Guanylate binding proteins (GBPs) directly attack T. gondii via supramolecular complexes

  1. Elisabeth Kravets
  2. Daniel Degrandi
  3. Qijun Ma
  4. Thomas-Otavio Peulen
  5. Verena Klümpers
  6. Suren Felekyan
  7. Ralf Kühnemuth
  8. Stefanie Weidtkamp-Peters
  9. Claus AM Seidel  Is a corresponding author
  10. Klaus Pfeffer
  1. Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany
  2. Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Germany
  3. Heidelberg University, Germany

Abstract

GBPs are essential for immunity against intracellular pathogens, especially for T. gondii control. Here, the molecular interactions of murine GBPs (mGBP1/2/3/5/6), homo- and hetero-multimerization properties of mGBP2 and its function in parasite killing were investigated by mutational, Multiparameter Fluorescence Image Spectroscopy, and live cell microscopy methodologies. Control of T. gondii replication by mGBP2 requires GTP hydrolysis and isoprenylation thus, enabling reversible oligomerization in vesicle-like structures. mGBP2 undergoes structural transitions between monomeric, dimeric and oligomeric states visualized by quantitative FRET analysis. mGBPs reside in at least two discrete subcellular reservoirs and attack the parasitophorous vacuole membrane (PVM) as orchestrated, supramolecular complexes forming large, densely packed multimers comprising up to several thousand monomers. This dramatic mGBP enrichment results in the loss of PVM integrity, followed by a direct assault of mGBP2 upon the plasma membrane of the parasite. These discoveries provide vital dynamic and molecular perceptions into cell-autonomous immunity.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Elisabeth Kravets

    Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Daniel Degrandi

    Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Qijun Ma

    Institute for Molecular Physical Chemistry, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Thomas-Otavio Peulen

    Institute for Molecular Physical Chemistry, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Verena Klümpers

    Institute of Transfusion Medicine and Immunology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Suren Felekyan

    Institute for Molecular Physical Chemistry, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Ralf Kühnemuth

    Institute for Molecular Physical Chemistry, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Stefanie Weidtkamp-Peters

    Center of Advanced Imaging, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Claus AM Seidel

    Institute for Molecular Physical Chemistry, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
    For correspondence
    cseidel@hhu.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Klaus Pfeffer

    Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Taekjip Ha, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, United States

Version history

  1. Received: September 9, 2015
  2. Accepted: January 26, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: January 27, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: February 29, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2016, Kravets et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,371
    views
  • 741
    downloads
  • 103
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Elisabeth Kravets
  2. Daniel Degrandi
  3. Qijun Ma
  4. Thomas-Otavio Peulen
  5. Verena Klümpers
  6. Suren Felekyan
  7. Ralf Kühnemuth
  8. Stefanie Weidtkamp-Peters
  9. Claus AM Seidel
  10. Klaus Pfeffer
(2016)
Guanylate binding proteins (GBPs) directly attack T. gondii via supramolecular complexes
eLife 5:e11479.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11479

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11479

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Marcel Proske, Robert Janowski ... Dierk Niessing
    Research Article

    Mutations in the human PURA gene cause the neurodevelopmental PURA syndrome. In contrast to several other monogenetic disorders, almost all reported mutations in this nucleic acid-binding protein result in the full disease penetrance. In this study, we observed that patient mutations across PURA impair its previously reported co-localization with processing bodies. These mutations either destroyed the folding integrity, RNA binding, or dimerization of PURA. We also solved the crystal structures of the N- and C-terminal PUR domains of human PURA and combined them with molecular dynamics simulations and nuclear magnetic resonance measurements. The observed unusually high dynamics and structural promiscuity of PURA indicated that this protein is particularly susceptible to mutations impairing its structural integrity. It offers an explanation why even conservative mutations across PURA result in the full penetrance of symptoms in patients with PURA syndrome.

    1. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Alexander D Cook, Mark Carrington, Matthew K Higgins
    Research Article

    African trypanosomes replicate within infected mammals where they are exposed to the complement system. This system centres around complement C3, which is present in a soluble form in serum but becomes covalently deposited onto the surfaces of pathogens after proteolytic cleavage to C3b. Membrane-associated C3b triggers different complement-mediated effectors which promote pathogen clearance. To counter complement-mediated clearance, African trypanosomes have a cell surface receptor, ISG65, which binds to C3b and which decreases the rate of trypanosome clearance in an infection model. However, the mechanism by which ISG65 reduces C3b function has not been determined. We reveal through cryogenic electron microscopy that ISG65 has two distinct binding sites for C3b, only one of which is available in C3 and C3d. We show that ISG65 does not block the formation of C3b or the function of the C3 convertase which catalyses the surface deposition of C3b. However, we show that ISG65 forms a specific conjugate with C3b, perhaps acting as a decoy. ISG65 also occludes the binding sites for complement receptors 2 and 3, which may disrupt recruitment of immune cells, including B cells, phagocytes, and granulocytes. This suggests that ISG65 protects trypanosomes by combining multiple approaches to dampen the complement cascade.