Abstract

Human calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR) is a G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) that maintains extracellular Ca2+ homeostasis through the regulation of parathyroid hormone secretion. It functions as a disulfide-tethered homodimer composed of three main domains, the Venus Flytrap module, cysteine-rich domain, and seven-helix transmembrane region. Here we present the crystal structures of the entire extracellular domain of CaSR in the resting and active conformations. We provide direct evidence that L-amino acids are agonists of the receptor. In the active structure, L-Trp occupies the orthosteric agonist-binding site at the interdomain cleft, and is primarily responsible for inducing extracellular domain closure to initiate receptor activation. Our structures reveal multiple binding sites for Ca2+ and PO43- ions. Both ions are crucial for structural integrity of the receptor. While Ca2+ ions stabilize the active state, PO43- ions reinforce the inactive conformation. The activation mechanism of CaSR involves the formation of a novel dimer interface between subunits.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Yong Geng

    Department of Pharmacology, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Lidia Mosyak

    Department of Pharmacology, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Igor Kurinov

    Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Hao Zuo

    Department of Pharmacology, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Emmanuel Sturchler

    Department of Molecular Therapeutics, The Scripps Translational Science Institute, Jupiter, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Tat Cheung Cheng

    Department of Pharmacology, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Prakash Subramanyam

    Department of Physiology and Cellular Biophysics, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Alice P Brown

    School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Sarah C Brennan

    School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Hee-chang Mun

    School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Martin Bush

    Department of Pharmacology, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Yan Chen

    Department of Pharmacology, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Trang X Nguyen

    Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Baohua Cao

    Department of Pharmacology, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Donald D Chang

    Department of Physiology and Cellular Biophysics, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Matthias Quick

    Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Arthur D Conigrave

    School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Henry M Colecraft

    Department of Physiology and Cellular Biophysics, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Patricia McDonald

    Department of Molecular Therapeutics, The Scripps Translational Science Institute, Jupiter, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  20. Qing R Fan

    Department of Pharmacology, Columbia University, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    qf13@cumc.columbia.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9330-0963

Funding

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM112973)

  • Qing R Fan

American Heart Association (15GRNT25420002)

  • Qing R Fan

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2016, Geng et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,512
    views
  • 1,599
    downloads
  • 191
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Yong Geng
  2. Lidia Mosyak
  3. Igor Kurinov
  4. Hao Zuo
  5. Emmanuel Sturchler
  6. Tat Cheung Cheng
  7. Prakash Subramanyam
  8. Alice P Brown
  9. Sarah C Brennan
  10. Hee-chang Mun
  11. Martin Bush
  12. Yan Chen
  13. Trang X Nguyen
  14. Baohua Cao
  15. Donald D Chang
  16. Matthias Quick
  17. Arthur D Conigrave
  18. Henry M Colecraft
  19. Patricia McDonald
  20. Qing R Fan
(2016)
Structural mechanism of ligand activation in human calcium-sensing receptor
eLife 5:e13662.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13662

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13662

Further reading

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Po-Lin Chiu, Juan D Orjuela ... Thomas Walz
    Research Article

    Aquaporin-0 (AQP0) tetramers form square arrays in lens membranes through a yet unknown mechanism, but lens membranes are enriched in sphingomyelin and cholesterol. Here, we determined electron crystallographic structures of AQP0 in sphingomyelin/cholesterol membranes and performed molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to establish that the observed cholesterol positions represent those seen around an isolated AQP0 tetramer and that the AQP0 tetramer largely defines the location and orientation of most of its associated cholesterol molecules. At a high concentration, cholesterol increases the hydrophobic thickness of the annular lipid shell around AQP0 tetramers, which may thus cluster to mitigate the resulting hydrophobic mismatch. Moreover, neighboring AQP0 tetramers sandwich a cholesterol deep in the center of the membrane. MD simulations show that the association of two AQP0 tetramers is necessary to maintain the deep cholesterol in its position and that the deep cholesterol increases the force required to laterally detach two AQP0 tetramers, not only due to protein–protein contacts but also due to increased lipid–protein complementarity. Since each tetramer interacts with four such ‘glue’ cholesterols, avidity effects may stabilize larger arrays. The principles proposed to drive AQP0 array formation could also underlie protein clustering in lipid rafts.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Artem N Bonchuk, Konstantin I Balagurov ... Pavel G Georgiev
    Research Article

    BTB (Bric-a-brack, Tramtrack and Broad Complex) is a diverse group of protein-protein interaction domains found within metazoan proteins. Transcription factors contain a dimerizing BTB subtype with a characteristic N-terminal extension. The Tramtrack group (TTK) is a distinct type of BTB domain, which can multimerize. Single-particle cryo-EM microscopy revealed that the TTK-type BTB domains assemble into a hexameric structure consisting of three canonical BTB dimers connected through a previously uncharacterized interface. We demonstrated that the TTK-type BTB domains are found only in Arthropods and have undergone lineage-specific expansion in modern insects. The Drosophila genome encodes 24 transcription factors with TTK-type BTB domains, whereas only four have non‑TTK‑type BTB domains. Yeast two-hybrid analysis revealed that the TTK-type BTB domains have an unusually broad potential for heteromeric associations presumably through dimer-dimer interaction interface. Thus, the TTK-type BTB domains are a structurally and functionally distinct group of protein domains specific to Arthropodan transcription factors.