Our bodies are protected from infection and disease by several different types of immune cells. Gamma delta T cells are unusual in that they only make up a small proportion of the immune cells of the body, yet are present in many different animal species. These peculiar T cells are primarily found in the tissues that line the body (such as the skin, lung and gut) and are part of the first stage of the immune response that occurs when an invading microbe enters the body.

Gamma delta T cells, like all other T cells, develop in an organ called the thymus, which is found in the chest. Although several complex signaling pathways have been identified that help specific immune cells to develop, there are still many open questions about them. It is also unclear if other cells in the thymus influence how gamma delta T cells develop.

Mair et al. engineered mouse embryos that could not produce a signaling molecule known as NIK in certain subsets of their cells. This revealed that NIK is important for a structural cell in the thymus to instruct the early stages of gamma delta T cell development. However, gamma delta T cells themselves do not need to be able to produce NIK or the signaling pathway that it triggers.

Further work will focus on discovering the exact way in which the structural cells of the thymus interact with gamma delta T cells. This will help us understand better how developing immune cells are ‘educated’ in the thymus so that they are able to work effectively in the adult.

γδ T cells, together with αβ T cells and B cells, are the only cells in mammals capable of generating diverse antigenic receptors by somatic gene rearrangement, which enables them to specifically recognize and respond to a vast array of antigens. However, while the essential role of αβ T cells and B cells for the induction of long-lasting protective immune responses is undisputed, γδ T cells due to their low abundance in peripheral lymphoid organs have been often ignored by the scientific community (Allison and Havran, 1991). This has changed in the past decade, as it became evident that γδ T cells are important players not only during protective immune reactions (Lockhart et al., 2006), but also in various models of autoimmune disease (Petermann et al., 2010; Cai et al., 2011; Pantelyushin et al., 2012).

Several features distinguish γδ T cells from their αβ counterparts (reviewed in Vantourout and Hayday, 2013). Most notably, γδ T cells recognize qualitatively different antigens. The scope of the potential antigens has not been revealed entirely, but known targets include non-classical MHC molecules (Strid et al., 2008), phosophoantigens (Constant et al., 1994) as well as a discrete set of non-self proteins (Zeng et al., 2012). The second main characteristic of γδ T cells is their ability for rapid production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as INF-γ and IL-17 independent of TCR engagement (Sutton et al., 2009). This feature has been suggested to be hardwired in developing γδ T cells already during thymic development, probably in dependency of self-antigen recognition (Jensen et al., 2008). The surface molecule CD27, which belongs to the tumor necrosis (TNF) receptor superfamily has been shown to distinguish IFN-γ-producing from IL-17-producing γδ T cells (Ribot et al., 2009), as does the differential expression of the transcription factors T-bet and RORγt and certain chemokine receptors such as CCR6 (Haas et al., 2009).

Although the genetic diversity of the TCR γδ locus would theoretically allow an even higher number of different TCR specificities than for αβ T cells (Bonneville et al., 2010), γδ T cells show a remarkable limitation in their TCR variability. Moreover, γδ T cells with a given TCR specificity often home to non-lymphoid organs, where the majority of mature γδ T cells can be found. The prime example of tissue homing-behavior is observed in dendritic epidermal T cells (DETCs), which are found in the murine epidermis and almost exclusively express a clonotypic TCR consisting of the Vγ5 and Vδ1 chains (Asarnow et al., 1988). Vγ5⁺ DETCs are among the very first T cells to develop during embryogenesis, populating the epidermis already around day 15/16 of fetal development (Xiong et al., 2004). Also other subsets of γδ T cells, such as Vγ4⁺ γδ T cells (mostly IL-17 producers), which migrate predominantly to the dermis and lung tissue, have been shown to develop only early in ontogeny (Allison and Havran, 1991; Haas et al., 2012; Prinz et al., 2013).

The underpinning signaling pathways and precise developmental program as well as the mechanisms underlying the pre-determined cytokine profile of γδ T cells have been only partially resolved. One major step forward was the identification of Skint-1 (Selection and upkeep of intraepithelial T cells-1), which has an essential function for the development of Vγ5⁺ DETCs (Lockhart et al., 2006; Lewis et al., 2006; Boyden et al., 2008). Expression of Skint-1 by medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTECs) (Barbee et al., 2011) leads to a signaling cascade in developing γδ thymocytes that induces the typical gene expression profile of DETCs, concomitant to their preferential homing to the skin (Turchinovich and Hayday, 2011; Vantourout and Hayday, 2013). On the other hand, the induction of the typical gene signature of IL-17-producing Vγ4⁺ γδ T cells depends on the function of the transcription factor Sox13 (Gray et al., 2013), while the required receptors remain elusive.

It has been known for some time that signaling pathways leading to activation of NFκB are essential for the function of various immune cell compartments (reviewed in Li and Verma, 2002). The so-called classical pathway of NFκB activation is induced mainly by molecular danger signals such as LPS or certain cytokines such as TNF or IL-1β. Non-canonical NFκB signaling, which requires the NFκB-inducing kinase (hereafter referred to as NIK, the encoding gene being Map3k14,) (Malinin et al., 1997; Yin, 2001) is activated by a discrete subset of TNF family members, including CD40L, Lymphotoxin (LT), BAFF (B cell activating factor) and RANKL (Receptor activator of NFκB ligand). Signaling via the non-canonical pathway has been shown to fulfill roles in B cell survival (Sen, 2006), activation of T cells (Matsumoto et al., 2002; Ribot et al., 2009), maturation and function of dendritic cells (DCs) (Hofmann et al., 2011) as well as the induction of tolerance (Zhu et al., 2006; Bonneville et al., 2010), but it has not been studied in the context of γδ T cell biology in detail. Previous work has suggested that signaling via the CD70-CD27 axis (which belongs to the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily) can activate NFκB p52 processing (Ribot et al., 2010). Also, LTβR signaling has been implicated in the differentiation program of bulk γδ thymocytes (Silva-Santos, 2005), and the NFκB family members RelA and RelB were shown to guide the development of IL-17-producing Vγ4⁺ γδ T cells (Powolny-Budnicka et al., 2011). Furthermore, the genesis of invariant NKT cells was claimed to depend on signaling via NIK (Elewaut et al., 2003).

In the present study we set out to systematically analyze the impact of non-canonical NFκB signaling on the development and function of γδ T cells. In line with previous studies that were using knockout models of the TNF receptor family member RANKL (Roberts et al., 2012) we found that NIK-deficient mice showed a drastic loss of DETCs in the epidermis. Of note, in the absence of NIK most of the IL-17 production by splenic and lung-resident γδ T cells was lost, while their ability to express IFN-γ was not affected. Mechanistically, this was accompanied by a loss of Rorc and Sox13 expression in NIK-deficient CD27^- γδ T cells, while in turn expression of Tbet and Egr3 was increased. While previous studies reported trans-conditioning of developing γδ T cell precursors by CD4⁺ thymocytes (Silva-Santos, 2005; Powolny-Budnicka et al., 2011), our data suggest that NIK signaling specifically in thymic epithelium is essential for shaping the cytokine profile of the γδ T cell compartment.

In the past years, γδ T cells have attracted growing interest due to their unique features that place them at the interface of adaptive and innate immunity. Nevertheless, in contrast to αβ T cells, the signaling events underlying γδ T cell development and activation are much less understood (reviewed in Prinz et al., 2013 and Vantourout and Hayday, 2013). Here, we have shown in vivo that NIK signaling in thymic epithelial cells is essential for the full function of two different γδ T cell populations, namely skin-resident DETCs as well as CD27^- IL-17-producing γδ T cells.

Previous work has suggested an involvement of the NFκB-inducing kinase in the differentiation of both αβ and γδ T cells (Eshima et al., 2014). Contrary to the findings by Eshima and colleagues we could not observe a consistent overall reduction in the number of γδ T cells (except the DETC pool), yet we observed functional impairment of CD27^- IL-17-producing γδ T cells. This discrepancy might result from two mutually non-exclusive explanations: first, aly/aly mice as well as Map3k14^-/- mice due to their complex phenotype (including impairment of thymic negative selection) are prone to develop some degree of tissue inflammation over time, which is accompanied by an expansion of both CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ cells (Tsubata et al., 1996; Ishimaru et al., 2006; Zhu et al., 2006) and could thereby induce a relative decrease in the proportion of γδ T cells. Second, it has recently been established that the γδ T cell compartment cannot be fully reconstituted using bone-marrow chimeric animals (Gray et al., 2011; Haas et al., 2012). Using a genetic model that allows the cell-type specific deletion of NIK avoids all these confounding phenotypes of mice in which the gene locus of NIK (Map3k14) has been deleted in the germ-line.

Two members of the TNFR family, namely CD40 and RANK, have been implicated both in the development of DETCs and full maturation of mTECs (Hikosaka et al., 2008; Akiyama et al., 2008). In embryogenesis, these events occur at similar time points post conception, and it seems that in the embryonic thymus, developing DETC precursors signal via the RANKL-RANK axis to immature mTECs, inducing their full maturation to Aire⁺ MHC-II^high mTECs (Roberts et al., 2012). Hence, Tnfrsf11a^-/- mice have reduced numbers of DETCs. Given that NIK is downstream of RANK (Darnay et al., 1999), one would expect a similar phenotype in Map3k14^-/- animals, but the DETC deficiency that we observed in newborn Map3k14^-/- mice was much more pronounced than in Tnfrsf11a^-/- animals, suggesting that during DETC development several upstream receptors converge in their signaling to NIK, making it a key pathway during thymic DETC development. Importantly, our data obtained using the conditional NIK-mutant strongly suggests that for normal function of the γδ T cell compartment, NIK signaling does not act γδ cell-intrinsically but in trans by its function in thymic epithelial cells. Conditional deletion of NIK solely in thymic epithelial cells was sufficient to copy the DETC phenotype seen in complete germ-line NIK-knockout animals. We believe this to be the first genetic in vivo demonstration that non-canonical NFκB signaling is not required in DETCs in a cell-intrinsic manner, but through its activity in TECs.

The ability of CD27^- γδ T cells to rapidly produce IL-17 even after being activated only by cytokines (Sutton et al., 2009; Ribot et al., 2009) has been the focus of intense research. Only the neonatal thymic microenvironment appears to have the capacity to imprint a stable cytokine profile to γδ T cells, since the IL-17-producing γδ T cell subsets cannot be reconstituted in adult animals by bone marrow transfer (Haas et al., 2012). Very recently, a hallmark paper has provided mechanistic insights into how this can be achieved: during embryonic development of certain γδ T cell subsets, the signaling threshold for activation of the TCR becomes markedly altered (Wencker et al., 2013). Hence, mature γδ T cells do not necessarily rely on a TCR stimulation as “‘signal one”’, although they can still respond to that (Strid et al., 2011).

However, while this intriguing mechanism (Wencker et al., 2013) explains the behavior of several γδ T cell subsets, the thymic cues orchestrating this hard-wiring of γδ T cells remain unclear. Previous work suggested either LTβR-dependent trans-conditioning by double positive thymocytes or γδ T cell intrinsic RelB activation (Silva-Santos, 2005; Powolny-Budnicka et al., 2011). Further work by Silva-Santos and colleagues emphasized the role of TNF-receptor family members such as CD27 as well as NFκBp52 activation (Ribot et al., 2010). However, the contribution of thymic stromal cells to these processes has not been experimentally addressed in vivo. Our data suggest that NFκB signaling via NIK seems to be dispensable both within CD27^- γδ T cells as well as αβ T cells, at least for their ability for expression of pro-inflammatory IL-17. Of note, deletion of NIK in all thymic epithelial cells using Foxn1-Cre phenocopied the complete NIK-knockout in terms of IL-17 expression by CD27^-γδ T cells, while this was not the case using Ccl19-Cre. The latter has been reported to target only maturing medullary thymic epithelial cells (Onder et al., 2015). This would suggest that the instruction of γδ T cells is mediated by early or junctional TECs, or that the timing of Ccl19-Cre-mediated recombination sharply coincides with the expression of the γδ T cell instructing program in TECs. Based on our observation that NIK signaling in the early thymic stroma has a profound and long-lasting effect on the maturation and cytokine profile of developing γδ T cells, further studies are required in order to precisely define the nature of γδ T cell instructing molecules, and which thymic epithelial cell type is required for delivery. While our data does not exclude a role for canonical-NFκB signaling via RelA (Powolny-Budnicka et al., 2011), the impact of non-canonical signaling via NIK on the development of DETC precursors and IL-17-producing γδ T cells stems from signaling within the thymic stroma, for which the conditional NIK mutant is a unique tool for further studies. Future work will reveal whether NIK-deficient thymic stroma influences only γδ T cell development, or also the functional profile of the subsequently emerging αβ T cell compartment.

1. 1. Akiyama T
   2. Shimo Y
   3. Yanai H
   4. Qin J
   5. Ohshima D
   6. Maruyama Y
   7. Asaumi Y
   8. Kitazawa J
   9. Takayanagi H
   10. Penninger JM
   11. Matsumoto M
   12. Nitta T
   13. Takahama Y
   14. Inoue Jun-ichiro

   (2008) The tumor necrosis factor family receptors RANK and CD40 cooperatively establish the thymic medullary microenvironment and self-tolerance

   Immunity 29:423–437.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2008.06.015

   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Allison JP
   2. Havran WL

   (1991) The immunobiology of t cells with invariant gammadelta antigen receptors

   Annual Review of Immunology 9:679–705.

   https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.iy.09.040191.003335

   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Asarnow DM
   2. Kuziel WA
   3. Bonyhad M
   4. Tigelaar RE
   5. Tucker PW
   6. Allison JP

   (1988) Limited diversity of γ antigen receptor genes of thy-11+dendritic epidermal cellss

   Cell 55:837–847.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(88)90139-0

   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Barbee SD
   2. Woodward MJ
   3. Turchinovich G
   4. Mention J-J
   5. Lewis JM
   6. Boyden LM
   7. Lifton RP
   8. Tigelaar R
   9. Hayday AC

   (2011) Skint-1 is a highly specific, unique selecting component for epidermal t cells

   Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108:3330–3335.

   https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010890108

   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Bonneville M
   2. O'Brien RL
   3. Born WK

   (2010) γ t cell effector functions: a blend of innate programming and acquired plasticityy

   Nature Reviews Immunology 10:467–478.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2781

   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Boyden LM
   2. Lewis JM
   3. Barbee SD
   4. Bas A
   5. Girardi M
   6. Hayday AC
   7. Tigelaar RE
   8. Lifton RP

   (2008) Skint1, the prototype of a newly identified immunoglobulin superfamily gene cluster, positively selects epidermal γ t cellss

   Nature Genetics 40:656–662.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.108

   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Cai Y
   2. Shen X
   3. Ding C
   4. Qi C
   5. Li K
   6. Li X
   7. Jala VR
   8. Zhang Huang-ge
   9. Wang T
   10. Zheng J
   11. Yan J

   (2011) Pivotal role of dermal IL-17-producing γ t cells in skin inflammationn

   Immunity 35:596–610.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2011.08.001

   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Chai Q
   2. Onder L
   3. Scandella E
   4. Gil-Cruz C
   5. Perez-Shibayama C
   6. Cupovic J
   7. Danuser R
   8. Sparwasser T
   9. Luther SA
   10. Thiel V
   11. Rülicke T
   12. Stein JV
   13. Hehlgans T
   14. Ludewig B

   (2013) Maturation of lymph node fibroblastic reticular cells from myofibroblastic precursors is critical for antiviral immunity

   Immunity 38:1013–1024.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2013.03.012

   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Constant P
   2. Davodeau F
   3. Peyrat M
   4. Poquet Y
   5. Puzo G
   6. Bonneville M
   7. Fournie J

   (1994) Stimulation of human gamma delta t cells by nonpeptidic mycobacterial ligands

   Science 264:267–270.

   https://doi.org/10.1126/science.8146660

   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Cua DJ
    2. Tato CM

    (2010) Innate IL-17-producing cells: the sentinels of the immune system

    Nature Reviews Immunology 10:479–489.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2800

    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Darnay BG
    2. Ni J
    3. Moore PA
    4. Aggarwal BB

    (1999) Activation of NF- b by RANK requires tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor (tRAF) 6 and NF- b-inducing kinase: identification of a novel TRAF6 interaction motif

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 274:7724–7731.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.12.7724

    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Elewaut D
    2. Shaikh RB
    3. Hammond KJL
    4. De Winter H
    5. Leishman AJ
    6. Sidobre S
    7. Turovskaya O
    8. Prigozy TI
    9. Ma L
    10. Banks TA
    11. Lo D
    12. Ware CF
    13. Cheroutre H
    14. Kronenberg M

    (2003) NIK-dependent RelB activation defines a unique signaling pathway for the development of v 14i NKT cells

    Journal of Experimental Medicine 197:1623–1633.

    https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20030141

    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Eshima K
    2. Okabe M
    3. Kajiura S
    4. Noma H
    5. Shinohara N
    6. Iwabuchi K

    (2014) Significant involvement of nuclear factor-κB-inducing kinase in proper differentiation of α and γ t cellsls

    Immunology 141:222–232.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/imm.12186

    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Gordon J
    2. Xiao S
    3. Hughes B
    4. Su Dong-ming
    5. Navarre SP
    6. Condie BG
    7. Manley NR

    (2007) Specific expression of lacZ and cre recombinase in fetal thymic epithelial cells by multiplex gene targeting at the Foxn1 locus

    BMC Developmental Biology 7:69.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-213X-7-69

    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Gray EE
    2. Suzuki K
    3. Cyster JG

    (2011) Cutting edge: identification of a motile IL-17-producing t cell population in the dermis

    The Journal of Immunology 186:6091–6095.

    https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1100427

    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Gray EE
    2. Ramírez-Valle F
    3. Xu Y
    4. Wu S
    5. Wu Z
    6. Karjalainen KE
    7. Cyster JG

    (2013) Deficiency in IL-17-committed Vγ4+ γ t cells in a spontaneous Sox13-mutant CD45.11+congenic mouse substrain provides protection from dermatitiss

    Nature Immunology 14:584–592.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.2585

    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Haas JD
    2. González FHM
    3. Schmitz S
    4. Chennupati V
    5. Föhse L
    6. Kremmer E
    7. Förster R
    8. Prinz I

    (2009) CCR6 and NK1.1 distinguish between IL-17A and IFN-γ-producing γ effector t cellss

    European Journal of Immunology 39:3488–3497.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.200939922

    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Haas JD
    2. Ravens S
    3. Düber S
    4. Sandrock I
    5. Oberdörfer L
    6. Kashani E
    7. Chennupati V
    8. Föhse L
    9. Naumann R
    10. Weiss S
    11. Krueger A
    12. Förster R
    13. Prinz I

    (2012) Development of interleukin-17-producing γ t cells is restricted to a functional embryonic wavee

    Immunity 37:48–59.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2012.06.003

    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Hikosaka Y
    2. Nitta T
    3. Ohigashi I
    4. Yano K
    5. Ishimaru N
    6. Hayashi Y
    7. Matsumoto M
    8. Matsuo K
    9. Penninger JM
    10. Takayanagi H
    11. Yokota Y
    12. Yamada H
    13. Yoshikai Y
    14. Inoue Jun-ichiro
    15. Akiyama T
    16. Takahama Y

    (2008) The cytokine RANKL produced by positively selected thymocytes fosters medullary thymic epithelial cells that express autoimmune regulator

    Immunity 29:438–450.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2008.06.018

    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Hofmann J
    2. Mair F
    3. Greter M
    4. Schmidt-Supprian M
    5. Becher B

    (2011) NIK signaling in dendritic cells but not in t cells is required for the development of effector t cells and cell-mediated immune responses

    Journal of Experimental Medicine 208:1917–1929.

    https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20110128

    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Ishimaru N
    2. Kishimoto H
    3. Hayashi Y
    4. Sprent J

    (2006) Regulation of naive t cell function by the NF-κB2 pathway

    Nature Immunology 7:763–772.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ni1351

    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Jensen KDC
    2. Su X
    3. Shin S
    4. Li L
    5. Youssef S
    6. Yamasaki S
    7. Steinman L
    8. Saito T
    9. Locksley RM
    10. Davis MM
    11. Baumgarth N
    12. Chien Yueh-hsiu

    (2008) Thymic selection determines γ t cell effector fate: antigen-naive cells make interleukin-17 and antigen-experienced cells make interferon γγ

    Immunity 29:90–100.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2008.04.022

    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Lewis JM
    2. Girardi M
    3. Roberts SJ
    4. D Barbee S
    5. Hayday AC
    6. Tigelaar RE

    (2006) Selection of the cutaneous intraepithelial γ+ t cell repertoire by a thymic stromal determinant

    Nature Immunology 7:843–850.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ni1363

    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Li Q
    2. Verma IM

    (2002) NF-κB regulation in the immune system

    Nature Reviews Immunology 2:725–734.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nri910

    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Lockhart E
    2. Green AM
    3. Flynn JL

    (2006) IL-17 production is dominated by gammadelta t cells rather than CD4 t cells during mycobacterium tuberculosis infection

    The Journal of Immunology 177:4662–4669.

    https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.177.7.4662

    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Malinin NL
    2. Boldin MP
    3. Kovalenko AV
    4. Wallach D

    (1997) MAP3K-related kinase involved in NF-KB induction by TNF, CD95 and IL-1

    Nature 385:540–544.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/385540a0

    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Matsumoto M
    2. Yamada T
    3. Yoshinaga SK
    4. Boone T
    5. Horan T
    6. Fujita S
    7. Li Y
    8. Mitani T

    (2002) Essential role of NF- b-inducing kinase in t cell activation through the TCR/CD3 pathway

    The Journal of Immunology 169:1151–1158.

    https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.169.3.1151

    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Onder L
    2. Nindl V
    3. Scandella E
    4. Chai Q
    5. Cheng H-W
    6. Caviezel-Firner S
    7. Novkovic M
    8. Bomze D
    9. Maier R
    10. Mair F
    11. Ledermann B
    12. Becher B
    13. Waisman A
    14. Ludewig B

    (2015) Alternative NF-κB signaling regulates mTEC differentiation from podoplanin-expressing presursors in the cortico-medullary junction

    European Journal of Immunology 45:2218–2231.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.201545677

    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Pantelyushin S
    2. Haak S
    3. Ingold B
    4. Kulig P
    5. Heppner FL
    6. Navarini AA
    7. Becher B

    (2012) Rortt+innate lymphocytes and γ t cells initiate psoriasiform plaque formation in micece

    Journal of Clinical Investigation 122:2252–2256.

    https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI61862

    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Perfetto SP
    2. Chattopadhyay PK
    3. Roederer M

    (2004) Innovation: seventeen-colour flow cytometry: unravelling the immune system

    Nature Reviews Immunology 4:648–655.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nri1416

    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Petermann F
    2. Rothhammer V
    3. Claussen MC
    4. Haas JD
    5. Blanco LR
    6. Heink S
    7. Prinz I
    8. Hemmer B
    9. Kuchroo VK
    10. Oukka M
    11. Korn T

    (2010) γ t cells enhance autoimmunity by restraining regulatory t cell responses via an interleukin-23-dependent mechanismm

    Immunity 33:351–363.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2010.08.013

    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Powolny-Budnicka I
    2. Riemann M
    3. Tänzer S
    4. Schmid RM
    5. Hehlgans T
    6. Weih F

    (2011) RelA and RelB transcription factors in distinct thymocyte populations control lymphotoxin-dependent interleukin-17 production in γ t cellss

    Immunity 34:364–374.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2011.02.019

    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Prinz I
    2. Silva-Santos B
    3. Pennington DJ

    (2013) Functional development of γ t cellss

    European Journal of Immunology 43:1988–1994.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.201343759

    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Ribot JC
    2. deBarros A
    3. Pang DJ
    4. Neves JF
    5. Peperzak V
    6. Roberts SJ
    7. Girardi M
    8. Borst J
    9. Hayday AC
    10. Pennington DJ
    11. Silva-Santos B

    (2009) CD27 is a thymic determinant of the balance between interferon-γ- and interleukin 17–producing γ t cell subsetss

    Nature Immunology 10:427–436.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.1717

    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Ribot JC
    2. Chaves-Ferreira M
    3. d'Orey F
    4. Wencker M
    5. Goncalves-Sousa N
    6. Decalf J
    7. Simas JP
    8. Hayday AC
    9. Silva-Santos B

    (2010) Cutting edge: adaptive versus innate receptor signals selectively control the pool sizes of murine IFN-γ- or IL-17-producing γδ t cells upon infection

    The Journal of Immunology 185:6421–6425.

    https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1002283

    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Roberts NA
    2. White AJ
    3. Jenkinson WE
    4. Turchinovich G
    5. Nakamura K
    6. Withers DR
    7. McConnell FM
    8. Desanti GE
    9. Benezech C
    10. Parnell SM
    11. Cunningham AF
    12. Paolino M
    13. Penninger JM
    14. Simon AK
    15. Nitta T
    16. Ohigashi I
    17. Takahama Y
    18. Caamano JH
    19. Hayday AC
    20. Lane PJL
    21. Jenkinson EJ
    22. Anderson G

    (2012) Rank signaling links the development of invariant γ t cell progenitors and airee+medullary epitheliumm

    Immunity 36:427–437.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2012.01.016

    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Sen R

    (2006) Control of b lymphocyte apoptosis by the transcription factor NF-κB

    Immunity 25:871–883.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2006.12.003

    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Shinkura R
    2. Kitada K
    3. Matsuda F
    4. Tashiro K
    5. Ikuta K
    6. Suzuki M
    7. Kogishi K
    8. Serikawa T
    9. Honjo T

    (1999) Alymphoplasia is caused by a point mutation in the mouse gene encoding nf-kappa b-inducing kinase

    Nature Genetics 22:74–77.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/8780

    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Silva-Santos B
    2. Pennington DJ
    3. Hayday AC

    (2005) Lymphotoxin-mediated regulation of cell differentiation by t cell progenitors

    Science 307:925–928.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1103978

    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Strid J
    2. Roberts SJ
    3. Filler RB
    4. Lewis JM
    5. Kwong BY
    6. Schpero W
    7. Kaplan DH
    8. Hayday AC
    9. Girardi M

    (2008) Acute upregulation of an NKG2D ligand promotes rapid reorganization of a local immune compartment with pleiotropic effects on carcinogenesis

    Nature Immunology 9:146–154.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ni1556

    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Strid J
    2. Sobolev O
    3. Zafirova B
    4. Polic B
    5. Hayday A

    (2011) The intraepithelial t cell response to NKG2D-ligands links lymphoid stress surveillance to atopy

    Science 334:1293–1297.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1211250

    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Sutton CE
    2. Lalor SJ
    3. Sweeney CM
    4. Brereton CF
    5. Lavelle EC
    6. Mills KHG

    (2009) Interleukin-1 and IL-23 induce innate IL-17 production from γ t cellss,amplifying Th17 responses and autoimmunityy

    Immunity 31:331–341.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2009.08.001

    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Tsubata R
    2. Tsubata T
    3. Hiai H
    4. Shinkura R
    5. Matsumura R
    6. Sumida T
    7. Miyawaki S
    8. Ishida H
    9. Kumagai S
    10. Nakao K
    11. Honjo T

    (1996) Autoimmune disease of exocrine organs in immunodeficient alymphoplasia mice: a spontaneous model for sjren's syndromee

    European Journal of Immunology 26:2742–2748.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.1830261129

    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Turchinovich G
    2. Hayday AC

    (2011) Skint-1 identifies a common molecular mechanism for the development of interferon-γ-secreting versus interleukin-17-secreting γ t cellss

    Immunity 35:59–68.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2011.04.018

    • Google Scholar
45. 1. van der Fits L
    2. Mourits S
    3. Voerman JSA
    4. Kant M
    5. Boon L
    6. Laman JD
    7. Cornelissen F
    8. Mus A-M
    9. Florencia E
    10. Prens EP
    11. Lubberts E

    (2009) Imiquimod-induced psoriasis-like skin inflammation in mice is mediated via the IL-23/IL-17 axis

    The Journal of Immunology 182:5836–5845.

    https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0802999

    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Vantourout P
    2. Hayday A

    (2013) Six-of-the-best: unique contributions of γ t cells to immunologyy

    Nature Reviews Immunology 13:88–100.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3384

    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Wencker M
    2. Turchinovich G
    3. Di Marco Barros R
    4. Deban L
    5. Jandke A
    6. Cope A
    7. Hayday AC

    (2013) Innate-like t cells straddle innate and adaptive immunity by altering antigen-receptor responsiveness

    Nature Immunology 15:80–87.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.2773

    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Xiong N
    2. Kang C
    3. Raulet DH

    (2004) Positive selection of dendritic epidermal γ t cell precursors in the fetal thymus determines expression of skin-homing receptorss

    Immunity 21:121–131.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2004.06.008

    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Yin L
    2. Wu L
    3. Wesche H
    4. Arthur CD
    5. White JM
    6. Goeddel DV
    7. Schreiber RD

    (2001) Defective lymphotoxin-beta receptor-induced NF-kappa b transcriptional activity in NIK-deficient mice

    Science 291:2162–2165.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1058453

    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Zeng X
    2. Wei Y-L
    3. Huang J
    4. Newell EW
    5. Yu H
    6. Kidd BA
    7. Kuhns MS
    8. Waters RW
    9. Davis MM
    10. Weaver CT
    11. Chien Yueh-hsiu

    (2012) γ t cells recognize a microbial encoded b cell antigen to initiate a rapid antigen-specific interleukin-17 responsee

    Immunity 37:524–534.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2012.06.011

    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Zhu M
    2. Chin RK
    3. Christiansen PA
    4. Lo JC
    5. Liu X
    6. Ware C
    7. Siebenlist U
    8. Fu Y-X

    (2006) NF-κB2 is required for the establishment of central tolerance through an aire-dependent pathway

    Journal of Clinical Investigation 116:2964–2971.

    https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI28326

    • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Florian Mair

   Institute of Experimental Immunology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

   Contribution

   FM, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

2. Stefanie Joller

   Institute of Experimental Immunology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

   Contribution

   SJ, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6906-4892

3. Romy Hoeppli

   Institute of Experimental Immunology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

   Present address

   Department of Surgery, Child and Family Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

   Contribution

   RH, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

4. Lucas Onder

   Institute of Immunobiology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland

   Contribution

   LO, Drafting or revising the article, Contributed unpublished essential data or reagents

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

5. Matthias Hahn

   Institute for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center, Johannes-Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany

   Contribution

   MH, Acquisition of data, Drafting or revising the article

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

6. Burkhard Ludewig

   Institute of Immunobiology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland

   Contribution

   BL, Drafting or revising the article, Contributed unpublished essential data or reagents

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

7. Ari Waisman

   Institute for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center, Johannes-Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany

   Contribution

   AW, Conception and design, Drafting or revising the article, Contributed unpublished essential data or reagents

   Contributed equally with

   Burkhard Becher

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

8. Burkhard Becher

   Institute of Experimental Immunology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

   Contribution

   BB, Conception and design, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article

   Contributed equally with

   Ari Waisman

   For correspondence

   becher@immunology.uzh.ch

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1541-7867

• 1,838

  views

• 473

  downloads

• 37

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.