NKX2-5 mutations causative for congenital heart disease retain functionality and are directed to hundreds of targets

Abstract

To model cardiac gene regulatory networks in health and disease we used DamID to establish robust target gene sets for the cardiac homeodomain factor NKX2-5 and two congenital heart disease-associated mutants carrying a crippled homeodomain, which normally functions as DNA- and protein-binding interface. Despite compromised direct DNA-binding, NKX2-5 mutants retained partial functionality and bound hundreds of targets, including NKX2-5 wild type targets and unique sets of 'off-targets'. NKX2-5∆HD, which lacks the entire homeodomain, could still dimerise with wild type NKX2-5 and its cofactors, including newly-discovered cofactors of the ETS family, through the conserved tyrosine-rich domain (YRD). NKX2-5∆HD off-targets showed overrepresentation of many binding motifs, including ETS motifs, the majority co-occupied by ETS proteins as determined by DamID. Off-targets of an NKX2-5 YRD mutant were not enriched in ETS targets. Our study reveals off-target binding and transcriptional activity for NKX2-5 mutations driven in part by cofactor interactions, suggesting a novel type of gain-of-function in congenital heart disease.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Romaric Bouveret

    Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Darlinghurst, Australia
    For correspondence
    r.bouveret@victorchang.edu.au
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Ashley J Waardenberg

    Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Darlinghurst, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Nicole Schonrock

    Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Darlinghurst, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Mirana Ramialison

    Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Darlinghurst, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Tram Doan

    Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Darlinghurst, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Danielle de Jong

    Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Darlinghurst, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Antoine Bondue

    Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Biologie Humaine et Moléculaire, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Gurpreet Kaur

    European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Stephanie Mohamed

    Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Darlinghurst, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Hananeh Fonoudi

    Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Darlinghurst, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Chiann-mun Chen

    Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Merridee Wouters

    Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Darlinghurst, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Shoumo Bhattacharya

    Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Nicolas Plachta

    European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Sally L Dunwoodie

    Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Darlinghurst, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Gavin Chapman

    Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Darlinghurst, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Cédric Blanpain

    Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Biologie Humaine et Moléculaire, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Richard P Harvey

    Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Darlinghurst, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Margaret Buckingham, Institut Pasteur, France

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Animal experimentation was performed with approval of the Garvan Institute/St Vincent's Hospital Animal Ethics Committee (Project numbers 10/19 and 10/01).

Version history

  1. Received: February 10, 2015
  2. Accepted: July 5, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: July 6, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: August 25, 2015 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2015, Bouveret et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,746
    views
  • 730
    downloads
  • 56
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Romaric Bouveret
  2. Ashley J Waardenberg
  3. Nicole Schonrock
  4. Mirana Ramialison
  5. Tram Doan
  6. Danielle de Jong
  7. Antoine Bondue
  8. Gurpreet Kaur
  9. Stephanie Mohamed
  10. Hananeh Fonoudi
  11. Chiann-mun Chen
  12. Merridee Wouters
  13. Shoumo Bhattacharya
  14. Nicolas Plachta
  15. Sally L Dunwoodie
  16. Gavin Chapman
  17. Cédric Blanpain
  18. Richard P Harvey
(2015)
NKX2-5 mutations causative for congenital heart disease retain functionality and are directed to hundreds of targets
eLife 4:e06942.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06942

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06942

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Samuel C Griffiths, Jia Tan ... Hsin-Yi Henry Ho
    Research Article Updated

    The receptor tyrosine kinase ROR2 mediates noncanonical WNT5A signaling to orchestrate tissue morphogenetic processes, and dysfunction of the pathway causes Robinow syndrome, brachydactyly B, and metastatic diseases. The domain(s) and mechanisms required for ROR2 function, however, remain unclear. We solved the crystal structure of the extracellular cysteine-rich (CRD) and Kringle (Kr) domains of ROR2 and found that, unlike other CRDs, the ROR2 CRD lacks the signature hydrophobic pocket that binds lipids/lipid-modified proteins, such as WNTs, suggesting a novel mechanism of ligand reception. Functionally, we showed that the ROR2 CRD, but not other domains, is required and minimally sufficient to promote WNT5A signaling, and Robinow mutations in the CRD and the adjacent Kr impair ROR2 secretion and function. Moreover, using function-activating and -perturbing antibodies against the Frizzled (FZ) family of WNT receptors, we demonstrate the involvement of FZ in WNT5A-ROR signaling. Thus, ROR2 acts via its CRD to potentiate the function of a receptor super-complex that includes FZ to transduce WNT5A signals.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Nicolas Loyer, Elizabeth KJ Hogg ... Jens Januschke
    Research Article Updated

    The generation of distinct cell fates during development depends on asymmetric cell division of progenitor cells. In the central and peripheral nervous system of Drosophila, progenitor cells respectively called neuroblasts or sensory organ precursors use PAR polarity during mitosis to control cell fate determination in their daughter cells. How polarity and the cell cycle are coupled, and how the cell cycle machinery regulates PAR protein function and cell fate determination is poorly understood. Here, we generate an analog sensitive allele of CDK1 and reveal that its partial inhibition weakens but does not abolish apical polarity in embryonic and larval neuroblasts and leads to defects in polarisation of fate determinants. We describe a novel in vivo phosphorylation of Bazooka, the Drosophila homolog of PAR-3, on Serine180, a consensus CDK phosphorylation site. In some tissular contexts, phosphorylation of Serine180 occurs in asymmetrically dividing cells but not in their symmetrically dividing neighbours. In neuroblasts, Serine180 phosphomutants disrupt the timing of basal polarisation. Serine180 phosphomutants also affect the specification and binary cell fate determination of sensory organ precursors as well as Baz localisation during their asymmetric cell divisions. Finally, we show that CDK1 phosphorylates Serine-S180 and an equivalent Serine on human PAR-3 in vitro.