DYT1 dystonia increases risk taking in humans

  1. David Arkadir  Is a corresponding author
  2. Angela Radulescu
  3. Deborah Raymond
  4. Naomi Lubarr
  5. Susan B Bressman
  6. Pietro Mazzoni
  7. Yael Niv  Is a corresponding author
  1. Hadassah Medical Center and the Hebrew University, Israel
  2. Princeton University, United States
  3. Beth Israel Medical Center, United States
  4. Columbia University, United States

Abstract

It has been difficult to link synaptic modification to overt behavioral changes. Rodent models of DYT1 dystonia, a single-mutation motor disorder, demonstrate increased long-term potentiation and decreased long-term depression in corticostriatal synapses. Computationally, such asymmetric learning predicts risk taking in probabilistic tasks. Here we demonstrate abnormal risk taking in DYT1 dystonia patients, which is correlated with disease severity, thereby supporting striatal plasticity in shaping choice behavior in humans.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. David Arkadir

    Department of Neurology, Hadassah Medical Center, Hadassah Medical Center and the Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
    For correspondence
    arkadir@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Angela Radulescu

    Psychology Department, Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Deborah Raymond

    Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Naomi Lubarr

    Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Susan B Bressman

    Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Pietro Mazzoni

    The Neurological Institute, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Yael Niv

    Psychology Department, Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    For correspondence
    yael@princeton.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Ethics

Human subjects: All participants gave informed consent and the study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Columbia University, Beth Israel Medical Center, and Princeton University.

Copyright

© 2016, Arkadir et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,436
    views
  • 336
    downloads
  • 13
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. David Arkadir
  2. Angela Radulescu
  3. Deborah Raymond
  4. Naomi Lubarr
  5. Susan B Bressman
  6. Pietro Mazzoni
  7. Yael Niv
(2016)
DYT1 dystonia increases risk taking in humans
eLife 5:e14155.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14155

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14155

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Toshiki Kobayashi, Daichi Nozaki
    Research Article

    The remarkable ability of the motor system to adapt to novel environments has traditionally been investigated using kinematically non-redundant tasks, such as planar reaching movements. This limitation prevents the study of how the motor system achieves adaptation by altering the movement patterns of our redundant body. To address this issue, we developed a redundant motor task in which participants reached for targets with the tip of a virtual stick held with both hands. Despite the redundancy of the task, participants consistently employed a stereotypical strategy of flexibly changing the tilt angle of the stick depending on the direction of tip movement. Thus, this baseline relationship between tip-movement direction and stick-tilt angle constrained both the physical and visual movement patterns of the redundant system. Our task allowed us to systematically investigate how the motor system implicitly changed both the tip-movement direction and the stick-tilt angle in response to imposed visual perturbations. Both types of perturbations, whether directly affecting the task (tip-movement direction) or not (stick-tilt angle around the tip), drove adaptation, and the patterns of implicit adaptation were guided by the baseline relationship. Consequently, tip-movement adaptation was associated with changes in stick-tilt angle, and intriguingly, even seemingly ignorable stick-tilt perturbations significantly influenced tip-movement adaptation, leading to tip-movement direction errors. These findings provide a new understanding that the baseline relationship plays a crucial role not only in how the motor system controls movement of the redundant system, but also in how it implicitly adapts to modify movement patterns.

    1. Neuroscience
    Sudhanvan Iyer, Kathryn Maxson Jones ... Mary A Majumder
    Review Article

    In this paper, we provide an overview and analysis of the BRAIN Initiative data-sharing ecosystem. First, we compare and contrast the characteristics of the seven BRAIN Initiative data archives germane to data sharing and reuse, namely data submission and access procedures and aspects of interoperability. Second, we discuss challenges, benefits, and future opportunities, focusing on issues largely specific to sharing human data and drawing on N = 34 interviews with diverse stakeholders. The BRAIN Initiative-funded archive ecosystem faces interoperability and data stewardship challenges, such as achieving and maintaining interoperability of data and archives and harmonizing research participants’ informed consents for tiers of access for human data across multiple archives. Yet, a benefit of this distributed archive ecosystem is the ability of more specialized archives to adapt to the needs of particular research communities. Finally, the multiple archives offer ample raw material for network evolution in response to the needs of neuroscientists over time. Our first objective in this paper is to provide a guide to the BRAIN Initiative data-sharing ecosystem for readers interested in sharing and reusing neuroscience data. Second, our analysis supports the development of empirically informed policy and practice aimed at making neuroscience data more findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable.