Tracking transcription factor mobility and interaction in Arabidopsis roots with fluorescence correlation spectroscopy

  1. Natalie M Clark
  2. Elizabeth Hinde
  3. Cara M Winter
  4. Adam P Fisher
  5. Giuseppe Crosti
  6. Ikram Blilou
  7. Enrico Gratton
  8. Philip N Benfey  Is a corresponding author
  9. Rosangela Sozzani
  1. North Carolina State University, United States
  2. University of California, Irvine, United States
  3. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Duke University, United States
  4. Wageningen University, Netherlands

Abstract

To understand complex regulatory processes in multicellular organisms, it is critical to be able to quantitatively analyze protein movement and protein-protein interactions in time and space. During Arabidopsis development, the intercellular movement of SHORTROOT (SHR) and subsequent interaction with its downstream target SCARECROW (SCR) control root patterning and cell fate specification. However, quantitative information about the spatio-temporal dynamics of SHR movement and SHR-SCR interaction is currently unavailable. Here, we quantify parameters including SHR mobility, oligomeric state, and association with SCR using a combination of Fluorescent Correlation Spectroscopy (FCS) techniques. We then incorporate these parameters into a mathematical model of SHR and SCR, which shows that SHR reaches a steady state in minutes, while SCR and the SHR-SCR complex reach a steady-state between 18 and 24 hours. Our model reveals the timing of SHR and SCR dynamics and allows us to understand how protein movement and protein-protein stoichiometry contribute to development.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Natalie M Clark

    Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Elizabeth Hinde

    Laboratory for Fluorescence Dynamics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Cara M Winter

    Department of Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Duke University, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Adam P Fisher

    Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Giuseppe Crosti

    Department of Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Duke University, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Ikram Blilou

    Plant Developmental Biology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Enrico Gratton

    Laboratory for Fluorescence Dynamics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Philip N Benfey

    Department of Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Duke University, Durham, United States
    For correspondence
    philip.benfey@duke.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Rosangela Sozzani

    Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Dominique C Bergmann, Stanford University/HHMI, United States

Version history

  1. Received: January 27, 2016
  2. Accepted: June 10, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: June 11, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: July 15, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2016, Clark et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,972
    views
  • 1,111
    downloads
  • 69
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Natalie M Clark
  2. Elizabeth Hinde
  3. Cara M Winter
  4. Adam P Fisher
  5. Giuseppe Crosti
  6. Ikram Blilou
  7. Enrico Gratton
  8. Philip N Benfey
  9. Rosangela Sozzani
(2016)
Tracking transcription factor mobility and interaction in Arabidopsis roots with fluorescence correlation spectroscopy
eLife 5:e14770.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14770

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14770

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Gang Xue, Xiaoyi Zhang ... Zhiyuan Li
    Research Article

    Organisms utilize gene regulatory networks (GRN) to make fate decisions, but the regulatory mechanisms of transcription factors (TF) in GRNs are exceedingly intricate. A longstanding question in this field is how these tangled interactions synergistically contribute to decision-making procedures. To comprehensively understand the role of regulatory logic in cell fate decisions, we constructed a logic-incorporated GRN model and examined its behavior under two distinct driving forces (noise-driven and signal-driven). Under the noise-driven mode, we distilled the relationship among fate bias, regulatory logic, and noise profile. Under the signal-driven mode, we bridged regulatory logic and progression-accuracy trade-off, and uncovered distinctive trajectories of reprogramming influenced by logic motifs. In differentiation, we characterized a special logic-dependent priming stage by the solution landscape. Finally, we applied our findings to decipher three biological instances: hematopoiesis, embryogenesis, and trans-differentiation. Orthogonal to the classical analysis of expression profile, we harnessed noise patterns to construct the GRN corresponding to fate transition. Our work presents a generalizable framework for top-down fate-decision studies and a practical approach to the taxonomy of cell fate decisions.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Zhuqing Wang, Yue Wang ... Wei Yan
    Research Article

    Despite rapid evolution across eutherian mammals, the X-linked MIR-506 family miRNAs are located in a region flanked by two highly conserved protein-coding genes (SLITRK2 and FMR1) on the X chromosome. Intriguingly, these miRNAs are predominantly expressed in the testis, suggesting a potential role in spermatogenesis and male fertility. Here, we report that the X-linked MIR-506 family miRNAs were derived from the MER91C DNA transposons. Selective inactivation of individual miRNAs or clusters caused no discernible defects, but simultaneous ablation of five clusters containing 19 members of the MIR-506 family led to reduced male fertility in mice. Despite normal sperm counts, motility, and morphology, the KO sperm were less competitive than wild-type sperm when subjected to a polyandrous mating scheme. Transcriptomic and bioinformatic analyses revealed that these X-linked MIR-506 family miRNAs, in addition to targeting a set of conserved genes, have more targets that are critical for spermatogenesis and embryonic development during evolution. Our data suggest that the MIR-506 family miRNAs function to enhance sperm competitiveness and reproductive fitness of the male by finetuning gene expression during spermatogenesis.