Paradoxical resistance of multiple myeloma to proteasome inhibitors by decreased levels of 19S proteasomal subunits

  1. Diego Acosta-Alvear
  2. Min Y Cho
  3. Thomas Wild
  4. Tonia J Buchholz
  5. Alana G Lerner
  6. Olga Simakova
  7. Jamie Hahn
  8. Neha Korde
  9. Ola Landgren
  10. Irina Maric
  11. Chunaram Choudhary
  12. Peter Walter
  13. Jonathan S Weissman  Is a corresponding author
  14. Martin Kampmann
  1. University of California, San Francisco, United States
  2. University of Copenhagen, Denmark
  3. Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. an Amgen subsidiary, United States
  4. National Institutes of Health, United States
  5. National Cancer Institute, United States

Abstract

Hallmarks of cancer, including rapid growth and aneuploidy, can result in non-oncogene addiction to the proteostasis network that can be exploited clinically. The defining example is the exquisite sensitivity of multiple myeloma (MM) to 20S proteasome inhibitors, such as carfilzomib. However, MM patients invariably acquire resistance to these drugs. Using a next-generation shRNA platform, we found that proteostasis factors, including chaperones and stress-response regulators, controlled the response to carfilzomib. Paradoxically, 19S proteasome regulator knockdown induced resistance to carfilzomib in MM and non-MM cells. 19S subunit knockdown did not affect the activity of the 20S subunits targeted by carfilzomib nor their inhibition by the drug, suggesting an alternative mechanism, such as the selective accumulation of protective factors. In MM patients, lower 19S levels predicted a diminished response to carfilzomib-based therapies. Together, our findings suggest that an understanding of network rewiring can inform development of new combination therapies to overcome drug resistance.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Diego Acosta-Alvear

    Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Min Y Cho

    Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Thomas Wild

    The Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Tonia J Buchholz

    Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. an Amgen subsidiary, South San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    Tonia J Buchholz, is an employee of Onyx Pharmaceuticals, an Amgen subsidiary.
  5. Alana G Lerner

    Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. an Amgen subsidiary, South San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    Alana G Lerner, is an employee of Onyx Pharmaceuticals, an Amgen subsidiary.
  6. Olga Simakova

    Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Jamie Hahn

    Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Neha Korde

    Multiple Myeloma Section, Lymphoid Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Ola Landgren

    Multiple Myeloma Section, Lymphoid Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Irina Maric

    Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Chunaram Choudhary

    The Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Peter Walter

    Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Jonathan S Weissman

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    For correspondence
    Jonathan.Weissman@ucsf.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Martin Kampmann

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

Ethics

Human subjects: The registered clinical research trial (NCT01402284) was approved by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Institutional Review Board (IRB) and complied with the Declaration of Helsinki, the International Conference on Harmonization, and the Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice. All enrolled patients meeting criteria were consented with an IRB-approved document

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 4,445
    views
  • 1,043
    downloads
  • 85
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Diego Acosta-Alvear
  2. Min Y Cho
  3. Thomas Wild
  4. Tonia J Buchholz
  5. Alana G Lerner
  6. Olga Simakova
  7. Jamie Hahn
  8. Neha Korde
  9. Ola Landgren
  10. Irina Maric
  11. Chunaram Choudhary
  12. Peter Walter
  13. Jonathan S Weissman
  14. Martin Kampmann
(2015)
Paradoxical resistance of multiple myeloma to proteasome inhibitors by decreased levels of 19S proteasomal subunits
eLife 4:e08153.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08153

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08153

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Physics of Living Systems
    Deb Sankar Banerjee, Shiladitya Banerjee
    Research Article

    Accurate regulation of centrosome size is essential for ensuring error-free cell division, and dysregulation of centrosome size has been linked to various pathologies, including developmental defects and cancer. While a universally accepted model for centrosome size regulation is lacking, prior theoretical and experimental works suggest a centrosome growth model involving autocatalytic assembly of the pericentriolar material. Here, we show that the autocatalytic assembly model fails to explain the attainment of equal centrosome sizes, which is crucial for error-free cell division. Incorporating latest experimental findings into the molecular mechanisms governing centrosome assembly, we introduce a new quantitative theory for centrosome growth involving catalytic assembly within a shared pool of enzymes. Our model successfully achieves robust size equality between maturing centrosome pairs, mirroring cooperative growth dynamics observed in experiments. To validate our theoretical predictions, we compare them with available experimental data and demonstrate the broad applicability of the catalytic growth model across different organisms, which exhibit distinct growth dynamics and size scaling characteristics.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Bhumil Patel, Maryke Grobler ... Needhi Bhalla
    Research Article

    Meiotic crossover recombination is essential for both accurate chromosome segregation and the generation of new haplotypes for natural selection to act upon. This requirement is known as crossover assurance and is one example of crossover control. While the conserved role of the ATPase, PCH-2, during meiotic prophase has been enigmatic, a universal phenotype when pch-2 or its orthologs are mutated is a change in the number and distribution of meiotic crossovers. Here, we show that PCH-2 controls the number and distribution of crossovers by antagonizing their formation. This antagonism produces different effects at different stages of meiotic prophase: early in meiotic prophase, PCH-2 prevents double-strand breaks from becoming crossover-eligible intermediates, limiting crossover formation at sites of initial double-strand break formation and homolog interactions. Later in meiotic prophase, PCH-2 winnows the number of crossover-eligible intermediates, contributing to the designation of crossovers and ultimately, crossover assurance. We also demonstrate that PCH-2 accomplishes this regulation through the meiotic HORMAD, HIM-3. Our data strongly support a model in which PCH-2’s conserved role is to remodel meiotic HORMADs throughout meiotic prophase to destabilize crossover-eligible precursors and coordinate meiotic recombination with synapsis, ensuring the progressive implementation of meiotic recombination and explaining its function in the pachytene checkpoint and crossover control.