Controlling the synchronization and symmetry breaking of coupled bacterial pili on active biofilm carpets

  1. Baha Altın
  2. Enes Talha Günay
  3. İlker Yusuf Yaman
  4. Alp Ünlü
  5. Yiğithan Gediz
  6. Neslihan Gedik
  7. Bora Karataş
  8. Mustafa Başaran
  9. Coşkun Kocabaş
  10. Şahin Kaya Özdemir
  11. Askin Kocabas  Is a corresponding author
  1. Department of Physics, Koç University, Turkiye
  2. Department of Physics, Undergraduate Program, Boğaziçi University, Turkiye
  3. Department of Materials, University of Manchester, United Kingdom
  4. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Saint Louis University, United States
  5. Koç University Surface Science and Technology Center, Koç University, Turkiye

eLife Assessment

This important study concerns the propagation of waves in bacterial biofilms, bridging active matter physics and bacterial biophysics. The experimental observations are solid, and the theoretical interpretation and model validation have been refined with revisions. This work will be of interest to microbiologists, biophysicists, and researchers studying collective behavior in biological systems.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.107609.3.sa0

Abstract

In the low Reynolds number regime, active biological systems utilize nonreciprocal cyclic activities to achieve motility, as seen in the spinning of bacterial flagella and the beating of cilia. Coupling among these active mechanical components leads to synchronization and emergence of metachronal waves. Here, we report that biofilms of Pseudomonas nitroreducens form active carpet-like surfaces textured with diverse topological defects, generating Mexican-wave-like collective behavior in which bacteria periodically lift up. On these active surfaces, non-reciprocally coupled extension and retraction activities of bacterial pili drive these collective oscillations. Surprisingly, this collective behavior exhibits left-right asymmetry across the biofilm driving unidirectionally propagating waves. We discover that this directionality is primarily governed by an aging-related frequency gradient across the biofilm. Leveraging these insights, we further demonstrate the ability to control the collective dynamics of these waves, including symmetry breaking, transitions from spiral waves into target and propagating plane waves by manipulating the elastic properties of biofilms. Overall, our findings illuminate the fundamental role of nonreciprocally interacting active components in regulating synchronization, collective dynamics, and symmetry-breaking phenomena in biological systems.

Introduction

In low Reynolds number regime, overcoming reversibility constraints to gain motility, is a challenging task which requires innovative solutions. Microorganisms utilize a variety of specialized active mechanical components to solve these difficulties by performing nonreciprocal motion (Wadhwa and Berg, 2022; Lauga, 2016; Lopez and Lauga, 2014; Kearns, 2010). Typical examples include the rotating helical flagella and beating elastic cilia. These active mechanical systems have the ability to execute cyclic motions, thereby breaking time-reversibility constraints (Purcell, 1977). In addition, due to the coupling among these active microstructures, complex synchronization phenomena also known as metachronal waves could emerge (Byron et al., 2021; Leoni and Liverpool, 2012; Golestanian et al., 2011). From these perspective coupling, synchronization and collective behaviors are intrinsically related and ubiquitous in nature. Such widespread dynamical processes are also biologically essential, as seen in cilia-driven mucus transport in lungs (Sleigh et al., 1988), nodal flow in developing embryos (Hirokawa et al., 2006), central motor generators (Cohen et al., 1982), and spinal cord development (Yaman and Ramanathan, 2023). These intricate synchronization behaviors share the same underlying dynamical principles that surprisingly align with non-Hermitian physics of active systems (Wu et al., 2023; Bender and Boettcher, 1998; Chen et al., 2021; Fruchart et al., 2023). All these active systems are capable of injecting and transferring energy across the system by breaking certain symmetries.

Recent advances, especially those in the field of active matter physics (Hickey et al., 2023; Brauns and Marchetti, 2024; Fruchart et al., 2021; Dinelli et al., 2023; You et al., 2020; Tang et al., 2021), have illuminated critical non-Hermitian features, such as chiral states where PT symmetry is broken. In this broken mode system could sustain the phase difference between fundamental fields or the modes which further trigger the directional energy transfer between the active compartments and generate travelling waves. Notably, this non-Hermitian process is particularly driven by nonreciprocity in the coupled mechanical system (Golestanian et al., 2011; Hickey et al., 2023; Uchida and Golestanian, 2010). Although non-Hermiticity has its roots in quantum mechanics (Bender and Boettcher, 1998; Hatano and Nelson, 1996) and the fundamental principles have been broadly studied in photonics (Özdemir et al., 2019), electronics, acoustics, optomechanics (El-Ganainy et al., 2018; Miri and Alù, 2019), superconducting qubits (Naghiloo et al., 2019), trapped ions (Zhang et al., 2022; Ding et al., 2021), single-spin systems (Wu et al., 2019), and in light-matter interactions (Ergoktas et al., 2022). This process is often achieved not only using strong nonlinearities, but also utilizing nonreciprocal interactions and coupling (Soleymani et al., 2022; Zhong et al., 2019; Lau and Clerk, 2018). On the other hand, nonreciprocity is a very common feature in biological systems. Hydrodynamic interactions (Tlusty, 2021) or prey-predator (Biktashev et al., 2004) relations could easily break action-reaction symmetry and result in exotic collective behaviors. Extending the basic concepts from non-Hermitian physics to the biological domain holds promise for shedding light on the fundamental principles of symmetry breaking in active and, more crucially, in complex biological systems.

Various biological models with specific active micromechanical components have been studied. The most notable biological platforms are ciliated epithelial cell (Loiseau et al., 2020), bacterial carpet (Guzmán-Lastra et al., 1906; Kim and Breuer, 2007), starfish embryo (Tan et al., 2022) social amoeba (Gregor et al., 2010; Dreher et al., 2014; Ford et al., 2023), and walking placozoa (Bull et al., 2021). In addition to flagellum or cilia, bacteria could also use nanofilaments known as type IV pili to gain motility on surfaces where the rotating flagella do not work effectively. Recent studies also highlighted the importance of pili controlling the collective behaviors of bacteria (Kühn et al., 2021; Kühn et al., 2023; Xu et al., 2023; Liu et al., 2024a) and also large-scale oscillations in the form of biofilm.

During our recent experiments, we noted striking dynamic patterns and unidirectionally propagating waves on the surface of Pseudomonas nitroreducens (PN) bacterial biofilms. These unexpected collective activities ranging from spiral to planar wave formations are interestingly aligned with recent predictions of active matter physics (Uchida and Golestanian, 2010; Rana and Golestanian, 2024a). These activities are reminiscent of metachronal waves observed in various biological systems. We also observed that these collective activities are driven by the coupled pili activity of the bacteria. Recently, large-scale pili-driven activities and spiral waves were also identified in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Liu et al., 2024a). The main distinction of our observed metachronal wave lies in its localized behavior on the surface and broken left-right symmetry across the biofilm, which we refer to as the active biofilm carpet. On these active surfaces bacteria periodically lift up and form Mexican-wave-like dynamics. In this study, we aim to provide a comprehensive experimental approach, including biological, physical, and theoretical tools to be able to understand and control these collective behaviors and also the symmetry-breaking process of these biological systems.

Bacterial biofilms develop into multicellular communities characterized by interdependent biological structures. Understanding the dynamics of these dense biological formations is vital, given that their collective actions can amplify their pathogenic potential. The collective movement of pili and its variability among strains offer a crucial foundation for understanding the influence of pili activities on pathogenicity. Moreover, pili is also a primary target protein for next-generation medications and antibacterial therapies. In essence, comprehending the effect of pili dynamics on the collective behavior of biofilms can greatly influence human health by preventing severe infections.

Results

Emergence of metachronal waves on active biofilm carpets

Bacterial biofilms are commonly used in various experiments particularly to investigate host-pathogen interactions. During our recent screen of biofilm library for nematode C. elegans (Demir et al., 2020), we observed that PN (Materials and methods) bacterial biofilms exhibit rhythmic activities approximately 10 hr post-inoculation (Figure 1a, b). In their firing phase, faint propagating pairs of spiral wave patterns emerged on the biofilm’s surface. These waves have a periodicity of around 2–7 min (Figure 1c). We also determined that the visibility of these waves improves dramatically with oblique contrast and polarized light-based microscopy (Figure 1a, b, Figure 1—video 1, Figure 1—video 2). Later on, these waves were very dynamic and converged to various combinations of spiral, target and planar waves. The most striking feature of these waves is their broken left-right symmetries. They often unidirectionally propagate from right to left (edge to the center) or radially in inward direction across the colony (Figure 1a, b). Furthermore, the contrast of the wave’s switches between the dark to bright sharp lines depending on the direction of propagation. This suggests that the front kink of these waves scatters the light asymmetrically (Figure 1—figure supplement 1). We observed that these waves predominantly propagate on the biofilm’s surface rather than its bulk region (Figure 1e). This critical feature is particularly revealed by the nature of our optical imaging systems which are very sensitive to the surface topography. To validate this observation, we employed cytoplasmic GFP for imaging. Yet, no waves were detected in the green fluorescence channel (Figure 1—figure supplement 2). Similarly, when we labeled extracellular DNA with a dye, the waves remained unobserved in the fluorescence signal (Figure 1—figure supplement 2). Moreover, close-up imaging (100 X) highlighted the bacterial displacement together with clear optical dark or bright contrast on the surface (Figure 1—video 3). Imaging growing biofilm starting from a single bacterium clarifies that oscillations first start from dense regions and gradually propagate through the entire colony (Figure 1—video 4). Further motivated by recent studies (Xu et al., 2023; Liu et al., 2024a), we also tested the P. aeruginosa strain PA14 under the same conditions. Similarly, PA14 exhibited weak but comparable wave patterns, though within a shorter time window (Figure 1—figure supplement 4).

Figure 1 with 13 supplements see all
Emergence of unidirectionally propagating waves on bacterial biofilms.

(a, b) Optical imaging shows spiral, planar (a), and radially shrinking waves (b) propagating unidirectionally on biofilm surfaces. Left-right or radial symmetry is generally broken on growing biofilm surfaces. Scale bar 250 μm. (c) Time response of optical scattering signal indicating the firing state of coupled pili dynamics. (d) Schematic representation of the coupling mechanism of pili on biofilm surfaces, modeled as an active solid. Red cylinders represent the bacteria in the biofilm. The oscillatory extension and retraction of pili act as active units. (e) Schematic representation of the collective behavior of elastically coupled active biofilm surfaces, characterized by local displacement (U) and pili polarization (P) undergoing limit-cycle oscillations. Propagating waves remain localized on the surface and travel toward the direction of the sharp rising edge. (f) Optical images of the leading edge of the growing biofilm with fingering instabilities. Pseudomonas nitroreducens (PN) and PA14 show strong fingers compared to PAO1.

To delve deeper into these phenomena, our next focus was on the necessary media, given that the original experiments were conducted on C. elegans using Nematode Growth Media (NGM) plates (see Materials and methods). Interestingly, we found that these activities were exclusive to NGM. Substituting NGM with a standard LB plate did not reproduce the same dynamics; instead, the bacteria grow rapidly. Yet, upon omitting yeast extract and replacing bactotryptone with bactopeptone, a major nutritional component, from the LB media PN resumed its activity (Figure 1—figure supplement 6). These findings underscore the significance of nutrient restriction as a primary factor. Remarkably, these observations are unexpected, but become evident due to the use of NGM plate, which is not common in microbiology experiments.

Although PA14 generates similar waves, we observed that PAO1, a close relative of PA14, failed to produce waves on both NGM and LB plates (Figure 1—figure supplement 5). Worth noting, PAO1 is also an important human pathogen causing Cystic Fibrosis (CF). Finally, through this comprehensive screening effort, we successfully identified a group of bacteria, offering the potential to examine various factors, from genetics to physical domain, influencing the emergence of these spiral waves. Both PAO1 and PA14 possess robust genetic toolkits, while PN strain displays a clear and prolonged active carpet state for detailed physical investigations. The other critical difference between all these biofilms is the finger formation around the leading edge. Unlike PAO1, PN, and PA14 form very strong instabilities leading to unstable extensions (Figure 1f).

To gain deeper insight into the mechanisms underlying wave formation, we imaged the dynamics of individual bacteria from the fingering regions toward the center of the biofilm. This distinction is critical because, unlike the biofilm center, the edges do not generate waves. We observed that bacteria near the fingering regions remain motile and exhibit collective flow. In contrast, bacteria at the biofilm center are surface-attached and undergo periodic lifting motions. This behavior strongly resembles Mexican-wave dynamics (Figure 1—video 5, Figure 1—video 6).

We further found that the central region of the biofilm is mechanically more elastic (Figure 1—figure supplement 3), whereas the edge regions—where wave formation is absent—are motile. These observations suggest that gradual biofilm maturation is a key factor that transforms motile bacteria into a periodically moving but spatially constrained state. Consistent with this picture, the PAO1 strain, which has a strong biofilm-forming capability, completely suppresses surface oscillations. In contrast, the PA14 strain exhibits intermediate behavior, sustaining a partial transition between motile and locally constrained dynamics. Remarkably, signatures of this transition and wave generation are already detectable at the earliest stages of finger formation.

We then shifted our attention to the genetic distinctions between PN, PA14, and PAO1. Initially, we first explored the contribution of bacterial pili and flagella as an active mechanical structure. We found that PA14:ΔPilB and PA14:ΔPilA mutations eliminated the waves but not PA14:ΔFilK (Figure 1—figure supplement 4). This suggests that activity is exclusively originating from pili dynamics and the original dynamics is similar to the recent work (Liu et al., 2024a), but activities are localized to the surface to the transition from motile to biofilm-forming state. We then explored the potential of hyperpiliation, which might amplify the coupling of pili on the biofilm surfaces. Yet, the PAO1 ΔPilH mutant, known for its polarized and hyperpiliation condition (Kühn et al., 2021; Kühn et al., 2023), did not manifest the waves but provided only small fluctuations on the surface (Figure 1—figure supplement 5). Then, we pinpointed that a significant variation was in the pili subunit groups (Kus et al., 2004). While PA14 possesses group 3 Pilin, PAO1 has group 2 Pilin. It’s essential to highlight that all these bacteria have type IV pili, though they might be categorized into separate groups. Currently, our hypothesis posits that diverse pili types might exhibit varied physical characteristics, such as elasticity or rigidity. Our understanding of PN at the genetic level remains limited but it shares strong similarity with PA. Nonetheless, the various genome sequences of PN are accessible. Our analysis of their pili related genomic region revealed a resemblance to the group 4 and 5 pili (Figure 1—figure supplement 7). All these firing pili groups 3 and 4, 5 have additional accessory genes in the genome and they may contribute to the expression or folding of these pilins. Together with the unstable edge fingering (Figure 1f), the comparison of PN and PA strains supports the idea that group of pili and particularly pili expression play a critical role in driving waves on these bacterial biofilms.

Modelling of propagating spiral waves

To get more intuition about the dynamics of the waves and emergence of the broken symmetry across the biofilm, we next focused on the mathematical modelling. From an active matter perspective, spiral waves can emerge in non-equilibrium and excitable media (Meron, 1992; Tan et al., 2020; Aranson and Rabinovich, 1990) as well as in coupled oscillatory systems with delays (Paullet and Ermentrout, 1994). Despite these systems exhibiting similar wave patterns, the internal mechanisms that trigger the waves vary significantly. Recent studies, particularly on the concept of nonreciprocity provide a comprehensive approach (Uchida and Golestanian, 2010; Rana and Golestanian, 2024a). It is important to note that coupling between active mechanical units could introduce nonreciprocity into the system due to local symmetry-breaking processes. Inspired by the previous studies on the dynamics of cilia (Hickey et al., 2023; Chakrabarti et al., 2022), and recent robotic system (Baconnier et al., 2022) we proposed that coupled active pili system could also show similar limit cycle oscillations defined by bacterial displacement (U) and the polarization of the bacterial pili (P) (Figure 1e). We note that combining phenomenological field models with more detailed elastic solid models could provide a more comprehensive framework for understanding how the elastic properties of the biofilm drive these collective oscillations. To study these phenomena, we first utilized a minimal phenomenological phase field model that includes a nonreciprocal coupling term. The oscillatory dynamics of the model are driven by oscillatory extension and retraction processes. The Kuramoto-based model (Uchida and Golestanian, 2010; Paullet and Ermentrout, 1994; Kim et al., 2004; Sakaguchi et al., 1987; Sakaguchi and Kuramoto, 1986), which effectively captures the phase dynamics of coupled oscillators, is extended here by incorporating a delay term (α) that disrupts the odd symmetry—representing action and reaction symmetry between interacting oscillators—and enriches the system’s dynamic repertoire. This modified model is described by the equation:

dϕidt=w0bsin(ϕi)Kjsin(ϕiϕjα)

Here, ϕ represents the local phase of individual pili oscillations (The phase of confined parameter space defined by U and P, Figure 1e). We assume interactions only among nearest neighbors, where w0 represents the uniform intrinsic oscillation frequency of an isolated oscillator. The term α specifically breaks odd interaction symmetry between pili, facilitating the formation of travelling waves. Note that traveling waves indicate this broken PT symmetry between these fields. It’s important to emphasize that the detailed biophysical mechanisms behind this nonreciprocity remain unclear. Several possibilities, such as force relaxation dynamics or hydrodynamic interactions, could also result in similar nonreciprocal behavior (Gupta et al., 2022). Our phenomenological model accurately captures the principal features of these phenomena. While reciprocally coupled oscillators (α=0) tend to achieve a globally synchronized state (Figure 2a), nonreciprocity favors the formation of traveling waves (Figure 2b, c, Figure 2—video 1, Figure 2—figure supplement 1). The excitability term (b) shapes the pulsative nature of the waves (illustrated in Figure 2d–e) by amplifying the effects of specific phases within the coupling mechanism (Paullet and Ermentrout, 1994; Kim et al., 1997; Ohta and Sasa, 2008).

tU=πP+Fe
tP=(P×tU)×P+1P22tUDrP
Figure 2 with 7 supplements see all
Numerical modeling of coupled pili dynamics as an active carpet.

(a–c) Numerical simulation results based on the nonreciprocal Kuramoto phase-field model. Nonreciprocal coupling term (α) among bacteria drives the emergence of spiral waves, while the excitability term (b) of the mechanical system induces pulsatile behavior. (d) Numerical simulations of local oscillation frequencies under varying conditions (α=0, α=0.2π, and b=0.1π). (e) Experimental measurements of pulses on biofilm surfaces confirming pulsatile responses. (f, g) Numerical simulations of elastically coupled biofilm structures using the active solid model. Active solids exhibit large-scale spiral and planar wave formations. Displacement (U) and pili polarization (P) fields highlight the essential phase difference necessary for wave propagation and limit-cycle oscillations.

Next, we turned our focus to continuum simulations to capture the essential properties of these dynamic processes (Figure 2—video 2). In our previous experiments, we observed that changes in the elastic properties of the colony during the transition from a motile state to a biofilm-forming state are critical. The recently developed active solid model provides a broad and robust framework for studying collective behaviors of interacting elasto-active components, spanning from robotic systems to human crowds (Baconnier et al., 2022; Gu et al., 2025). The core idea of this model is based on two nonreciprocally coupled fields: displacement (U), representing bacterial displacement within the biofilm lattice, and polarization (P), representing the orientation of pili, which exert active forces whose direction can be modulated by the displacement field (Figure 1d). The dynamics of the active biofilm lattice can be described by coupled equations, where Fe denotes elastic force and Dr represents polarization relaxation. The underlying rationale of these equations is that retracted pili exert active forces on bacteria, which are elastically coupled to the biofilm structure. Local biofilm displacement can guide the growth direction of pili extension, influenced by local deformation. Importantly, since pili are anchored to the substrate, their orientation dynamically adjusts based on extension processes. Our simulations demonstrate that the active solid model successfully captures critical dynamical phenomena, such as the formation of spiral and planar waves (Figure 2f–g). As anticipated, fields U and P develop a characteristic phase difference, indicative of limit cycle oscillations. Moreover, analysis of vector configurations around defect cores reveals directional reversals of displacement U on opposite sides of defects, highlighting the fundamental mechanism underlying defect formation, where U diminishes, and the phase (ϕ) becomes undefined (Figure 2—figure supplement 2). We should note that traveling waves indicate broken PT symmetry between these fields triggered by nonreciprocity, with spiral waves serving as a classic signature of this phenomenon. A further transition from spiral to planar waves reflects an overall asymmetry in the frequency profile, which is not directly related to PT-symmetry breaking.

Controlling the transition between the waveforms on active biofilm carpet

Extensive parameter testing has revealed that our models not only capture the emergence of spiral waves but also predict transitions into target and plane wave solutions which we commonly observe in grooving biofilms. This transition is particularly emerge around the edge of the plate where the drying process is gradually modifying the agar plate. During the transition to target waves, two oppositely spinning spiral waves with topological charges of +1 and –1 merge, forming a symmetrically expanding target wave. Subsequently, fast oscillating plane waves progressively dominate the entire simulation domain (Figure 3a–c, Figure 3—video 1).

Figure 3 with 1 supplement see all
Controlling transitions between spiral, target, and planar waves.

(a) Experimentally observed transitions from spiral waves to target and planar waves spontaneously emerge across the plate. Pairs of spiral waves merge, forming topologically neutral target waves, which eventually give rise to planar waves dominating the biofilm surface. (b, c) Optical imaging of biofilm surfaces demonstrating similar controlled transitions between spiral, target, and planar waves experimentally triggered by adding a water droplet. Red arrows indicate wave propagation direction. (e–g) Controlled recovery of spiral waves achieved by heating biofilm surfaces, removing excess moisture, and facilitating re-emergence of spiral waves around specific inhomogeneities. Image size is 1 mm × 1 mm.

Motivated by our simulation results and experimental observations, we hypothesize that our active carpet system could also facilitate similar transitions between different forms of traveling waves (Rana and Golestanian, 2024b; Wang et al., 2010), offering a means to externally control the dynamics of the system and may explain the details of broken symmetries. We observed that adding a water droplet to the biofilm surface led to the transformation of spiral waves into target and planar waves (Figure 3d–f). To recover the spiral waves, we increased the surface temperature by gently heating the system. As expected, with the temperature rise, the leading edge of the planar waves first became noisy, and multiple target waves randomly appeared, then finally converged to spiral waves (Figure 3—video 1). These findings are in interesting similarity with recent theoretical predictions in different nonreciprocal systems (Rana and Golestanian, 2024a; Rana and Golestanian, 2024b).

Additionally, by incorporating the water-soluble polymer polyethylene glycol (PEG) into the biofilm, we managed to not only alter wave propagation patterns but also direct the movement of inward-growing target waves. Intriguingly, the addition of a small drop of PEG modified the intrinsic oscillation period of the pili dynamics, creating a radial gradient profile largely due to the slow evaporation rate and uneven deposition of PEG on the surface. This inward wave guidance is particularly controlled by frequency gradient (Figure 4a–d). The center has slow oscillations than the edge. This gradient profile is the critical feature to understand the basics of broken symmetry observed in the circular biofilms. In naturally growing colony oscillation frequency is also varying (Figure 4a, b). We hypothesize that this variation is age-dependent where the center of the colony is slowing down due to change in elastic properties of the biofilm. Before delving deeper into this interesting symmetry-breaking process, we investigated how the aging of the biofilm affected the oscillation dynamics. This is because symmetry breaking occurs at late stage where the aging is critical. To do so, we first measured the oscillation periods as the uniform colony aged. We observed that the periods of these spiral waves continuously increased (Figure 5a–b). These results suggest that the intrinsic oscillation dynamics of the pili decreased, likely due to biofilm formation which changes the elastic properties of the colony, during the first 24 hr.

Controlling dynamics of inward propagating waves.

(a) Optical imaging of inward propagating waves within a circular biofilm structure. Scale bar: 100 μm (b) Period of pili oscillations decreases toward the colony center. (c) Application of a small droplet containing polymer polyethylene glycol (PEG) creates a radially varying period profile, guiding inward wave propagation, capturing similar wave dynamics on naturally growing radially symmetric biofilms. Error bar shows the SD, N=5 measurements.

Age-dependent dynamics of oscillations.

(a) Sample image showing multiple pairs of spiral waves on a uniform biofilm surface. (b) Period of the oscillations increases as the biofilm ages. Error bar shows the SD, N=10 measurements. Image size is 1 mm × 1 mm.

Furthermore, we examined the growing biofilm starting from a thin inoculation strip, we reproducibly achieved a broken left-right symmetry for plane waves across the colony (Figure 6—video 1). The waves propagated from the edges toward the center. This asymmetry became particularly pronounced a few days after inoculation, during which the colony edges continued to grow while the center remained stationary (Figure 6a, b). To finally confirm this observation, we numerically solved the coupled oscillators under varying frequencies. Similarly, we found a similar left-right asymmetry where the planar waves propagating towards the slower region of the biofilm center (Figure 6c, d and Figure 6—video 2).

Figure 6 with 2 supplements see all
Left-right asymmetry in naturally growing biofilms.

(a) Representative image of a bacterial biofilm at a late growth stage (3 days post-inoculation). Metachronal waves propagate towards the biofilm center, with the leading edge displaying chaotic dynamics. Following growth cessation, spiral waves gradually converge into planar waves propagating inward. Image size is 1 mm × 1 mm (b) Oscillation period increases towards the biofilm center. Error bar indicates the SD, N=10 measurements (c, d) Numerical simulation demonstrating the formation of planar waves and the left-right symmetry-breaking process, driven by a spatially varying intrinsic oscillation frequency(d), capturing dynamics observed in naturally growing biofilms.

Defect dynamics controlling the transition between spiral to target waves

To better understand the dynamics of the transition between different forms of the waves we focused on numerical simulations. We noticed that the motility of defects is the crucial parameter governing the transition between spiral, target, and planar waves varying the moisture content provides an effective and experimentally accessible control of this motility. Our analyses revealed that spiral defect cores can move and merge to form target waves or annihilate entirely—processes that we also observe experimentally. This rich dynamical behavior underscores the importance of elasticity in shaping pattern transitions. First, we compare defect dynamics in both Kuramoto-based simulations and the active solid model. Both systems exhibit similar defect-survival behavior. As shown in Figure 2—figure supplement 3, pairs of unlike (+/−) defects can stably persist only at high nonreciprocity. We further quantify this behavior by plotting the separation distances between unlike defect pairs and find that short-range defect separations are possible exclusively in the high-nonreciprocity regime (Figure 2—figure supplement 4). This high-nonreciprocity regime corresponds to the dry biofilm state. Increasing moisture reduces elasticity, leading to the loss of stable defect dynamics and promoting the annihilation of unlike defect pairs, which in turn drives the system toward target-wave formation and ultimately planar waves. Conversely, heating the biofilm removes water, enhances elasticity, and increases the system’s ability to sustain closely separated defect pairs. Experimentally, we further observe that removing water by heating enhances surface nonuniformities, which readily trigger defect-pair formation (Figure 3—video 1). To investigate this mechanism, we performed additional simulations in which local nonuniformities were introduced (Figure 7—video 1, Figure 7—video 2, Figure 2—figure supplement 5). Consistent with experiments, defect-pair generation occurs only at high nonreciprocity, where pairs of unlike defects can be stably maintained. Experimental observation (Figure 3—video 1) also shows that surface nonuniformities on the biofilm surface similarly trigger the formation of closely separated defect pairs.

Controlling left-right asymmetry

As a final step, we focused on how to control the symmetry breaking and dynamics of metachronal waves. We noticed that temperature adjustments also reversibly affect the oscillatory behavior of the waves which increased the oscillation frequency (Figure 7a, b). This suggests that temperature could also be used as a complementary technique to dynamically guide the wave propagation by controlling the frequency gradients. To do so, we embedded metallic pipes in the bulk agar plate and tuned the local temperatures (Figure 7—figure supplement 1). Setting different temperatures in these pipes creates a temperature gradient (∇T ~10 °C/cm). This gradient profile converted spiral waves quickly to planar waves, propagating from warmer (31 °C) to cooler (21 °C) areas. Similarly, when we switched the temperature profiles, wave propagation also reversed (Figure 7c, d, Figure 7—video 3). This result indicates that spatial temperature variations can effectively dictate wave propagation directions. These comprehensive observations confirm that the developed frequency gradients of intrinsic Pili oscillations are the critical feature breaking symmetry and controlling the propagation directions of the waves.

Figure 7 with 4 supplements see all
Temperature-controlled dynamics of metachronal waves generating left-right asymmetry.

(a) Optical pulses from spiral waves on the biofilm surface as temperature increases from 21 °C (TL) to 31 °C (TH). (b) An increase in temperature raises the oscillation frequency (c, d) Controlling the propagation of the waves by creating a temperature gradient. Waves propagate from the warmer area (fast oscillating, TH) to the colder region (slow oscillating, TL). (d) Reversing the temperature gradient changes the direction of propagation of the waves. Image size is 1 mm × 1 mm.

Discussion

Synchronization is a ubiquitous phenomenon in biological systems. A classic hallmark signature of this dynamical process is global synchronization, where all components of the system tend to merge in phase, as observed in fireflies, clocks, and metronomes. Hydrodynamics or intrinsic activities of the interactions, however, introduce nonreciprocity into these tightly coupled systems, fundamentally altering the synchronization process. This action-reaction asymmetry drives the emergence of large-scale propagating waves, often emerging as spiral waves in two dimensions. Remarkably, diverse systems from proteins in cell membranes to social amoebae exhibit similar dynamics, highlighting the special importance of these waves in biological systems, particularly due to their transport capabilities.

From a symmetry perspective, nonreciprocity is the key feature in understanding these phenomena. Recent advancements in active matter physics have bridged various seemingly unrelated fields around this concept. Particularly, non-Hermitian physics, including PT-symmetry, provides a beneficial macroscopic metric for understanding a system’s response through the classical formalism borrowed from quantum physics and optics. Despite the diverse nature of the dynamic processes and the varying types of interactions—from predator-prey dynamics, specific chemical reactions, to elasticity of active metamaterials—the common feature across these systems is to maintain a phase difference between the fundamental fields that support limit cycle oscillations enabling collective motility and transport capabilities to the interacting active system.

We have observed that bacterial biofilm surfaces, also known as active carpets, exhibit similar dynamics due to coupled and cyclic pili extension and retraction activities. Although these nanoscale activities make the biophysical mechanisms complex and demanding to elucidate, the fundamental characteristic of the process remains consistent: the cyclic motion of bacterial pili forms limit cycle oscillations in phase space to disrupt local or action-reaction symmetry among the interacting components.

Using a phenomenological model, we have concentrated on identifying critical parameters that control the system dynamics and synchronization. We have also developed methods to manipulate and control the collective dynamics and propagation of metachronal waves by adjusting these critical parameters. From the perspective of active matter, the controllability of densely coupled active mechanical components is crucial, especially at low Reynolds numbers where controlling turbulence and managing long-range transport is vital. Biological systems can effectively address these challenges and precisely control active and programmable transport (Yang et al., 2025). A deeper understanding of the underlying principles and critical symmetries governing this controllability could provide new insights into the complexities of biological systems. We speculate that these waves could promote active diffusion of oxygen and DNA. Further biophysical investigations are needed to delve deeper into these fascinating collective behaviors and its biological significance. Furthermore, the dynamical similarities between non-Hermitian physics and PT symmetry and the metachronal waves due to nonreciprocity are remarkable. Finally, we also hypothesize that the concepts developed in no-Hermitian physics could bring new perspective to dissect the complexities of these collective behaviors. Finally, our findings also raise several questions, particularly regarding the biological significance of these waves in the physiology of the biofilm. Rhythmic activities (Sartor and Kovács, 2022; Eelderink-Chen et al., 2021) play a critical role in bacterial communities. We hypothesize that this synchronization may facilitate rhythmic behavior across the biofilm or enable expression and the transport of specific biomolecules under stressful conditions. Further studies are needed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying this emerging phenomenon.

Materials and methods

Analysis of pilin proteins and accessory genes

Request a detailed protocol

Genetic analyses were conducted using the complete genome sequence of PN strain L4 chromosome (Liu et al., 2024b) (NCBI Reference Sequence: NZ_CP120376.1). The reference genomic region between pilB and tRNA-thr was specifically compared.

Imaging system

Request a detailed protocol

Time-lapse imaging was performed using multiple microscopy techniques, selected for their capability to visualize surface topography effectively. We observed that oblique and polarized illumination techniques significantly enhanced the visibility of surface waves. During the evaporation process, the roughness of the biofilm significantly varies. During the evaporation process, the roughness of the biofilm varies significantly. We observed that oblique illumination is more effective on rough surfaces, whereas polarized imaging provides clearer results on flat surfaces. Oblique imaging was primarily conducted using Zeiss Smartzoom digital microscopes and Nikon Stereo SMZ18 microscopes equipped with contrast illumination. Additional polarized imaging utilized a Zeiss Axio Imager M2m. Successive images were captured at intervals of 10 s. Fluorescence imaging for GFP was conducted using 488 nm blue-light excitation with GFP emission filters, and DNA staining was visualized using RFP emission filters and imaged with an Andor EMCCD camera. The typical optical magnification was 10 X.

Image processing

Request a detailed protocol

To enhance wave visibility, successive images taken at 10 s intervals were subtracted, and the resulting false-colored difference images were superimposed onto the original ones. The time-dependent responses of surface pulses were analyzed using ImageJ software.

Bacterial growth and preparation

Request a detailed protocol

The PN bacterial strain used in this study was initially isolated from environmental samples and identified through 16 S rRNA sequencing. Verification was performed through comparison with the corresponding strain obtained from DSMZ (DSM 1650). For optical imaging, PN bacteria were grown overnight in LB broth at 21 °C on a shaker, and subsequently, 100 µl drops of bacterial suspension were placed onto 10 cm, 1-day-old, 1.4% solid agar, NGM plates. To ensure slow evaporation of excess moisture, humidity was maintained at approximately 80%, and plate lids were partially left open. NGM plates were prepared following the standard protocols. All the bacterial strains used in this study are given in Table 1.

Table 1
List of strains used in this study.
StrainParentOperationGenotype
BAK132PNIsolated from environmental samples, transformed pUCP18-MCSgfpmut3ampR
BAK133PA14Received from F. M. Ausubel lab
BAK134LD2222Received from Lars Dietrich Lab (Hölscher et al., 2015)PA14 ΔpilB
BAK135LD2221Received from Lars Dietrich Lab (Hölscher et al., 2015)PA14 ΔflgK
BAK136PAO1 PilHReceived from Joanne EngelΔPilH
BAKPAO1Received from DSMZ 10145GFP

Numerical simulation

Request a detailed protocol

Numerical simulations based on the Kuramoto model were performed using custom-developed MATLAB code with finite difference algorithms (https://github.com/akocabaslab/kuramoto-oscillators, copy archived at akocabaslab, 2026). The original code for the active solid model was obtained from prior literature and modified for improved visualization. Through extensive parameter exploration, we determined that large lattice structures with fixed boundary conditions effectively reproduced spiral and planar wave dynamics.

Data availability

The critical experimental data generated or analyzed during this study are provided as supporting video files. We did not generate additional data sets. All the codes used in the study will be/are available online (https://github.com/akocabaslab/kuramoto-oscillators, copy archived at akocabaslab, 2026).

References

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Baha Altın

    Department of Physics, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkiye
    Contribution
    Data curation, Software, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0009-0007-2240-4961
  2. Enes Talha Günay

    Department of Physics, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkiye
    Contribution
    Data curation, Software, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0009-0002-3596-040X
  3. İlker Yusuf Yaman

    Department of Physics, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkiye
    Present address
    Sciences and Engineering Program, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
    Contribution
    Software, Validation, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  4. Alp Ünlü

    Department of Physics, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkiye
    Contribution
    Software, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  5. Yiğithan Gediz

    Department of Physics, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkiye
    Contribution
    Software, Visualization, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  6. Neslihan Gedik

    Department of Physics, Undergraduate Program, Boğaziçi University, Istanbul, Turkiye
    Contribution
    Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  7. Bora Karataş

    Department of Physics, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkiye
    Contribution
    Data curation, Validation, Visualization
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  8. Mustafa Başaran

    Department of Physics, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkiye
    Present address
    Sciences and Engineering Program, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Software, Investigation, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  9. Coşkun Kocabaş

    Department of Materials, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  10. Şahin Kaya Özdemir

    Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, United States
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2625-3992
  11. Askin Kocabas

    1. Department of Physics, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkiye
    2. Koç University Surface Science and Technology Center, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkiye
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Writing – review and editing
    For correspondence
    akocabas@ku.edu.tr
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6930-1202

Funding

United States Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-22-1-0431)

  • Askin Kocabas

Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (121C159)

  • Askin Kocabas

United States Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-21-1-0202)

  • Şahin Kaya Özdemir

Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (123C580)

  • Askin Kocabas

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) under Grant No: FA9550-22-1-0431 with Program Manager Ali Sayir and Tübitak Project No: 121C159 and 123C580. SKO acknowledges the support from AFOSR Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (MURI) Award No. FA9550-21-1-0202. We thank Zeiss, the Turkey division, and Kenan Doğru for the digital microscopy installation and training.

Version history

  1. Preprint posted:
  2. Sent for peer review:
  3. Reviewed Preprint version 1:
  4. Reviewed Preprint version 2:
  5. Version of Record published:

Cite all versions

You can cite all versions using the DOI https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.107609. This DOI represents all versions, and will always resolve to the latest one.

Copyright

© 2025, Altın et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 695
    views
  • 55
    downloads
  • 0
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Baha Altın
  2. Enes Talha Günay
  3. İlker Yusuf Yaman
  4. Alp Ünlü
  5. Yiğithan Gediz
  6. Neslihan Gedik
  7. Bora Karataş
  8. Mustafa Başaran
  9. Coşkun Kocabaş
  10. Şahin Kaya Özdemir
  11. Askin Kocabas
(2026)
Controlling the synchronization and symmetry breaking of coupled bacterial pili on active biofilm carpets
eLife 14:RP107609.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.107609.3

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.107609