Inside the cells of animals and plants, compartments called mitochondria play several important roles including supplying chemical energy for cellular processes. The mitochondria inside nerve cells are produced in the main body of each cell, and must travel down a long nerve fiber called the axon and the branch-like extensions called dendrites to reach the sites where they are most needed. As the nerve cells form, dendritic branches grow and retract as the connections between different nerve cells – known as synapses – form and disappear. Later on, the dendrites and synapses become more stable, but it is not clear if the amount that the mitochondria move also changes.

Faits et al. used microscopy to study the movement of mitochondria in the developing dendrites of ganglion cells in the eyes of mice. The experiments show that early on in the development of nerve cells, the mitochondria are very mobile. However, as the synapses become more stable later on, the mitochondria become almost motionless. The movement of another type of cell compartment to the dendrites is unaffected, which suggests that this decline in movement is specific to mitochondria.

Next, Faits et al. studied mutant mice that suffer from degeneration of part of the eye called the retina. These mice have ganglion cells that display higher levels of spontaneous activity than normal and their synapses continue to form and disappear later in development. The experiments show that the mitochondria in the ganglion cells remain mobile in the adult mutant mice. Faits et al.’s findings challenge the prevailing views of mitochondria in dendrites, and suggest that mitochondria reach stable positions during a critical period in the development of the retina.

Further studies should reveal how the decline in the movement of mitochondria is regulated, which may help us to understand how differences in the movement of mitochondria can lead to the degeneration of nerve cells in some human diseases, such as dominant optic atrophy.

Mitochondria provide energy in the form of ATP and phosphocreatine, and participate in Ca²⁺ signaling. In neurons, mitochondrial biosynthesis occurs in the soma, but sites of energy use and Ca²⁺ influx are dispersed across axonal and dendritic arbors (Davis and Clayton, 1996). To meet these distributed demands, neuronal mitochondria are transported throughout axons and dendrites along microtubule tracks (Ehlers, 2013; Lin and Sheng, 2015). A number of recent studies have explored the dynamics and function of axonal mitochondria, including detailed analyses of mitochondrial movements in peripheral and central axons in vivo (Breckwoldt et al., 2014; Misgeld et al., 2007; Plucinska et al., 2012; Takihara et al., 2015). By comparison, dendritic mitochondria are less explored and their dynamics have not been examined in intact neural circuits.

Most of the energy in dendrites is consumed at synapses (Attwell and Laughlin, 2001; Howarth et al., 2012), which are also a primary site of Ca²⁺ influx (Augustine et al., 2003; Grienberger and Konnerth, 2012). Dendritic mitochondria have been shown to localize to synapses in several systems and appear to contribute to their formation and plasticity (Chang et al., 2006; Ishihara et al., 2009; Li et al., 2010; Li et al., 2004). Increased ER complexity and Golgi outposts at dendritic branch points support protein and lipid biosynthesis, and secretory trafficking (Cui-Wang et al., 2012; Ehlers, 2013; Horton et al., 2005; Ye et al., 2007). In addition, branch points are hotspots for Ca²⁺ signals in some dendrites (Fitzpatrick et al., 2009; Larkum et al., 2003). Mitochondria are required for dendrites to establish normal branching patterns (Fukumitsu et al., 2015; Kimura and Murakami, 2014), but whether mitochondria localize to branch points is not clear. Moreover, when associations between mitochondria and synapses or branch points emerge during development has not been examined. Finally, the prevailing view of dendritic mitochondria as being highly motile is based on observations of cultured neurons isolated from embryonic tissue. Whether this view holds true for neurons in their native environments, and how mitochondrial motility in dendrites changes as branching and connectivity patterns stabilize during circuit maturation remains unknown.

Neuronal activity is thought to control the movements of dendritic mitochondria. In particular, increases in intracellular Ca²⁺ were shown to uncouple mitochondria from motor proteins via the Ca²⁺-dependent adaptor protein Miro1 (MacAskill et al., 2009; Wang and Schwarz, 2009). However, the evidence supporting a leading role for activity in dendritic mitochondrial transport was obtained from cultured neurons exposed to artificial stimuli (e.g. high external K⁺), raising the question whether physiologically occurring activity patterns in intact circuits exert a similar influence.

Here, we analyze how development and neuronal activity shape the distribution and dynamics of mitochondria in dendrites of ganglion cells in the intact retina. We find that mitochondrial density in retinal ganglion cell (RGC) dendrites reaches near-mature levels before most synapses are formed. In the adult retina, mitochondria are enriched at synapses and branch points of RGC dendrites. Mitochondria localize to synapses early, whereas their accumulation at branch points occurs gradually during circuit development. The motility of mitochondria changes fundamentally across development. During the period of dendrite growth and synaptogenesis approximately 30% of mitochondria are in motion at any time. By contrast, we observed no movements of dendritic mitochondria in mature circuits. This drastic decline in motility is cargo-specific, as peroxisomes remain motile in mature RGC dendrites. Using simultaneous two-photon imaging of mitochondrial movements and intracellular Ca²⁺, we find that although elevation of external K⁺ reduces motility of dendritic mitochondria in the retina as it does in cultured neurons, neither spontaneous waves of activity during development, nor sensory-evoked activity at maturity alter the motility of dendritic mitochondria in RGCs. Finally, pathologically elevated RGC activity, a common feature of retinal degeneration, restores motility in mature retinas to developmental levels.

We used RGCs to study how development and neuronal activity influence the distribution and dynamics of dendritic mitochondria. In the mature retina, photoreceptors translate changes in photon flux into changes in glutamate release (Figure 1), and bipolar cells (BCs) relay this signal from the outer to the inner retina where they provide excitatory input to the dendrites of RGCs (Euler et al., 2014; Masland, 2001). In mice, synapses between BCs and RGCs begin to form around postnatal day 7 (P7), and connectivity patterns reach maturity around P21 (Fisher, 1979; Johnson et al., 2003; Morgan et al., 2008). Dendrite development leads synaptogenesis, and arborization patterns become set by P15 (Kim et al., 2010; Morgan et al., 2008; Soto et al., 2012). During development, RGCs exhibit spontaneous waves of activity, which propagate through the early visual system and shape its synaptic organization (Ackman et al., 2012; Kerschensteiner, 2013; Meister et al., 1991). Retinal waves stop around the time of eye opening (P14-15 in mice) when sensory-evoked inputs begin to drive RGC activity (Demas et al., 2003).

Figure 1

Download asset Open asset

To analyze the distribution and dynamics of mitochondria in RGC dendrites, we performed confocal and two-photon imaging in flat-mounted explants, which leave the circuitry of the retina intact (Williams et al., 2013). We have previously shown that BC-RGC synaptogenesis in retinal flat mounts matches in vivo rates (Kerschensteiner et al., 2009; Morgan et al., 2011; Soto et al., 2012). Moreover, during development, retinal circuits in this preparation generate spontaneous waves of activity with patterns similar to those observed in vivo (Ackman et al., 2012; Demas et al., 2003); and at maturity light, responses of RGCs in retinal explants closely resemble those recorded in vivo (Farrow et al., 2013; Grimes et al., 2015; Sagdullaev and McCall, 2005). Retinal explants thus allow us to examine the influence of development, and spontaneous and sensory-evoked physiologic activity patterns on dendritic mitochondria.

Development of the distribution of dendritic mitochondria

To analyze the distribution of dendritic mitochondria relative to sites of high energy demand and Ca²⁺ signaling, and assess its changes across development, we biolistically labeled RGCs with mitochondrially targeted yellow fluorescent protein (mtYFP), the postsynaptic density protein 95 fused to CFP (PSD95-CFP), and a red cytosolic fluorophore (tdTomato). Others and we previously showed that PSD95-CFP localizes specifically to BC synapses on RGC dendrites (i.e. excitatory synapses) (Jakobs et al., 2008; Kerschensteiner et al., 2009; Morgan et al., 2008). We labeled RGCs at three different ages (Figure 2A–C): P9 (early synaptogenesis, mid dendritogenesis, spontaneous retinal waves), P15 (mid synaptogenesis, mature dendrites, transition from retinal waves to light-evoked activity), and P21 (mature synapses, mature dendrites, light-evoked activity). We found that mitochondria enter dendrites to near-mature levels before most synapses are formed (Figure 2D,E). Similar to other systems, mitochondria in RGC dendrites are found closer to synapses than expected by chance (Figure 2F). This synaptic localization of mitochondria was apparent from the earliest time point examined (P9). In addition, at maturity, mitochondria are enriched >15-fold at branch points. Unlike their localization to synapses, the enrichment of mitochondria at branch points emerges gradually during development (Figure 2G). Thus, mitochondria enter RGC dendrites during early development, associate with synapses as circuits go through the trial-and-error process of establishing precise connections, and progressively accumulate at branch points even after mature arborization patterns are established.

Figure 2

Download asset Open asset

Video 1

Download asset

Cargo-specific developmental decline in mitochondrial motility

To study the dynamics of dendritic mitochondria across development, we performed time-lapse imaging experiments (0.9 frames per second or fps) on RGCs biolistically or transgenically (Thy1-mtCFP-P) labeled with mtYFP and mtCFP, respectively (Misgeld et al., 2007; Williams et al., 2013). Because mitochondria co-localize with synapses even at ages when synapse turnover is high (Figure 2F), we expected mitochondria during development to be motile, allowing them to adjust to changing patterns of connections. Indeed, similar to studies on cultured neurons, we found that at P9 approximately 30% of mitochondria moved at least once per minute (i.e. motile fraction) (Figure 3A,B and Video 1). However, subsequently, the motile fraction of mitochondria in RGC dendrites decreases steeply, falling to approximately 15% by P15, and at P21, we observed no mitochondrial movements in dendrites of 7 RGCs imaged in four retinas for 35 min. This drastic decline in motility is specific to mitochondria and does not reflect a general transition in dendritic trafficking, as SKL-GFP-labeled peroxisomes (Monosov et al., 1996) in RGC dendrites remain motile at P21 (Figure 3C,D) and beyond (data not shown). Interestingly, the movement patterns - including duration of runs, speed during uninterrupted motion, and duration of short pauses - of motile mitochondria at P15 were not significantly different from those observed at P9 (Figure 3E–G). Thus, as circuits mature dendritic mitochondria undergo a cargo-specific transition from a partially motile to a stationary phase, in which they preferentially localize to synapses and branch points.

Figure 3

Download asset Open asset

Video 2

Download asset

Patterned spontaneous activity and dendritic mitochondria during development

Neuronal activity has been proposed to control the motility of dendritic mitochondria. In particular, increases in intracellular Ca²⁺ accompanying neuronal activation are thought to uncouple mitochondria from microtubule motors, causing acute movement arrests (MacAskill et al., 2009; Wang and Schwarz, 2009; Yi et al., 2004). The evidence supporting this model comes from studies of cultured neurons exposed to artificial stimuli, raising the question whether physiologically occurring activity patterns and Ca²⁺ transients similarly control the movements of dendritic mitochondria in intact circuits.

The developing retina spontaneously generates propagating waves of RGC activity. In retinal waves, excitatory input (P0 – P10: cholinergic, P10 – P15: glutamatergic) elicits bursts of action potentials in RGCs (Kerschensteiner, 2013). As waves propagate across the retina, they synchronize the firing of neighboring RGCs. We first recorded ensembles of RGCs at P9 on multielectrode arrays (MEAs, Figure 4A), confirming that biolistically labeled explants generate waves of activity with similar frequency and correlation structure to those observed in unlabeled preparations and in vivo (Figure 4C, D) (Ackman et al., 2012; Demas et al., 2003). We then performed two-photon Ca²⁺ imaging of RGCs biolistically labeled with GCaMP6s. At P9, nearby RGCs (<200 μm between cell bodies) exhibited synchronous global Ca²⁺ transients across their dendritic arbors. The frequency and correlation of these transients was indistinguishable from that of spike bursts in MEA recordings (Figure 4B–D), indicating that global Ca²⁺ transients in RGC dendrites accompany retinal waves (Lohmann et al., 2002). To test whether this physiologically occurring activity pattern regulates the motility of mitochondria in developing dendrites, we co-labeled RGCs with GCaMP6s and mtDsRed. Simultaneous imaging of dendritic Ca²⁺ signals and mitochondrial movements (Figure 4E), revealed that wave-associated Ca²⁺ transients do not alter mitochondrial motility in RGC dendrites: neither the instantaneous motile fraction (Figure 4H and Video 2) nor the average speed of moving mitochondria (△ speed: 0.132 ± 0.067 μm/s, n = 66 mitochondria, p>0.1) change following a dendritic Ca²⁺ transient.

Figure 4 with 2 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

In cultured neurons, Ca²⁺ elevations were shown to stop moving mitochondria via the adaptor protein Miro1, which uncouples mitochondria from kinesin motors upon Ca²⁺ binding. Miro1 is readily detected in Western blots of the retina from at least P6 onwards and its expression reaches mature levels by P15 (Figure 4—figure supplement 1). In addition, we found that biolistic delivery of wild-type Miro1 or of a Ca²⁺-binding-deficient mutant (Miro1KK) does not alter the motility of dendritic mitochondria. Thus, a lack of Miro1 expression or function is unlikely to account for the lack of effect of physiologic activity patterns on the movements of mitochondria in RGC dendrites.

Several previous studies raised external K⁺ concentrations to elicit changes in mitochondrial motility. We therefore tested the effects of this manipulation in the developing retina. Elevating external K⁺ to 30 mM tonically increased the concentration of Ca²⁺ in RGC dendrites and, similar to observations in cultured neurons, decreased the motile fraction of mitochondria (Figure 4F, I and Video 3). By contrast, blocking cholinergic retinal waves and the accompanying Ca²⁺ transients with the nicotinic antagonist DhβE did not affect mitochondrial motility in RGC dendrites (Figure 4G, J and Video 3).

Video 3

Download asset

Video 4

Download asset

A subset of RGCs (21 of 59 cells) exhibited local dendritic Ca²⁺ transients at a similar frequency as global signals (Figure 4—figure supplement 2, local: 0.0102 ± 0.0055 events / s, n = 7 cells, global: 0.0141 ± 0.0022 events / s, n = 32 cells, p>0.4). Local transients have previously been observed in RGC dendrites in the developing chick retina, where they are caused by Ca²⁺ release from internal stores (Lohmann et al., 2002). Like global signals, local Ca²⁺ transients in developing mouse RGC dendrites do not appear to alter mitochondrial motility (Figure 4—figure supplement 2).

Together these results suggest that physiologically occurring activity patterns and Ca²⁺ transients in the developing retina do not regulate mitochondrial motility in RGC dendrites, irrespective of Miro1 expression, and that tonic elevations of Ca²⁺ upon application of high K⁺ solution may engage different mechanisms to physiological transients.

Sensory-evoked activity and dendritic mitochondria at maturity

As the retina matures, waves of spontaneous activity subside and light-evoked inputs begin to drive RGC activity. We wanted to test whether sensory-evoked activity affects the distribution and/or movements of mitochondria in RGC dendrites at maturity. Because mitochondrial movements are rare at P21, we acquired z-stacks of RGC dendrites in Thy1-mtCFP-P retinas every 15 min on a two-photon microscope. In the intervals between image acquisitions, retinas were either kept in darkness (P21 – no stim) or presented a full-field white noise stimulus with alternating contrast levels (P21 – stim, see 'Materials and methods'). MEA recordings confirmed that this stimulus robustly elevates the firing rates of RGCs (Figure 5A–C). In darkness, mitochondria rarely changed position even across two imaging intervals at P21, whereas approximately half of them were displaced over the same time at P9 (Figure 5D, E). Light stimulation did not alter the stability of mitochondria at P21 and very few changed their position in the imaging intervals (Figure 5D, E). Thus, similar to our observations for spontaneous activity in developing circuits, sensory-evoked activity does not appear to regulate the motility of dendritic mitochondria in the mature retina.

Figure 5 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Toxins that depolarize mitochondria and inhibit their ability to synthetize ATP have been reported to increase, decrease or not change mitochondrial motility in axons and dendrites of different neuron types. To test how toxin-mediated stress affects mitochondrial transport in RGC dendrites, we applied a mixture of Antimycin A (a complex III inhibitor) and Oligomycin (an ATP synthase inhibitor) to P9 and P21 retinas. Fast (0.9 fps) and long-interval (15 min) time-lapse imaging revealed no significant changes in the motility of mitochondria in developing or mature RGC dendrites (Figure 5—figure supplement 1).

Pathological hyperactivity and dendritic mitochondria in retinal degeneration

Spontaneous oscillatory hyperactivity of RGCs is a common feature of retinal degenerations and originates in presynaptic circuits (Borowska et al., 2011; Margolis et al., 2008; Soto and Kerschensteiner, 2015; Soto et al., 2012; Stasheff, 2008; Yee et al., 2012). In Crx^-/- mice, a model of Leber congenital amaurosis, retinal waves are preserved. But, from P15 on RGCs exhibit rhythmic hyperactivity as a result of enhanced input from BCs (Soto et al., 2012). We previously showed that this elevated activity prolongs and enhances BC-RGC synaptogenesis (Soto et al., 2012). Given the correlation between synaptic development and mitochondrial motility in wild-type mice (Figures 2 and 3), we first confirmed RGC activity was elevated in explants from P21 Crx^-/- mice (Figure 6A–C), and then examined mitochondrial transport in RGC dendrites at this age. We found that dendritic mitochondria in Crx^-/- retinas remained motile at P21, at a level intermediate to those at P9 and P15 in wild-type mice (Figure 6D,E and Video 4). Moreover, the movement patterns of motile mitochondria at P21 in Crx^-/- mice except for slightly longer pauses were indistinguishable from those in wild-type at P9 and P15 (Figure 6F–H).

Figure 6

Download asset Open asset

The importance of mitochondrial dynamics and distribution to neuronal function is highlighted by the fact that mutations that alter the fission-fusion balance and transport of mitochondria cause neurodegenerative diseases (Chan, 2006). Among the neurons affected by such diseases are RGCs, which degenerate in autosomal dominant optic atrophy (ADOA), the most common hereditary optic neuropathy (Olichon et al., 2006; Yu-Wai-Man et al., 2011). A majority of ADOA patients harbors mutations in the OPA1 gene, which encodes a GTPase involved in mitochondrial fusion (Olichon et al., 2006; Yu-Wai-Man et al., 2011). Changes in fission-fusion balance alter the transport and distribution of mitochondria in neurons (Chan, 2006).

In axons, mitochondrial transport and distribution have been explored in detail, including recent in vivo imaging studies (Breckwoldt et al., 2014; Misgeld et al., 2007; Plucinska et al., 2012; Takihara et al., 2015), and the contributions of mitochondria to axonal branching and synaptic transmission are relatively well understood (Courchet et al., 2013; Medler and Gleason, 2002; Spillane et al., 2013; Verstreken et al., 2005; Werth and Thayer, 1994). By comparison, dendritic mitochondria have been studied less, and many aspects of their transport, distribution, and function, particularly in intact circuits, remain obscure.

We find that during development mitochondria enter RGC dendrites to near-mature levels before branching patterns are established (Figure 2). Similar observations were recently made for dendrites of cerebellar Purkinje cells (Fukumitsu et al., 2015), and together with experiments that block export of mitochondria into dendrites support the notion that local mitochondria are required for the formation and/or maintenance of dendritic branches (Fukumitsu et al., 2015; Ishihara et al., 2009). We find that during development, dendritic mitochondria gradually become enriched (>15-fold) near branch points (Figure 2). These mitochondria likely provide energy for lipid and protein biosynthesis, and secretory trafficking in the complex ER structures and Golgi outposts found at branch points (Cui-Wang et al., 2012; Horton et al., 2005; Ye et al., 2007). Consistent with this idea, ER structures and Golgi outposts at branch points are required for the formation and maintenance of dendritic branches (Cui-Wang et al., 2012; Horton et al., 2005; Ye et al., 2007), and the branching phenotypes of neurons lacking dendritic mitochondria can be rescued by exogenous supply of ATP-phosphocreatine (Fukumitsu et al., 2015; Li et al., 2004).

Mitochondria in RGC dendrites localize to excitatory synapses (Figure 2). Similar observations have been made on cultured neurons, although the extent of co-localization varied between studies (Chang et al., 2006; Li et al., 2004). Local mitochondria are thought to participate in the formation of synapses and their plasticity (Ishihara et al., 2009; Li et al., 2010; Li et al., 2004). Experiments in cultured hippocampal neurons suggested that enhancing the dendritic mitochondria content is sufficient to increase the number of synapses (Li et al., 2004). As mitochondrial density in RGCs dendrites reaches near-mature levels before most synapses are formed, it seems unlikely that mitochondria limit the rate of synaptogenesis during development of this circuit.

Mitochondrial transport in RGC dendrites is well described by a state diagram recently applied to axonal transport, in which mitochondria exist in a motile or a stationary state (Obashi and Okabe, 2013). Motile mitochondria alternate between short runs and short pauses (Figure 3) and frequently switch the direction of their movements (data not shown). By contrast, stationary mitochondria remain in place for long periods of time. Unlike transitions between runs and pauses in the motile state, transitions between motile and stationary state are rare (Obashi and Okabe, 2013). Our results show that as circuits mature, dendritic mitochondria undergo a nearly complete shift to the stationary state. Thus, whereas approximately 30% of mitochondria move at any time in P9 dendrites, we observed no mitochondrial movements at P21 during fast time-lapse imaging (0.9 fps, Figure 3) and displacements were rare even during long imaging intervals (15–30 min, Figure 5). These rare displacements may be associated with mitochondrial fission or support mitochondrial fusion or mitophagy (Chen and Chan, 2009; Maday and Holzbaur, 2014). Disruption of mitochondrial fusion in a mouse model of ADOA (Opa1^+/- mice) results in shortened mitochondria, which accumulate in proximal RGC dendrites (Williams et al., 2012). As Opa1^+/- mice age (>1 yr), the number of excitatory synapses and branches of RGC dendrites declines, highlighting the importance of mitochondrial fusion for dendritic and synaptic integrity (Williams et al., 2010; Williams et al., 2012).

In isolated cortical neurons, a modest decline in mitochondrial motility was observed with increasing time in culture (Chang and Reynolds, 2006). In the intact retina, we discover a drastic developmental shift (motile to stationary) in dendritic mitochondria. Importantly, this shift is cargo-specific, as peroxisomes keep moving in dendrites of mature RGCs (Figure 3), and compartment-specific, as mitochondria remain motile in RGC axons (data not shown) (Takihara et al., 2015). Together with results on dendritic localization (Figure 2), these observations reveal that mitochondria form stable associations with synapses and branch points in RGC dendrites, and suggest that the prevailing view of mitochondria as highly motile organelles applies to developing but not to mature dendrites.

Using simultaneous two-photon imaging of Ca²⁺ and mitochondria in the intact retina, we find that neither patterned spontaneous activity during development (Figure 4) nor sensory-evoked activity at maturity (Figure 5) regulate the motility of mitochondria in RGC dendrites. These results are in contrast to studies of cultured neurons, which suggest that neuronal activity controls motility of dendritic mitochondria via the adaptor protein Miro1 (Li et al., 2004; MacAskill et al., 2009; Rintoul et al., 2003). We confirmed that Miro1 is expressed in the developing and mature retina and showed that overexpression of wild-type Miro1 or a mutant unable to bind Ca²⁺ (Fransson et al., 2006) do not affect mitochondrial motility in RGC dendrites. Thus, it seems unlikely that differences in Miro1 expression or function account for the discrepant results on the influence of activity. Instead, we suggest that differences between activity patterns physiologically occurring in intact circuits and artificial stimuli used to elicit effects on mitochondrial motility in culture may be a contributing factor. In support of this notion, we find that elevation of external K⁺ reduces mitochondrial motility in RGC dendrites (Figure 4) as it does in cultured neurons (Li et al., 2004), but elicits tonic rises in intracellular Ca²⁺ not observed during physiologic activity.

In a mouse models of retinal degeneration, circuits in the inner retina exhibit spontaneous hyperactivity (Borowska et al., 2011; Margolis et al., 2008; Soto and Kerschensteiner, 2015; Soto et al., 2012; Stasheff, 2008; Yee et al., 2012). In Crx^-/- mice, we previously showed that this hyperactivity enhances and prolongs synaptogenesis between BCs and RGCs (Soto et al., 2012). Here, we find that extended synaptogenesis is matched by an increase in mitochondrial motility at P21 in Crx^-/- mice. Together with the parallel decline in synapse turnover and mitochondrial motility across normal development (Figure 3) (Kerschensteiner et al., 2009; Morgan et al., 2008), this suggests that the two processes are linked.

In summary, we discover a cargo- and compartment-specific developmental shift in the transport of mitochondria, which during a critical period of high motility localize to synapses and branch points in RGC dendrites and subsequently maintain stable positions. In addition, using simultaneous two-photon imaging of Ca²⁺ signals and mitochondrial transport, we find that neither spontaneous nor sensory-evoked activity patterns regulate the motility of dendritic mitochondria in the intact retina. Together these results suggest important amendments to our understanding of dendritic mitochondria.

1. 1. Ackman JB
   2. Burbridge TJ
   3. Crair MC

   (2012) Retinal waves coordinate patterned activity throughout the developing visual system

   Nature 490:219–225.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11529

   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Attwell D
   2. Laughlin SB

   (2001) An energy budget for signaling in the grey matter of the brain

   Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 21:1133–1145.

   https://doi.org/10.1097/00004647-200110000-00001

   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Augustine GJ
   2. Santamaria F
   3. Tanaka K

   (2003) Local calcium signaling in neurons

   Neuron 40:331–346.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00639-1

   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Borowska J
   2. Trenholm S
   3. Awatramani GB

   (2011) An intrinsic neural oscillator in the degenerating mouse retina

   Journal of Neuroscience 31:5000–5012.

   https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5800-10.2011

   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Breckwoldt MO
   2. Pfister FMJ
   3. Bradley PM
   4. Marinković P
   5. Williams PR
   6. Brill MS
   7. Plomer B
   8. Schmalz A
   9. St Clair DK
   10. Naumann R
   11. Griesbeck O
   12. Schwarzländer M
   13. Godinho L
   14. Bareyre FM
   15. Dick TP
   16. Kerschensteiner M
   17. Misgeld T

   (2014) Multiparametric optical analysis of mitochondrial redox signals during neuronal physiology and pathology in vivo

   Nature Medicine 20:555–560.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3520

   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Chan DC

   (2006) Mitochondria: dynamic organelles in disease, aging, and development

   Cell 125:1241–1252.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.010

   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Chang DTW
   2. Honick AS
   3. Reynolds IJ

   (2006) Mitochondrial trafficking to synapses in cultured primary cortical neurons

   Journal of Neuroscience 26:7035–7045.

   https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1012-06.2006

   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Chang DTW
   2. Reynolds IJ

   (2006) Differences in mitochondrial movement and morphology in young and mature primary cortical neurons in culture

   Neuroscience 141:727–736.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.01.034

   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Chen H
   2. Chan DC

   (2009) Mitochondrial dynamics-fusion, fission, movement, and mitophagy-in neurodegenerative diseases

   Human Molecular Genetics 18:R169–R176.

   https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddp326

   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Courchet J
    2. Lewis TL
    3. Lee S
    4. Courchet V
    5. Liou D-Y
    6. Aizawa S
    7. Polleux F

    (2013) Terminal axon branching is regulated by the LKB1-NUAK1 kinase pathway via presynaptic mitochondrial capture

    Cell 153:1510–1525.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.021

    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Cui-Wang T
    2. Hanus C
    3. Cui T
    4. Helton T
    5. Bourne J
    6. Watson D
    7. Harris KM
    8. Ehlers MD

    (2012) Local zones of endoplasmic reticulum complexity confine cargo in neuronal dendrites

    Cell 148:309–321.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.056

    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Davis AF
    2. Clayton DA

    (1996) In situ localization of mitochondrial DNA replication in intact mammalian cells

    The Journal of Cell Biology 135:883–893.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.135.4.883

    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Demas J
    2. Eglen SJ
    3. Wong RO

    (2003)

    Developmental loss of synchronous spontaneous activity in the mouse retina is independent of visual experience

    Journal of Neuroscience 23:2851–2860.

    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Ehlers MD

    (2013) Dendritic trafficking for neuronal growth and plasticity

    Biochemical Society Transactions 41:1365–1382.

    https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20130081

    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Euler T
    2. Haverkamp S
    3. Schubert T
    4. Baden T

    (2014) Retinal bipolar cells: elementary building blocks of vision

    Nature Reviews Neuroscience 15:507–519.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3783

    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Farrow K
    2. Teixeira M
    3. Szikra T
    4. Viney TJ
    5. Balint K
    6. Yonehara K
    7. Roska B

    (2013) Ambient illumination toggles a neuronal circuit switch in the retina and visual perception at cone threshold

    Neuron 78:325–338.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.02.014

    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Fisher LJ

    (1979) Development of synaptic arrays in the inner plexiform layer of neonatal mouse retina

    The Journal of Comparative Neurology 187:359–372.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.901870207

    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Fitzpatrick JS
    2. Hagenston AM
    3. Hertle DN
    4. Gipson KE
    5. Bertetto-D'Angelo L
    6. Yeckel MF

    (2009) Inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor-mediated ca ²⁺ waves in pyramidal neuron dendrites propagate through hot spots and cold spots

    The Journal of Physiology 587:1439–1459.

    https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2009.168930

    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Fransson S
    2. Ruusala A
    3. Aspenström P

    (2006) The atypical rho GTPases miro-1 and miro-2 have essential roles in mitochondrial trafficking

    Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 344:500–510.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.03.163

    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Fukumitsu K
    2. Fujishima K
    3. Yoshimura A
    4. Wu YK
    5. Heuser J
    6. Kengaku M

    (2015) Synergistic action of dendritic mitochondria and creatine kinase maintains ATP homeostasis and actin dynamics in growing neuronal dendrites

    Journal of Neuroscience 35:5707–5723.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4115-14.2015

    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Furukawa T
    2. Cepko CL
    3. Morrow EM
    4. Li T
    5. Davis FC

    (1999) Retinopathy and attenuated circadian entrainment in crx-deficient mice

    Nature Genetics 23:466–470.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/70591

    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Grienberger C
    2. Konnerth A

    (2012) Imaging calcium in neurons

    Neuron 73:862–885.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2012.02.011

    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Grimes WN
    2. Graves LR
    3. Summers MT
    4. Rieke F

    (2015) A simple retinal mechanism contributes to perceptual interactions between rod- and cone-mediated responses in primates

    eLife 4:.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08033

    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Horton AC
    2. Rácz B
    3. Monson EE
    4. Lin AL
    5. Weinberg RJ
    6. Ehlers MD

    (2005) Polarized secretory trafficking directs cargo for asymmetric dendrite growth and morphogenesis

    Neuron 48:757–771.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.11.005

    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Howarth C
    2. Gleeson P
    3. Attwell D

    (2012) Updated energy budgets for neural computation in the neocortex and cerebellum

    Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 32:1222–1232.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2012.35

    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Ishihara N
    2. Nomura M
    3. Jofuku A
    4. Kato H
    5. Suzuki SO
    6. Masuda K
    7. Otera H
    8. Nakanishi Y
    9. Nonaka I
    10. Goto Yu-ichi
    11. Taguchi N
    12. Morinaga H
    13. Maeda M
    14. Takayanagi R
    15. Yokota S
    16. Mihara K

    (2009) Mitochondrial fission factor Drp1 is essential for embryonic development and synapse formation in mice

    Nature Cell Biology 11:958–966.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1907

    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Jakobs TC
    2. Koizumi A
    3. Masland RH

    (2008) The spatial distribution of glutamatergic inputs to dendrites of retinal ganglion cells

    The Journal of Comparative Neurology 510:221–236.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.21795

    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Johnson J
    2. Tian N
    3. Caywood MS
    4. Reimer RJ
    5. Edwards RH
    6. Copenhagen DR

    (2003)

    Vesicular neurotransmitter transporter expression in developing postnatal rodent retina: GABA and glycine precede glutamate

    Journal of Neuroscience 23:518–529.

    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Kerschensteiner D
    2. Wong ROL

    (2008) A precisely timed asynchronous pattern of on and OFF retinal ganglion cell activity during propagation of retinal waves

    Neuron 58:851–858.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.025

    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Kerschensteiner D
    2. Morgan JL
    3. Parker ED
    4. Lewis RM
    5. Wong ROL

    (2009) Neurotransmission selectively regulates synapse formation in parallel circuits in vivo

    Nature 460:1016–1020.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08236

    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Kerschensteiner D

    (2014) Spontaneous network activity and synaptic development

    The Neuroscientist 20:272–290.

    https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858413510044

    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Kim I-J
    2. Zhang Y
    3. Meister M
    4. Sanes JR

    (2010) Laminar restriction of retinal ganglion cell dendrites and axons: subtype-specific developmental patterns revealed with transgenic markers

    Journal of Neuroscience 30:1452–1462.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4779-09.2010

    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Kimura T
    2. Murakami F

    (2014) Evidence that dendritic mitochondria negatively regulate dendritic branching in pyramidal neurons in the neocortex

    Journal of Neuroscience 34:6938–6951.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5095-13.2014

    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Larkum ME
    2. Watanabe S
    3. Nakamura T
    4. Lasser-Ross N
    5. Ross WN

    (2003) Synaptically activated ca ²⁺ waves in layer ²/3 and layer 5 rat neocortical pyramidal neurons

    The Journal of Physiology 549:471–488.

    https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2002.037614

    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Li Z
    2. Okamoto K-I
    3. Hayashi Y
    4. Sheng M

    (2004) The importance of dendritic mitochondria in the morphogenesis and plasticity of spines and synapses

    Cell 119:873–887.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.003

    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Li Z
    2. Jo J
    3. Jia J-M
    4. Lo S-C
    5. Whitcomb DJ
    6. Jiao S
    7. Cho K
    8. Sheng M

    (2010) Caspase-3 activation via mitochondria is required for long-term depression and AMPA receptor internalization

    Cell 141:859–871.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.053

    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Lin M-Y
    2. Sheng Z-H

    (2015) Regulation of mitochondrial transport in neurons

    Experimental Cell Research 334:35–44.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2015.01.004

    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Lohmann C
    2. Myhr KL
    3. Wong ROL

    (2002) Transmitter-evoked local calcium release stabilizes developing dendrites

    Nature 418:177–181.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature00850

    • Google Scholar
39. 1. MacAskill AF
    2. Rinholm JE
    3. Twelvetrees AE
    4. Arancibia-Carcamo IL
    5. Muir J
    6. Fransson A
    7. Aspenstrom P
    8. Attwell D
    9. Kittler JT

    (2009) Miro1 is a calcium sensor for glutamate receptor-dependent localization of mitochondria at synapses

    Neuron 61:541–555.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.01.030

    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Maday S
    2. Holzbaur ELF

    (2014) Autophagosome biogenesis in primary neurons follows an ordered and spatially regulated pathway

    Developmental Cell 30:71–85.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2014.06.001

    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Margolis DJ
    2. Newkirk G
    3. Euler T
    4. Detwiler PB

    (2008) Functional stability of retinal ganglion cells after degeneration-induced changes in synaptic input

    Journal of Neuroscience 28:6526–6536.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1533-08.2008

    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Masland RH

    (2001) The fundamental plan of the retina

    Nature Neuroscience 4:877–886.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nn0901-877

    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Medler K
    2. Gleason EL

    (2002)

    Mitochondrial Ca(2+) buffering regulates synaptic transmission between retinal amacrine cells

    Journal of Neurophysiology 87:1426–1439.

    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Meister M
    2. Wong R
    3. Baylor D
    4. Shatz C

    (1991) Synchronous bursts of action potentials in ganglion cells of the developing mammalian retina

    Science 252:939–943.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2035024

    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Misgeld T
    2. Kerschensteiner M
    3. Bareyre FM
    4. Burgess RW
    5. Lichtman JW

    (2007) Imaging axonal transport of mitochondria in vivo

    Nature Methods 4:559–561.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth1055

    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Monosov EZ
    2. Wenzel TJ
    3. Luers GH
    4. Heyman JA
    5. Subramani S

    (1996) Labeling of peroxisomes with green fluorescent protein in living p. pastoris cells

    Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry 44:581–589.

    https://doi.org/10.1177/44.6.8666743

    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Morgan JL
    2. Schubert T
    3. Wong ROL

    (2008) Developmental patterning of glutamatergic synapses onto retinal ganglion cells

    Neural Development 3:8.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-8104-3-8

    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Morgan JL
    2. Kerschensteiner D

    (2011) Shooting DNA, dyes, or indicators into tissue slices using the gene gun: figure 1

    Cold Spring Harbor Protocols 2011:pdb.prot067074–pdb.prot061514.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.prot067074

    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Morgan JL
    2. Soto F
    3. Wong ROL
    4. Kerschensteiner D

    (2011) Development of cell type-specific connectivity patterns of converging excitatory axons in the retina

    Neuron 71:1014–1021.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.08.025

    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Morgan JL
    2. Kerschensteiner D

    (2012) Coating gold particles with DNA (biolistics)

    Cold Spring Harbor Protocols 2012:114–117.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.prot067066

    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Obashi K
    2. Okabe S

    (2013) Regulation of mitochondrial dynamics and distribution by synapse position and neuronal activity in the axon

    European Journal of Neuroscience 38:2350–2363.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.12263

    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Olichon A
    2. Guillou E
    3. Delettre C
    4. Landes T
    5. Arnauné-Pelloquin L
    6. Emorine LJ
    7. Mils V
    8. Daloyau M
    9. Hamel C
    10. Amati-Bonneau P
    11. Bonneau D
    12. Reynier P
    13. Lenaers G
    14. Belenguer P

    (2006) Mitochondrial dynamics and disease, OPA1

    Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta 1763:500–509.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.04.003

    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Pearson JT
    2. Kerschensteiner D

    (2015) Ambient illumination switches contrast preference of specific retinal processing streams

    Journal of Neurophysiology 114:540–550.

    https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00360.2015

    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Plucinska G
    2. Paquet D
    3. Hruscha A
    4. Godinho L
    5. Haass C
    6. Schmid B
    7. Misgeld T

    (2012) In vivo imaging of disease-related mitochondrial dynamics in a vertebrate model system

    Journal of Neuroscience 32:16203–16212.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1327-12.2012

    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Rintoul GL
    2. Filiano AJ
    3. Brocard JB
    4. Kress GJ
    5. Reynolds IJ

    (2003)

    Glutamate decreases mitochondrial size and movement in primary forebrain neurons

    Journal of Neuroscience 23:7881–7888.

    • Google Scholar
56. 1. SAGDULLAEV BT
    2. MCCALL MA

    (2005) Stimulus size and intensity alter fundamental receptive-field properties of mouse retinal ganglion cells in vivo

    Visual Neuroscience 22:649–659.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952523805225142

    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Soto F
    2. Ma X
    3. Cecil JL
    4. Vo BQ
    5. Culican SM
    6. Kerschensteiner D

    (2012) Spontaneous activity promotes synapse formation in a cell-type-dependent manner in the developing retina

    Journal of Neuroscience 32:5426–5439.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0194-12.2012

    • Google Scholar
58. 1. Soto F
    2. Kerschensteiner D

    (2015) Synaptic remodeling of neuronal circuits in early retinal degeneration

    Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience 9:.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2015.00395

    • Google Scholar
59. 1. Spillane M
    2. Ketschek A
    3. Merianda TT
    4. Twiss JL
    5. Gallo G

    (2013) Mitochondria coordinate sites of axon branching through localized intra-axonal protein synthesis

    Cell Reports 5:1564–1575.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2013.11.022

    • Google Scholar
60. 1. Stasheff SF

    (2008) Emergence of sustained spontaneous hyperactivity and temporary preservation of OFF responses in ganglion cells of the retinal degeneration (rd1) mouse

    Journal of Neurophysiology 99:1408–1421.

    https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00144.2007

    • Google Scholar
61. 1. Takihara Y
    2. Inatani M
    3. Eto K
    4. Inoue T
    5. Kreymerman A
    6. Miyake S
    7. Ueno S
    8. Nagaya M
    9. Nakanishi A
    10. Iwao K
    11. Takamura Y
    12. Sakamoto H
    13. Satoh K
    14. Kondo M
    15. Sakamoto T
    16. Goldberg JL
    17. Nabekura J
    18. Tanihara H

    (2015) In vivo imaging of axonal transport of mitochondria in the diseased and aged mammalian CNS

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112:10515–10520.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1509879112

    • Google Scholar
62. 1. Verstreken P
    2. Ly CV
    3. Venken KJT
    4. Koh T-W
    5. Zhou Y
    6. Bellen HJ

    (2005) Synaptic mitochondria are critical for mobilization of reserve pool vesicles at drosophila neuromuscular junctions

    Neuron 47:365–378.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.06.018

    • Google Scholar
63. 1. Wang X
    2. Schwarz TL

    (2009) The mechanism of Ca2+-dependent regulation of kinesin-mediated mitochondrial motility

    Cell 136:163–174.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.11.046

    • Google Scholar
64. 1. Werth JL
    2. Thayer SA

    (1994)

    Mitochondria buffer physiological calcium loads in cultured rat dorsal root ganglion neurons

    Journal of Neuroscience 14:348–356.

    • Google Scholar
65. 1. Williams PA
    2. Morgan JE
    3. Votruba M

    (2010) Opa1 deficiency in a mouse model of dominant optic atrophy leads to retinal ganglion cell dendropathy

    Brain 133:2942–2951.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awq218

    • Google Scholar
66. 1. Williams PA
    2. Piechota M
    3. von Ruhland C
    4. Taylor E
    5. Morgan JE
    6. Votruba M

    (2012) Opa1 is essential for retinal ganglion cell synaptic architecture and connectivity

    Brain 135:493–505.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr330

    • Google Scholar
67. 1. Williams PR
    2. Morgan JL
    3. Kerschensteiner D
    4. Wong ROL

    (2013) In vitro imaging of retinal whole mounts

    Cold Spring Harbor Protocols 2013:pdb.prot072645.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.prot072645

    • Google Scholar
68. 1. Ye B
    2. Zhang Y
    3. Song W
    4. Younger SH
    5. Jan LY
    6. Jan YN

    (2007) Growing dendrites and axons differ in their reliance on the secretory pathway

    Cell 130:717–729.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.06.032

    • Google Scholar
69. 1. Yee CW
    2. Toychiev AH
    3. Sagdullaev BT

    (2012) Network deficiency exacerbates impairment in a mouse model of retinal degeneration

    Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 6:.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2012.00008

    • Google Scholar
70. 1. Yi M
    2. Weaver D
    3. Hajnóczky G

    (2004) Control of mitochondrial motility and distribution by the calcium signal: a homeostatic circuit

    The Journal of Cell Biology 167:661–672.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200406038

    • Google Scholar
71. 1. Yu-Wai-Man P
    2. Griffiths PG
    3. Chinnery PF

    (2011) Mitochondrial optic neuropathies – disease mechanisms and therapeutic strategies

    Progress in Retinal and Eye Research 30:81–114.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2010.11.002

    • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Michelle C Faits

   1. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, United States
   2. Graduate Program in Developmental, Regenerative and Stem Cell Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States

   Contribution

   MCF, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

2. Chunmeng Zhang

   Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, United States

   Contribution

   CZ, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

3. Florentina Soto

   Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, United States

   Contribution

   FS, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

4. Daniel Kerschensteiner

   1. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, United States
   2. Department of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, United States
   3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, United States
   4. Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, United States

   Contribution

   DK, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article

   For correspondence

   dkerschensteiner@wustl.edu

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

• 4,226

  views

• 857

  downloads

• 82

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.