert T Knight
  11. Alan Richardson-Klavehn
(2014)
Corticothalamic phase synchrony and cross-frequency coupling predict human memory formation
eLife 3:e05352.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05352

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05352

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience

    Thalamic theta phase alignment predicts human memory formation and anterior thalamic cross-frequency coupling

    Catherine M Sweeney-Reed, Tino Zaehle ... Alan Richardson-Klavehn
    Research Advance Updated

    Previously we reported electrophysiological evidence for a role for the anterior thalamic nucleus (ATN) in human memory formation (Sweeney-Reed et al., 2014). Theta-gamma cross-frequency coupling (CFC) predicted successful memory formation, with the involvement of gamma oscillations suggesting memory-relevant local processing in the ATN. The importance of the theta frequency range in memory processing is well-established, and phase alignment of oscillations is considered to be necessary for synaptic plasticity. We hypothesized that theta phase alignment in the ATN would be necessary for memory encoding. Further analysis of the electrophysiological data reveal that phase alignment in the theta rhythm was greater during successful compared with unsuccessful encoding, and that this alignment was correlated with the CFC. These findings support an active processing role for the ATN during memory formation.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Neuroscience

    A unique multi-synaptic mechanism involving acetylcholine and GABA regulates dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens through early adolescence in male rats

    Melody C Iacino, Taylor A Stowe ... Mark J Ferris
    Research Article Updated

    Adolescence is characterized by changes in reward-related behaviors, social behaviors, and decision-making. These behavioral changes are necessary for the transition into adulthood, but they also increase vulnerability to the development of a range of psychiatric disorders. Major reorganization of the dopamine system during adolescence is thought to underlie, in part, the associated behavioral changes and increased vulnerability. Here, we utilized fast scan cyclic voltammetry and microdialysis to examine differences in dopamine release as well as mechanisms that underlie differential dopamine signaling in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) core of adolescent (P28-35) and adult (P70-90) male rats. We show baseline differences between adult and adolescent-stimulated dopamine release in male rats, as well as opposite effects of the α6 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) on modulating dopamine release. The α6-selective blocker, α-conotoxin, increased dopamine release in early adolescent rats, but decreased dopamine release in rats beginning in middle adolescence and extending through adulthood. Strikingly, blockade of GABAA and GABAB receptors revealed that this α6-mediated increase in adolescent dopamine release requires NAc GABA signaling to occur. We confirm the role of α6 nAChRs and GABA in mediating this effect in vivo using microdialysis. Results herein suggest a multisynaptic mechanism potentially unique to the period of development that includes early adolescence, involving acetylcholine acting at α6-containing nAChRs to drive inhibitory GABA tone on dopamine release.

    1. Neuroscience

    The scheduling of adolescence with Netrin-1 and UNC5C

    Daniel Hoops, Robert Kyne ... Cecilia Flores
    Short Report

    Dopamine axons are the only axons known to grow during adolescence. Here, using rodent models, we examined how two proteins, Netrin-1 and its receptor, UNC5C, guide dopamine axons toward the prefrontal cortex and shape behaviour. We demonstrate in mice (Mus musculus) that dopamine axons reach the cortex through a transient gradient of Netrin-1-expressing cells – disrupting this gradient reroutes axons away from their target. Using a seasonal model (Siberian hamsters; Phodopus sungorus) we find that mesocortical dopamine development can be regulated by a natural environmental cue (daylength) in a sexually dimorphic manner – delayed in males, but advanced in females. The timings of dopamine axon growth and UNC5C expression are always phase-locked. Adolescence is an ill-defined, transitional period; we pinpoint neurodevelopmental markers underlying this period.