Synergistic integration of Netrin and ephrin axon guidance signals by spinal motor neurons

  1. Sebastian Poliak
  2. Daniel Morales
  3. Louis-Philippe Croteau
  4. Dayana Krawchuk
  5. Elena Palmesino
  6. Susan Morton
  7. Cloutier Jean-François
  8. Frederic Charron
  9. Matthew B Dalva
  10. Susan L Ackerman
  11. Tzu-Jen Kao
  12. Artur Kania  Is a corresponding author
  1. Columbia University, United States
  2. Institut de recherches cliniques de Montreal, Canada
  3. Montreal Neurological Institute, Canada
  4. Department of Neuroscience, The Farber Institute for Neurosciences, Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, United States
  5. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The Jackson Laboratory, United States
  6. Taipei Medical University, Taiwan

Abstract

During neural circuit assembly, axonal growth cones are exposed to multiple guidance signals at trajectory choice points. While axonal responses to individual guidance cues have been extensively studied, less is known about responses to combination of signals and underlying molecular mechanisms. Here, we studied the convergence of signals directing trajectory selection of spinal motor axons entering the limb. We first demonstrate that Netrin-1 attracts and repels distinct motor axon populations, according to their expression of Netrin receptors. Quantitative in vitro assays demonstrate that motor axons synergistically integrate both, attractive or repulsive Netrin-1 signals together with repulsive ephrin signals. Our investigations of the mechanism of ephrin-B2 and Netrin-1 integration demonstrate that the Netrin receptor Unc5c and the ephrin receptor EphB2 can form a complex in a ligand-dependent manner and that Netrin-ephrin synergistic growth cones responses involve the potentiation of Src family kinase signaling, a common effector of both pathways.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sebastian Poliak

    Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Daniel Morales

    Neural Circuit Development Laboratory, Institut de recherches cliniques de Montreal, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Louis-Philippe Croteau

    Neural Circuit Development Laboratory, Institut de recherches cliniques de Montreal, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Dayana Krawchuk

    Neural Circuit Development Laboratory, Institut de recherches cliniques de Montreal, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Elena Palmesino

    Neural Circuit Development Laboratory, Institut de recherches cliniques de Montreal, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Susan Morton

    Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Cloutier Jean-François

    Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Frederic Charron

    Institut de recherches cliniques de Montreal, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Matthew B Dalva

    Thomas Jefferson University, Department of Neuroscience, The Farber Institute for Neurosciences, Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Susan L Ackerman

    Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Tzu-Jen Kao

    Graduate Institute of Neural Regenerative Medicine, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Artur Kania

    Neural Circuit Development Lab, Institut de recherches cliniques de Montreal, Montreal, Canada
    For correspondence
    artur.kania@ircm.qc.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experimental procedures were approved by the Animal Care Committee at the Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal, in accordance with the regulations of the Canadian Council on Animal Care. The following protocol reference numbers were used: 2005-03, 2008-18, 2009-10, 2011-30 and 2012-22.

Copyright

© 2015, Poliak et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,302
    views
  • 796
    downloads
  • 69
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sebastian Poliak
  2. Daniel Morales
  3. Louis-Philippe Croteau
  4. Dayana Krawchuk
  5. Elena Palmesino
  6. Susan Morton
  7. Cloutier Jean-François
  8. Frederic Charron
  9. Matthew B Dalva
  10. Susan L Ackerman
  11. Tzu-Jen Kao
  12. Artur Kania
(2015)
Synergistic integration of Netrin and ephrin axon guidance signals by spinal motor neurons
eLife 4:e10841.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10841

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10841

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Kara A Nelson, Kari F Lenhart ... Stephen DiNardo
    Research Article

    Niches are often found in specific positions in tissues relative to the stem cells they support. Consistency of niche position suggests that placement is important for niche function. However, the complexity of most niches has precluded a thorough understanding of how their proper placement is established. To address this, we investigated the formation of a genetically tractable niche, the Drosophila Posterior Signaling Center (PSC), the assembly of which had not been previously explored. This niche controls hematopoietic progenitors of the lymph gland (LG). PSC cells were previously shown to be specified laterally in the embryo, but ultimately reside dorsally, at the LG posterior. Here, using live-imaging, we show that PSC cells migrate as a tight collective and associate with multiple tissues during their trajectory to the LG posterior. We find that Slit emanating from two extrinsic sources, visceral mesoderm and cardioblasts, is required for the PSC to remain a collective, and for its attachment to cardioblasts during migration. Without proper Slit-Robo signaling, PSC cells disperse, form aberrant contacts, and ultimately fail to reach their stereotypical position near progenitors. Our work characterizes a novel example of niche formation and identifies an extrinsic signaling relay that controls precise niche positioning.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Elise S Bruguera, Jacob P Mahoney, William I Weis
    Research Article

    Wnt/β-catenin signaling directs animal development and tissue renewal in a tightly controlled, cell- and tissue-specific manner. In the mammalian central nervous system, the atypical ligand Norrin controls angiogenesis and maintenance of the blood-brain barrier and blood-retina barrier through the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Like Wnt, Norrin activates signaling by binding and heterodimerizing the receptors Frizzled (Fzd) and low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 or 6 (LRP5/6), leading to membrane recruitment of the intracellular transducer Dishevelled (Dvl) and ultimately stabilizing the transcriptional coactivator β-catenin. Unlike Wnt, the cystine knot ligand Norrin only signals through Fzd4 and additionally requires the co-receptor Tetraspanin12 (Tspan12); however, the mechanism underlying Tspan12-mediated signal enhancement is unclear. It has been proposed that Tspan12 integrates into the Norrin-Fzd4 complex to enhance Norrin-Fzd4 affinity or otherwise allosterically modulate Fzd4 signaling. Here, we measure direct, high-affinity binding between purified Norrin and Tspan12 in a lipid environment and use AlphaFold models to interrogate this interaction interface. We find that Tspan12 and Fzd4 can simultaneously bind Norrin and that a pre-formed Tspan12/Fzd4 heterodimer, as well as cells co-expressing Tspan12 and Fzd4, more efficiently capture low concentrations of Norrin than Fzd4 alone. We also show that Tspan12 competes with both heparan sulfate proteoglycans and LRP6 for Norrin binding and that Tspan12 does not impact Fzd4-Dvl affinity in the presence or absence of Norrin. Our findings suggest that Tspan12 does not allosterically enhance Fzd4 binding to Norrin or Dvl, but instead functions to directly capture Norrin upstream of signaling.