NUDT21-spanning CNVs lead to neuropsychiatric disease and altered MeCP2 abundance via alternative polyadenylation

  1. Vincenzo A Gennarino
  2. Callison E Alcott
  3. Chun-An Chen
  4. Arindam Chaudhury
  5. Madelyn A Gillentine
  6. Jill A Rosenfeld
  7. Sumit Parikh
  8. James W Wheless
  9. Elizabeth R Roeder
  10. Dafne DG Horovitz
  11. Erin K Roney
  12. Janice L Smith
  13. Sau W Cheung
  14. Wei Li
  15. Joel R Neilson
  16. Christian P Schaaf
  17. Huda Y Zoghbi  Is a corresponding author
  1. Baylor College of Medicine, United States
  2. Texas Children's Hospital, United States
  3. Cleveland Clinic Children's Hospital, United States
  4. University of Tennessee Health Science Center, United States
  5. Instituto Nacional de Saude da Mulher, da Criança e do Adolescente Fernandes Figueira, Brazil

Abstract

The brain is sensitive to the dose of MECP2 such that small fluctuations in protein quantity lead to neuropsychiatric disease. Despite the importance of MeCP2 levels to brain function, little is know about its regulation. Here, we report eleven individuals with neuropsychiatric disease and copy-number variations spanning NUDT21, which encodes a subunit of pre-mRNA cleavage factor Im. Investigations of MECP2 mRNA and protein abundance in patient-derived lymphoblastoid cells from one NUDT21 deletion and three duplication cases show that NUDT21 regulates MeCP2 protein quantity. Elevated NUDT21 increases usage of the distal polyadenylation site in the MECP2 3'UTR, resulting in an enrichment of inefficiently translated long-mRNA isoforms. Importantly, normalization of NUDT21 via siRNA-mediated knockdown in duplication-patient lymphoblasts restores MeCP2 to normal levels. In this study, we identify NUDT21 as a novel candidate for intellectual disability and neuropsychiatric disease, and elucidate a mechanism of pathogenesis by MeCP2 dysregulation via altered alternative polyadenylation.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Vincenzo A Gennarino

    Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Callison E Alcott

    Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Chun-An Chen

    Departments of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Arindam Chaudhury

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Madelyn A Gillentine

    Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Jill A Rosenfeld

    Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Sumit Parikh

    Center for Child Neurology, Cleveland Clinic Children's Hospital, Cleveland, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. James W Wheless

    Department of Pediatric Neurology, Neuroscience Institute and Tuberous Sclerosis Clinic, Le Bonheur Children's Hospital, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Elizabeth R Roeder

    Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Dafne DG Horovitz

    Depto de Genetica Medica, Instituto Nacional de Saude da Mulher, da Criança e do Adolescente Fernandes Figueira, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Erin K Roney

    Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Janice L Smith

    Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Sau W Cheung

    Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Wei Li

    Division of Biostatistics, Dan L Duncan Cancer Center, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Joel R Neilson

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Christian P Schaaf

    Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  17. Huda Y Zoghbi

    Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    For correspondence
    hzoghbi@bcm.edu
    Competing interests
    Huda Y Zoghbi, Senior editor, eLife.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Harry C Dietz, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, United States

Ethics

Human subjects: Following informed consent, approved by the InstitutionalReview Board for Human Subject Research at Baylor College of Medicine, we performed a comprehensive chart review of medical records and neuropsychological testing. A venous blood sample was provided by the probands in order to establish immortalized lymphoblastoid cell lines.

Version history

  1. Received: August 11, 2015
  2. Accepted: August 26, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: August 27, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: August 28, 2015 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: September 29, 2015 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2015, Zoghbi et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,687
    Page views
  • 648
    Downloads
  • 58
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Scopus, Crossref, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Vincenzo A Gennarino
  2. Callison E Alcott
  3. Chun-An Chen
  4. Arindam Chaudhury
  5. Madelyn A Gillentine
  6. Jill A Rosenfeld
  7. Sumit Parikh
  8. James W Wheless
  9. Elizabeth R Roeder
  10. Dafne DG Horovitz
  11. Erin K Roney
  12. Janice L Smith
  13. Sau W Cheung
  14. Wei Li
  15. Joel R Neilson
  16. Christian P Schaaf
  17. Huda Y Zoghbi
(2015)
NUDT21-spanning CNVs lead to neuropsychiatric disease and altered MeCP2 abundance via alternative polyadenylation
eLife 4:e10782.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10782

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10782

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Lies Deceuninck, Fabian Kloosterman
    Research Article Updated

    Storing and accessing memories is required to successfully perform day-to-day tasks, for example for engaging in a meaningful conversation. Previous studies in both rodents and primates have correlated hippocampal cellular activity with behavioral expression of memory. A key role has been attributed to awake hippocampal replay – a sequential reactivation of neurons representing a trajectory through space. However, it is unclear if awake replay impacts immediate future behavior, gradually creates and stabilizes long-term memories over a long period of time (hours and longer), or enables the temporary memorization of relevant events at an intermediate time scale (seconds to minutes). In this study, we aimed to address the uncertainty around the timeframe of impact of awake replay by collecting causal evidence from behaving rats. We detected and disrupted sharp wave ripples (SWRs) - signatures of putative replay events - using electrical stimulation of the ventral hippocampal commissure in rats that were trained on three different spatial memory tasks. In each task, rats were required to memorize a new set of locations in each trial or each daily session. Interestingly, the rats performed equally well with or without SWR disruptions. These data suggest that awake SWRs - and potentially replay - does not affect the immediate behavior nor the temporary memorization of relevant events at a short timescale that are required to successfully perform the spatial tasks. Based on these results, we hypothesize that the impact of awake replay on memory and behavior is long-term and cumulative over time.

    1. Neuroscience
    Sydney Trask, Nicole C Ferrara
    Insight

    Gradually reducing a source of fear during extinction treatments may weaken negative memories in the long term.