Status Epilepticus: Stopping runaway seizures with a chill pill

The neuropeptide neurotensin can reduce status epilepticus and its associated consequences through induction of therapeutic hypothermia when bound to a molecule that can penetrate the blood-brain barrier.
  1. Gordon F Buchanan  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Iowa, Carver College of Medicine, United States

The brain consists of electrically excitable cells called neurons, which work in concert to regulate brain function. Sometimes, these cells become aberrantly connected and may activate together as a small network, leading to abnormal bursts of electrical activity known as seizures. Seizures disrupt the flow of messages between neurons and can lead to involuntary changes in behavior, sensation, and body movement or function.

Recurrent seizures are the hallmark of disease in patients with epilepsy (Langbein et al., 2024). Seizures that last a long time, also known as status epilepticus, can be life-threatening and require immediate treatment. Unfortunately, status epilepticus is often very difficult to control, leading to a high rate of morbidity and mortality (Kämppi et al., 2024).

Efforts to develop better therapies for status epilepticus are ongoing (O’Kula and Hill, 2024; Kishihara et al., 2024). One way to manage these kinds of seizures involves inducing hypothermia in the body and the brain to reduce cellular excitability (Kirmani et al., 2021). However, lowering body temperature using physical means, such as cooling blankets or infusions of cooled saline, can negatively affect the body. A more targeted way would be through medication that could pharmacologically alter body temperature.

While drugs targeting the biochemical pathways that regulate temperature homeostasis can lower body temperature, they often fail to reach the brain due to the blood-brain barrier, a protective semipermeable membrane between the blood and the brain. Thus, many drugs that lower body temperature do not markedly reduce brain temperature and have little to no effect on status epilepticus. Now, in eLife, Lotfi Ferhat, Michel Khrestchatisky and colleagues report a new approach to specifically reduce brain temperature and stop status epilepticus (Ferhat et al., 2024).

The researchers, who are based at various research institutes in France, targeted the biochemical pathway involving the signaling molecule neurotensin, which is known to regulate body temperature by lowering the set point on the thermostat that governs body temperature. As neurotensin cannot cross the blood-brain barrier, Ferhat et al. combined neurotensin with a molecule known to penetrate the brain and tested its effectiveness in mice. Specifically, these ‘conjugated’ versions were able to bind the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR), which then transported the molecule across the blood-brain barrier intothe brain.

The researchers developed several conjugate proteins, and through a series of careful testing, identified one to employ throughout the study. The conjugate formed by this protein and neurotensin was successful in reaching the brain, inducing hypothermia, and reducing the seizures and cognitive and inflammatory changes associated with status epilepticus. However, it still needs to be confirmed that neurotensin-induced hypothermia alone is responsible for alleviating the effects associated with status epilepticus.

Regardless, the possibility of pharmacologically induced hypothermia for managing status epilepticus is exciting. Refractory status epilepticus (which continues despite treatment) is a dreadful condition with extremely high rates of mortality, despite the barrage of currently available therapies. Improved treatment modalities are sorely needed. While the findings of Ferhat et al. are promising, more needs to be learned about the safety of these treatments for the rest of the body. Such studies could be first trialled in animals but would later need to be replicated in humans. Moreover, while it is assumed that pharmacological means to induce hypothermia would have fewer negative consequences than physical means, this needs to be empirically evaluated. Hypothermia itself can have profound negative consequences, so the degree of hypothermia would need to be tightly monitored (Lu et al., 2024).

The extent of neuroprotection afforded by pharmacologically induced hypothermia could likely extend to other forms of neural injury, including stroke, post-anoxic brain injury or traumatic brain injury (Lin et al., 2024). Thus, implications for this promising work are potentially extremely far-reaching.

References

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Gordon F Buchanan

    Gordon F Buchanan is in the University of Iowa, Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, United States

    For correspondence
    gordon-buchanan@uiowa.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2371-4455

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published:

Copyright

© 2024, Buchanan

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 329
    views
  • 29
    downloads
  • 0
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Gordon F Buchanan
(2024)
Status Epilepticus: Stopping runaway seizures with a chill pill
eLife 13:e102055.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.102055

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Hendrik Heinbockel, Gregor Leicht ... Lars Schwabe
    Research Article

    When retrieved, seemingly stable memories can become sensitive to significant events, such as acute stress. The mechanisms underlying these memory dynamics remain poorly understood. Here, we show that noradrenergic stimulation after memory retrieval impairs subsequent remembering, depending on hippocampal and cortical signals emerging during retrieval. In a three-day study, we measured brain activity using fMRI during initial encoding, 24 hr-delayed memory cueing followed by pharmacological elevations of glucocorticoid or noradrenergic activity, and final recall. While post-retrieval glucocorticoids did not affect subsequent memory, the impairing effect of noradrenergic arousal on final recall depended on hippocampal reactivation and category-level reinstatement in the ventral temporal cortex during memory cueing. These effects did not require a reactivation of the original memory trace and did not interact with offline reinstatement during rest. Our findings demonstrate that, depending on the retrieval-related neural reactivation of memories, noradrenergic arousal after retrieval can alter the future accessibility of consolidated memories.

    1. Neuroscience
    Rituja S Bisen, Fathima Mukthar Iqbal ... Jan M Ache
    Research Article

    Insulin plays a key role in metabolic homeostasis. Drosophila insulin-producing cells (IPCs) are functional analogues of mammalian pancreatic beta cells and release insulin directly into circulation. To investigate the in vivo dynamics of IPC activity, we quantified the effects of nutritional and internal state changes on IPCs using electrophysiological recordings. We found that the nutritional state strongly modulates IPC activity. IPC activity decreased with increasing periods of starvation. Refeeding flies with glucose or fructose, two nutritive sugars, significantly increased IPC activity, whereas non-nutritive sugars had no effect. In contrast to feeding, glucose perfusion did not affect IPC activity. This was reminiscent of the mammalian incretin effect, where glucose ingestion drives higher insulin release than intravenous application. Contrary to IPCs, Diuretic hormone 44-expressing neurons in the pars intercerebralis (DH44PINs) responded to glucose perfusion. Functional connectivity experiments demonstrated that these DH44PINs do not affect IPC activity, while other DH44Ns inhibit them. Hence, populations of autonomously and systemically sugar-sensing neurons work in parallel to maintain metabolic homeostasis. Accordingly, activating IPCs had a small, satiety-like effect on food-searching behavior and reduced starvation-induced hyperactivity, whereas activating DH44Ns strongly increased hyperactivity. Taken together, we demonstrate that IPCs and DH44Ns are an integral part of a modulatory network that orchestrates glucose homeostasis and adaptive behavior in response to shifts in the metabolic state.