Specific cancer associated mutations in the switch III-region of Ras increase tumorigenicity by nanocluster augmentation

  1. Maja Solman
  2. Alessio Ligabue
  3. Olga Blazevits
  4. Alok Jaiswal
  5. Yong Zhou
  6. Hong Liang
  7. Benoit Lectez
  8. Kari Kopra
  9. Camilo Guzman
  10. Harri Härmä
  11. John F Hancock
  12. Tero Aittokallio
  13. Daniel Abankwa  Is a corresponding author
  1. Åbo Akademi University, Finland
  2. University of Helsinki, Finland
  3. University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, United States
  4. University of Turku, Finland

Abstract

Hotspot mutations of Ras drive cell transformation and tumorigenesis. Less frequent mutations in Ras are poorly characterized for their oncogenic potential. Yet insight into their mechanism of action may point to novel opportunities to target Ras. Here we show that several cancer-associated mutations in the switch III region moderately increase Ras activity in all isoforms. Mutants are biochemically inconspicuous, while their clustering into nanoscale signaling complexes on the plasma membrane, termed nanocluster, is augmented. Nanoclustering dictates downstream effector recruitment, MAPK-activity and tumorigenic cell proliferation. Our results describe an unprecedented mechanism of signaling protein activation in cancer.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Maja Solman

    Turku Centre for Biotechnology, Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Alessio Ligabue

    Turku Centre for Biotechnology, Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Olga Blazevits

    Turku Centre for Biotechnology, Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Alok Jaiswal

    Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Yong Zhou

    Department of Integrative Biology and Pharmacology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Hong Liang

    Department of Integrative Biology and Pharmacology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Benoit Lectez

    Turku Centre for Biotechnology, Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Kari Kopra

    Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Camilo Guzman

    Turku Centre for Biotechnology, Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Harri Härmä

    Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. John F Hancock

    Department of Integrative Biology and Pharmacology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Tero Aittokallio

    Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Daniel Abankwa

    Turku Centre for Biotechnology, Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland
    For correspondence
    daniel.abankwa@btk.fi
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Copyright

© 2015, Solman et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,313
    views
  • 563
    downloads
  • 42
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Maja Solman
  2. Alessio Ligabue
  3. Olga Blazevits
  4. Alok Jaiswal
  5. Yong Zhou
  6. Hong Liang
  7. Benoit Lectez
  8. Kari Kopra
  9. Camilo Guzman
  10. Harri Härmä
  11. John F Hancock
  12. Tero Aittokallio
  13. Daniel Abankwa
(2015)
Specific cancer associated mutations in the switch III-region of Ras increase tumorigenicity by nanocluster augmentation
eLife 4:e08905.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08905

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08905

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Sasha L Evans, Bethany A Haynes ... Rivka L Isaacson
    Insight

    Nature has inspired the design of improved inhibitors for cancer-causing proteins.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Gabriel E Jara, Francesco Pontiggia ... Dorothee Kern
    Research Article

    Transition-state (TS) theory has provided the theoretical framework to explain the enormous rate accelerations of chemical reactions by enzymes. Given that proteins display large ensembles of conformations, unique TSs would pose a huge entropic bottleneck for enzyme catalysis. To shed light on this question, we studied the nature of the enzymatic TS for the phosphoryl-transfer step in adenylate kinase by quantum-mechanics/molecular-mechanics calculations. We find a structurally wide set of energetically equivalent configurations that lie along the reaction coordinate and hence a broad transition-state ensemble (TSE). A conformationally delocalized ensemble, including asymmetric TSs, is rooted in the macroscopic nature of the enzyme. The computational results are buttressed by enzyme kinetics experiments that confirm the decrease of the entropy of activation predicted from such wide TSE. TSEs as a key for efficient enzyme catalysis further boosts a unifying concept for protein folding and conformational transitions underlying protein function.