Autism Spectrum Disorders: Making connections
Autism spectrum disorders—such as Asperger syndrome and childhood autism—have long been known to have a significant genetic component (Ronald and Hoekstra, 2011). However, the biological basis of these disorders has remained largely elusive. Hundreds of genes have been linked to autism spectrum disorders (or ASDs), but most only contribute a small increase in risk (Devlin and Scherer, 2012).
It has been proposed that ASDs are caused by the abnormal development or dysfunction of synapses: these are the connections between neurons that allow chemical signals to be sent from one neuron to another in the brain (Sudhof, 2008). The dysfunction is thought to lead to a change in the relative numbers of excitatory and inhibitory signals received by neurons. Now, in eLife, Roman Giger and colleagues at the University of Michigan School of Medicine and the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine report additional evidence for a link between ASDs and dysfunctional synapses (Duan et al., 2014).
Previous studies have shown that small genetic differences near a human gene called SEMA5A confer an increased risk for ASDs. It has also been shown that SEMA5A expression is reduced in the brains of people with ASDs (Weiss et al., 2009). The SEMA5A gene encodes a transmembrane protein called Semaphorin 5A that is important for guiding the branches of neurons during development (Kantor et al., 2004). Consistent with a prominent role of synapses in ASDs, Giger and colleagues—who include Yuntoa Duan and Shih-Hsiu Wang as joint first authors—report that deleting the Sema5A gene from mice results in an increase in the density of synapses and in increased transmission of excitatory signals across synapses (Figure 1). The increase in synaptic density appears in granule cells in a region of the brain called the dentate gyrus, which is found in the hippocampus.
At the behavioural level, ASDs are characterised by a combination of abnormal social interactions, difficulties with communication and repetitive behaviours. Alterations in ASD genes related to synaptic function typically result in deficits in social interactions in mice (Ey et al., 2011). Consistent with this previous work, Duan, Wang et al. report that mice in which the Sema5A gene has been ‘knocked-out’ perform poorly in a social preference task, but show normal levels of performance in several other learning tasks or behaviours. Such specific deficits suggest that different behaviours observed in ASDs may be underpinned by distinct biological processes. However, it is not clear how an increase in the synaptic density in granule cells of the dentate gyrus leads to deficits in social interactions.
The traditional view of developmental disorders of the brain and nervous system holds that there is a limited time window during development in which treatment may be beneficial. From this perspective, treatment during adulthood would be of limited value. However, several studies over the last decade using mouse models of autism and related disorders have challenged this perspective. For several of these mouse models, treatment with drugs enable adult mice to overcome both their cognitive and social interaction deficits (Ehninger et al., 2008; Castren et al., 2012). Duan, Wang et al. find that treating neurons grown in the laboratory with a fragment of the Sema5A protein fused to another molecule for only two hours decreases the density of synapses. This suggests that the structural abnormalities in neurons that are thought to underlie ASDs are highly plastic and amenable to manipulation on short time scales. However, it remains to be seen whether such rapid effects are also observed in living mice and whether they are capable of mitigating the behavioural deficits.
A key goal in unveiling the genetic underpinnings of any disorder is to provide a basis for the rational design of therapeutics. Towards this end, Duan, Wang et al. identified a protein called plexin-A2 (or PlxnA2) as the receptor that mediates the effects of Semaphorin 5A on synaptic density. They find that Semaphorin 5A binds to plexin-A2 to restrict the growth and density of synapses in individual neurons. Like Sema5A knockout mice, PlxnA2 knockout mice have more synapses on the granule cells in the dentate gyrus. Furthermore, synapse density was not affected by over-production of Semaphorin 5A in neurons with the PlxnA2 gene deleted when grown in vitro. This suggests that the plexin-A2 protein may be a useful target to explore with respect to developing novel therapeutics for ASDs and other disorders in which there is an increase in synaptic density.
Although the biological and genetic bases for ASDs are being slowly unravelled, numerous questions still remain. Of the most perplexing is how changes in synapse number or function lead to specific deficits, such as difficulties with social interaction, and do not have more general behavioural effects. Of potentially greater consequence is whether or not treatment, pharmacological or otherwise, will be beneficial in older children and adults. Our search for the physiological basis of ASDs promises not only to eventually yield treatments for these disorders, but also to deepen our understanding of normal workings of synapses.
References
-
Treatment of neurodevelopmental disorders in adulthoodJournal of Neuroscience 32:14074–14079.https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3287-12.2012
-
Genetic architecture in autism spectrum disorderCurrent Opinion in Genetics & Development 22:229–237.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2012.03.002
-
Autism spectrum disorders and autistic traits: a decade of new twin studiesAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric Genetics 156B:255–274.https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.31159
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2014, Kenney and Frankland
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 1,469
- views
-
- 66
- downloads
-
- 2
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
Unipolar brush cells (UBCs) are excitatory interneurons in the cerebellar cortex that receive mossy fiber (MF) inputs and excite granule cells. The UBC population responds to brief burst activation of MFs with a continuum of temporal transformations, but it is not known how UBCs transform the diverse range of MF input patterns that occur in vivo. Here, we use cell-attached recordings from UBCs in acute cerebellar slices to examine responses to MF firing patterns that are based on in vivo recordings. We find that MFs evoke a continuum of responses in the UBC population, mediated by three different types of glutamate receptors that each convey a specialized component. AMPARs transmit timing information for single stimuli at up to 5 spikes/s, and for very brief bursts. A combination of mGluR2/3s (inhibitory) and mGluR1s (excitatory) mediates a continuum of delayed, and broadened responses to longer bursts, and to sustained high frequency activation. Variability in the mGluR2/3 component controls the time course of the onset of firing, and variability in the mGluR1 component controls the duration of prolonged firing. We conclude that the combination of glutamate receptor types allows each UBC to simultaneously convey different aspects of MF firing. These findings establish that UBCs are highly flexible circuit elements that provide diverse temporal transformations that are well suited to contribute to specialized processing in different regions of the cerebellar cortex.
-
- Neuroscience
The specific role that prolactin plays in lactational infertility, as distinct from other suckling or metabolic cues, remains unresolved. Here, deletion of the prolactin receptor (Prlr) from forebrain neurons or arcuate kisspeptin neurons resulted in failure to maintain normal lactation-induced suppression of estrous cycles. Kisspeptin immunoreactivity and pulsatile LH secretion were increased in these mice, even in the presence of ongoing suckling stimulation and lactation. GCaMP fibre photometry of arcuate kisspeptin neurons revealed that the normal episodic activity of these neurons is rapidly suppressed in pregnancy and this was maintained throughout early lactation. Deletion of Prlr from arcuate kisspeptin neurons resulted in early reactivation of episodic activity of kisspeptin neurons prior to a premature return of reproductive cycles in early lactation. These observations show dynamic variation in arcuate kisspeptin neuronal activity associated with the hormonal changes of pregnancy and lactation, and provide direct evidence that prolactin action on arcuate kisspeptin neurons is necessary for suppressing fertility during lactation in mice.