Guanylate binding proteins (GBPs) directly attack T. gondii via supramolecular complexes

  1. Elisabeth Kravets
  2. Daniel Degrandi
  3. Qijun Ma
  4. Thomas-Otavio Peulen
  5. Verena Klümpers
  6. Suren Felekyan
  7. Ralf Kühnemuth
  8. Stefanie Weidtkamp-Peters
  9. Claus AM Seidel  Is a corresponding author
  10. Klaus Pfeffer
  1. Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany
  2. Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Germany
  3. Heidelberg University, Germany

Abstract

GBPs are essential for immunity against intracellular pathogens, especially for T. gondii control. Here, the molecular interactions of murine GBPs (mGBP1/2/3/5/6), homo- and hetero-multimerization properties of mGBP2 and its function in parasite killing were investigated by mutational, Multiparameter Fluorescence Image Spectroscopy, and live cell microscopy methodologies. Control of T. gondii replication by mGBP2 requires GTP hydrolysis and isoprenylation thus, enabling reversible oligomerization in vesicle-like structures. mGBP2 undergoes structural transitions between monomeric, dimeric and oligomeric states visualized by quantitative FRET analysis. mGBPs reside in at least two discrete subcellular reservoirs and attack the parasitophorous vacuole membrane (PVM) as orchestrated, supramolecular complexes forming large, densely packed multimers comprising up to several thousand monomers. This dramatic mGBP enrichment results in the loss of PVM integrity, followed by a direct assault of mGBP2 upon the plasma membrane of the parasite. These discoveries provide vital dynamic and molecular perceptions into cell-autonomous immunity.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Elisabeth Kravets

    Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Daniel Degrandi

    Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Qijun Ma

    Institute for Molecular Physical Chemistry, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Thomas-Otavio Peulen

    Institute for Molecular Physical Chemistry, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Verena Klümpers

    Institute of Transfusion Medicine and Immunology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Suren Felekyan

    Institute for Molecular Physical Chemistry, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Ralf Kühnemuth

    Institute for Molecular Physical Chemistry, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Stefanie Weidtkamp-Peters

    Center of Advanced Imaging, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Claus AM Seidel

    Institute for Molecular Physical Chemistry, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
    For correspondence
    cseidel@hhu.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Klaus Pfeffer

    Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Copyright

© 2016, Kravets et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,498
    views
  • 758
    downloads
  • 110
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Elisabeth Kravets
  2. Daniel Degrandi
  3. Qijun Ma
  4. Thomas-Otavio Peulen
  5. Verena Klümpers
  6. Suren Felekyan
  7. Ralf Kühnemuth
  8. Stefanie Weidtkamp-Peters
  9. Claus AM Seidel
  10. Klaus Pfeffer
(2016)
Guanylate binding proteins (GBPs) directly attack T. gondii via supramolecular complexes
eLife 5:e11479.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11479

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11479

Further reading

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Mart GF Last, Leoni Abendstein ... Thomas H Sharp
    Tools and Resources

    Segmentation is a critical data processing step in many applications of cryo-electron tomography. Downstream analyses, such as subtomogram averaging, are often based on segmentation results, and are thus critically dependent on the availability of open-source software for accurate as well as high-throughput tomogram segmentation. There is a need for more user-friendly, flexible, and comprehensive segmentation software that offers an insightful overview of all steps involved in preparing automated segmentations. Here, we present Ais: a dedicated tomogram segmentation package that is geared towards both high performance and accessibility, available on GitHub. In this report, we demonstrate two common processing steps that can be greatly accelerated with Ais: particle picking for subtomogram averaging, and generating many-feature segmentations of cellular architecture based on in situ tomography data. Featuring comprehensive annotation, segmentation, and rendering functionality, as well as an open repository for trained models at aiscryoet.org, we hope that Ais will help accelerate research and dissemination of data involving cryoET.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Johannes Elferich, Lingli Kong ... Nikolaus Grigorieff
    Research Advance

    Images taken by transmission electron microscopes are usually affected by lens aberrations and image defocus, among other factors. These distortions can be modeled in reciprocal space using the contrast transfer function (CTF). Accurate estimation and correction of the CTF is essential for restoring the high-resolution signal in cryogenic electron microscopy (cryoEM). Previously, we described the implementation of algorithms for this task in the cisTEM software package (Grant et al., 2018). Here we show that taking sample characteristics, such as thickness and tilt, into account can improve CTF estimation. This is particularly important when imaging cellular samples, where measurement of sample thickness and geometry derived from accurate modeling of the Thon ring pattern helps judging the quality of the sample. This improved CTF estimation has been implemented in CTFFIND5, a new version of the cisTEM program CTFFIND. We evaluated the accuracy of these estimates using images of tilted aquaporin crystals and eukaryotic cells thinned by focused ion beam milling. We estimate that with micrographs of sufficient quality CTFFIND5 can measure sample tilt with an accuracy of 3° and sample thickness with an accuracy of 5 nm.