Genetic mechanisms control the linear scaling between related cortical primary and higher order sensory areas

  1. Andreas Zembrzycki  Is a corresponding author
  2. Adam M Stocker
  3. Axel Leingärtner
  4. Setsuko Sahara
  5. Shen-Ju Chou
  6. Valery Kalatsky
  7. Scott R May
  8. Michael P Stryker
  9. Dennis DM O'Leary
  1. The Salk Institute For Biological Studies, United States
  2. Minnesota State University Moorhead, United States
  3. University Medical Center, Germany
  4. King's College London, United Kingdom
  5. Academia Sinica, Taiwan
  6. Enthought Scientific Computing Solutions, United States
  7. University of California, San Francisco, United States

Abstract

In mammals, the neocortical layout consists of few modality-specific primary sensory areas and a multitude of higher order ones. Abnormal layout of cortical areas may disrupt sensory function and behavior. Developmental genetic mechanisms specify primary areas, but mechanisms influencing higher order area properties are unknown. By exploiting gain-of and loss-of function mouse models of the transcription factor Emx2, we have generated bi-directional changes in primary visual cortex size in vivo and have used it as a model to show a novel and prominent function for genetic mechanisms regulating primary visual area size and also proportionally dictating the sizes of surrounding higher order visual areas. This finding redefines the role for intrinsic genetic mechanisms to concomitantly specify and scale primary and related higher order sensory areas in a linear fashion.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Andreas Zembrzycki

    Molecular Neurobiology Laboratory, The Salk Institute For Biological Studies, La Jolla, United States
    For correspondence
    azembrzycki@salk.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Adam M Stocker

    Biosciences Department, Minnesota State University Moorhead, Moorhead, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Axel Leingärtner

    University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Setsuko Sahara

    MRC Centre for Developmental Neurobiology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Shen-Ju Chou

    Institute of Cellular and Organismic Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Valery Kalatsky

    Enthought Scientific Computing Solutions, Austin, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Scott R May

    Molecular Neurobiology Laboratory, The Salk Institute For Biological Studies, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Michael P Stryker

    Center for Integrative Neuroscience, Department of Physiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Dennis DM O'Leary

    Molecular Neurobiology Laboratory, The Salk Institute For Biological Studies, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments were approved under Protocol #09-012 and conducted following the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the Salk Institute and were in full compliance with the guidelines of the National Institutes of Health for the care and use of laboratory animals.

Copyright

© 2015, Zembrzycki et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,210
    views
  • 484
    downloads
  • 13
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Andreas Zembrzycki
  2. Adam M Stocker
  3. Axel Leingärtner
  4. Setsuko Sahara
  5. Shen-Ju Chou
  6. Valery Kalatsky
  7. Scott R May
  8. Michael P Stryker
  9. Dennis DM O'Leary
(2015)
Genetic mechanisms control the linear scaling between related cortical primary and higher order sensory areas
eLife 4:e11416.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11416

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11416

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Rachael Kuintzle, Leah A Santat, Michael B Elowitz
    Research Article

    The Notch signaling pathway uses families of ligands and receptors to transmit signals to nearby cells. These components are expressed in diverse combinations in different cell types, interact in a many-to-many fashion, both within the same cell (in cis) and between cells (in trans), and their interactions are modulated by Fringe glycosyltransferases. A fundamental question is how the strength of Notch signaling depends on which pathway components are expressed, at what levels, and in which cells. Here, we used a quantitative, bottom-up, cell-based approach to systematically characterize trans-activation, cis-inhibition, and cis-activation signaling efficiencies across a range of ligand and Fringe expression levels in Chinese hamster and mouse cell lines. Each ligand (Dll1, Dll4, Jag1, and Jag2) and receptor variant (Notch1 and Notch2) analyzed here exhibited a unique profile of interactions, Fringe dependence, and signaling outcomes. All four ligands were able to bind receptors in cis and in trans, and all ligands trans-activated both receptors, although Jag1-Notch1 signaling was substantially weaker than other ligand-receptor combinations. Cis-interactions were predominantly inhibitory, with the exception of the Dll1- and Dll4-Notch2 pairs, which exhibited cis-activation stronger than trans-activation. Lfng strengthened Delta-mediated trans-activation and weakened Jagged-mediated trans-activation for both receptors. Finally, cis-ligands showed diverse cis-inhibition strengths, which depended on the identity of the trans-ligand as well as the receptor. The map of receptor-ligand-Fringe interaction outcomes revealed here should help guide rational perturbation and control of the Notch pathway.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Kara A Nelson, Kari F Lenhart ... Stephen DiNardo
    Research Article

    Niches are often found in specific positions in tissues relative to the stem cells they support. Consistency of niche position suggests that placement is important for niche function. However, the complexity of most niches has precluded a thorough understanding of how their proper placement is established. To address this, we investigated the formation of a genetically tractable niche, the Drosophila Posterior Signaling Center (PSC), the assembly of which had not been previously explored. This niche controls hematopoietic progenitors of the lymph gland (LG). PSC cells were previously shown to be specified laterally in the embryo, but ultimately reside dorsally, at the LG posterior. Here, using live-imaging, we show that PSC cells migrate as a tight collective and associate with multiple tissues during their trajectory to the LG posterior. We find that Slit emanating from two extrinsic sources, visceral mesoderm and cardioblasts, is required for the PSC to remain a collective, and for its attachment to cardioblasts during migration. Without proper Slit-Robo signaling, PSC cells disperse, form aberrant contacts, and ultimately fail to reach their stereotypical position near progenitors. Our work characterizes a novel example of niche formation and identifies an extrinsic signaling relay that controls precise niche positioning.