Aging: Restoring bone healing potential
A combination of intermittent fasting and administering Wnt3a proteins to a bone injury can rejuvenate bone repair in aged mice.
- Centre for Oral Immunobiology and Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom
- Barts Centre for Squamous Cancer, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom
As we become older our body experiences a progressive decline in its ability to heal and regenerate. Bones are particularly affected (Colón et al., 2018), with age-related changes decreasing the number and functionality of osteoprogenitors – the cells that are required for bone development and repair. Aging can also decrease the blood supply to the bones and reduce mitochondrial activity, which is necessary for generating energy in cells (Clark et al., 2017).
Flat bones – such as the sternum, scapula, pelvis and skull – play crucial roles in protecting organs and anchoring muscles. However, their thin structure makes them prone to fractures (Huelke and Compton, 1983), and this risk increases as they become more brittle with age (Beedham et al., 2019). Skull fractures resulting from head injuries are particularly concerning in older individuals (Tsai et al., 2022).
As the global population ages, the need for innovative strategies to promote bone healing in elderly people becomes more urgent; however, previous approaches – including those based on growth factors, biomaterials, and cell therapies – have fallen short. This may be due to the bone tissue microenvironment – the surrounding cells, molecules and structures that support bone formation and repair – deteriorating, becoming stiffer, and displaying reduced metabolic activity with age.
Emerging evidence suggests that targeting metabolic pathways and rejuvenating the bone microenvironment could unlock the regenerative potential of aged tissues. However, this has been limited by a lack of studies on mice that are old enough to accurately reflect the decline seen in elderly humans. Now, in eLife, Shukry Habib (University of Lausanne) and colleagues – including Joshua Reeves as first author – report a detailed investigation of bone regeneration in very old mice (Reeves et al., 2024).
The researchers – who are at Lausanne, King’s College London and Zhejiang University – studied mice that were over 20 months old, which is equivalent to approximately 70 human years (Dutta and Sengupta, 2016). To identify systemic and local interventions that can restore the microenvironment of aged bones and also support bone healing, Reeves et al. employed a dual therapeutic approach to treat a bone injury in the skull of aged mice.
A bandage was used to administer a signalling protein called Wnt3a (which activates osteoprogenitors and thus drives bone growth and formation) to the injury site. This was combined with an intermittent fasting regimen, a systemic intervention known to enhance mitochondrial function and vascular health (Catterson et al., 2018; Longo and Anderson, 2022). Remarkably, this combination increased the number of osteoprogenitors at the site of injury and also restored their functionality, resulting in bone healing outcomes comparable to those seen in young mice.
At the cellular level, Reeves et al. provide fascinating insights into why this combined approach has a better outcome than either strategy alone. Amongst other benefits, intermittent fasting was shown to improve mitochondrial activity – while also improving the vascularisation of the tissue. This is critical for providing bone-healing cells with oxygen and nutrients – something which can be compromised as blood vessels deteriorate with age. Intermittent fasting also enhanced the production of NAD+ (a molecule which is vital for cellular energy and repair) in osteoprogenitor cells and improved the balance of beneficial bacteria in the gut of aged mice.
The Wnt3a bandage, on the other hand, boosted the number of osteoprogenitor cells at the site of injury. However, these cells only regained full functionality with intermittent fasting. Similar bone-healing benefits were also achieved without fasting by either directly increasing NAD+ levels through supplements, or by specifically modifying the gut bacteria population.
Taken together, these findings highlight the critical role of metabolic health in bone repair, as well as demonstrating the importance of integrating both systemic and local strategies for effective bone regeneration. Previous research has often relied on younger "aged" models that fail to capture the complexity of aging in humans (Kim et al., 2021). Focusing on mice equivalent in age to elderly humans is particularly noteworthy and provides a more realistic assessment of therapeutic potential, offering valuable insights into the possibility of translating the approach to humans.
While the findings represent a significant advance, they also raise important questions. Can the benefits of intermittent fasting be replicated in humans through NAD+ supplements or by modulating gut bacteria to provide alternative treatments for those not able to follow strict dietary regimens? How do interactions between osteoprogenitors and other microenvironment cells, such as immune cells, influence the observed outcomes? Would similar effects occur in younger individuals or other tissues? Future studies must address these gaps to accelerate the therapeutic potential of these approaches.
The significance of these findings extends beyond bone repair by suggesting the potential for restoring functionality to other aged tissues through targeting metabolic and cellular pathways. This raises intriguing possibilities for applying these strategies to tissues like skin or muscle, which also lose regenerative capacity with age.
Looking ahead, the findings of Reeves et al. open pathways for therapies combining localised treatments, like Wnt3a ligands, with systemic interventions targeting the metabolism. If successfully applied to humans, these therapies could transform care for elderly patients, enhancing fracture healing and, as a result, quality of life.
References
-
Head injury in the elderly - an overview for the physicianClinical Medicine 19:177–184.https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.19-2-177
-
Effects of aging on fracture HealingCurrent Osteoporosis Reports 15:601–608.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-017-0413-9
-
Muscle and bone mass loss in the elderly population: Advances in diagnosis and treatmentJournal of Biomedicine 3:40–49.https://doi.org/10.7150/jbm.23390
-
Men and mice: Relating their agesLife Sciences 152:244–248.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2015.10.025
-
Facial injuries in automobile crashesJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 41:241–244.https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(83)90266-5
-
A decrease in NAD+ contributes to the loss of osteoprogenitors and bone mass with agingNPJ Aging and Mechanisms of Disease 7:8.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41514-021-00058-7
-
The association between skull bone fractures and the mortality outcomes of patients with traumatic brain injuryEmergency Medicine International 2022:1296590.https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1296590
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2025, Sequeira
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 152
- views
-
- 18
- downloads
-
- 0
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Aging: Restoring bone healing potential
eLife 14:e105420.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.105420
Further reading
-
- Cell Biology
In animals, mitosis involves the breakdown of the nucleus. The reassembly of a nucleus after mitosis requires the reformation of the nuclear envelope around a single mass of chromosomes. This process requires Ankle2 (also known as LEM4 in humans) which interacts with PP2A and promotes the function of the Barrier-to-Autointegration Factor (BAF). Upon dephosphorylation, BAF dimers cross-bridge chromosomes and bind lamins and transmembrane proteins of the reassembling nuclear envelope. How Ankle2 functions in mitosis is incompletely understood. Using a combination of approaches in Drosophila, along with structural modeling, we provide several lines of evidence that suggest that Ankle2 is a regulatory subunit of PP2A, explaining how it promotes BAF dephosphorylation. In addition, we discovered that Ankle2 interacts with the endoplasmic reticulum protein Vap33, which is required for Ankle2 localization at the reassembling nuclear envelope during telophase. We identified the interaction sites of PP2A and Vap33 on Ankle2. Through genetic rescue experiments, we show that the Ankle2/PP2A interaction is essential for the function of Ankle2 in nuclear reassembly and that the Ankle2/Vap33 interaction also promotes this process. Our study sheds light on the molecular mechanisms of post-mitotic nuclear reassembly and suggests that the endoplasmic reticulum is not merely a source of membranes in the process, but also provides localized enzymatic activity.
-
- Cell Biology
- Chromosomes and Gene Expression
Meiotic crossover recombination is essential for both accurate chromosome segregation and the generation of new haplotypes for natural selection to act upon. This requirement is known as crossover assurance and is one example of crossover control. While the conserved role of the ATPase, PCH-2, during meiotic prophase has been enigmatic, a universal phenotype when pch-2 or its orthologs are mutated is a change in the number and distribution of meiotic crossovers. Here, we show that PCH-2 controls the number and distribution of crossovers by antagonizing their formation. This antagonism produces different effects at different stages of meiotic prophase: early in meiotic prophase, PCH-2 prevents double-strand breaks from becoming crossover-eligible intermediates, limiting crossover formation at sites of initial double-strand break formation and homolog interactions. Later in meiotic prophase, PCH-2 winnows the number of crossover-eligible intermediates, contributing to the designation of crossovers and ultimately, crossover assurance. We also demonstrate that PCH-2 accomplishes this regulation through the meiotic HORMAD, HIM-3. Our data strongly support a model in which PCH-2’s conserved role is to remodel meiotic HORMADs throughout meiotic prophase to destabilize crossover-eligible precursors and coordinate meiotic recombination with synapsis, ensuring the progressive implementation of meiotic recombination and explaining its function in the pachytene checkpoint and crossover control.
