Single-celled photosynthetic bacteria determine the direction of incoming light by acting as lenses.
Land plants are restricted to the location in which they germinate and grow, and individual plants are at the mercy of the light conditions where a given seed lands. However, some single-celled photosynthetic organisms exhibit behavior known as “phototaxis” that involves moving in response to local light conditions (Gualteri, 2001). For example, the green alga, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, can swim toward light to increase photosynthesis, but it can also swim away from bright light to avoid damage to molecular complexes required for photosynthesis (Foster and Smyth, 1980).
What are the minimal requirements for phototaxis? First, the organism must have a molecule that detects light. In most algal systems these photoreceptors act as both a light receptor and as an ion channel to trigger downstream signal transduction, similar to the rhodopsins found in bacteria (Nagel et al., 2005). The second requirement for phototaxis is motility. The third requirement is the ability to determine the direction of the incoming light, so that the cell can respond by moving in the appropriate direction.
This final requirement, “knowing where the light is”, has been solved by evolution in a variety of ways in different organisms. Now, in eLife, Conrad Mullineaux, Annegret Wilde and co-workers – including Nils Schuergers as first author – report that in a genus of bacteria called Synechocystis, the cells themselves act as lenses that can focus light (Schuergers et al., 2016). They use a combination of high-end microscopy and materials science to show that light hitting the convex surface of the cell is focused by the refractive properties of the cell body into a spot on the opposite side of the cell.
How does focusing light result in directional movement? To move in a given direction, some kind of asymmetry must be established in the cell. In Synechocystis, motility relies on tiny cell-surface projections called pili that grab the substrate and pull the cell forward, before releasing it and starting another round of grabbing and pulling. Schuergers et al. – who are based in Freiburg, Karlsruhe, London and Porto – found that the cells move away from the focused spot, toward the external light source. The required asymmetry is established by motor proteins that drive assembly of the pili, which cluster on the side of the cell away from the focused spot. The photoreceptors, on the other hand, are evenly distributed in the cell membrane.
By contrast, in other single-celled systems, such as Chlamydomonas and other eukaryotic algae, the flagella responsible for the movement are fixed at one end of the cell by the basal bodies from which they extend (Marshall, 2008). Thus, to provide useful information for directional movement, the photoreceptors must be clustered in one location in the cell, in organelles called eyespots. The position of the eyespot relative to the flagella is fixed by the asymmetric properties of the microtubule cytoskeleton established by the basal bodies (Holmes and Dutcher, 1989; Kamiya and Witman, 1984). Additionally, elaborate light-absorbing structures, often provided by the chloroplast, block light traveling through the cell (Kawai and Kreimer, 2000).
Why did such complicated phototaxis systems evolve in eukaryotic algae? Perhaps having the flagella fixed at one end of primordial cells dictated first the clustering of the photoreceptors, followed by the development of the variety of “light-blocking” systems in different species, which often include structures evolved from the cyanobacterium ancestor engulfed by the host cell.
That cells could act as lenses was proposed previously as an explanation for the phototactic behavior observed in colorless single-celled algae (Sineshchekov et al., 1994). And recently it was shown that the Chlamydomonas-like cells that comprise multicellular Volvox colonies are lenses (Kessler et al., 2015). These cells focus light most acutely a few cell diameters away. Kessler et al. suggested that this light-focusing ability of individual cells influenced the evolutionary path from single cells to the more complex volvocine algae containing thousands of cells.
The work of Schuergers et al. is the first truly elegant demonstration of “lensing” by a bacterial cell. These data are also a powerful reminder of the influence of light on life. Photoreceptors have evolved to capture photons and signal transduction pathways have evolved to allow cells to harness their energy. More pointedly, this work reminds us that light is directional and can be absorbed, reflected and refracted by interactions with living cells. This is a beautiful demonstration of the intersection of physics and biology, not only at the cellular level, but at the experimental level as well.
Sensory mechanisms: phototaxes and light perception in algaeIn: BSC Leadbetter, JC Green, editors. Flagellates: unity, diversity and evolution. Boca Raton: CRC Press. . p 124–145.
Cells acting as lenses: a possible role for light in the evolution of morphological asymmetry in multicellular volvocine algae.In: I Ruiz-Trillo, AM Nedelcu, editors. Evolutionary transitions to multicellular life. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. p 225–243.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9642-2_12
Channelrhodopsins: directly light-gated cation channelsBiochemical Society Transactions 33:863–-866.https://doi.org/10.1042/BST0330863
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cell fate decisions in the fly embryo are rapid: hunchback genes decide in minutes whether nuclei follow the anterior/posterior developmental blueprint by reading out positional information in the Bicoid morphogen. This developmental system is a prototype of regulatory decision processes that combine speed and accuracy. Traditional arguments based on fixed-time sampling of Bicoid concentration indicate that an accurate readout is impossible within the experimental times. This raises the general issue of how speed-accuracy tradeoffs are achieved. Here, we compare fixed-time to on-the-fly decisions, based on comparing the likelihoods of anterior/posterior locations. We found that these more efficient schemes complete reliable cell fate decisions within the short embryological timescales. We discuss the influence of promoter architectures on decision times and error rates, present concrete examples that rapidly readout the morphogen, and predictions for new experiments. Lastly, we suggest a simple mechanism for RNA production and degradation that approximates the log-likelihood function.
The design principles dictating the spatio-temporal organisation of eukaryotic cells, and in particular the mechanisms controlling the self-organisation and dynamics of membrane-bound organelles such as the Golgi apparatus, remain elusive. Although this organelle was discovered 120 years ago, such basic questions as whether vesicular transport through the Golgi occurs in an anterograde (from entry to exit) or retrograde fashion are still strongly debated. Here, we address these issues by studying a quantitative model of organelle dynamics that includes: de-novo compartment generation, inter-compartment vesicular exchange, and biochemical conversion of membrane components. We show that anterograde or retrograde vesicular transports are asymptotic behaviors of a much richer dynamical system. Indeed, the structure and composition of cellular compartments and the directionality of vesicular exchange are intimately linked. They are emergent properties that can be tuned by varying the relative rates of vesicle budding, fusion and biochemical conversion.