BAG2 promotes tumorigenesis through enhancing mutant p53 protein levels and function

  1. Xuetian Yue
  2. Yuhan Zhao
  3. Juan Liu
  4. Cen Zhang
  5. Haiyang Yu
  6. Jiabei Wang
  7. Tongsen Zheng
  8. Lianxin Liu
  9. Jun Li
  10. Zhaohui Feng
  11. Wenwei Hu  Is a corresponding author
  1. Rutgers University Newark Campus, United States
  2. Harbin Medical University, China

Abstract

Tumor suppressor p53 is the most frequently mutated gene in tumors. Many mutant p53 (mutp53) proteins promote tumorigenesis through the gain-of-function (GOF) mechanism. Mutp53 proteins often accumulate to high levels in tumors, which is critical for mutp53 GOF. Its underlying mechanism is poorly understood. Here, we found that BAG2, a protein of Bcl-2 associated athanogene (BAG) family, promotes mutp53 accumulation and GOF in tumors. Mechanically, BAG2 binds to mutp53 and translocates to the nucleus to inhibit the MDM2-mutp53 interaction, and MDM2-mediated ubiquitination and degradation of mutp53. Thus, BAG2 promotes mutp53 accumulation and GOF in tumor growth, metastasis and chemoresistance. BAG2 is frequently overexpressed in tumors. BAG2 overexpression is associated with poor prognosis in patients and mutp53 accumulation in tumors. These findings revealed a novel and important mechanism for mutp53 accumulation and GOF in tumors, and also uncovered an important role of BAG2 in tumorigenesis through promoting mutp53 accumulation and GOF.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Xuetian Yue

    Rutgers University Newark Campus, New Brunswick, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Yuhan Zhao

    Rutgers University Newark Campus, New Brunswick, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Juan Liu

    Rutgers University Newark Campus, New Brunswick, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Cen Zhang

    Rutgers University Newark Campus, New Brunswick, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Haiyang Yu

    Rutgers University Newark Campus, New Brunswick, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Jiabei Wang

    Rutgers University Newark Campus, New Brunswick, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Tongsen Zheng

    Rutgers University Newark Campus, New Brunswick, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Lianxin Liu

    Key laboratory of hepatosplenic surgery, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Jun Li

    Rutgers University Newark Campus, New Brunswick, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Zhaohui Feng

    Rutgers University Newark Campus, New Brunswick, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Wenwei Hu

    Rutgers University Newark Campus, New Brunswick, United States
    For correspondence
    wh221@cinj.rutgers.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocol (#I13-028) of Rutgers University.

Copyright

© 2015, Yue et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,983
    views
  • 674
    downloads
  • 63
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Xuetian Yue
  2. Yuhan Zhao
  3. Juan Liu
  4. Cen Zhang
  5. Haiyang Yu
  6. Jiabei Wang
  7. Tongsen Zheng
  8. Lianxin Liu
  9. Jun Li
  10. Zhaohui Feng
  11. Wenwei Hu
(2015)
BAG2 promotes tumorigenesis through enhancing mutant p53 protein levels and function
eLife 4:e08401.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08401

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08401

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Jingjing Li, Xinyue Wang ... Vincent Archambault
    Research Article

    In animals, mitosis involves the breakdown of the nucleus. The reassembly of a nucleus after mitosis requires the reformation of the nuclear envelope around a single mass of chromosomes. This process requires Ankle2 (also known as LEM4 in humans) which interacts with PP2A and promotes the function of the Barrier-to-Autointegration Factor (BAF). Upon dephosphorylation, BAF dimers cross-bridge chromosomes and bind lamins and transmembrane proteins of the reassembling nuclear envelope. How Ankle2 functions in mitosis is incompletely understood. Using a combination of approaches in Drosophila, along with structural modeling, we provide several lines of evidence that suggest that Ankle2 is a regulatory subunit of PP2A, explaining how it promotes BAF dephosphorylation. In addition, we discovered that Ankle2 interacts with the endoplasmic reticulum protein Vap33, which is required for Ankle2 localization at the reassembling nuclear envelope during telophase. We identified the interaction sites of PP2A and Vap33 on Ankle2. Through genetic rescue experiments, we show that the Ankle2/PP2A interaction is essential for the function of Ankle2 in nuclear reassembly and that the Ankle2/Vap33 interaction also promotes this process. Our study sheds light on the molecular mechanisms of post-mitotic nuclear reassembly and suggests that the endoplasmic reticulum is not merely a source of membranes in the process, but also provides localized enzymatic activity.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Bhumil Patel, Maryke Grobler ... Needhi Bhalla
    Research Article

    Meiotic crossover recombination is essential for both accurate chromosome segregation and the generation of new haplotypes for natural selection to act upon. This requirement is known as crossover assurance and is one example of crossover control. While the conserved role of the ATPase, PCH-2, during meiotic prophase has been enigmatic, a universal phenotype when pch-2 or its orthologs are mutated is a change in the number and distribution of meiotic crossovers. Here, we show that PCH-2 controls the number and distribution of crossovers by antagonizing their formation. This antagonism produces different effects at different stages of meiotic prophase: early in meiotic prophase, PCH-2 prevents double-strand breaks from becoming crossover-eligible intermediates, limiting crossover formation at sites of initial double-strand break formation and homolog interactions. Later in meiotic prophase, PCH-2 winnows the number of crossover-eligible intermediates, contributing to the designation of crossovers and ultimately, crossover assurance. We also demonstrate that PCH-2 accomplishes this regulation through the meiotic HORMAD, HIM-3. Our data strongly support a model in which PCH-2’s conserved role is to remodel meiotic HORMADs throughout meiotic prophase to destabilize crossover-eligible precursors and coordinate meiotic recombination with synapsis, ensuring the progressive implementation of meiotic recombination and explaining its function in the pachytene checkpoint and crossover control.