Oxyntomodulin regulates resetting of the liver circadian clock by food

  1. Dominic Landgraf
  2. Anthony H Tsang
  3. Alexei Leliavski
  4. Christiane E Koch
  5. Johanna L Barclay
  6. Daniel J Drucker
  7. Henrik Oster  Is a corresponding author
  1. Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Germany
  2. University of Lübeck, Germany
  3. University of Toronto, Canada

Decision letter

  1. Louis Ptáček
    Reviewing Editor; University of California, San Francisco, United States

eLife posts the editorial decision letter and author response on a selection of the published articles (subject to the approval of the authors). An edited version of the letter sent to the authors after peer review is shown, indicating the substantive concerns or comments; minor concerns are not usually shown. Reviewers have the opportunity to discuss the decision before the letter is sent (see review process). Similarly, the author response typically shows only responses to the major concerns raised by the reviewers.

Thank you for sending your work entitled “Oxyntomodulin regulates resetting of the liver circadian clock by food” for consideration at eLife. Your article has been favorably evaluated by Janet Rossant (Senior editor) and 3 reviewers, one of whom, Louis Ptacek, is a member of our Board of Reviewing Editors.

The Reviewing editor and the other reviewers discussed their comments before we reached this decision, and the Reviewing editor has assembled the following comments to help you prepare a revised submission.

The findings in this paper strongly point to a physiological role of OXM in the regulation of the liver circadian clock that arises following the ingestion of food. This study complements earlier work by other groups that examine how corticosterone or body temperature can synchronize clocks in peripheral tissues. OXM has not been implicated in this process and this study demonstrates a new role for this neuropeptide. Moreover, the findings also point to unusual receptor signaling mechanisms as underpinning the actions of OXM in the liver.

Minor comments:

1) How do the doses of OXM used in this study compare to what is known regarding the physiological concentrations of OXM?

2) Mice generally eat most during the lights-off phase, but will occasionally spontaneously eat small meals and water during the lights-on phase. Does this mean then that the release of a critical liver resetting concentration of OXM is only achieved when substantially more food is consumed during the day than is typical?

3) Are the effects of OXM on Per2 in the liver always indicative of induction? There seems to be some variation from one experiment to another or possible alternative interpretations.

4) A statement in the Methods on how the results were statistically analysed would be helpful, e.g. what statistics software package was used, significance levels used etc. Also, why not report F-values and Deg. of Freedom in the figure captions?

5) What is known about the cycling of OXM transcript in the gut? Does this vary circadianly in the absence of food intake?

6) It would be informative to include representative examples of bioluminescence rhythms from the liver slices, showing the phase shift effect of OXM. This would make it clearer to a reader not familiar with such experiments.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06253.014

Author response

1) How do the doses of OXM used in this study compare to what is known regarding the physiological concentrations of OXM?

We have added a new supplemental figure (Figure 6–figure supplement 1) in which we measure blood OLI levels after i.v. and i.p. injection as used in this paper. When one compares these to the refeeding data (Figure 6C), it becomes clear that the OXM concentrations after injection are around 2-3 fold higher than after re-feeding. We added this information into the subsection of the Results headed “Food intake-mediated OXM induction and liver clock resetting”.

2) Mice generally eat most during the lights-off phase, but will occasionally spontaneously eat small meals and water during the lights-on phase. Does this mean then that the release of a critical liver resetting concentration of OXM is only achieved when substantially more food is consumed during the day than is typical?

We now include a new panel in Figure 6 (revised Figure 6A) where we compare blood OLI levels between mice under ad libitum feeding conditions and fasted animals. Overall OLI levels are 20% higher in fed animals (p < 0.001 for feeding condition in a 2-way ANOVA), and the difference is strongest during the lights-off phase. This suggests that even small meals as consumed during the light phase can affect OLI, but the overall variation is too high for this effect to reach significance at any single time point during the lights-on phase. We discuss this in the Discussion section.

3) Are the effects of OXM on Per2 in the liver always indicative of induction? There seems to be some variation from one experiment to another or possible alternative interpretations.

In our hands Per2 induction was consistently observed after OXM treatment. However, without longitudinal measurements (e.g. by using in vivo PER2::LUC recordings as introduced by Saini et al. Genes Dev 2013 Jul 1;27(13):1526-36) occasional non-responders cannot be excluded.

4) A statement in the Methods on how the results were statistically analysed would be helpful, e.g. what statistics software package was used, significance levels used etc. Also, why not report F-values and Deg. of Freedom in the figure captions?

We have added this information (Methods section and in the figure captions).

5) What is known about the cycling of OXM transcript in the gut? Does this vary circadianly in the absence of food intake?

We have measured Gcg mRNA rhythms (as the precursor mRNA of OXM) in the gut under fasting conditions (see Author response image 1) and blood OLI levels under ad libitum food and fasting conditions (revised Figure 6A). mRNA and peptide levels are non-rhythmic under fasting conditions, while under ad libitum feeding OLI is elevated during the dark phase when mice are active and eat most of their food. Since Gcg also gives rise to other peptides besides OXM, we believe that the mRNA data are not very informative for our story and, thus, only mention these data briefly in the main text (in the subsection headed “Food intake-mediated OXM induction and liver clock resetting”)

Author response image 1

Circadian mRNA expression of Gcg and Dbp in the gut of fasted mice. Animals were released into constant darkness and samples were collected at 4 time points under fasting conditions on day 3. While Dbp shows a robust circadian rhythm, Gcg mRNA is expressed at comparable levels throughout the circadian cycle. Data are mean ± SEM (n = 4).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06253.016

6) It would be informative to include representative examples of bioluminescence rhythms from the liver slices, showing the phase shift effect of OXM. This would make it clearer to a reader not familiar with such experiments.

We have added representative bioluminescence traces to Figure 1 to exemplify the data obtained from this type of resetting experiments.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06253.015

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Dominic Landgraf
  2. Anthony H Tsang
  3. Alexei Leliavski
  4. Christiane E Koch
  5. Johanna L Barclay
  6. Daniel J Drucker
  7. Henrik Oster
(2015)
Oxyntomodulin regulates resetting of the liver circadian clock by food
eLife 4:e06253.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06253

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06253