Camouflage: Tiny particles help insects evade predators
By reducing the reflection of ultraviolet light, hollow nanoparticles called brochosomes help to protect leafhoppers from predators.
- Department of Mechanical Engineering and the Materials Research Institute, Pennsylvania State University, United States
The wings of leafhoppers – tiny insects that feed on the sap in plants – are coated with hollow spheres called brochosomes. These structures are extremely small, typically ranging from 200 to 600 nanometers in diameter (Figure 1), and have fascinated entomologists since they were discovered in the 1950s (Tulloch et al., 1952; Tulloch and Shapiro, 1954).
Figure 1
The structure of brochosomes.
A scanning-electron microscope image showing brochosomes produced by the leafhopper species Gyponana serpenta. The name brochosome comes from the Greek words for net (brochos) and body (soma), and the near-spherical shape of these nanoparticles resembles the structure of Buckminsterfullerene (a much smaller molecule formed of 60 carbon atoms). Wu et al. demonstrated how brochosomes reduce the reflection of ultraviolet light, thus making it more difficult for various predators to see leafhoppers.
Image credit: Lin Wang and Tak-Sing Wong (CC BY 4.0).
Brochosomes are secreted through droplets and are spread across the body by the hind legs of the insect during a repetitive grooming process (Rakitov, 1996). They also have properties that are thought to help leafhoppers perform various roles, such as repelling water and keeping themselves clean (Rakitov and Gorb, 2013a; Rakitov and Gorb, 2013b).
It has long been believed that brochosomes may also provide a camouflage coating that allows leafhoppers to hide from predators, such as birds and jumping spiders (Swain, 1936). These predators are able to see a broad range of wavelengths, including ultraviolet light (Cronin and Bok, 2016). This creates intense evolutionary pressure for insects like leafhoppers to develop mechanisms that reduce their visibility.
Previous research revealed that brochosomes reflect light poorly at both visible and ultraviolet wavelengths (Yang et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2024b). Now, in eLife, Wei Wu, Jian-Ping Chen and colleagues at Ningbo University and the Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences report the first direct evidence that this camouflage function protects leafhoppers from jumping spiders (Wu et al., 2024).
To investigate how effective brochosomes are at reducing reflection at ultraviolet wavelengths, Wu et al. studied the forewings of leafhoppers 5 and 25 days after they had emerged from their eggs and developed into adults. Their findings showed that 5-day-old leafhoppers, which have high levels of brochosome coverage (90%), exhibited less reflectance than 25-day-old leafhoppers, which have lower levels of coverage (10–40%).
Wu et al. then measured the hunting efficiency of the jumping spiders against 5-day-old and 25-day-old leafhoppers. This revealed that leafhoppers with less brochosomes were captured more quickly than those with more extensive coverage. In addition, the percentage of leafhoppers killed by the spider (known as the predation rate) was higher for populations with reduced brochosome coverage (66.7% vs 33% for males; 81.7% vs 18.3% for females). These findings provide direct evidence that brochosomes enhance leafhopper survival by reducing the reflection of ultraviolet light, making it more difficult for predators to see the leafhoppers.
Another important contribution by Wu et al. was to identify four novel structural proteins that help to synthesize brochosomes. Blocking the production of these proteins, using a tool called RNA interference, altered the shape of the brochosomes. Moreover, leafhopper wings coated with these misshapen nanoparticles reflected more ultraviolet light, leading to a higher rate of predation. Further analysis investigating the ancestry of the four genes that code for these proteins suggests that brochosomes may have evolved through gene duplication events and by accumulating genetic changes over time.
This study represents an important step in understanding the broader biological functions of brochosomes. By demonstrating how these structures protect leafhoppers from their natural predators, Wu et al. provide compelling evidence of the role of brochosomes in antireflective camouflage. An intriguing open question remains: do variations in the size and geometry of brochosomes help leafhoppers evade specific predators in different environments? The techniques developed in this work could help answer this and other questions.
Beyond their importance in biology, brochosomes offer a blueprint for new optical materials that could be useful for applications in solar energy, advanced coatings and camouflage technology. However, replicating the complex structure of brochosomes using synthetic methods at scale remains difficult (Wang et al., 2024a). The work of Wu et al. could help to inspire novel approaches for addressing these challenges.
References
-
Photoreception and vision in the ultravioletThe Journal of Experimental Biology 219:2790–2801.https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.128769
-
Post-moulting behaviour associated with Malpighian tubule secretions in leafhoppers and treehoppers (Auchenorrhyncha: Membracoidea)Eur. J. Entomology 93:167–184.
-
Brochosomal coats turn leafhopper (Insecta, Hemiptera, Cicadellidae) integument to superhydrophobic stateProceedings of the Royal Society B. Biological Sciences 280:20122391.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.2391
-
Brochosomes protect leafhoppers (Insecta, Hemiptera, Cicadellidae) from sticky exudatesJournal of the Royal Society Interface 10:20130445.https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2013.0445
-
Notes on the oviposition and life history of the leafhopper Oncometopta undata FabrEntomological News 47:264–266.
-
The occurrence of ultramicroscopic bodies with leafhoppers and mosquitoesBull. Brooklyn Entomol. Soc 47:41–42.
-
Ultra-antireflective synthetic brochosomesNature Communications 8:1285.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01404-8
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2024, Wang and Wong
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 608
- views
-
- 65
- downloads
-
- 1
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Camouflage: Tiny particles help insects evade predators
eLife 13:e103508.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.103508
Further reading
-
- Ecology
- Neuroscience
Prey must balance predator avoidance with feeding, a central dilemma in prey refuge theory. Additionally, prey must assess predatory imminence—how close threats are in space and time. Predatory imminence theory classifies defensive behaviors into three defense modes: pre-encounter, post-encounter, and circa-strike, corresponding to increasing levels of threat—–suspecting, detecting, and contacting a predator. Although predatory risk often varies in spatial distribution and imminence, how these factors intersect to influence defensive behaviors is poorly understood. Integrating these factors into a naturalistic environment enables comprehensive analysis of multiple defense modes in consistent conditions. Here, we combine prey refuge and predatory imminence theories to develop a model system of nematode defensive behaviors, with Caenorhabditis elegans as prey and Pristionchus pacificus as predator. In a foraging environment comprised of a food-rich, high-risk patch and a food-poor, low-risk refuge, C. elegans innately exhibits circa-strike behaviors. With experience, it learns post- and pre-encounter behaviors that proactively anticipate threats. These defense modes intensify with predator lethality, with only life-threatening predators capable of eliciting all three modes. SEB-3 receptors and NLP-49 peptides, key stress regulators, vary in their impact and interdependence across defense modes. Overall, our model system reveals fine-grained insights into how stress-related signaling regulates defensive behaviors.
-
- Ecology
Understanding the relationships between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning stands as a cornerstone in ecological research. Extensive evidence now underscores the profound impact of species loss on the stability and dynamics of ecosystem functions. However, it remains unclear whether the loss of genetic diversity within key species yields similar consequences. Here, we delve into the intricate relationship between species diversity, genetic diversity, and ecosystem functions across three trophic levels – primary producers, primary consumers, and secondary consumers – in natural aquatic ecosystems. Our investigation involves estimating species diversity and genome-wide diversity – gauged within three pivotal species – within each trophic level, evaluating seven key ecosystem functions, and analyzing the magnitude of the relationships between biodiversity and ecosystem functions (BEFs). We found that, overall, the absolute effect size of genetic diversity on ecosystem functions mirrors that of species diversity in natural ecosystems. We nonetheless unveil a striking dichotomy: while genetic diversity was positively correlated with various ecosystem functions, species diversity displays a negative correlation with these functions. These intriguing antagonist effects of species and genetic diversity persist across the three trophic levels (underscoring its systemic nature), but were apparent only when BEFs were assessed within trophic levels rather than across them. This study reveals the complexity of predicting the consequences of genetic and species diversity loss under natural conditions, and emphasizes the need for further mechanistic models integrating these two facets of biodiversity.
