Nerve growth factor receptor negates the tumor suppressor p53 as a feedback regulator

  1. Xiang Zhou
  2. Qian Hao
  3. Peng Liao
  4. Shiwen Luo
  5. Minhong Zhang
  6. Guohui hu
  7. Hongbing Liu
  8. Yiwei Zhang
  9. Bo Cao
  10. Melody Baddoo
  11. Erik K Flemington
  12. Shelya X Zeng
  13. Hua Lu  Is a corresponding author
  1. Fudan University, China
  2. Tulane University School of Medicine, United States
  3. The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, China

Abstract

Cancer develops and progresses often by inactivating p53. Here, we unveil nerve growth factor receptor (NGFR, CD271 or p75NTR) as a novel p53 inactivator. p53 activates NGFR transcription, whereas NGFR inactivates p53 by promoting its MDM2-mediated ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis and by directly binding to its central DNA binding domain and preventing its DNA-binding activity. Inversely, NGFR ablation activates p53, consequently inducing apoptosis, attenuating survival, and reducing clonogenic capability of cancer cells, as well as sensitizing human cancer cells to chemotherapeutic agents that induce p53 and suppressing mouse xenograft tumor growth. NGFR is highly expressed in human glioblastomas, and its gene is often amplified in breast cancers with wild type p53. Altogether, our results demonstrate that cancers hijack NGFR as an oncogenic inhibitor of p53.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Xiang Zhou

    Shanghai Cancer Center and Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Qian Hao

    Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Peng Liao

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Shiwen Luo

    Center for Experimental Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Minhong Zhang

    Center for Experimental Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Guohui hu

    Center for Experimental Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Hongbing Liu

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Yiwei Zhang

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Bo Cao

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Melody Baddoo

    Tulane Cancer Center, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Erik K Flemington

    Tulane Cancer Center, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Shelya X Zeng

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Hua Lu

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, United States
    For correspondence
    hlu2@tulane.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Carol Prives, Columbia University, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#4257R) of Tulane University School of Medicine.

Version history

  1. Received: February 8, 2016
  2. Accepted: June 9, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: June 10, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: July 13, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2016, Zhou et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,434
    views
  • 533
    downloads
  • 60
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Xiang Zhou
  2. Qian Hao
  3. Peng Liao
  4. Shiwen Luo
  5. Minhong Zhang
  6. Guohui hu
  7. Hongbing Liu
  8. Yiwei Zhang
  9. Bo Cao
  10. Melody Baddoo
  11. Erik K Flemington
  12. Shelya X Zeng
  13. Hua Lu
(2016)
Nerve growth factor receptor negates the tumor suppressor p53 as a feedback regulator
eLife 5:e15099.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15099

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15099

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    Célia Guérin, David Tulasne
    Review Article

    Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) directed against MET have been recently approved to treat advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbouring activating MET mutations. This success is the consequence of a long characterization of MET mutations in cancers, which we propose to outline in this review. MET, a receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK), displays in a broad panel of cancers many deregulations liable to promote tumour progression. The first MET mutation was discovered in 1997, in hereditary papillary renal cancer (HPRC), providing the first direct link between MET mutations and cancer development. As in other RTKs, these mutations are located in the kinase domain, leading in most cases to ligand-independent MET activation. In 2014, novel MET mutations were identified in several advanced cancers, including lung cancers. These mutations alter splice sites of exon 14, causing in-frame exon 14 skipping and deletion of a regulatory domain. Because these mutations are not located in the kinase domain, they are original and their mode of action has yet to be fully elucidated. Less than five years after the discovery of such mutations, the efficacy of a MET TKI was evidenced in NSCLC patients displaying MET exon 14 skipping. Yet its use led to a resistance mechanism involving acquisition of novel and already characterized MET mutations. Furthermore, novel somatic MET mutations are constantly being discovered. The challenge is no longer to identify them but to characterize them in order to predict their transforming activity and their sensitivity or resistance to MET TKIs, in order to adapt treatment.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Kevin Nuno, Armon Azizi ... Ravindra Majeti
    Research Article

    Relapse of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is highly aggressive and often treatment refractory. We analyzed previously published AML relapse cohorts and found that 40% of relapses occur without changes in driver mutations, suggesting that non-genetic mechanisms drive relapse in a large proportion of cases. We therefore characterized epigenetic patterns of AML relapse using 26 matched diagnosis-relapse samples with ATAC-seq. This analysis identified a relapse-specific chromatin accessibility signature for mutationally stable AML, suggesting that AML undergoes epigenetic evolution at relapse independent of mutational changes. Analysis of leukemia stem cell (LSC) chromatin changes at relapse indicated that this leukemic compartment underwent significantly less epigenetic evolution than non-LSCs, while epigenetic changes in non-LSCs reflected overall evolution of the bulk leukemia. Finally, we used single-cell ATAC-seq paired with mitochondrial sequencing (mtscATAC) to map clones from diagnosis into relapse along with their epigenetic features. We found that distinct mitochondrially-defined clones exhibit more similar chromatin accessibility at relapse relative to diagnosis, demonstrating convergent epigenetic evolution in relapsed AML. These results demonstrate that epigenetic evolution is a feature of relapsed AML and that convergent epigenetic evolution can occur following treatment with induction chemotherapy.