Genetic mechanisms control the linear scaling between related cortical primary and higher order sensory areas

  1. Andreas Zembrzycki  Is a corresponding author
  2. Adam M Stocker
  3. Axel Leingärtner
  4. Setsuko Sahara
  5. Shen-Ju Chou
  6. Valery Kalatsky
  7. Scott R May
  8. Michael P Stryker
  9. Dennis DM O'Leary
  1. The Salk Institute For Biological Studies, United States
  2. Minnesota State University Moorhead, United States
  3. University Medical Center, Germany
  4. King's College London, United Kingdom
  5. Academia Sinica, Taiwan
  6. Enthought Scientific Computing Solutions, United States
  7. University of California, San Francisco, United States

Abstract

In mammals, the neocortical layout consists of few modality-specific primary sensory areas and a multitude of higher order ones. Abnormal layout of cortical areas may disrupt sensory function and behavior. Developmental genetic mechanisms specify primary areas, but mechanisms influencing higher order area properties are unknown. By exploiting gain-of and loss-of function mouse models of the transcription factor Emx2, we have generated bi-directional changes in primary visual cortex size in vivo and have used it as a model to show a novel and prominent function for genetic mechanisms regulating primary visual area size and also proportionally dictating the sizes of surrounding higher order visual areas. This finding redefines the role for intrinsic genetic mechanisms to concomitantly specify and scale primary and related higher order sensory areas in a linear fashion.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Andreas Zembrzycki

    Molecular Neurobiology Laboratory, The Salk Institute For Biological Studies, La Jolla, United States
    For correspondence
    azembrzycki@salk.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Adam M Stocker

    Biosciences Department, Minnesota State University Moorhead, Moorhead, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Axel Leingärtner

    University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Setsuko Sahara

    MRC Centre for Developmental Neurobiology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Shen-Ju Chou

    Institute of Cellular and Organismic Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Valery Kalatsky

    Enthought Scientific Computing Solutions, Austin, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Scott R May

    Molecular Neurobiology Laboratory, The Salk Institute For Biological Studies, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Michael P Stryker

    Center for Integrative Neuroscience, Department of Physiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Dennis DM O'Leary

    Molecular Neurobiology Laboratory, The Salk Institute For Biological Studies, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Moses V Chao, New York University School of Medicine, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments were approved under Protocol #09-012 and conducted following the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the Salk Institute and were in full compliance with the guidelines of the National Institutes of Health for the care and use of laboratory animals.

Version history

  1. Received: September 5, 2015
  2. Accepted: December 23, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: December 24, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: January 26, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2015, Zembrzycki et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,203
    views
  • 483
    downloads
  • 13
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Andreas Zembrzycki
  2. Adam M Stocker
  3. Axel Leingärtner
  4. Setsuko Sahara
  5. Shen-Ju Chou
  6. Valery Kalatsky
  7. Scott R May
  8. Michael P Stryker
  9. Dennis DM O'Leary
(2015)
Genetic mechanisms control the linear scaling between related cortical primary and higher order sensory areas
eLife 4:e11416.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11416

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11416

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Samuel C Griffiths, Jia Tan ... Hsin-Yi Henry Ho
    Research Article Updated

    The receptor tyrosine kinase ROR2 mediates noncanonical WNT5A signaling to orchestrate tissue morphogenetic processes, and dysfunction of the pathway causes Robinow syndrome, brachydactyly B, and metastatic diseases. The domain(s) and mechanisms required for ROR2 function, however, remain unclear. We solved the crystal structure of the extracellular cysteine-rich (CRD) and Kringle (Kr) domains of ROR2 and found that, unlike other CRDs, the ROR2 CRD lacks the signature hydrophobic pocket that binds lipids/lipid-modified proteins, such as WNTs, suggesting a novel mechanism of ligand reception. Functionally, we showed that the ROR2 CRD, but not other domains, is required and minimally sufficient to promote WNT5A signaling, and Robinow mutations in the CRD and the adjacent Kr impair ROR2 secretion and function. Moreover, using function-activating and -perturbing antibodies against the Frizzled (FZ) family of WNT receptors, we demonstrate the involvement of FZ in WNT5A-ROR signaling. Thus, ROR2 acts via its CRD to potentiate the function of a receptor super-complex that includes FZ to transduce WNT5A signals.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Nicolas Loyer, Elizabeth KJ Hogg ... Jens Januschke
    Research Article Updated

    The generation of distinct cell fates during development depends on asymmetric cell division of progenitor cells. In the central and peripheral nervous system of Drosophila, progenitor cells respectively called neuroblasts or sensory organ precursors use PAR polarity during mitosis to control cell fate determination in their daughter cells. How polarity and the cell cycle are coupled, and how the cell cycle machinery regulates PAR protein function and cell fate determination is poorly understood. Here, we generate an analog sensitive allele of CDK1 and reveal that its partial inhibition weakens but does not abolish apical polarity in embryonic and larval neuroblasts and leads to defects in polarisation of fate determinants. We describe a novel in vivo phosphorylation of Bazooka, the Drosophila homolog of PAR-3, on Serine180, a consensus CDK phosphorylation site. In some tissular contexts, phosphorylation of Serine180 occurs in asymmetrically dividing cells but not in their symmetrically dividing neighbours. In neuroblasts, Serine180 phosphomutants disrupt the timing of basal polarisation. Serine180 phosphomutants also affect the specification and binary cell fate determination of sensory organ precursors as well as Baz localisation during their asymmetric cell divisions. Finally, we show that CDK1 phosphorylates Serine-S180 and an equivalent Serine on human PAR-3 in vitro.