Resolving rates of mutation in the brain using single-neuron genomics

  1. Gilad D Evrony
  2. Eunjung Lee
  3. Peter J Park
  4. Christopher A Walsh  Is a corresponding author
  1. Boston Children's Hospital, United States
  2. Harvard Medical School, United States

Abstract

Whether somatic mutations contribute functional diversity to brain cells is a long-standing question. Single-neuron genomics enables direct measurement of somatic mutation rates in human brain and promises to answer this question. A recent study (Upton et al., 2015) reported high rates of somatic LINE-1 element (L1) retrotransposition in the hippocampus and cerebral cortex that would have major implications for normal brain function, and further claimed these mutation events preferentially impact genes important for neuronal function. We identify errors in single-cell sequencing approach, bioinformatic analysis, and validation methods that led to thousands of false-positive artifacts being mistakenly interpreted as somatic mutation events. Our reanalysis of the data supports a corrected mutation frequency (0.2 per cell) more than fifty-fold lower than reported, inconsistent with the authors' conclusion of 'ubiquitous' L1 mosaicism, but consistent with L1 elements mobilizing occasionally. Through consideration of the challenges and pitfalls identified, we provide a foundation and framework for designing single-cell genomics studies.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Gilad D Evrony

    Division of Genetics and Genomics, Manton Center for Orphan Disease, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Eunjung Lee

    Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Peter J Park

    Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Christopher A Walsh

    Division of Genetics and Genomics, Manton Center for Orphan Disease, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    Christopher.Walsh@childrens.harvard.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Copyright

© 2016, Evrony et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,769
    views
  • 2,033
    downloads
  • 139
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Gilad D Evrony
  2. Eunjung Lee
  3. Peter J Park
  4. Christopher A Walsh
(2016)
Resolving rates of mutation in the brain using single-neuron genomics
eLife 5:e12966.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12966

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12966

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Proloy Das, Mingjian He, Patrick L Purdon
    Tools and Resources

    Modern neurophysiological recordings are performed using multichannel sensor arrays that are able to record activity in an increasingly high number of channels numbering in the 100s to 1000s. Often, underlying lower-dimensional patterns of activity are responsible for the observed dynamics, but these representations are difficult to reliably identify using existing methods that attempt to summarize multivariate relationships in a post hoc manner from univariate analyses or using current blind source separation methods. While such methods can reveal appealing patterns of activity, determining the number of components to include, assessing their statistical significance, and interpreting them requires extensive manual intervention and subjective judgment in practice. These difficulties with component selection and interpretation occur in large part because these methods lack a generative model for the underlying spatio-temporal dynamics. Here, we describe a novel component analysis method anchored by a generative model where each source is described by a bio-physically inspired state-space representation. The parameters governing this representation readily capture the oscillatory temporal dynamics of the components, so we refer to it as oscillation component analysis. These parameters – the oscillatory properties, the component mixing weights at the sensors, and the number of oscillations – all are inferred in a data-driven fashion within a Bayesian framework employing an instance of the expectation maximization algorithm. We analyze high-dimensional electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography recordings from human studies to illustrate the potential utility of this method for neuroscience data.

    1. Neuroscience
    Sihan Yang, Anastasia Kiyonaga
    Insight

    A neural signature of serial dependence has been found, which mirrors the attractive bias of visual information seen in behavioral experiments.