Sexually divergent expression of active and passive conditioned fear responses in rats

  1. Tina M Gruene
  2. Katelyn Flick
  3. Alexis Stefano
  4. Stephen D Shea
  5. Rebecca M Shansky  Is a corresponding author
  1. Northeastern University, United States
  2. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, United States

Abstract

Traditional rodent models of Pavlovian fear conditioning assess the strength of learning by quantifying freezing responses. However, sole reliance on this measure includes the de facto assumption that any locomotor activity reflects an absence of fear. Consequently, alternative expressions of associative learning are rarely considered. Here we identify a novel, active fear response ('darting') that occurs primarily in female rats. In females, darting exhibits the characteristics of a learned fear behavior, appearing during the CS period as conditioning proceeds and disappearing from the CS period during extinction. This finding motivates a reinterpretation of rodent fear conditioning studies, particularly in females, and it suggests that conditioned fear behavior is more diverse than previously appreciated. Moreover, rats that darted during initial fear conditioning exhibited lower freezing during the second day of extinction testing, suggesting that females employ distinct and adaptive fear response strategies that improve long-term outcomes.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Tina M Gruene

    Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Katelyn Flick

    Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Alexis Stefano

    Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Stephen D Shea

    Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Rebecca M Shansky

    Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    r.shansky@neu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All procedures were conducted in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Northeastern University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee protocol # 12-0102R.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Peggy Mason, University of Chicago, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: September 3, 2015
  2. Accepted: November 12, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: November 14, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: December 23, 2015 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2015, Gruene et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 7,170
    Page views
  • 1,067
    Downloads
  • 187
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Tina M Gruene
  2. Katelyn Flick
  3. Alexis Stefano
  4. Stephen D Shea
  5. Rebecca M Shansky
(2015)
Sexually divergent expression of active and passive conditioned fear responses in rats
eLife 4:e11352.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11352

Further reading

  1. Male rats and female rats respond to stress in different ways.

    1. Physics of Living Systems
    2. Neuroscience
    Nihav Dhawale, Madhusudhan Venkadesan
    Research Article Updated

    Running stably on uneven natural terrain takes skillful control and was critical for human evolution. Even as runners circumnavigate hazardous obstacles such as steep drops, they must contend with uneven ground that is gentler but still destabilizing. We do not know how footsteps are guided based on the uneven topography of the ground and how those choices influence stability. Therefore, we studied human runners on trail-like undulating uneven terrain and measured their energetics, kinematics, ground forces, and stepping patterns. We find that runners do not selectively step on more level ground areas. Instead, the body’s mechanical response, mediated by the control of leg compliance, helps maintain stability without requiring precise regulation of footsteps. Furthermore, their overall kinematics and energy consumption on uneven terrain showed little change from flat ground. These findings may explain how runners remain stable on natural terrain while devoting attention to tasks besides guiding footsteps.