Dbx1 precursor cells are a source of inspiratory XII premotoneurons

  1. Ann L Revill
  2. Nikolas C Vann
  3. Victoria T Akins
  4. Andrew Kottick
  5. Paul A Gray
  6. Christopher A Del Negro
  7. Gregory D Funk  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Alberta, Canada
  2. The College of William and Mary, United States
  3. Washington University School of Medicine, United States

Abstract

All behaviors require coordinated activation of motoneurons from central command and premotor networks. The genetic identities of premotoneurons providing behaviorally relevant excitation to any pool of mammalian motoneurons remain unknown. Recently we established in vitro that Dbx1-derived preBötzinger complex neurons are critical for rhythm generation and that a subpopulation serves a premotor function (Wang et al., 2014). Here we further show that a subpopulation of Dbx1-derived intermediate reticular (IRt) neurons are rhythmically active during inspiration and project to the hypoglossal (XII) nucleus that contains motoneurons important for maintaining airway patency. Laser ablation of Dbx1 IRt neurons, 57% of which are glutamatergic, decreased ipsilateral inspiratory motor output without affecting frequency. We conclude that a subset of Dbx1 IRt neurons is a source of premotor excitatory drive, contributing to the inspiratory behavior of XII motoneurons, as well as a key component of the airway control network whose dysfunction contributes to sleep apnea.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ann L Revill

    Departments of Physiology, Neuroscience and Mental Health Institute, Women and Children's Health Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Nikolas C Vann

    Department of Applied Science, The College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Victoria T Akins

    Department of Applied Science, The College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Andrew Kottick

    Department of Applied Science, The College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Paul A Gray

    Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Christopher A Del Negro

    Department of Applied Science, The College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Gregory D Funk

    Departments of Physiology, Neuroscience and Mental Health Institute, Women and Children's Health Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
    For correspondence
    gf@ualberta.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Ethics Statement: All experiments were performed in accordance with guidelines laid down by the NIH in the US regarding the care and use of animals for experimental procedures, the Institute for Laboratory Animal Research, and in compliance with protocols approved by the College of William & Mary Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol #8828), the Animal Studies Committee at Washington University School of Medicine (protocol #20110249) and the University of Alberta of Medicine Animal Welfare Committee (protocol #255).

Copyright

© 2015, Revill et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,071
    views
  • 286
    downloads
  • 49
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ann L Revill
  2. Nikolas C Vann
  3. Victoria T Akins
  4. Andrew Kottick
  5. Paul A Gray
  6. Christopher A Del Negro
  7. Gregory D Funk
(2015)
Dbx1 precursor cells are a source of inspiratory XII premotoneurons
eLife 4:e12301.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12301

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12301

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Guoqiang Wang, Ryan J Guasp ... Monica Driscoll
    Research Article

    Large vesicle extrusion from neurons may contribute to spreading pathogenic protein aggregates and promoting inflammatory responses, two mechanisms leading to neurodegenerative disease. Factors that regulate the extrusion of large vesicles, such as exophers produced by proteostressed C. elegans touch neurons, are poorly understood. Here, we document that mechanical force can significantly potentiate exopher extrusion from proteostressed neurons. Exopher production from the C. elegans ALMR neuron peaks at adult day 2 or 3, coinciding with the C. elegans reproductive peak. Genetic disruption of C. elegans germline, sperm, oocytes, or egg/early embryo production can strongly suppress exopher extrusion from the ALMR neurons during the peak period. Conversely, restoring egg production at the late reproductive phase through mating with males or inducing egg retention via genetic interventions that block egg-laying can strongly increase ALMR exopher production. Overall, genetic interventions that promote ALMR exopher production are associated with expanded uterus lengths and genetic interventions that suppress ALMR exopher production are associated with shorter uterus lengths. In addition to the impact of fertilized eggs, ALMR exopher production can be enhanced by filling the uterus with oocytes, dead eggs, or even fluid, supporting that distention consequences, rather than the presence of fertilized eggs, constitute the exopher-inducing stimulus. We conclude that the mechanical force of uterine occupation potentiates exopher extrusion from proximal proteostressed maternal neurons. Our observations draw attention to the potential importance of mechanical signaling in extracellular vesicle production and in aggregate spreading mechanisms, making a case for enhanced attention to mechanobiology in neurodegenerative disease.

    1. Neuroscience
    Zeming Fang, Meihua Zhao ... Ru-Yuan Zhang
    Research Article

    Previous studies on reinforcement learning have identified three prominent phenomena: (1) individuals with anxiety or depression exhibit a reduced learning rate compared to healthy subjects; (2) learning rates may increase or decrease in environments with rapidly changing (i.e. volatile) or stable feedback conditions, a phenomenon termed learning rate adaptation; and (3) reduced learning rate adaptation is associated with several psychiatric disorders. In other words, multiple learning rate parameters are needed to account for behavioral differences across participant populations and volatility contexts in this flexible learning rate (FLR) model. Here, we propose an alternative explanation, suggesting that behavioral variation across participant populations and volatile contexts arises from the use of mixed decision strategies. To test this hypothesis, we constructed a mixture-of-strategies (MOS) model and used it to analyze the behaviors of 54 healthy controls and 32 patients with anxiety and depression in volatile reversal learning tasks. Compared to the FLR model, the MOS model can reproduce the three classic phenomena by using a single set of strategy preference parameters without introducing any learning rate differences. In addition, the MOS model can successfully account for several novel behavioral patterns that cannot be explained by the FLR model. Preferences for different strategies also predict individual variations in symptom severity. These findings underscore the importance of considering mixed strategy use in human learning and decision-making and suggest atypical strategy preference as a potential mechanism for learning deficits in psychiatric disorders.