A mutant transcription factor that has been linked to congenital heart disease has wider effects than previously thought.
Congenital heart disease affects at least 1 in every 100 people worldwide, making these developmental defects and their consequences a significant clinical burden (Gelb and Chung, 2014). While the gene regulatory networks that control cardiac development and disease have been studied for many years (Vincent and Buckingham, 2010; Waardenberg et al., 2014; Paige et al., 2015), the field has yet to mechanistically link disruptions of cardiac gene networks to the pathology of congenital heart disease.
Proteins called transcription factors bind to specific DNA sequences, such as promoters and enhancers, to control gene expression. Cardiogenic transcription factors, such as NKX2-5, TBX5 and GATA4, play critical roles in ensuring that the embryonic heart forms properly, and dominant mutations in the genes that encode these transcription factors have been implicated in the development of congenital heart defects. A commonly-held assumption is that disease-associated mutations in the DNA binding region of transcription factors act primarily to decrease the functionality of the protein, thus altering the expression levels of their target genes. Now, in eLife, researchers at the Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, the University of New South Wales, the Université Libre de Bruxelles and other institutions in Australia, Belgium, Iran and the UK – including Romaric Bouveret as corresponding author and Richard Harvey as last author – challenge this assumption for the cardiogenic transcription factor NKX2-5 (Bouveret et al., 2015).
NKX2-5 was originally described in the fruit fly Drosophila where it was named tinman, as without it, the heart fails to form (Bodmer, 1993). Two decades ago Harvey and co-workers first described the heart defects caused by the inactivation of the mouse Nkx2-5 gene (Lyons et al., 1995), and have been leaders in investigating the role of NKX2-5 and how it functions in cardiac biology since (Stanley et al., 2002; Elliott et al., 2006; Prall et al., 2007; Watanabe et al., 2012; Behrens et al., 2013). Now Bouveret et al. have analyzed how the mutations in NKX2-5 that are associated with congenital heart disease affect cardiac and non-cardiac gene regulatory networks.
Bouveret et al. used a technique called DamID to detect sites where NKX2-5 binds to DNA in cardiac muscle cells. Two mutant versions of NKX2-5 were also investigated: one, called NKX2-5Y191C, harbors a mutation located within the homeodomain – the region of NKX2-5 that binds to DNA – that has been linked to congenital heart disease; and another that completely lacks the homeodomain.
Neither mutation prevented NKX2-5 from binding to all of its usual targets. In fact, both NKX2-5 mutants were able to bind to and repress transcription from a known NKX2-5 regulatory element that controls the expression of Id3, a gene that inhibits cardiomyocyte differentiation. Overexpressing NKX2-5Y191C in cardiac progenitor cells also led to normal levels of activation and repression of some NKX2-5 target genes.
Transcription factors often bind to other proteins and molecules – known as cofactors – that regulate their activity. Bouveret et al. showed that the mutant forms of NKX2-5 maintained contact with non-mutant copies of NKX2-5 and other co-factors. This finding suggests that the effect of transcription factor mutations may be ameliorated because the proteins retain the ability to form dimers, and provides a model that may partially explain why some human patients with NKX2-5 homeodomain mutations exhibit only mild symptoms.
Most strikingly, Bouveret et al. have identified hundreds of DNA sites that the mutant NKX2-5 proteins bind to, but which are not targeted by wild-type NKX2-5. A technique called motif analysis implicated members of a broadly expressed protein family, known as the ETS transcription factors, as potential binding partners for the NKX2-5 mutants. Bouveret et al. further demonstrated that ETS family members, such as ELK1 and ELK4, act as co-factors for both wild-type and mutant NKX2-5 proteins within the cardiac gene regulatory network, but that this interaction is enriched in the homeodomain mutants.
Bouveret et al. conclude that interactions with ETS co-factors guide NKX2-5 mutants to a large set of “off-target” genes – perhaps the homeodomain mutants lose some of their DNA binding specificity, allowing co-factors such as ETS to play a stronger role in determining a new pattern of binding. Importantly, NKX2-5 mutants were shown to regulate the expression of these off-target genes, which together could be viewed as a “mutation-acquired gene regulatory network.” Whereas wild-type NKX2-5 tended to target genes important for heart development and physiology, the mutant forms of NKX2-5 targeted genes involved in the regulation of more general cellular processes, such as chromatin organization and cell cycle control (Figure 1). These mutant-specific targets may include genes that contribute to the developmental defects and heart pathologies observed in patients with NKX2-5 homeodomain mutations.
The results presented by Bouveret et al. raise important questions about the mutations associated with congenital heart disease and provide fertile ground for future studies. It will be important to understand the degree to which the mutation-acquired gene regulatory network causes mutation-associated heart problems. This work potentially provides a novel paradigm for how congenital heart disease results from transcription factor mutations, and should encourage the field to examine the combined effects of both misregulated off-targets and misregulated wild-type targets when considering the effects of these mutations.
Of broad importance is whether the off-target binding of NKX2-5 mutants represents a generalizable phenomenon – do mutations in the DNA-binding domains of other highly specific transcription factors lead to the regulation of new targets via interactions with cofactors? This work highlights the importance of interactions between lineage-specific cardiac transcription factors (e.g., NKX2-5) and more broadly expressed co-factors (e.g., ETS) in the regulation of gene expression. Furthermore, it suggests that the specific control of cardiac regulatory genes is embedded within a broader and more ancient network that regulates ubiquitous cellular processes.
Nkx2-5 mediates differential cardiac differentiation through interaction with Hoxa10Stem Cells and Development 22:2211–2220.https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2012.0611
The gene tinman is required for specification of the heart and visceral muscles in DrosophilaDevelopment 118:719–729.
Complex genetics and the etiology of human congenital heart diseaseCold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine 4:a013953.https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a013953
Molecular regulation of cardiomyocyte differentiationCirculation Research 116:341–353.https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.302752
Efficient Cre-mediated deletion in cardiac progenitor cells conferred by a 3'UTR-ires-Cre allele of the homeobox gene Nkx2-5International Journal of Developmental Biology 46:431–439.
How to make a heart: the origin and regulation of cardiac progenitor cellsCurrent Topics in Developmental Biology 90:1–41.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0070-2153(10)90001-X
Fibroblast growth factor 10 gene regulation in the second heart field by Tbx1, Nkx2-5, and Islet1 reveals a genetic switch for down-regulation in the myocardiumProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 109:18273–18280.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1215360109
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Jellyfish, with their tetraradial symmetry, offer a novel paradigm for addressing patterning mechanisms during regeneration. Here we show that an interplay between mechanical forces, cell migration and proliferation allows jellyfish fragments to regain shape and functionality rapidly, notably by efficient restoration of the central feeding organ (manubrium). Fragmentation first triggers actomyosin-powered remodeling that restores body umbrella shape, causing radial smooth muscle fibers to converge around ‘hubs’ which serve as positional landmarks. Stabilization of these hubs, and associated expression of Wnt6, depends on the configuration of the adjoining muscle fiber ‘spokes’. Stabilized hubs presage the site of the manubrium blastema, whose growth is Wnt/β-catenin dependent and fueled by both cell proliferation and long-range cell recruitment. Manubrium morphogenesis is modulated by its connections with the gastrovascular canal system. We conclude that body patterning in regenerating jellyfish emerges mainly from local interactions, triggered and directed by the remodeling process.
With implantation mouse stromal cells begin to transform into epithelial-like cells surrounding the implantation chamber forming an avascular zone called the primary decidual zone (PDZ). In mouse, the PDZ forms a transient, size-dependent permeable barrier to protect the embryo from maternal circulating harmful agents. The process of decidualization is critical for early pregnancy maintenance in mice and humans. Mice deficient in cannabinoid receptors, CB1 and CB2, show compromised PDZ with dysregulated angiogenic factors, resulting in the retention of blood vessels and macrophages. This phenotype is replicated in Cnr1-/-, but not in Cnr2-/- mice. In vitro decidualization models suggest that Cnr1 levels substantially increase in mouse and human decidualizing stromal cells, and that neutralization of CB1 signaling suppresses decidualization and misregulates angiogenic factors. In sum, we propose that implantation quality depends on appropriate angiogenic events driven by the integration of CB2 in endothelial cells and CB1 in decidual cells.