Cerebellum: Linking abnormal neural activity patterns to motor deficits

Abnormal activity in the cerebellar nuclei can be used to predict motor symptoms and induce them experimentally, pointing to potential therapeutic strategies.
  1. David J Herzfeld  Is a corresponding author
  1. Department of Neurobiology, Duke University School of Medicine, United States

The brain is made up of a dense web of interconnected brain regions. This means that when neurological dysfunction occurs in one area, errant signals can spread to connected regions. While the spread of abnormal activity in the brain poses challenges for researchers developing therapeutic interventions, it also presents opportunities. It might be possible to detect abnormal brain activity and correct it without needing to pinpoint the exact origin of the dysfunction.

Studying movement disorders is an ideal medium for understanding the effects of neurological dysfunction on brain circuits because animal models that mimic the motor symptoms of patients can be studied in the laboratory. The cerebellum is one of many areas crucial for movement control and presents a unique opportunity to understand how neural circuits are linked to motor disorders (Holmes, 1917). Information from much of the brain is sent to the cerebellum and processed by expansive neural circuitry in the cerebellar cortex, the folded surface of the cerebellum. The processed inputs are then funneled through an information bottleneck at the synapse between Purkinje cells, which are the sole output of the cerebellar cortex, and their targets in discrete clusters of neurons in the cerebellar nuclei (a set of relay stations located deep in the cerebellum). From there, the information processed by the cerebellum is broadcast back to the rest of the brain (Bostan et al., 2013). The large number of inputs to the cerebellar cortex and the compression of information at the cerebellar nuclei provide an ideal target for understanding how dysfunction in one area can affect connected regions.

Now, in eLife, Meike van der Heijden, Amanda Brown, Dominic Kizek and Roy Sillitoe report that abnormal patterns of activity from a single set of neurons can be used to predict motor symptoms associated with multiple neurological disorders (van der Heijden et al., 2024). Taking advantage of the information bottleneck at the cerebellar nuclei, the team – who are based at Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children’s Hospital – measured the firing patterns of these neurons in mouse models of movement disorders. The recordings were then used to devise a relatively simple machine-learning classifier, which examines the firing patterns and automatically sorts them into different categories based on their characteristics.

The classifier identified unique firing patterns associated with different motor symptoms and then successfully predicted motor symptoms across multiple mouse models of the same neurological disorder (Figure 1A). This predictive ability was true for motor symptoms often associated with cerebellar disorders, such as ataxia (loss of coordination), as well as those often associated with dysfunction of other brain regions, for example, dystonia (uncontrolled muscle spasms).

Connecting cerebellar nuclei activity to motor symptoms.

(A) Using the recorded firing activity patterns of cerebellar nucleus neurons, a classifier can predict motor deficits in mouse models of motor disease. (B) Inducing abnormal activity in cerebellar nucleus neurons (using, for example, optogenetic systems) with specific stimulation parameters can cause motor symptoms in healthy mice, mirroring those in motor disease models. (C) Conceptual approach for closed-loop analysis and brain stimulation, where recordings of neural firing patterns are used to detect aberrant activity and to identify stimulation patterns targeting the cerebellar nuclei to potentially alleviate symptoms of neurophysiological diseases.

The team then went a crucial step further. If unique firing patterns in the cerebellar nuclei can predict motor symptoms, can inducing these patterns in the brains of healthy mice cause motor symptoms even in the absence of neurological disorders? Using an optogenetic system to modify firing activity in cerebellar neurons, van der Heijden et al. were able to induce motor deficits in mice that were reminiscent of motor disorders (Figure 1B).

The findings of van der Heijden et al. provide a major stepping stone for understanding the cerebellum’s role in motor disorders, and they also have broad implications for targeted therapies to reduce motor symptoms in patients. If driving aberrant activity in cerebellar nuclei neurons produces motor symptoms, then the opposite might also be true – strategically chosen patterns of stimulation might be able to restore healthy firing patterns and reduce motor deficits (Figure 1C).

It is possible to envision a device that includes a sophisticated classifier – perhaps leveraging advances in deep-learning techniques – capable of pinpointing precise patterns of aberrant activity in the cerebellar nuclei. This device could then identify the targeted stimulation parameters needed to push the aberrant activity back towards normal, a technique termed “closed-loop” brain stimulation (Chandrabhatla et al., 2023).

With monitoring of neural activity in carefully chosen sites and strategic selection of stimulation parameters, closed-loop brain stimulation could even be therapeutic for neurological disorders without motor dysfunction. It has only recently been appreciated that the cerebellum is also densely interconnected with regions of the brain traditionally thought of as ‘non-motor’ (Strick et al., 2009). In addition, it is now known that cerebellar damage often results in deficits in higher-order behavioral functions, such as difficulty with language and visuo-spatial cognition (Schmahmann, 2019). Therefore, targeted stimulation of the cerebellar nuclei might also alleviate some non-motor symptoms of neurological disorders. While significant research remains, the work of van der Heijden et al. highlights a bright future for cerebellar nuclei stimulation as a therapeutic target for a range of brain disorders.

References

Article and author information

Author details

  1. David J Herzfeld

    David J Herzfeld is in the Department of Neurobiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States

    For correspondence
    david.herzfeld@duke.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9910-0658

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published:

Copyright

© 2024, Herzfeld

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 440
    views
  • 33
    downloads
  • 0
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. David J Herzfeld
(2024)
Cerebellum: Linking abnormal neural activity patterns to motor deficits
eLife 13:e100833.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.100833

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Magdalena Solyga, Georg B Keller
    Research Article

    Our movements result in predictable sensory feedback that is often multimodal. Based on deviations between predictions and actual sensory input, primary sensory areas of cortex have been shown to compute sensorimotor prediction errors. How prediction errors in one sensory modality influence the computation of prediction errors in another modality is still unclear. To investigate multimodal prediction errors in mouse auditory cortex, we used a virtual environment to experimentally couple running to both self-generated auditory and visual feedback. Using two-photon microscopy, we first characterized responses of layer 2/3 (L2/3) neurons to sounds, visual stimuli, and running onsets and found responses to all three stimuli. Probing responses evoked by audiomotor (AM) mismatches, we found that they closely resemble visuomotor (VM) mismatch responses in visual cortex (V1). Finally, testing for cross modal influence on AM mismatch responses by coupling both sound amplitude and visual flow speed to the speed of running, we found that AM mismatch responses were amplified when paired with concurrent VM mismatches. Our results demonstrate that multimodal and non-hierarchical interactions shape prediction error responses in cortical L2/3.

    1. Neuroscience
    Moritz F Wurm, Doruk Yiğit Erigüç
    Research Article

    Recognizing goal-directed actions is a computationally challenging task, requiring not only the visual analysis of body movements, but also analysis of how these movements causally impact, and thereby induce a change in, those objects targeted by an action. We tested the hypothesis that the analysis of body movements and the effects they induce relies on distinct neural representations in superior and anterior inferior parietal lobe (SPL and aIPL). In four fMRI sessions, participants observed videos of actions (e.g. breaking stick, squashing plastic bottle) along with corresponding point-light-display (PLD) stick figures, pantomimes, and abstract animations of agent–object interactions (e.g. dividing or compressing a circle). Cross-decoding between actions and animations revealed that aIPL encodes abstract representations of action effect structures independent of motion and object identity. By contrast, cross-decoding between actions and PLDs revealed that SPL is disproportionally tuned to body movements independent of visible interactions with objects. Lateral occipitotemporal cortex (LOTC) was sensitive to both action effects and body movements. These results demonstrate that parietal cortex and LOTC are tuned to physical action features, such as how body parts move in space relative to each other and how body parts interact with objects to induce a change (e.g. in position or shape/configuration). The high level of abstraction revealed by cross-decoding suggests a general neural code supporting mechanical reasoning about how entities interact with, and have effects on, each other.