Bone marrow contains types of stem cell that can produce new blood and immune cells. Transplanting bone marrow from a healthy person can be used to treat people with certain disorders of the blood and immune system, by providing a new supply of regenerating bone marrow stem cells. Bone marrow transplants are also critical for individuals who had their own bone marrow stem cells destroyed by cancer or by toxic anti-cancer therapies like chemotherapy.

Acquiring bone marrow for transplants can be a difficult process. Sometimes doctors can use the patient's own stem cells for a transplant. But in circumstances where the patient lacks healthy bone marrow, a bone marrow donor must be found. Donors and recipients must be carefully matched: certain proteins on the donor's bone marrow cells must be very similar to the proteins on the recipient's bone marrow cells, or the recipient's immune system will attack and kill the new cells.

If scientists could learn to grow the stem cells found in bone marrow in laboratories, they could circumvent some of the challenges associated with bone marrow donation. To do that, scientists must first understand the precise molecular mechanisms that allow the blood cell-producing stem cells to regenerate themselves and produce new blood cells.

Angiopoietin-like proteins are commonly used to help stem cells grow in the laboratory, and Lin et al. have now looked in detail at how these proteins work. This revealed that angiopoietin-like proteins also cause the stem cells that produce blood cells to grow in zebrafish embryos and are necessary for the embryos' vascular system to develop properly.

Zebrafish embryos lacking angiopoietin-like proteins develop a similar set of developmental problems as zebrafish embryos with a mutation in another protein called Notch. Through a series of experiments, Lin et al. show that angiopoietin-like proteins interact with Notch and help transform Notch into its active form, which is necessary for blood stem cell growth. Lin et al. also found that both angiopoietin-like proteins and Notch affect the same signaling molecules. This suggests that the two proteins may work together as part of the same molecular pathway. The work suggests an alternative method to activate Notch for blood stem cell stimulation during processes such as bone marrow or cord blood transplantation.

Human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) are defined as cells with the ability to self-renew and differentiate into all blood lineages. They provide tremendous therapeutic potential for bone marrow transplantation in the treatment of hematologic malignancy, inherited blood disorders, and cancer chemotherapy. An important goal in studying stem cells is to identify factors that can expand HSPCs in vitro, while maintaining their self-renewal capacity. Scientists have turned to clues during embryonic hematopoietic development to identify novel factors that regulate this expansion. Developmental hematopoiesis occurs in at least two distinct phases, in which an initial transient wave produces mainly primitive erythrocytes and myeloid cells, followed by a definitive wave which produces long-term HSPCs (Orkin and Zon, 2008). Ontogeny studies across species have identified the aorta-gonad-mesonephros (AGM) region as the site from which definitive HSPCs arise (Dieterlen-Lievre, 1975; Medvinsky and Dzierzak, 1996; Tavian et al., 1996; Jaffredo et al., 1998). Recent studies using time-lapse imaging in live zebrafish embryos and live mouse thick tissue sections revealed that HSPCs bud off from the endothelium lining the ventral wall of the developing dorsal aorta (DA) prior to entering circulation (Bertrand et al., 2010; Boisset et al., 2010; Kissa and Herbomel, 2010). Subsequent to their birth in the AGM, HSPCs migrate to the fetal liver where they undergo significant expansion in vivo (Ema and Nakauchi, 2000) before colonizing the bone marrow and provide life-long supply of all blood cells.

Angiopoietin-like proteins (ANGPTLs) were recently identified as growth factors capable of expanding mouse (Zhang et al., 2006; Zheng et al., 2011; Farahbakhshian et al., 2014) and human (Zhang et al., 2008; Khoury et al., 2011; Ventura Ferreira et al., 2013; Fan et al., 2014) HSPCs in culture. ANGPTLs are secreted proteins that closely resembled the Angiopoietins, which are important vascular regulators, but despite structural similarities, they do not bind to TIE-2 or TIE-1 (Kim et al., 1999, 2000; Oike et al., 2004). They also exert much wider functions outside of the vasculature such as regulation of lipid, glucose and energy metabolism (Hato et al., 2008), inflammation (Tabata et al., 2009), and cancer (Zhu et al., 2011).

Notch receptors (NOTCH1-4) are single-pass type I transmembrane receptors implicated in various developmental and disease processes including the activation of the hematopoietic program. They are synthesized as ∼300 kD full-length precursor proteins that undergo a series of proteolytic cleavages in order to become fully activated. Prior to translocating to the cell surface, NOTCH is first cleaved by furin-like convertases in the trans-Golgi compartment, resulting in a heterodimer composed of the N-terminal extracellular domain and the C-terminal-transmembrane/intracellular domain, bound through noncovalent linkage. Canonical NOTCH activation requires its obligatory interaction with NOTCH ligands belonging to the Delta/Serrate/Jagged/LAG-2 (DSL) family (Fortini, 2009; Kopan and Ilagan, 2009). Several studies support a model in which ligand binding followed by endocytosis creates a mechanical force that alters the conformation of a juxtamembrane NOTCH negative regulatory region (Kopan and Ilagan, 2009). This permits cleavage of NOTCH by ADAM/TACE (a disintegrin and metalloprotease/tumor necrosis factor α converting enzyme) at Site 2 (S2), generating the membrane-anchored NOTCH extracellular truncation (NEXT) fragment. NEXT is a substrate for the γ-secretase complex, which cleaves Site 3 (S3), releasing the NOTCH intracellular domain (NICD) to freely translocate into the nucleus to interact with DNA binding protein CSL (CBF1/Su(H)/Lag-1)/RBPjκ and initiate transcription of target genes.

While the role of NOTCH in adult HSPC homeostasis still remains controversial, NOTCH is irrefutably important during embryonic hematopoiesis. Several Notch receptors and ligands are expressed in the mouse AGM and deletion of Notch1, Jagged1, or CSL resulted in impaired intra-embryonic hematopoiesis (Kumano et al., 2003; Robert-Moreno et al., 2005, 2008). Notch target genes such as Gata2 (Minegishi et al., 2003), Runx1 (North et al., 2002) and those belonging to the Hairy and Enhancer-of-split related basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors, Hes1, Hey1, and Hey2, are also expressed in the AGM (Robert-Moreno et al., 2005, 2008; Guiu et al., 2013). Previous studies from our lab demonstrated that HSPC fate is dictated by the notch-runx1 pathway, in which overexpression of runx1 mRNA in the notch mutant mindbomb (mib) can partially restore the loss of HSPCs normally observed in mib (Burns et al., 2005). Furthermore, recent studies demonstrated an even earlier role for notch in which somite-derived signals such as wnt16 (Clements et al., 2011) or physical intracellular contacts between the jam1a/2a adhesion proteins (Kobayashi et al., 2014) can regulate notch signaling in HSC precursors.

Because of their potential in hematological applications and therapy, it is important to decipher the molecular pathways on which these ANGPTLs act. Here, we utilized zebrafish genetics to help provide insights into the mechanism by which ANGPTLs can expand adult HSPCs. We found that angptls1 and 2 are indispensible for zebrafish definitive hematopoiesis and that they genetically interacted with notch signaling. To further uncover potential mechanisms for this interaction, we utilized cultured human cells and found that ANGPTL2 mediates NOTCH receptor cleavage/activation, occurring at the level of ANGPTL receptor binding to NOTCH. Our novel findings that angptls can induce notch activation provide an additional layer of regulation of canonical notch signaling.

Previous studies have demonstrated that notch is indispensable during the developmental specification of HSPCs (Burns et al., 2005; Clements et al., 2011). In our present study, we defined the essential role of zangptl1 and 2 during developmental hematopoiesis (Figure 1), likely through regulation of notch signaling in the hemogenic endothelium. To our knowledge, this is the first time zangptls has been shown to activate notch. The current model for notch specification of HSPCs during development has mostly been suggested to be a cell-autonomous one (Hadland et al., 2004; Burns et al., 2005; Robert-Moreno et al., 2005). Our live imaging data from transient Tg(drl:eGFP;kdrl:NICD)-injected embryos resulting in significantly more budding HSPCs in the AGM of DA corroborate with this. More recently, studies have revealed an additional and separate role for somite-derived notch signaling during HSPC specification that occurs much earlier than previously thought (Clements et al., 2011; Kobayashi et al., 2014). Based on our genetic data in zebrafish in which we observed a tight genetic interaction between zangptls and notch (Figure 2), we believe that zangptls exert their effects on definitive hematopoiesis during the vascular specifications of the axial vessels including the DA, when it coincides with the highest endogenous expression of zangptl2 (Figure 1—figure supplement 1B). Though it remains to be determined, information on the spatial/temporal expression pattern of the yet unidentified zangptl receptor would solidify this premise. There are receptors in zebrafish with similar domains as the mammalian receptor, but there is no obvious orthologue. Nevertheless, our current proposed model (Figure 7A) extrapolated from our genetic data places zangptl2 downstream of mib as Tg(hsp70:zangptl2) crossed into mib can rescue its hematopoietic defect (Figure 2C). Zangptl2 acts upstream of notch activation, that is, generation of NICD, as forced expression of NICD from Tg(hsp70:Gal4;UAS:NICD) can rescue angptls-MO morphant phenotype (Figure 2B). Interestingly, loss of notch signaling in angptls-MO-injected notch reporter embryos (Figure 2A) indicates that zangptls are required for notch signaling but also raises questions as to whether notch ligands needed to be present for zangptls to regulate notch activation. One of the notch ligands, deltaC, has considerable overlapping expression both spatially and temporally with notch in the developing DA, suggesting that it may play a role during the formation of the hemogenic endothelium and the subsequent generation of HSPCs. DeltaC expression, normally absent in the DA of mib was similarly rescued in Tg(hsp70:zangptl2);mib (data not shown). This restoration of notch ligand in the mib by zangptl2 overexpression was intriguing, and it remains to be established whether this restored notch ligand is functional in the absence of mib.

Figure 7

Download asset Open asset

To examine potential downstream signaling from angptls and notch, we looked at the previously identified target of notch, myc. The relationship between NOTCH and MYC has been best studied in T-ALL cells whereby MYC transduces growth and survival signals to many NOTCH-dependent T-ALL cell lines and forced ectopic expression of MYC can restore the leukemogenic signals for these cells in instances when NOTCH is inhibited (Palomero et al., 2006; Weng et al., 2006; Chan et al., 2007). However, myc has not been studied in zebrafish hematopoiesis. We found that not only is myc required during HSPC formation in the AGM (Figure 4A), overexpression of exogenous myc in embryos lacking zangptls (angptls-MO) or notch (mib) signaling could similarly rescue AGM defects (Figure 4C,B). This puts myc downstream of zangptls and notch signaling. Through independent gene expression analysis, we found MYC to be highly activated upon ANGPTL2 stimulation in human CD34⁺ progenitor cells (Figure 4D). Furthermore, we ran GSEA comparing our ANGPTL2-induced gene expression signature to the set of MYC target genes whose regulatory elements were bound by NOTCH from our ChIP-seq data and found significant overlap (Figure 4E). This implies that the set of MYC targets downstream of ANGPTL2 and NOTCH signaling is highly similar, supporting our hypothesis that ANGPTL may signal partially through NOTCH.

To test this hypothesis, we utilized cultured mammalian cells to directly investigate the mechanism by which ANGPTL2 may act on NOTCH. We first discovered that purified ANGPTL2 ligand added to cells can rapidly induce NOTCH activation, measurable using three different assays: a luciferase reporter assay (Figure 5—figure supplement 1A), qPCR of known NOTCH target genes (Figure 5B and Figure 5—figure supplement 1B), and Western blotting for the NOTCH cleavage product NICD (Figure 5A). Of particular note, when we used different drugs that block certain cleavage events, we found that ANGPTL2-stimulated S2 cleavage of NOTCH (Figure 5C). Interestingly, this step occurs at the cell surface when NOTCH engages with its ligands. Although the precise mechanism in which ANGPTL2 mediates NOTCH cleavage is subject to further investigation, our assumption that this level of regulation must occur in close proximity led to our surprising discovery that human ANGPTL2 receptor, LILRB2, can interact with NOTCH (Figure 6A–D and Figure 6—figure supplement 1,2). These preliminary results from co-IPs certainly suggest that ANGPTL signaling occurs in very close proximity to NOTCH. Such co-IP experiments do not definitively signify that there is direct physical interaction and do not address the stoichiometry of this potential interaction. Nevertheless, ANGPTL2-mediated NOTCH cleavage appears to be dependent on LILRB2 signaling, as sh-LILRB2 knockdown resulted in diminished NICD generation (Figure 6E). This demonstrates a functional interaction. A more thorough mapping of the interactions between these two surface receptors will shed light on the mechanism by which ANGPTL2 can regulate NOTCH activation. An attractive speculation as to why this interaction may occur would be to potentially facilitate or even poise the NOTCH receptor for more efficient cleavage, as depicted in the model proposed in Figure 7B. This also raises an intriguing possibility of whether LILRB2 can physically alter NOTCH interaction with its ligand or whether ANGPTL2 signaling can influence NOTCH ligand availability. Indeed several studies have suggested that Notch receptors oligomerize at the cell surface at sites of DSL ligand contact from neighboring cells (Luty et al., 2007; Nichols et al., 2007). The recruitment of LILRB2 to NOTCH may facilitate this clustering process although the stoichiometry of LILRB2 to NOTCH remains to be established.

Various alternative non-DSL type ligands have been identified to activate NOTCH, such as the adhesion molecule F3/Contactin (Hu et al., 2003), EGF-repeat factor DNER (Eiraku et al., 2005), EGF-like domain 7 (Schmidt et al., 2009), and Microfibrillar associated glycoproteins (MAGP) 1 and 2 (Miyamoto et al., 2006). Interestingly, a related family member to the latter, MFAP4 was found to be capable of expanding mouse HSPCs ex vivo along with ANGPTLs 2 and 3 (Zhang et al., 2006). Our study does not propose ANGPTL2/LILRB2 as a non-canonical NOTCH ligand but offers an additional layer of regulation on NOTCH activation which may not be previously appreciated.

Previous report on the discovery of ANGPTL receptor, LILRB2, suggested downstream activation of CAMK (calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase)-2 and -4 and subsequent recruitment of SHP-2 (a Src homology 2 domain containing non-transmembrane protein tyrosine phosphatase) in freshly isolated mouse spleen cells (Zheng et al., 2012). CAMK2 has been shown to activate NOTCH in human prostate cancer cells (Mamaeva et al., 2009) whereas SHP-2 has also been shown to genetically interact with notch signaling in Drosophila (Oishi et al., 2006). Although the answer as to whether CAMKs and SHP-2 may directly or indirectly regulate NOTCH is still yet to be determined, this suggests that LILRB2 signaling may extend beyond the models presented in our studies.

The ability of ANGPTLs to regulate the local events at which NOTCH cleavage occurs creates new opportunity for therapeutic intervention. The role of Notch during HSPC renewal at homeostasis is controversial (Bigas et al., 2010). Recent studies demonstrate that endothelial-derived Notch signal can stimulate murine cKit⁺Sca1⁺Lin⁻ cells expansion (Butler et al., 2010). Delta1^ext−IgG, in which the engineered activating NOTCH ligand is tethered to the Fc domain of human IgG1, was developed for ex vivo expansion of human CD34⁺ cord blood (CB) progenitors (Delaney et al., 2005). More recently, Delta1^ext−IgG-expanded HSPCs showed great clinical promise in rapid hematopoietic engraftment with shortened time to neutrophil recovery (Delaney et al., 2010). In support of an interaction between the angptls and notch, preliminary analysis of human CD34⁺ CB progenitors treated with ANGPTL2 or Delta^ext−IgG had comparable expansion in CD34⁺/CD90(Thy-1)^lo populations. Furthermore, these expansions were effectively abrogated when cells were treated with a combination of NOTCH1 and NOTCH2 blocking antibodies, suggesting that they were at least partially NOTCH mediated. This supports that the ANGPTLs and NOTCH can interact in another cell type such as human cord blood CD34⁺ cells. In conclusion, our studies of ANGPTL-mediated activation of NOTCH presented here have uncovered an important genetic, physical, and functional interaction of these two signaling pathways that are critical for hematopoiesis.

1. 1. Lin Michelle I
   2. White Richard M
   3. Zon Leonard I

   (2014) Expression arrays of ANGPTL2-treated CD34 cells

   Publicly available at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE51652).

   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE51652
2. 1. Lin Michelle I
   2. Trompouki Eirini
   3. Zon Leonard I

   (2014) Notch ChIP-seq from ANGPTL2-treated CD34 cells

   Publicly available at NCBI Sequence Read Archive (GSE63010).

   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE63010

1. 1. Bertrand JY
   2. Chi NC
   3. Santoso B
   4. Teng S
   5. Stainier DY
   6. Traver D

   (2010) Haematopoietic stem cells derive directly from aortic endothelium during development

   Nature 464:108–111.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08738

   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Bigas A
   2. Robert-Moreno A
   3. Espinosa L

   (2010) The Notch pathway in the developing hematopoietic system

   The International Journal of Developmental Biology 54:1175–1188.

   https://doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.093049ab

   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Boisset JC
   2. van Cappellen W
   3. Andrieu-Soler C
   4. Galjart N
   5. Dzierzak E
   6. Robin C

   (2010) In vivo imaging of haematopoietic cells emerging from the mouse aortic endothelium

   Nature 464:116–120.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08764

   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Burns CE
   2. Traver D
   3. Mayhall E
   4. Shepard JL
   5. Zon LI

   (2005) Hematopoietic stem cell fate is established by the Notch-Runx pathway

   Genes & Development 19:2331–2342.

   https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1337005

   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Butler JM
   2. Nolan DJ
   3. Vertes EL
   4. Varnum-Finney B
   5. Kobayashi H
   6. Hooper AT
   7. Seandel M
   8. Shido K
   9. White IA
   10. Kobayashi M
   11. Witte L
   12. May C
   13. Shawber C
   14. Kimura Y
   15. Kitajewski J
   16. Rosenwaks Z
   17. Bernstein ID
   18. Rafii S

   (2010) Endothelial cells are essential for the self-renewal and repopulation of Notch-dependent hematopoietic stem cells

   Cell Stem Cell 6:251–264.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2010.02.001

   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Chan SM
   2. Weng AP
   3. Tibshirani R
   4. Aster JC
   5. Utz PJ

   (2007) Notch signals positively regulate activity of the mTOR pathway in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

   Blood 110:278–286.

   https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2006-08-039883

   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Chi NC
   2. Shaw RM
   3. De Val S
   4. Kang G
   5. Jan LY
   6. Black BL
   7. Stainier DY

   (2008) Foxn4 directly regulates tbx2b expression and atrioventricular canal formation

   Genes & Development 22:734–739.

   https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1629408

   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Clements WK
   2. Kim AD
   3. Ong KG
   4. Moore JC
   5. Lawson ND
   6. Traver D

   (2011) A somitic Wnt16/Notch pathway specifies haematopoietic stem cells

   Nature 474:220–224.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10107

   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Davidson AJ
   2. Zon LI

   (2004) The ‘definitive’ (and ‘primitive’) guide to zebrafish hematopoiesis

   Oncogene 23:7233–7246.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207943

   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Delaney C
    2. Heimfeld S
    3. Brashem-Stein C
    4. Voorhies H
    5. Manger RL
    6. Bernstein ID

    (2010) Notch-mediated expansion of human cord blood progenitor cells capable of rapid myeloid reconstitution

    Nature Medicine 16:232–236.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2080

    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Delaney C
    2. Varnum-Finney B
    3. Aoyama K
    4. Brashem-Stein C
    5. Bernstein ID

    (2005) Dose-dependent effects of the Notch ligand Delta1 on ex vivo differentiation and in vivo marrow repopulating ability of cord blood cells

    Blood 106:2693–2699.

    https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2005-03-1131

    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Detrich HW III
    2. Kieran MW
    3. Chan FY
    4. Barone LM
    5. Yee K
    6. Rundstadler JA
    7. Pratt S
    8. Ransom D
    9. Zon LI

    (1995) Intraembryonic hematopoietic cell migration during vertebrate development

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 92:10713–10717.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.23.10713

    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Dieterlen-Lievre F

    (1975)

    On the origin of haemopoietic stem cells in the avian embryo: an experimental approach

    Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology 33:607–619.

    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Dooley KA
    2. Davidson AJ
    3. Zon LI

    (2005) Zebrafish scl functions independently in hematopoietic and endothelial development

    Developmental Biology 277:522–536.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.09.004

    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Eiraku M
    2. Tohgo A
    3. Ono K
    4. Kaneko M
    5. Fujishima K
    6. Hirano T
    7. Kengaku M

    (2005) DNER acts as a neuron-specific Notch ligand during Bergmann glial development

    Nature Neuroscience 8:873–880.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1492

    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Ema H
    2. Nakauchi H

    (2000)

    Expansion of hematopoietic stem cells in the developing liver of a mouse embryo

    Blood 95:2284–2288.

    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Fan X
    2. Gay FP
    3. Lim FW
    4. Ang JM
    5. Chu PP
    6. Bari S
    7. Hwang WY

    (2014) Low-dose insulin-like growth factor binding proteins 1 and 2 and angiopoietin-like protein 3 coordinately stimulate ex vivo expansion of human umbilical cord blood hematopoietic stem cells as assayed in NOD/SCID gamma null mice

    Stem Cell Research & Therapy 5:71.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/scrt460

    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Farahbakhshian E
    2. Verstegen MM
    3. Visser TP
    4. Kheradmandkia S
    5. Geerts D
    6. Arshad S
    7. Riaz N
    8. Grosveld F
    9. van Til NP
    10. Meijerink JP

    (2014) Angiopoietin-like protein 3 promotes preservation of stemness during ex vivo expansion of murine hematopoietic stem cells

    PLOS ONE 9:e105642.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105642

    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Fortini ME

    (2009) Notch signaling: the core pathway and its posttranslational regulation

    Developmental Cell 16:633–647.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2009.03.010

    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Guenther MG
    2. Lawton LN
    3. Rozovskaia T
    4. Frampton GM
    5. Levine SS
    6. Volkert TL
    7. Croce CM
    8. Nakamura T
    9. Canaani E
    10. Young RA

    (2008) Aberrant chromatin at genes encoding stem cell regulators in human mixed-lineage leukemia

    Genes & Development 22:3403–3408.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1741408

    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Guiu J
    2. Shimizu R
    3. D'Altri T
    4. Fraser ST
    5. Hatakeyama J
    6. Bresnick EH
    7. Kageyama R
    8. Dzierzak E
    9. Yamamoto M
    10. Espinosa L
    11. Bigas A

    (2013) Hes repressors are essential regulators of hematopoietic stem cell development downstream of Notch signaling

    The Journal of Experimental Medicine 210:71–84.

    https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20120993

    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Hadland BK
    2. Huppert SS
    3. Kanungo J
    4. Xue Y
    5. Jiang R
    6. Gridley T
    7. Conlon RA
    8. Cheng AM
    9. Kopan R
    10. Longmore GD

    (2004) A requirement for Notch1 distinguishes 2 phases of definitive hematopoiesis during development

    Blood 104:3097–3105.

    https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2004-03-1224

    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Hato T
    2. Tabata M
    3. Oike Y

    (2008) The role of angiopoietin-like proteins in angiogenesis and metabolism

    Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine 18:6–14.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcm.2007.10.003

    • Google Scholar
24. 1. He C
    2. Hu H
    3. Braren R
    4. Fong SY
    5. Trumpp A
    6. Carlson TR
    7. Wang RA

    (2008) c-myc in the hematopoietic lineage is crucial for its angiogenic function in the mouse embryo

    Development 135:2467–2477.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.020131

    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Hu QD
    2. Ang BT
    3. Karsak M
    4. Hu WP
    5. Cui XY
    6. Duka T
    7. Takeda Y
    8. Chia W
    9. Sankar N
    10. Ng YK
    11. Ling EA
    12. Maciag T
    13. Small D
    14. Trifonova R
    15. Kopan R
    16. Okano H
    17. Nakafuku M
    18. Chiba S
    19. Hirai H
    20. Aster JC
    21. Schachner M
    22. Pallen CJ
    23. Watanabe K
    24. Xiao ZC

    (2003) F3/contactin acts as a functional ligand for Notch during oligodendrocyte maturation

    Cell 115:163–175.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00810-9

    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Itoh M
    2. Kim CH
    3. Palardy G
    4. Oda T
    5. Jiang YJ
    6. Maust D
    7. Yeo SY
    8. Lorick K
    9. Wright GJ
    10. Ariza-McNaughton L
    11. Weissman AM
    12. Lewis J
    13. Chandrasekharappa SC
    14. Chitnis AB

    (2003) Mind bomb is a ubiquitin ligase that is essential for efficient activation of Notch signaling by Delta

    Developmental Cell 4:67–82.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00409-4

    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Jaffredo T
    2. Gautier R
    3. Eichmann A
    4. Dieterlen-Lièvre F

    (1998)

    Intraaortic hemopoietic cells are derived from endothelial cells during ontogeny

    Development 125:4575–4583.

    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Jiang YJ
    2. Brand M
    3. Heisenberg CP
    4. Beuchle D
    5. Furutani-Seiki M
    6. Kelsh RN
    7. Warga RM
    8. Granato M
    9. Haffter P
    10. Hammerschmidt M
    11. Kane DA
    12. Mullins MC
    13. Odenthal J
    14. van Eeden FJ
    15. Nüsslein-Volhard C

    (1996)

    Mutations affecting neurogenesis and brain morphology in the zebrafish, Danio rerio

    Development 123:205–216.

    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Johnson DS
    2. Mortazavi A
    3. Myers RM
    4. Wold B

    (2007) Genome-wide mapping of in vivo protein-DNA interactions

    Science 316:1497–1502.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1141319

    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Khoury M
    2. Drake A
    3. Chen Q
    4. Dong D
    5. Leskov I
    6. Fragoso MF
    7. Li Y
    8. Iliopoulou BP
    9. Hwang W
    10. Lodish HF
    11. Chen J

    (2011) Mesenchymal stem cells secreting angiopoietin-like-5 support efficient expansion of human hematopoietic stem cells without compromising their repopulating potential

    Stem Cells and Development 20:1371–1381.

    https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2010.0456

    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Kim I
    2. Kim HG
    3. Kim H
    4. Kim HH
    5. Park SK
    6. Uhm CS
    7. Lee ZH
    8. Koh GY

    (2000) Hepatic expression, synthesis and secretion of a novel fibrinogen/angiopoietin-related protein that prevents endothelial-cell apoptosis

    The Biochemical Journal 346:603–610.

    https://doi.org/10.1042/0264-6021:3460603

    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Kim I
    2. Moon SO
    3. Koh KN
    4. Kim H
    5. Uhm CS
    6. Kwak HJ
    7. Kim NG
    8. Koh GY

    (1999) Molecular cloning, expression, and characterization of angiopoietin-related protein. angiopoietin-related protein induces endothelial cell sprouting

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 274:26523–26528.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.37.26523

    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Kissa K
    2. Herbomel P

    (2010) Blood stem cells emerge from aortic endothelium by a novel type of cell transition

    Nature 464:112–115.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08761

    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Kobayashi I
    2. Kobayashi-Sun J
    3. Kim AD
    4. Pouget C
    5. Fujita N
    6. Suda T
    7. Traver D

    (2014) Jam1a-Jam2a interactions regulate haematopoietic stem cell fate through Notch signalling

    Nature 512:319–323.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13623

    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Kopan R
    2. Ilagan MX

    (2009) The canonical Notch signaling pathway: unfolding the activation mechanism

    Cell 137:216–233.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.03.045

    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Kubota Y
    2. Oike Y
    3. Satoh S
    4. Tabata Y
    5. Niikura Y
    6. Morisada T
    7. Akao M
    8. Urano T
    9. Ito Y
    10. Miyamoto T
    11. Nagai N
    12. Koh GY
    13. Watanabe S
    14. Suda T

    (2005) Cooperative interaction of Angiopoietin-like proteins 1 and 2 in zebrafish vascular development

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 102:13502–13507.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0501902102

    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Kumano K
    2. Chiba S
    3. Kunisato A
    4. Sata M
    5. Saito T
    6. Nakagami-Yamaguchi E
    7. Yamaguchi T
    8. Masuda S
    9. Shimizu K
    10. Takahashi T

    et al. (2003) Notch1 but not Notch2 is essential for generating hematopoietic stem cells from endothelial cells

    Immunity 18:699–711.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1074-7613(03)00117-1

    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Kwan KM
    2. Fujimoto E
    3. Grabher C
    4. Mangum BD
    5. Hardy ME
    6. Campbell DS
    7. Parant JM
    8. Yost HJ
    9. Kanki JP
    10. Chien CB

    (2007) The Tol2kit: a multisite gateway-based construction kit for Tol2 transposon transgenesis constructs

    Developmental Dynamics 236:3088–3099.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.21343

    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Laurenti E
    2. Varnum-Finney B
    3. Wilson A
    4. Ferrero I
    5. Blanco-Bose WE
    6. Ehninger A
    7. Knoepfler PS
    8. Cheng PF
    9. MacDonald HR
    10. Eisenman RN
    11. Bernstein ID
    12. Trumpp A

    (2008) Hematopoietic stem cell function and survival depend on c-myc and N-myc activity

    Cell Stem Cell 3:611–624.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2008.09.005

    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Lawson ND
    2. Scheer N
    3. Pham VN
    4. Kim CH
    5. Chitnis AB
    6. Campos-Ortega JA
    7. Weinstein BM

    (2001)

    Notch signaling is required for arterial-venous differentiation during embryonic vascular development

    Development 128:3675–3683.

    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Luty WH
    2. Rodeberg D
    3. Parness J
    4. Vyas YM

    (2007) Antiparallel segregation of notch components in the immunological synapse directs reciprocal signaling in allogeneic Th:DC conjugates

    The Journal of Immunology 179:819–829.

    https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.179.2.819

    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Mamaeva OA
    2. Kim J
    3. Feng G
    4. McDonald JM

    (2009) Calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase II regulates notch-1 signaling in prostate cancer cells

    Journal of Cellular Biochemistry 106:25–32.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.21973

    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Marson A
    2. Levine SS
    3. Cole MF
    4. Frampton GM
    5. Brambrink T
    6. Johnstone S
    7. Guenther MG
    8. Johnston WK
    9. Wernig M
    10. Newman J
    11. Calabrese JM
    12. Dennis LM
    13. Volkert TL
    14. Gupta S
    15. Love J
    16. Hannett N
    17. Sharp PA
    18. Bartel DP
    19. Jaenisch R
    20. Young RA

    (2008) Connecting microRNA genes to the core transcriptional regulatory circuitry of embryonic stem cells

    Cell 134:521–533.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.020

    • Google Scholar
44. 1. McLean CY
    2. Bristor D
    3. Hiller M
    4. Clarke SL
    5. Schaar BT
    6. Lowe CB
    7. Wenger AM
    8. Bejerano G

    (2010) GREAT improves functional interpretation of cis-regulatory regions

    Nature Biotechnology 28:495–501.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1630

    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Medvinsky A
    2. Dzierzak E

    (1996) Definitive hematopoiesis is autonomously initiated by the AGM region

    Cell 86:897–906.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80165-8

    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Minegishi N
    2. Suzuki N
    3. Yokomizo T
    4. Pan X
    5. Fujimoto T
    6. Takahashi S
    7. Hara T
    8. Miyajima A
    9. Nishikawa S
    10. Yamamoto M

    (2003) Expression and domain-specific function of GATA-2 during differentiation of the hematopoietic precursor cells in midgestation mouse embryos

    Blood 102:896–905.

    https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2002-12-3809

    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Miyamoto A
    2. Lau R
    3. Hein PW
    4. Shipley JM
    5. Weinmaster G

    (2006) Microfibrillar proteins MAGP-1 and MAGP-2 induce Notch1 extracellular domain dissociation and receptor activation

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 281:10089–10097.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M600298200

    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Nichols JT
    2. Miyamoto A
    3. Olsen SL
    4. D'Souza B
    5. Yao C
    6. Weinmaster G

    (2007) DSL ligand endocytosis physically dissociates Notch1 heterodimers before activating proteolysis can occur

    The Journal of Cell Biology 176:445–458.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200609014

    • Google Scholar
49. 1. North TE
    2. de Bruijn MF
    3. Stacy T
    4. Talebian L
    5. Lind E
    6. Robin C
    7. Binder M
    8. Dzierzak E
    9. Speck NA

    (2002) Runx1 expression marks long-term repopulating hematopoietic stem cells in the midgestation mouse embryo

    Immunity 16:661–672.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1074-7613(02)00296-0

    • Google Scholar
50. 1. North TE
    2. Goessling W
    3. Walkley CR
    4. Lengerke C
    5. Kopani KR
    6. Lord AM
    7. Weber GJ
    8. Bowman TV
    9. Jang IH
    10. Grosser T
    11. Fitzgerald GA
    12. Daley GQ
    13. Orkin SH
    14. Zon LI

    (2007) Prostaglandin E2 regulates vertebrate haematopoietic stem cell homeostasis

    Nature 447:1007–1011.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05883

    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Nottingham WT
    2. Jarratt A
    3. Burgess M
    4. Speck CL
    5. Cheng JF
    6. Prabhakar S
    7. Rubin EM
    8. Li PS
    9. Sloane-Stanley J
    10. Kong-A-San J
    11. de Bruijn MF

    (2007) Runx1-mediated hematopoietic stem-cell emergence is controlled by a Gata/Ets/SCL-regulated enhancer

    Blood 110:4188–4197.

    https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2007-07-100883

    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Oike Y
    2. Ito Y
    3. Maekawa H
    4. Morisada T
    5. Kubota Y
    6. Akao M
    7. Urano T
    8. Yasunaga K
    9. Suda T

    (2004) Angiopoietin-related growth factor (AGF) promotes angiogenesis

    Blood 103:3760–3765.

    https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2003-04-1272

    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Oishi K
    2. Gaengel K
    3. Krishnamoorthy S
    4. Kamiya K
    5. Kim IK
    6. Ying H
    7. Weber U
    8. Perkins LA
    9. Tartaglia M
    10. Mlodzik M
    11. Pick L
    12. Gelb BD

    (2006) Transgenic Drosophila models of Noonan syndrome causing PTPN11 gain-of-function mutations

    Human Molecular Genetics 15:543–553.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddi471

    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Orkin SH
    2. Zon LI

    (2008) Hematopoiesis: an evolving paradigm for stem cell biology

    Cell 132:631–644.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.025

    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Palomero T
    2. Lim WK
    3. Odom DT
    4. Sulis ML
    5. Real PJ
    6. Margolin A
    7. Barnes KC
    8. O'Neil J
    9. Neuberg D
    10. Weng AP
    11. Aster JC
    12. Sigaux F
    13. Soulier J
    14. Look AT
    15. Young RA
    16. Califano A
    17. Ferrando AA

    (2006) NOTCH1 directly regulates c-MYC and activates a feed-forward-loop transcriptional network promoting leukemic cell growth

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 103:18261–18266.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0606108103

    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Parsons MJ
    2. Pisharath H
    3. Yusuff S
    4. Moore JC
    5. Siekmann AF
    6. Lawson N
    7. Leach SD

    (2009) Notch-responsive cells initiate the secondary transition in larval zebrafish pancreas

    Mechanisms of Development 126:898–912.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mod.2009.07.002

    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Robert-Moreno A
    2. Espinosa L
    3. de la Pompa JL
    4. Bigas A

    (2005) RBPjkappa-dependent Notch function regulates Gata2 and is essential for the formation of intra-embryonic hematopoietic cells

    Development 132:1117–1126.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.01660

    • Google Scholar
58. 1. Robert-Moreno A
    2. Guiu J
    3. Ruiz-Herguido C
    4. López ME
    5. Inglés-Esteve J
    6. Riera L
    7. Tipping A
    8. Enver T
    9. Dzierzak E
    10. Gridley T
    11. Espinosa L
    12. Bigas A

    (2008) Impaired embryonic haematopoiesis yet normal arterial development in the absence of the Notch ligand Jagged1

    The EMBO Journal 27:1886–1895.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2008.113

    • Google Scholar
59. 1. Rottbauer W
    2. Saurin AJ
    3. Lickert H
    4. Shen X
    5. Burns CG
    6. Wo ZG
    7. Kemler R
    8. Kingston R
    9. Wu C
    10. Fishman M

    (2002) Reptin and pontin antagonistically regulate heart growth in zebrafish embryos

    Cell 111:661–672.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01112-1

    • Google Scholar
60. 1. Scheer N
    2. Groth A
    3. Hans S
    4. Campos-Ortega JA

    (2001)

    An instructive function for Notch in promoting gliogenesis in the zebrafish retina

    Development 128:1099–1107.

    • Google Scholar
61. 1. Schmidt MH
    2. Bicker F
    3. Nikolic I
    4. Meister J
    5. Babuke T
    6. Picuric S
    7. Müller-Esterl W
    8. Plate KH
    9. Dikic I

    (2009) Epidermal growth factor-like domain 7 (EGFL7) modulates Notch signalling and affects neural stem cell renewal

    Nature Cell Biology 11:873–880.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1896

    • Google Scholar
62. 1. Tabata M
    2. Kadomatsu T
    3. Fukuhara S
    4. Miyata K
    5. Ito Y
    6. Endo M
    7. Urano T
    8. Zhu HJ
    9. Tsukano H
    10. Tazume H
    11. Kaikita K
    12. Miyashita K
    13. Iwawaki T
    14. Shimabukuro M
    15. Sakaguchi K
    16. Ito T
    17. Nakagata N
    18. Yamada T
    19. Katagiri H
    20. Kasuga M
    21. Ando Y
    22. Ogawa H
    23. Mochizuki N
    24. Itoh H
    25. Suda T
    26. Oike Y

    (2009) Angiopoietin-like protein 2 promotes chronic adipose tissue inflammation and obesity-related systemic insulin resistance

    Cell Metabolism 10:178–188.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2009.08.003

    • Google Scholar
63. 1. Tamplin OJ
    2. Durand EM
    3. Carr LA
    4. Childs SJ
    5. Hagedorn EJ
    6. Li P
    7. Yzaguirre AD
    8. Speck NA
    9. Zon LI

    (2015) Hematopoietic stem cell arrival triggers dynamic remodeling of the perivascular niche

    Cell 160:241–252.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.12.032

    • Google Scholar
64. 1. Tavian M
    2. Coulombel L
    3. Luton D
    4. Clemente HS
    5. Dieterlen-Lièvre F
    6. Péault B

    (1996)

    Aorta-associated CD34+ hematopoietic cells in the early human embryo

    Blood 87:67–72.

    • Google Scholar
65. 1. Thisse C
    2. Thisse B

    (2008) High-resolution in situ hybridization to whole-mount zebrafish embryos

    Nature Protocols 3:59–69.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.514

    • Google Scholar
66. 1. Trompouki E
    2. Bowman TV
    3. Lawton LN
    4. Fan ZP
    5. Wu DC
    6. DiBiase A
    7. Martin CS
    8. Cech JN
    9. Sessa AK
    10. Leblanc JL
    11. Li P
    12. Durand EM
    13. Mosimann C
    14. Heffner GC
    15. Daley GQ
    16. Paulson RF
    17. Young RA
    18. Zon LI

    (2011) Lineage regulators direct BMP and Wnt pathways to cell-specific programs during differentiation and regeneration

    Cell 147:577–589.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.09.044

    • Google Scholar
67. 1. Ventura Ferreira MS
    2. Labude N
    3. Walenda G
    4. Adamzyk C
    5. Wagner W
    6. Piroth D
    7. Muller AM
    8. Knuchel R
    9. Hieronymus T
    10. Zenke M
    11. Jahnen-Dechent W
    12. Neuss S

    (2013) Ex vivo expansion of cord blood-CD34(+) cells using IGFBP2 and Angptl-5 impairs short-term lymphoid repopulation in vivo

    Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine 7:944–954.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/term.1486

    • Google Scholar
68. 1. Wang H
    2. Zou J
    3. Zhao B
    4. Johannsen E
    5. Ashworth T
    6. Wong H
    7. Pear WS
    8. Schug J
    9. Blacklow SC
    10. Arnett KL
    11. Bernstein BE
    12. Kieff E
    13. Aster JC

    (2011) Genome-wide analysis reveals conserved and divergent features of Notch1/RBPJ binding in human and murine T-lymphoblastic leukemia cells

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 108:14908–14913.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1109023108

    • Google Scholar
69. 1. Weng AP
    2. Millholland JM
    3. Yashiro-Ohtani Y
    4. Arcangeli ML
    5. Lau A
    6. Wai C
    7. Del Bianco C
    8. Rodriguez CG
    9. Sai H
    10. Tobias J
    11. Li Y
    12. Wolfe MS
    13. Shachaf C
    14. Felsher D
    15. Blacklow SC
    16. Pear WS
    17. Aster JC

    (2006) c-Myc is an important direct target of Notch1 in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma

    Genes & Development 20:2096–2109.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1450406

    • Google Scholar
70. 1. White RM
    2. Sessa A
    3. Burke C
    4. Bowman T
    5. LeBlanc J
    6. Ceol C
    7. Bourque C
    8. Dovey M
    9. Goessling W
    10. Burns CE
    11. Zon LI

    (2008) Transparent adult zebrafish as a tool for in vivo transplantation analysis

    Cell Stem Cell 2:183–189.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2007.11.002

    • Google Scholar
71. 1. Wilson A
    2. Murphy MJ
    3. Oskarsson T
    4. Kaloulis K
    5. Bettess MD
    6. Oser GM
    7. Pasche AC
    8. Knabenhans C
    9. Macdonald HR
    10. Trumpp A

    (2004) c-Myc controls the balance between hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and differentiation

    Genes & Development 18:2747–2763.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.313104

    • Google Scholar
72. 1. Zhang CC
    2. Kaba M
    3. Ge G
    4. Xie K
    5. Tong W
    6. Hug C
    7. Lodish HF

    (2006) Angiopoietin-like proteins stimulate ex vivo expansion of hematopoietic stem cells

    Nature Medicine 12:240–245.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1342

    • Google Scholar
73. 1. Zhang CC
    2. Kaba M
    3. Iizuka S
    4. Huynh H
    5. Lodish HF

    (2008) Angiopoietin-like 5 and IGFBP2 stimulate ex vivo expansion of human cord blood hematopoietic stem cells as assayed by NOD/SCID transplantation

    Blood 111:3415–3423.

    https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2007-11-122119

    • Google Scholar
74. 1. Zheng J
    2. Huynh H
    3. Umikawa M
    4. Silvany R
    5. Zhang CC

    (2011) Angiopoietin-like protein 3 supports the activity of hematopoietic stem cells in the bone marrow niche

    Blood 117:470–479.

    https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-06-291716

    • Google Scholar
75. 1. Zheng J
    2. Umikawa M
    3. Cui C
    4. Li J
    5. Chen X
    6. Zhang C
    7. Huynh H
    8. Kang X
    9. Silvany R
    10. Wan X
    11. Ye J
    12. Cantó AP
    13. Chen SH
    14. Wang HY
    15. Ward ES
    16. Zhang CC

    (2012) Inhibitory receptors bind ANGPTLs and support blood stem cells and leukaemia development

    Nature 485:656–660.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11095

    • Google Scholar
76. 1. Zhu H
    2. Traver D
    3. Davidson AJ
    4. Dibiase A
    5. Thisse C
    6. Thisse B
    7. Nimer S
    8. Zon LI

    (2005) Regulation of the lmo2 promoter during hematopoietic and vascular development in zebrafish

    Developmental Biology 281:256–269.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.01.034

    • Google Scholar
77. 1. Zhu P
    2. Tan MJ
    3. Huang RL
    4. Tan CK
    5. Chong HC
    6. Pal M
    7. Lam CR
    8. Boukamp P
    9. Pan JY
    10. Tan SH
    11. Kersten S
    12. Li HY
    13. Ding JL
    14. Tan NS

    (2011) Angiopoietin-like 4 protein elevates the prosurvival intracellular O2(-):H2O2 ratio and confers anoikis resistance to tumors

    Cancer Cell 19:401–415.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2011.01.018

    • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Michelle I Lin

   Stem Cell Program and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Boston's Children's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States

   Contribution

   MIL, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared.

2. Emily N Price

   Stem Cell Program and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Boston's Children's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States

   Contribution

   ENP, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared.

3. Sonja Boatman

   Stem Cell Program and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Boston's Children's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States

   Contribution

   SB, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared.

4. Elliott J Hagedorn

   Stem Cell Program and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Boston's Children's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States

   Contribution

   EJH, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared.

5. Eirini Trompouki

   Stem Cell Program and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Boston's Children's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States

   Contribution

   ET, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared.

6. Sruthi Satishchandran

   Stem Cell Program and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Boston's Children's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States

   Contribution

   SS, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared.

7. Charles W Carspecken

   Stem Cell Program and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Boston's Children's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States

   Contribution

   CWC, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared.

8. Audrey Uong

   Stem Cell Program and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Boston's Children's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States

   Contribution

   AU, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared.

9. Anthony DiBiase

   Stem Cell Program and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Boston's Children's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States

   Contribution

   ADB, Bioinformatics analysis

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared.

10. Song Yang

    Stem Cell Program and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Boston's Children's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States

    Contribution

    SY, Bioinformatics analysis

    Competing interests

    No competing interests declared.

11. Matthew C Canver

    Stem Cell Program and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Boston's Children's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States

    Contribution

    MCC, Acquisition of data, Contributed unpublished essential data or reagents

    Competing interests

    No competing interests declared.

12. Ann Dahlberg

    Pediatric Oncology, Clinical Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States

    Contribution

    AD, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data

    Competing interests

    No competing interests declared.

13. Zhigang Lu

    1. Department of Physiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    2. Department of Developmental Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States

    Contribution

    ZL, Provided reagents and useful information

    Competing interests

    No competing interests declared.

14. Cheng Cheng Zhang

    1. Department of Developmental Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    2. Department of Physiology and Developmental Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States

    Contribution

    CCZ, Provided reagents and useful information, Drafting or revising the article

    Competing interests

    No competing interests declared.

15. Stuart H Orkin

    1. Stem Cell Program and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Boston's Children's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    2. Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States

    Contribution

    SHO, Drafting or revising the article, Contributed unpublished essential data or reagents

    Competing interests

    No competing interests declared.

16. Irwin D Bernstein

    Pediatric Oncology, Clinical Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States

    Contribution

    IDB, Drafting or revising the article, Contributed unpublished essential data or reagents

    Competing interests

    No competing interests declared.

17. Jon C Aster

    Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, United States

    Contribution

    JCA, Provided reagents and useful information, Conception and design, Drafting or revising the article

    Competing interests

    No competing interests declared.

18. Richard M White

    1. Department of Cancer Biology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
    2. Department of Genetics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
    3. Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States

    Contribution

    RMW, Conception and design, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article

    Competing interests

    No competing interests declared.

19. Leonard I Zon

    Stem Cell Program and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Boston's Children's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States

    Contribution

    LIZ, Conception and design, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article

    For correspondence

    zon@enders.tch.harvard.edu

    Competing interests

    LIZ: I am a founder and stockholder of Fate, Inc. and Scholar Rock, and a scientific advisor for Stemgent.

• 2,856

  views

• 745

  downloads

• 29

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.