Abstract

How the human brain controls hand movements to carry out different tasks is still debated. The concept of synergy has been proposed to indicate functional modules that may simplify the control of hand postures by simultaneously recruiting sets of muscles and joints. However, whether and to what extent synergic hand postures are encoded as such at a cortical level remains unknown. Here, we combined kinematic, electromyography, and brain activity measures obtained by functional magnetic resonance imaging while subjects performed a variety of movements towards virtual objects. Hand postural information, encoded through kinematic synergies, were represented in cortical areas devoted to hand motor control and successfully discriminated individual grasping movements, significantly outperforming alternative somatotopic or muscle-based models. Importantly, hand postural synergies were predicted by neural activation patterns within primary motor cortex. These findings support a novel cortical organization for hand movement control and open potential applications for brain-computer interfaces and neuroprostheses.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Andrea Leo

    Laboratory of Clinical Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Giacomo Handjaras

    Laboratory of Clinical Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Matteo Bianchi

    Research Center 'E. Piaggio', University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Hamal Marino

    Research Center 'E. Piaggio', University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Marco Gabiccini

    Research Center 'E. Piaggio', University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Andrea Guidi

    Research Center 'E. Piaggio', University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Enzo Pasquale Scilingo

    Research Center 'E. Piaggio', University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Pietro Pietrini

    Laboratory of Clinical Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Antonio Bicchi

    Research Center 'E. Piaggio', University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Marco Santello

    School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Emiliano Ricciardi

    Laboratory of Clinical Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
    For correspondence
    emiliano.ricciardi@bioclinica.unipi.it
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Ethics

Human subjects: This study was approved by the Ethical Committee at the University of Pisa, Italy. Participants received a detailed explanation of all the study procedures and risks and provided a written informed consent according to the protocol approved by the University of Pisa Ethical Committee (1616/2003). All participants retained the right to withdraw from the study at any moment.

Copyright

© 2016, Leo et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,309
    views
  • 1,020
    downloads
  • 92
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Andrea Leo
  2. Giacomo Handjaras
  3. Matteo Bianchi
  4. Hamal Marino
  5. Marco Gabiccini
  6. Andrea Guidi
  7. Enzo Pasquale Scilingo
  8. Pietro Pietrini
  9. Antonio Bicchi
  10. Marco Santello
  11. Emiliano Ricciardi
(2016)
A synergy-based hand control is encoded in human motor cortical areas
eLife 5:e13420.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13420

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13420

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Maëliss Jallais, Marco Palombo
    Research Article

    This work proposes µGUIDE: a general Bayesian framework to estimate posterior distributions of tissue microstructure parameters from any given biophysical model or signal representation, with exemplar demonstration in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Harnessing a new deep learning architecture for automatic signal feature selection combined with simulation-based inference and efficient sampling of the posterior distributions, µGUIDE bypasses the high computational and time cost of conventional Bayesian approaches and does not rely on acquisition constraints to define model-specific summary statistics. The obtained posterior distributions allow to highlight degeneracies present in the model definition and quantify the uncertainty and ambiguity of the estimated parameters.

    1. Neuroscience
    Bharath Krishnan, Noah Cowan
    Insight

    Mice can generate a cognitive map of an environment based on self-motion signals when there is a fixed association between their starting point and the location of their goal.