1. Neuroscience
Download icon

Magnetosensitive neurons mediate geomagnetic orientation in Caenorhabditis elegans

  1. Andrés Vidal-Gadea
  2. Kristi Ward
  3. Celia Beron
  4. Navid Ghorashian
  5. Sertan Gokce
  6. Joshua Russell
  7. Nicholas Truong
  8. Adhishri Parikh
  9. Otilia Gadea
  10. Adela Ben-Yakar
  11. Jonathan Pierce-Shimomura Is a corresponding author
  1. Illinois State University, United States
  2. University of Texas at Austin, United States
Research Article
Cited
18
Views
9,147
Comments
0
Cite as: eLife 2015;4:e07493 doi: 10.7554/eLife.07493

Abstract

Many organisms spanning from bacteria to mammals orient to the earth's magnetic field. For a few animals, central neurons responsive to earth-strength magnetic fields have been identified; however, magnetosensory neurons have yet to be identified in any animal. We show that the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans orients to the earth's magnetic field during vertical burrowing migrations. Well-fed worms migrated up, while starved worms migrated down. Populations isolated from around the world, migrated at angles to the magnetic vector that would optimize vertical translation in their native soil, with northern- and southern-hemisphere worms displaying opposite migratory preferences. Magnetic orientation and vertical migrations required the TAX-4 cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channel in the AFD sensory neuron pair. Calcium imaging showed that these neurons respond to magnetic fields even without synaptic input. C. elegans may have adapted magnetic orientation to simplify their vertical burrowing migration by reducing the orientation task from three dimensions to one.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Andrés Vidal-Gadea

    1. School of Biological Sciences, Illinois State University, Normal, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  2. Kristi Ward

    1. Department of Neuroscience; Center for Brain, Behavior and Evolution; Center for Learning and Memory; Waggoner Center for Alcohol and Addiction Research; Institute of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  3. Celia Beron

    1. Department of Neuroscience; Center for Brain, Behavior and Evolution; Center for Learning and Memory; Waggoner Center for Alcohol and Addiction Research; Institute of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  4. Navid Ghorashian

    1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  5. Sertan Gokce

    1. Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  6. Joshua Russell

    1. Department of Neuroscience; Center for Brain, Behavior and Evolution; Center for Learning and Memory; Waggoner Center for Alcohol and Addiction Research; Institute of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  7. Nicholas Truong

    1. Department of Neuroscience; Center for Brain, Behavior and Evolution; Center for Learning and Memory; Waggoner Center for Alcohol and Addiction Research; Institute of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  8. Adhishri Parikh

    1. Department of Neuroscience; Center for Brain, Behavior and Evolution; Center for Learning and Memory; Waggoner Center for Alcohol and Addiction Research; Institute of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  9. Otilia Gadea

    1. Department of Neuroscience; Center for Brain, Behavior and Evolution; Center for Learning and Memory; Waggoner Center for Alcohol and Addiction Research; Institute of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  10. Adela Ben-Yakar

    1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  11. Jonathan Pierce-Shimomura

    1. Department of Neuroscience; Center for Brain, Behavior and Evolution; Center for Learning and Memory; Waggoner Center for Alcohol and Addiction Research; Institute of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
    For correspondence
    1. jonps@austin.utexas.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Russ Fernald, Reviewing Editor, Stanford University, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: March 15, 2015
  2. Accepted: June 16, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: June 17, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: August 5, 2015 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2015, Vidal-Gadea et al

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 9,147
    Page views
  • 1,977
    Downloads
  • 18
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, Scopus, PubMed Central.

Comments

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

  1. A neurological compass

    Podcast

    Neurons in worms can sense the earth's magnetic field.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience

    Olfactory receptor neurons use gain control and complementary kinetics to encode intermittent odorant stimuli

    Srinivas Gorur-Shandilya et al.
    Research Article
    1. Microbiology and Infectious Disease

    Cryo-electron tomography reveals novel features of a viral RNA replication compartment

    Kenneth J Ertel et al.
    Research Article