Opposing roles of nuclear receptor HNF4α isoforms in colitis and colitis-associated colon cancer

  1. Karthikeyani Chellappa
  2. Poonamjot Deol
  3. Jane R Evans
  4. Linh M Vuong
  5. Gang Chen
  6. Nadege Briançon
  7. Eugene Bolotin
  8. Christian Lytle
  9. Meera G Nair
  10. Frances M Sladek  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Pennsylvania, United States
  2. University of California, Riverside, United States
  3. Harvard Medical School, United States
  4. University of California Riverside, United States

Abstract

HNF4α has been implicated in colitis and colon cancer in humans but the role of the different HNF4α isoforms expressed from the two different promoters (P1 and P2) active in the colon is not clear. Here, we show that P1-HNF4α is expressed primarily in the differentiated compartment of the mouse colonic crypt and P2-HNF4α in the proliferative compartment. Exon swap mice that express only P1- or only P2-HNF4α have different colonic gene expression profiles, interacting proteins, cellular migration, ion transport and epithelial barrier function. The mice also exhibit altered susceptibilities to experimental colitis (DSS) and colitis-associated colon cancer (AOM+DSS). When P2-HNF4α-only mice (which have elevated levels of the cytokine resistin-like β, RELMβ, and are extremely sensitive to DSS) are crossed with Retnlb-/- mice, they are rescued from mortality. Furthermore, P2-HNF4α binds and preferentially activates the RELMβ promoter. In summary, HNF4α isoforms perform non-redundant functions in the colon under conditions of stress, underscoring the importance of tracking them both in colitis and colon cancer.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Karthikeyani Chellappa

    Institute for Diabetes, Obesity, and Metabolism, Department of Physiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Poonamjot Deol

    Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Jane R Evans

    Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Linh M Vuong

    Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Gang Chen

    Division of Biomedical Sciences, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Nadege Briançon

    Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Eugene Bolotin

    Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Christian Lytle

    Division of Biomedical Sciences, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Meera G Nair

    Division of Biomedical Sciences, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Frances M Sladek

    Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, University of California Riverside, Riverside, United States
    For correspondence
    frances.sladek@ucr.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Care and treatment of animals were in strict accordance with guidelines from the University of California Riverside Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Institutional protocol number A200140014.

Copyright

© 2016, Chellappa et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,129
    views
  • 633
    downloads
  • 65
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Karthikeyani Chellappa
  2. Poonamjot Deol
  3. Jane R Evans
  4. Linh M Vuong
  5. Gang Chen
  6. Nadege Briançon
  7. Eugene Bolotin
  8. Christian Lytle
  9. Meera G Nair
  10. Frances M Sladek
(2016)
Opposing roles of nuclear receptor HNF4α isoforms in colitis and colitis-associated colon cancer
eLife 5:e10903.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10903

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10903

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Joan Chang, Adam Pickard ... Karl E Kadler
    Research Article

    Collagen-I fibrillogenesis is crucial to health and development, where dysregulation is a hallmark of fibroproliferative diseases. Here, we show that collagen-I fibril assembly required a functional endocytic system that recycles collagen-I to assemble new fibrils. Endogenous collagen production was not required for fibrillogenesis if exogenous collagen was available, but the circadian-regulated vacuolar protein sorting (VPS) 33b and collagen-binding integrin α11 subunit were crucial to fibrillogenesis. Cells lacking VPS33B secrete soluble collagen-I protomers but were deficient in fibril formation, thus secretion and assembly are separately controlled. Overexpression of VPS33B led to loss of fibril rhythmicity and overabundance of fibrils, which was mediated through integrin α11β1. Endocytic recycling of collagen-I was enhanced in human fibroblasts isolated from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, where VPS33B and integrin α11 subunit were overexpressed at the fibrogenic front; this correlation between VPS33B, integrin α11 subunit, and abnormal collagen deposition was also observed in samples from patients with chronic skin wounds. In conclusion, our study showed that circadian-regulated endocytic recycling is central to homeostatic assembly of collagen fibrils and is disrupted in diseases.

    1. Cell Biology
    Chun-Wei Chen, Jeffery B Chavez ... Bruce J Nicholson
    Research Article Updated

    Endometriosis is a debilitating disease affecting 190 million women worldwide and the greatest single contributor to infertility. The most broadly accepted etiology is that uterine endometrial cells retrogradely enter the peritoneum during menses, and implant and form invasive lesions in a process analogous to cancer metastasis. However, over 90% of women suffer retrograde menstruation, but only 10% develop endometriosis, and debate continues as to whether the underlying defect is endometrial or peritoneal. Processes implicated in invasion include: enhanced motility; adhesion to, and formation of gap junctions with, the target tissue. Endometrial stromal (ESCs) from 22 endometriosis patients at different disease stages show much greater invasiveness across mesothelial (or endothelial) monolayers than ESCs from 22 control subjects, which is further enhanced by the presence of EECs. This is due to the enhanced responsiveness of endometriosis ESCs to the mesothelium, which induces migration and gap junction coupling. ESC-PMC gap junction coupling is shown to be required for invasion, while coupling between PMCs enhances mesothelial barrier breakdown.