Locomotion: How vision shapes the paths we choose
When walking, our brain needs to make decisions, such as where to step and which path to follow. Visual inputs are central to this process, as they allow us to continuously estimate our motion and orientation, as well as regulate our direction and speed (Warren et al., 2001).
This continuous regulation can be explained using mathematical models that rely on vector calculus (Matthis et al., 2022). However, walking also involves discrete choices – such as selecting which available foothold to use, or turning left or right – that are guided by visual features of the path ahead, such as the rockiness and steepness of the terrain (Matthis et al., 2018). While it may seem obvious that people avoid rugged paths when easier alternatives exist, there is no mathematical model to explain this behavior. Now, in eLife, Mary Hayhoe and colleagues – including Karl Muller as first author – report the results of a study that sheds new light on how these decisions are made (Muller et al., 2024).
The researchers analyzed data from previous studies in which they had tracked the eye and body movements of nine individuals as they walked across natural terrains (Matthis et al., 2022; Bonnen et al., 2021). Participants also wore eye-tracking cameras that captured visual information about where they were looking within the surrounding physical landscape. Muller et al. used this data to create a three-dimensional computational reconstruction of the terrains, which they aligned to the body and eye movements of the participants. This allowed them to develop egocentric visual depth images (which estimated how the retinas of individuals detect the depth of the terrain), and to determine where participants placed their feet.
The researchers – who are based at the University of Texas at Austin, Indiana University and Northeastern University – then used these visual depth images and foothold locations to train a neural network where to step in the reconstructed terrain. The trained model successfully predicted where the human participants placed their feet better than chance, suggesting that decisions about where to step are influenced by visual depth cues. This agrees with prior work showing reduced depth cues cause walkers to shift their gaze to closer footholds, perhaps so they can devote more attention to resolving depth ambiguities (Bonnen et al., 2021).
Next, Muller et al. used their model to investigate whether walkers chose flatter, more winding paths over direct, steeper alternatives that require more energy to cross due to the uneven terrain (Darici and Kuo, 2023; Kowalsky et al., 2021). The team compared two metrics: tortuosity, which is the ratio between the length of a path and the direct distance between its start and end; and a dimensionless measure of ruggedness, equal to the average angle of the up and down steps within a path. These metrics were recorded for the actual path the walkers took, and also for simulated, alternative routes they might have taken through the same terrain.
Muller et al. found that the tortuosity of the paths chosen by the human walkers correlated with the ruggedness of the most direct simulated path through the terrain: the steeper and more rugged the direct path, the more likely a walker is to detour and take a longer, flatter route. This suggests a trade-off whereby walkers assess paths with high tortuosity to be less energetically costly than ones which are straighter but more rugged. Muller et al. also discovered that this trade-off was stronger for shorter individuals, possibly due to greater difficulty with steep steps, though this effect warrants further study (as discussed in the public reviews of the article).
Studying locomotion in natural settings is challenging, as terrains and visual features are harder to manipulate or measure compared to controlled laboratory environments. The methods created by Muller et al. open up new avenues for understanding decision-making during locomotion. However, there is much about the trade-off proposed in the study that remains unknown.
For example, controlled experiments are needed to confirm whether the ruggedness of the simulated direct paths match those experienced in real life. In addition, the human eye likely perceives other aspects of the terrain beyond just depth, and it remains to be seen whether other visual cues help evaluate different structural properties of the landscape, such as friction and the hardness of footholds. Related issues in natural locomotion, such as energy expenditure, also merit further investigation. For instance, the energetic costs of tortuous versus rugged paths still need quantification, as do temporal costs, which are also suspected to govern ecological behavior (Carlisle and Kuo, 2023).
The approach taken by Muller et al. could also be used to study people in human-designed environments, such as pedestrians crossing busy roads (do people jaywalk rather than use pedestrian crossings to save energy, time, or other costs?). Whether navigating natural landscapes or cityscapes, humans constantly create their own paths according to a variety of physical and perceptual criteria.
References
-
Gaze and the control of foot placement when walking in natural terrainCurrent Biology 28:1224–1233.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.03.008
-
Retinal optic flow during natural locomotionPLOS Computational Biology 18:e1009575.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009575
-
Optic flow is used to control human walkingNature Neuroscience 4:213–216.https://doi.org/10.1038/84054
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2024, Kuo
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 319
- views
-
- 23
- downloads
-
- 0
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
Recent studies suggest that calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) neurons in the parabrachial nucleus (PBN) represent aversive information and signal a general alarm to the forebrain. If CGRP neurons serve as a true general alarm, their activation would modulate both passive nad active defensive behaviors depending on the magnitude and context of the threat. However, most prior research has focused on the role of CGRP neurons in passive freezing responses, with limited exploration of their involvement in active defensive behaviors. To address this, we examined the role of CGRP neurons in active defensive behavior using a predator-like robot programmed to chase mice. Our electrophysiological results revealed that CGRP neurons encode the intensity of aversive stimuli through variations in firing durations and amplitudes. Optogenetic activation of CGRP neurons during robot chasing elevated flight responses in both conditioning and retention tests, presumably by amplifying the perception of the threat as more imminent and dangerous. In contrast, animals with inactivated CGRP neurons exhibited reduced flight responses, even when the robot was programmed to appear highly threatening during conditioning. These findings expand the understanding of CGRP neurons in the PBN as a critical alarm system, capable of dynamically regulating active defensive behaviors by amplifying threat perception, and ensuring adaptive responses to varying levels of danger.
-
- Neuroscience
Substance-induced social behavior deficits dramatically worsen the clinical outcome of substance use disorders; yet, the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Herein, we investigated the role for the corticotropin-releasing factor receptor 1 (CRF1) in the acute sociability deficits induced by morphine and the related activity of oxytocin (OXY)- and arginine-vasopressin (AVP)-expressing neurons of the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVN). For this purpose, we used both the CRF1 receptor-preferring antagonist compound antalarmin and the genetic mouse model of CRF1 receptor-deficiency. Antalarmin completely abolished sociability deficits induced by morphine in male, but not in female, C57BL/6J mice. Accordingly, genetic CRF1 receptor-deficiency eliminated morphine-induced sociability deficits in male mice. Ex vivo electrophysiology studies showed that antalarmin also eliminated morphine-induced firing of PVN neurons in male, but not in female, C57BL/6J mice. Likewise, genetic CRF1 receptor-deficiency reduced morphine-induced firing of PVN neurons in a CRF1 gene expression-dependent manner. The electrophysiology results consistently mirrored the behavioral results, indicating a link between morphine-induced PVN activity and sociability deficits. Interestingly, in male mice antalarmin abolished morphine-induced firing in neurons co-expressing OXY and AVP, but not in neurons expressing only AVP. In contrast, in female mice antalarmin did not affect morphine-induced firing of neurons co-expressing OXY and AVP or only OXY, indicating a selective sex-specific role for the CRF1 receptor in opiate-induced PVN OXY activity. The present findings demonstrate a major, sex-linked, role for the CRF1 receptor in sociability deficits and related brain alterations induced by morphine, suggesting new therapeutic strategy for opiate use disorders.