Nerve growth factor receptor negates the tumor suppressor p53 as a feedback regulator

  1. Xiang Zhou
  2. Qian Hao
  3. Peng Liao
  4. Shiwen Luo
  5. Minhong Zhang
  6. Guohui hu
  7. Hongbing Liu
  8. Yiwei Zhang
  9. Bo Cao
  10. Melody Baddoo
  11. Erik K Flemington
  12. Shelya X Zeng
  13. Hua Lu  Is a corresponding author
  1. Fudan University, China
  2. Tulane University School of Medicine, United States
  3. The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, China

Abstract

Cancer develops and progresses often by inactivating p53. Here, we unveil nerve growth factor receptor (NGFR, CD271 or p75NTR) as a novel p53 inactivator. p53 activates NGFR transcription, whereas NGFR inactivates p53 by promoting its MDM2-mediated ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis and by directly binding to its central DNA binding domain and preventing its DNA-binding activity. Inversely, NGFR ablation activates p53, consequently inducing apoptosis, attenuating survival, and reducing clonogenic capability of cancer cells, as well as sensitizing human cancer cells to chemotherapeutic agents that induce p53 and suppressing mouse xenograft tumor growth. NGFR is highly expressed in human glioblastomas, and its gene is often amplified in breast cancers with wild type p53. Altogether, our results demonstrate that cancers hijack NGFR as an oncogenic inhibitor of p53.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Xiang Zhou

    Shanghai Cancer Center and Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Qian Hao

    Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Peng Liao

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Shiwen Luo

    Center for Experimental Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Minhong Zhang

    Center for Experimental Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Guohui hu

    Center for Experimental Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Hongbing Liu

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Yiwei Zhang

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Bo Cao

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Melody Baddoo

    Tulane Cancer Center, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Erik K Flemington

    Tulane Cancer Center, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Shelya X Zeng

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Hua Lu

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, United States
    For correspondence
    hlu2@tulane.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#4257R) of Tulane University School of Medicine.

Copyright

© 2016, Zhou et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,524
    views
  • 540
    downloads
  • 67
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Xiang Zhou
  2. Qian Hao
  3. Peng Liao
  4. Shiwen Luo
  5. Minhong Zhang
  6. Guohui hu
  7. Hongbing Liu
  8. Yiwei Zhang
  9. Bo Cao
  10. Melody Baddoo
  11. Erik K Flemington
  12. Shelya X Zeng
  13. Hua Lu
(2016)
Nerve growth factor receptor negates the tumor suppressor p53 as a feedback regulator
eLife 5:e15099.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15099

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15099

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Ashley L Cook, Surojit Sur ... Nicolas Wyhs
    Research Article

    Despite exciting developments in cancer immunotherapy, its broad application is limited by the paucity of targetable antigens on the tumor cell surface. As an intrinsic cellular pathway, nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) conceals neoantigens through the destruction of the RNA products from genes harboring truncating mutations. We developed and conducted a high-throughput screen, based on the ratiometric analysis of transcripts, to identify critical mediators of NMD in human cells. This screen implicated disruption of kinase SMG1’s phosphorylation of UPF1 as a potential disruptor of NMD. This led us to design a novel SMG1 inhibitor, KVS0001, that elevates the expression of transcripts and proteins resulting from human and murine truncating mutations in vitro and murine cells in vivo. Most importantly, KVS0001 concomitantly increased the presentation of immune-targetable human leukocyte antigens (HLA) class I-associated peptides from NMD-downregulated proteins on the surface of human cancer cells. KVS0001 provides new opportunities for studying NMD and the diseases in which NMD plays a role, including cancer and inherited diseases.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Medicine
    Patrick Brandt, Dawayne Whittington ... Rebekah L Layton
    Research Article

    A doctoral-level internship program was developed at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill with the intent to create customizable experiential learning opportunities for biomedical trainees to support career exploration, preparation, and transition into their postgraduate professional roles. We report the outcomes of this program over a 5-year period. During that 5-year period, 123 internships took place at over 70 partner sites, representing at least 20 academic, for-profit, and non-profit career paths in the life sciences. A major goal of the program was to enhance trainees’ skill development and expertise in careers of interest. The benefits of the internship program for interns, host/employer, and supervisor/principal investigator were assessed using a mixed-methods approach, including surveys with closed- and open-ended responses as well as focus group interviews. Balancing stakeholder interests is key to creating a sustainable program with widespread support; hence, the level of support from internship hosts and faculty members were the key metrics analyzed throughout. We hypothesized that once a successful internship program was implemented, faculty culture might shift to be more accepting of internships; indeed, the data quantifying faculty attitudes support this. Furthermore, host motivation and performance expectations of interns were compared with results achieved, and this data revealed both expected and surprising benefits to hosts. Data suggests a myriad of benefits for each stakeholder group, and themes are cataloged and discussed. Program outcomes, evaluation data, policies, resources, and best practices developed through the implementation of this program are shared to provide resources that facilitate the creation of similar internship programs at other institutions. Program development was initially spurred by National Institutes of Health pilot funding, thereafter, successfully transitioning from a grant-supported model, to an institutionally supported funding model to achieve long-term programmatic sustainability.