Pivotal role for skin transendothelial radio-resistant anti-inflammatory macrophages in tissue repair
Abstract
Heterogeneity and functional specialization among skin-resident macrophages are incompletely understood. In this study, we describe a novel subset of murine dermal perivascular macrophages that extend protrusions across the endothelial junctions in steady-state and capture blood-borne macromolecules. Unlike other skin-resident macrophages that are reconstituted by bone marrow-derived progenitors after a genotoxic insult, these cells are replenished by an extramedullary radio-resistant and UV-sensitive Bmi1+ progenitor. Furthermore, they possess a distinctive anti-inflammatory transcriptional profile, which cannot be polarized under inflammatory conditions, and are involved in repair and remodeling functions for which other skin-resident macrophages appear dispensable. Based on all their properties, we define these macrophages as Skin Transendothelial Radio-resistant Anti-inflammatory Macrophages (STREAM) and postulate that their preservation is important for skin homeostasis.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15251.001eLife digest
The skin forms an essential barrier that defends our body from external damage. For this reason, it is important to understand the complex mechanisms involved in healing wounds and maintaining healthy skin. This could allow us to find effective treatments for skin diseases such as atopic dermatitis and psoriasis.
Immune cells called macrophages can protect the body in different ways depending on the signals they receive. Their protective roles include killing microbes that may cause disease, and helping to repair damaged tissues. Barreiro et al. have now investigated the roles of the macrophages in the skin by means of a number of complementary techniques, including a method called intravital microscopy that can image cells in a living organism.
The experiments revealed that a division of labor exists among the macrophages that reside in the skin of mice. Some macrophages help to trigger inflammatory responses in the skin. These immune cells disappear after being exposed to ionizing radiation (such as that used to treat cancer) but can be replaced via a bone marrow transplant. Other macrophages that help to repair tissues can survive being exposed to ionizing radiation but cannot resist high levels of ultraviolet light. Both types of macrophages perform unique and essential roles, and both types are necessary for maintaining healthy skin.
Barreiro et al. also discovered that the skin macrophages that help to repair tissues have the ability to move into blood vessels and take up substances from the blood. A question for future investigation is whether the macrophages perform this scavenging process to trigger a protective immune response in the nearby skin.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15251.002Introduction
Macrophages are myeloid cells highly specialized in pathogen clearance and antigen capture in lymphoid tissues, where they participate in the first line of immune defense against exogenous threats, extending a bridge between innate and adaptive immunity (Varol et al., 2015). Homeostasis is also maintained in a number of peripheral non-lymphoid tissues by the phagocytic, anti-microbial and tissue remodeling activities of specialized resident macrophages, including alveolar macrophages in lungs, interstitial histiocytes in connective tissue, osteoclasts in bone, microglia in brain, Kupffer cells in liver, peritoneal, intestinal and adipose tissue macrophages (Murray and Wynn, 2011). Likewise, macrophages contribute to the barrier function of the skin. Unlike migratory epidermal Langerhans cells and dermal dendritic cells, which are mobilized after topical antigen uptake to perform their tolerogenic or immunogenic role within the draining lymph nodes (Henri et al., 2010), skin-resident macrophages remain in the dermis, contributing to pathogen clearance, tissue repair and the resolution of inflammation (Pasparakis et al., 2014).
A certain degree of heterogeneity among skin-resident macrophages has been previously reported relative to their ontogeny as well as to the functional specialization of specific subsets (Abtin et al., 2014; Hoeffel et al., 2015; Schulz et al., 2012; Tamoutounour et al., 2013). Herein, we define for the first time a clear dichotomy among the skin-resident macrophages based on their differential sensitivity to γ-irradiation. Radio-resistant and radio-sensitive skin macrophages are distinctively polarized already in steady state as revealed by transcriptional analysis. Consequently, these two macrophage subsets are functionally specialized in a cell-autonomous manner even though both subsets are exposed to mostly shared environmental cues. In particular, the radio-resistant macrophage subset comprises a novel type of perivascular macrophages that gain access to the vascular lumen, are highly phagocytic and possess anti-inflammatory properties even in the presence of pro-inflammatory stimuli. Moreover, they are renewed from a local Bmi1+ progenitor and become outcompeted over time by bone marrow-derived resident macrophages. Finally, the preferential depletion of these skin transendothelial radio-resistant anti-inflammatory macrophages (STREAMs) using diphtheria toxin-OVA nanoparticles evidences their involvement in tissue repair and remodeling, as well as the inability of their radio-sensitive counterparts to act as functional surrogates.
Results
Dermal perivascular macrophages protrude into microvessels at steady-state
To visualize the microvascular network of the skin, we performed intravital imaging of the upper dermis of the mouse ear under steady-state conditions using a minimally invasive model based on confocal microscopy (Auffray et al., 2007). The vasculature was highlighted by injecting i.v. a non-permeable vascular tracer, high molecular weight (HMw; 2 MDa) TRITC-dextran. Remarkably, a population of perivascular cells became readily visible during the first hours after HMw dextran injection, suggesting that these mostly sessile cells were constantly taking up intravascular dextran (Figure 1A and Video 1). This observation was further confirmed by monitoring the uptake of two differently labeled HMw dextrans injected with a lapse of 24 hr (Figure 1—figure supplement 1A). Dextran administration followed by the subsequent injection of a non-phagocytosable tracer (vivotag) revealed the presence of dextran+ protrusions as non-stained regions in the vivotag channel projecting into the vessel lumen (Figure 1B). The protrusions were flapping inside the vessels, presumably deflected by the vascular flow, and even contacting circulating cells (Figure 1—figure supplement 1B and Videos 2–4). The phenotypic characterization of the TRITC-dextran+ perivascular cells identified them mostly as macrophages (i.e., they were either CD45+ F4/80high CD11c- CD11b+ or CD45+ F4/80high CD11c- CD64+ cells by FACS [Figure 1C and Figure 1—figure supplement 1C] and CD68+ cells by whole-mount immunofluorescence staining [Figure 1—figure supplement 1D]). Flow cytometry analysis of skin single-cell suspensions from 12-week-old animals showed that the 96.67% ± 1.02% of all TRITC-dextran+ cells were CD45+ and the 90.41% ± 2.06% of CD45+ TRITC-dextran+ cells corresponded to macrophages (CD64+). In addition, TRITC-dextran+ macrophages represented 41.28% ± 5.66% of total skin macrophages. Next, we performed a mesoscopic analysis of murine ears to characterize the spatial distribution of skin macrophages. This analysis revealed their preferential localization around dermal blood microvessels rather than lymphatics (Figure 2—figure supplement 1A and Video 5). Interestingly, TRITC-dextran+ macrophages were mostly apposed to capillaries and venules, possibly because the dense smooth muscle layer wrapping arterioles prevented the access of macrophages to the arteriolar lumen (data not shown). Moreover, endothelial cells did not detectably capture dextran under our experimental conditions, ruling out the possibility of the endothelium making accessible the intravascular dextran to the perivascular macrophages by transcytosis (Figure 2—figure supplement 1B).
We next studied how the macrophage protrusions gain access to the vascular lumen. We detected dextran+ macrophages embracing vessels from outside the pericyte sheath (visualized as GFP+ cells around vessels using a nestin-eGFP reporter mouse), whereas their protrusions extended across the basement membrane (stained with anti-collagen IV) and between pericytes to reach the endothelial wall (whole-mount immunofluorescence stainings in Figure 2A and Figure 2—figure supplement 1C). We also visualized dextran+ macrophage protrusions aligned with endothelial junctions in vivo by intravital microscopy by injecting i.v. an anti-CD31 antibody to stain the luminal surface of dermal microvasculature (Figure 2—figure supplement 1D and Video 6). Further analysis using orthogonal sectioning of whole-mount immunofluorescence stainings indicated that the macrophages insert their protrusions in the intravascular space through endothelial intercellular junctions (Figure 2B). Interestingly, TRITC-dextran uptake was minimal in VE-cadherin-α-catenin knock-in mice (Figure 2C). In these animals, endothelial adherens junctions are stabilized (Schulte et al., 2011), which prevents paravascular permeability and leukocyte paracellular but not transcellular diapedesis. The ability of dermal macrophages to access the intraluminal space is restricted in these animals, supporting the observation that macrophages can reach the vascular lumen crossing the endothelial junctions and excluding the possibility that their protrusions reach the vessel lumen via a transcellular route through endothelial cells. Finally, since the capture of dextran by skin myeloid cells is mediated by the mannose receptor (CD206) (Wollenberg et al., 2002), we could selectively stain the intraluminal protrusions of these dermal perivascular macrophages in vivo by injecting i.v. anti-CD206 and quantified the amount of endothelial-protruding macrophages by FACS (Figure 2D). Altogether these data indicate the existence of hitherto unidentified dermal perivascular macrophages able to protrude across endothelial junctions to reach the vascular lumen in homeostatic conditions.
Dermal dextran+ macrophages are a radio-resistant subset of tissue-resident macrophages
In an attempt to visualize endothelial-protruding macrophages without dextran labeling, we first analyzed whether these macrophages selectively expressed CX3CR1, a marker associated to certain tissue-resident macrophage subsets including intestinal macrophages and microglia (Varol et al., 2015). However, dextran+ macrophages did not express fluorescent reporter protein in Cx3cr1gfp/+ mice, neither in other myeloid reporter strains such as Lyz2Cre:Rosa26YFP and Langerin-eGFP (Figure 3—figure supplement 1A). Then, we generated chimeric animals by reconstituting lethally irradiated C57BL/6 mice with β-actin-GFP+ hematopoietic progenitors, since it has been previously reported the absence of radio-resistant macrophages in the skin (Bogunovic et al., 2006). Unexpectedly, dextran+ dermal macrophages did not express GFP in these chimeras (Figure 3A and Video 7), indicating that they were not replaced by BM-derived macrophages after irradiation and suggesting that they could be a specialized radio-resistant subset of skin-resident macrophages never characterized before. In fact, we monitored the presence of perivascular macrophages able to phagocytose intravascular HMw dextran 7d after lethal γ-irradiation without BM reconstitution (Figure 3—figure supplement 1B). To further assess their radio-resistant nature, we reconstituted lethally irradiated CD45.2 host mice with CD45.1 BM progenitors. Reconstitution of the hematopoietic system in blood and lymphoid organs was complete after 12 weeks, with a negligible residual contribution of host cells to the myeloid compartment. In contrast, the chimerism rate in the skin myeloid subsets exhibited a higher contribution of the host populations, which could not be ascribed to blood reconstitution (Figure 3—figure supplement 1C–D). The host radio-resistant CD45.2+ macrophages efficiently captured HMw dextran under steady-state conditions and were found mostly positioned around microvessels (Figure 3B and Figure 3—figure supplement 1E). To validate this observation in a homeostatic context devoid of irradiation, the uptake of intravascular dextran was also analyzed in parabiotic mice maintained for 6 months with a shared circulation. The results obtained were similar to those of chimeric animals, inasmuch as only host macrophages captured intraluminal dextran (Figure 3C).
Interestingly, a recent study described the existence of a subset of GFP+ perivascular macrophages in the DPE-GFP mouse strain, in which GFP is driven under the control of the distal and proximal CD4 enhancers and CD4 promoter (details on the generation of this mouse line described in [Mempel et al., 2006]). These GFP+ macrophages provide guidance cues for the recruitment of inflammatory cells such as neutrophils during intradermic bacterial infection (Abtin et al., 2014). To analyze whether the dermal endothelial-protruding macrophages correspond to the GFP+ macrophages described above, we injected HMw TRITC-dextran in DPE-GFP animals. Remarkably, ~80% of cells that acquired circulating HMw dextran were GFP– in the skin of DPE-GFP mice (Figure 4A). Furthermore, chimerism experiments in which we reconstituted lethally irradiated CD45.2 DPE-GFP hosts with CD45.1 hematopoietic progenitors revealed a dramatic decrease in the number of GFP+ dermal macrophages one month after the genotoxic insult, indicating their radio-sensitive nature (Figure 4B). Altogether these results allow us to establish a clear dichotomy between DPE-GFP+ and dextran-capturing perivascular macrophages.
Radio-resistant macrophages derive from an extramedullary UV-sensitive source
In order to find the source for the skin-resident radio-resistant macrophages described in this work, we explored whether they are long-lived, endowed with self-renewal capacity, or derived from an extramedullary progenitor as alternative possibilities. We first tackled their sensitivity to UV irradiation, since other radio-resistant immune subset in the skin, the Langerhans cells (LC), is UV-sensitive (Merad et al., 2002). Chimeric CD45.1/CD45.2 (donor/host) animals were exposed to UVA-B irradiation (5 J/cm2), and ear skin was analysed after one month. UV irradiation had a clearly negative effect on the survival and renewal of host compared with donor macrophages (Figure 5A), indicating that radio-resistant macrophages are UV-sensitive. However, the radio-resistant macrophages did not express langerin and are clearly distinguishable from epidermal and dermal langerin+ dendritic cells (Figure 3—figure supplement 1A).
Next, we explored whether the radio-resistant macrophages proliferate in situ. We first treated chimeric animals intradermally with clodronate liposomes to deplete skin macrophages. Monitoring at 24 hr after injection showed depletion of both macrophage subsets, whereas after 7d we observed selective partial recovery of host macrophages, consistent with an in situ renewal of these cells (Figure 5—figure supplement 1). Then, we performed Ki-67 staining in the skin of host and donor macrophages from chimeric animals using LC as control cells endowed with self-renewal potential (Chorro et al., 2009) (Figure 5B). The results point out to host macrophages as the only cell type assayed unable to proliferate by itself in steady-state. We complemented the study analysing the incorporation of BrdU administered ad libitum during 8d in these subsets (Figure 5C). The results indicate that host radio-resistant macrophages have a slower turnover compared to BM-derived donor macrophages and LC. Altogether these findings suggest that skin radio-resistant macrophages are a long-lived differentiated population that originates from an in situ proliferating progenitor. Interestingly, the relative content of resident macrophages from donor and host changed dynamically over time in favor of the dominant BM-derived pool, which exhibits higher proliferative capacity (Figure 5D).
To identify the extramedullary source for dermal radio-resistant macrophages, we performed a fate mapping analysis in adult skin. First, we performed an analysis of the expression of a panel of stemness-related genes demonstrating that skin-resident macrophages possess no pluripotent potential per se in steady-state (Figure 5—figure supplement 2A). Then, we employed a reporter mouse (Bmi1-IRES-Cre-ERT2 Rosa26 YFP) driven by the promoter of Bmi1, gene involved in the maintenance of adult stemness (Sangiorgi and Capecchi, 2008), which enabled us to trace adult stem cells and their progeny in skin (Figure 5—figure supplement 2B). Macrophages contain very low levels of the Bmi1 transcript (Figure 5—figure supplement 2C) and are devoid of Bmi1 protein in steady-state (Sienerth et al., 2011). However, YFP+ CD45+ F4/80high CD11b+ CD11c- macrophages were detected in the homeostatic skin of Bmi1 reporter animals not earlier than 5d after i.p. injection of tamoxifen, suggesting that they are indeed derived from a Bmi1+ progenitor (Figure 5E). Generation of YFP+ macrophages was increased during macrophage replenishment after depletion with s.c. clodronate treatment (Figure 5—figure supplement 2D). Moreover, microscopy analysis of the dermis of these reporter animals detected perivascular YFP+ cells protruding into vessels (Figure 5F). To exclude the contribution of BM-derived hematopoietic stem cells in this system, we generated chimeric CD45.1 C57BL/6 wt//Bmi1-IRES-Cre-ERT2 Rosa26 YFP CD45.2 (donor/host) mice. YFP+ dextran+ macrophages were detected in the skin of tamoxifen-treated HMw dextran-injected chimeric mice by FACS analysis (Figure 5G–H). Intravital experiments confirmed the existence of YFP+ dextran+ macrophages under steady-state conditions in chimeras lacking tamoxifen-inducible hematopoietic cells of BM origin (Figure 5I). Together these results confirm the in situ generation of radio-resistant macrophages from a skin pluripotent progenitor independent of BM.
Phenotypic differences among skin-resident macrophage subsets
Our results strongly imply the coexistence of two distinct skin-resident macrophage pools in homeostasis based on their differential capacity to uptake circulating macromolecules, sensitivity to γ-irradiation and progenitor source. To further characterize these two populations, we performed a detailed phenotypic characterization of host radio-resistant and donor BM-derived macrophages in chimeric mice after 3 months of reconstitution. Both subsets were F4/80high, CD11b+ and expressed similar levels of other myeloid markers such as Ly6C and CD115, as well as of the prototypic macrophage markers CD68 and CD64-MertK (whose combined expression is associated with mature tissue macrophages [Gautier et al., 2012]) (Figure 6A and Figure 6—figure supplement 1A). Moreover, both subsets were CD11c- and Ly6G- (Figure 6—figure supplement 1A). There was also no consistent or sizeable difference in the expression of the angiogenesis-related receptor Tie-2, the costimulatory molecules CD40 and CD70 or MHC-I. However, we found a higher mean expression of the costimulatory molecule CD86 and the mannose receptor (CD206) in the host radio-resistant subset, whereas MHC-II was elevated in the donor BM-derived subset (Figure 6A). Nevertheless, the broad range of expression of these differential markers within each macrophage subset precluded their use to dissect accurately the heterogeneity found among the skin-resident macrophages (example provided for MHC-II in Figure 6—figure supplement 1B).
Radio-resistant macrophages possess a distinctive anti-inflammatory gene expression profile
To find a specific marker for radio-resistant macrophages and gain further insight into the differences between the two tissue-resident macrophage subsets, we sorted donor and host macrophages from the skin of chimeric animals for high-resolution transcriptome profiling, using deep-sequencing technology (RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq)) (Wang et al., 2009). Of 17,741 genes compiled, we found significant differences in 744, 135 corresponding to protein coding sequences with similar normalized expression levels across replicates (Figure 6B–C, and Supplementary file 1). A comprehensive Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) of all genes expressed in at least one cell type showed 36 Kegg pathways upregulated in host radio-resistant macrophages (14 of them enriched at a nominal p-value < 1%) vs. 149 in donor macrophages (26 pathways enriched at a nominal p-value < 1%). The GSEA analysis confirmed striking differences in metabolism between the two resident macrophage populations in homeostatic skin (Figure 6—figure supplement 2A and Supplementary file 2). Host radio-resistant macrophages displayed a metabolic gene profile based on fatty acid oxidation and oxidative phosphorylation, whereas donor BM-derived macrophages showed a glycolytic gene profile. Such metabolic differences found at the gene expression level were confirmed by assessing mitochondrial activity ex vivo. Direct staining of the skin with an indicator of mitochondrial membrane potential (MitoTracker Orange CMTMRos) revealed elevated mitochondrial function in host radio-resistant macrophages, although both macrophage subsets contained comparable amounts of mitochondria per cell (as indicated by similar levels of Tomm20, a translocase of the outer mitochondrial membrane) (Figure 6—figure supplement 2B). Thus, the metabolic profiles of donor and host macrophages in homeostatic skin mirrored the metabolic reprogramming of pro-inflammatory classically activated and anti-inflammatory alternatively activated macrophages (Galvan-Pena and O'Neill, 2014), respectively.
In addition to metabolic differences, we further validated the differential expression observed for several immune-related genes using a microfluidic-based multiplex qRT-PCR. Donor-derived macrophages showed increased expression of genes such as H2-Eb1 (coding for MHC-II), Ccr2, Ilβ, Il6 and Il10. Importantly, the latest three genes code for cytokines related to the pro-inflammatory response in macrophages (Rodriguez-Prados et al., 2010). Host macrophages showed upregulated expression of Cd86, Il15 and Hmox among others (Figure 7A). Accordingly, we detected elevated protein expression of heme oxigenase-1 (encoded by Hmox) and of other anti-inflammatory markers such as arginase I (Figure 7B) as well as higher production of TGF-β (Figure 7C) in host macrophages in resting conditions.
Importantly, the immune gene signatures of the dermal macrophages expressing low MHC-II and never exposed to γ-irradiation and of the remaining dermal macrophages in the skin 7d after lethal γ-irradiation showed lack of upregulation of proinflammatory genes (Figure 7—figure supplement 1A), correlating with the observations made in radio-resistant host macrophages in chimeric animals. In contrast, dermal macrophages expressing high MHC-II and never exposed to γ-irradiation possess a pro-inflammatory profile as observed for donor BM-derived macrophages in chimeric animals (Figure 7—figure supplement 1A). These results suggest that the prior lethal irradiation to generate BM chimeras did not alter the immune gene expression profiles studied herein.
Hence, our results indicate that the radio-resistant subset of skin-resident macrophages is skewed towards an anti-inflammatory phenotype already in steady-state and predict a certain degree of functional specialization for them. We have coined this novel subset of macrophages as Skin Transendothelial Radio-resistant Anti-inflammatory Macrophages (STREAM) based on all the specific hallmarks found in our study.
Skin anti-inflammatory macrophages are refractory to inflammatory stimuli
The divergent immune-related transcriptional profiles observed in the two distinct macrophage subsets coexisting in homeostatic skin prompted us to investigate whether they are committed to specific pro- or anti-inflammatory functions in a cell-autonomous manner and independently of polarizing stimuli. To examine this possibility, we isolated both macrophage subsets treated them ex vivo with LPS, a stimulus for which both subsets expressed the prerequisite receptors (Figure 7—figure supplement 1B). Interestingly, the pro-inflammatory macrophages became activated and produced substantial levels of CCL4, CCL5, CXCL1, TNF-α and IL-6 (among other pro-inflammatory mediators examined) in comparison to control conditions, whereas the anti-inflammatory subset did not produce significant amounts of these cytokines and chemokines in response to LPS (Figure 7D). However, the anti-inflammatory macrophages produced IL-10 in response to IL-4 stimulation (Figure 7E). These results suggest that the anti-inflammatory macrophages have a dearth of functional plasticity, being refractory to pro-inflammatory challenges but responsive to anti-inflammatory stimuli. They also emphasize the fact that the different subsets of skin-resident macrophages could be already committed even since steady-state to perform non-redundant functions.
Selective depletion of STREAMs impairs skin repair
To explore the function of STREAMs, we searched for a method to deplete them selectively from the skin. For this purpose, we studied the capacity of STREAMs to capture nanoparticles coated with ovalbumin (OVA), another ligand for the mannose receptor (Burgdorf et al., 2006) that is highly expressed on their surface. In this manner, we ensured the active capture of the particulate OVA (OVA-coated fluorescent nanoparticles (FITC fluospheres), Φ=0.2 μm) from the bloodstream, preventing its passive diffusion into the perivascular tissue that could allow for extravascular phagocytosis. We first observed that OVA fluospheres injected i.v. were specifically captured by skin macrophages (Figure 8A), and this process was abrogated after the depletion of skin macrophages by s.c. clodronate treatment (Figure 8B). Intravital imaging followed by flow cytometry evaluation confirmed that the macrophages able to capture OVA fluospheres were dextran+ in C57BL/6 wt animals (Figure 8C, Figure 8—figure supplement 1A and Videos 8–9) as well as radio-resistant in CD45.1/CD45.2 (donor/host) C57BL/6 chimeras (Figure 8D–E). The availability of blood-borne nanoparticles in peripheral circulation is limited by the filtering action of mainly the liver and spleen, and therefore the amount of OVA-coated beads captured by skin STREAMs was low compared with that of splenic macrophages (Figure 8—figure supplement 1B); however, this amount was increased in γ-irradiated and splenectomized animals (Figure 8—figure supplement 1A).
Based on the specific ability of STREAMs to capture OVA nanoparticles, we next set up a method to deplete them selectively by administering i.v. OVA-coated nanoparticles (NP) adsorbed with diphtheria toxin (DT). In contrast to the i.v. administration of clodronate liposomes, which failed to eradicate skin STREAMs (data not shown), this tailored experimental strategy depleted preferentially STREAMs preserving most of the other skin macrophages that had no access to the blood-borne toxin-coated NPs (Figure 9—figure supplement 1). Then, the potential anti-inflammatory function of STREAMs in tissue repair was interrogated using a model of wound healing in combination with DT-OVA-NP treatment. Animals were treated either with OVA-NP or DT-OVA-NP (2.5 μl/g per dose) 1d before and 2d after wounding and were sacrificed at d5, observing a clear decrease in the macrophage population (Figure 9A,D). At this mid-stage of repair, macrophage depletion was associated with a significant delay in the healing process (measured as % of area of initial wound) (Figure 9B) and the histological analyses revealed a marked reduction in the formation of granulation tissue, concomitant reduced angiogenesis as well as delayed re-epithelialization (Figure 9C–D). Next, we administered a sole dose (2.5 μl/g) of DT-OVA-NP 2d after wounding and monitored wound closure till d9. In this manner, the macrophage depletion was attained after the initial inflammatory phase of wound healing (Gurtner et al., 2008). The Masson trichrome staining demonstrated a clear defect in collagen deposition in the animals treated with DT-OVA-NP (Figure 10A). This defect correlated with the disordered distribution of myofibroblasts in these animals observed with the α-smooth muscle actin (SMA) staining (Figure 10B). These results contrasted with the abundant collagen deposition and the parallel organization of myofibroblasts in OVA-NP-treated animals (Figure 10A–B). This noticeable phenotype observed in macrophage function-related parameters indicates that STREAMs could exert a prominent role as the macrophages involved in orchestrating tissue remodeling and repair in skin, as anticipated by their anti-inflammatory gene and protein expression profile.
Next, we performed wound healing experiments abrogating monocyte infiltration in the skin and depleting the radiosensitive subset of skin macrophages to further study the role of STREAMs in such scenario. We first analyzed the healing process in Ccr2-/- animals, wherein the repopulation of skin from blood monocytes is compromised (Boring et al., 1997; Serbina and Pamer, 2006). Interestingly, STREAMs are CCR2- (Figure 10—figure supplement 1A) and are normally localized around dermal vessels in Ccr2-/- mice (Figure 10—figure supplement 1B). Importantly, we did not observe substantial differences in wound closure, collagen deposition, and myofibroblast distribution in Ccr2-/- mice compared to Ccr2+/+ animals (Figure 10—figure supplement 1C–D). Next, we benefited from the radio-resistant nature of STREAMs to deplete skin radio-sensitive macrophages by lethal γ-irradiation and prevented their replenishment by limiting the affluence of peripheral blood monocytes after reconstitution with Ccr2-/- hematopoietic progenitors (Willenborg et al., 2012) (Figure 10—figure supplement 1E). We could not find differences in the healing capacity of the Ccr2-/-/Ccr2+/+ (donor/host) chimeras (whose skin was defective in radio-sensitive macrophages, the repopulation from BM was prevented but the pool of STREAMs was intact) compared to that of control Ccr2+/+/Ccr2+/+ chimeras, using all parameters assayed previously (Figure 10—figure supplement 1F–G). Altogether these results strengthen the idea of the selective role for STREAMs in tissue repair.
Discussion
In this study we have identified a unique subset of dermal perivascular macrophages, skin transendothelial radio-resistant anti-inflammatory macrophages (STREAM), which capture blood-borne macromolecules by extending protrusions into the vascular lumen at steady-state. The observation of this phenomenon in chimeric animals allowed us to further characterize STREAMs as a radio-resistant subset of skin macrophages, whose turnover is ensured by an extramedullary source. We could also determine that STREAMs are committed to perform anti-inflammatory functions, lacking the plasticity to be reprogrammed in the presence of a potent pro-inflammatory stimulus. Finally, the selective depletion of STREAMs highlighted their function in tissue repair and remodeling processes to regain skin homeostasis.
It is well established that specialized macrophage subtypes, such as subcapsular sinus macrophages in lymph nodes and Kupffer cells in liver, can traverse fenestrated endothelial sinusoids to capture lymph- or blood-borne particulate antigens and participate in the initiation of innate and adaptive immunity (Huang et al., 2013; Junt et al., 2007; Lee et al., 2010; Wong et al., 2013). Dendritic cells are also able to extend transepithelial projections to capture foreign particulate antigens from airways and gut mucosa, or traverse the vasculature in pancreatic islets of Langerhans (Calderon et al., 2008; Chang et al., 2013; Farache et al., 2013; Hammad et al., 2009; Rescigno et al., 2001). However, some of these specialized dendritic cells have been redefined as macrophages (Calderon et al., 2014; Mazzini et al., 2014). CX3CR1+ myeloid cells in the central nervous system could also gain access to vasculature (Barkauskas et al., 2013) and mast cells were recently reported to capture blood-borne IgE, albeit the underlying mechanism remains unknown (Cheng et al., 2013). Herein, we report that STREAMs are unique macrophages in that they traverse the endothelial junctions of non-fenestrated dermal vasculature to take up circulating macromolecules under homeostatic conditions. STREAM’s protrusions only emerge through the endothelial cell-cell junctions and do not use a transcellular route, as illustrated using a genetic approach (the VE-cad-α-cat transgenic mouse line, which display impregnable, highly stable adherens junctions). Moreover, unlike subcapsular sinus macrophages in lymph nodes, which act like fly paper retaining lymph-borne viral particles on their surface for subsequent transfer to B cells (Junt et al., 2007), STREAMs internalize particulate antigens, such as OVA-FITC Fluospheres, and might play a role in their cross-presentation to tissue-resident memory CD8+ T cells.
The existence of radio-resistant dendritic cells in the skin has been previously reported (Bogunovic et al., 2006; Merad et al., 2002), whereas the presence of radio-resistant dermal macrophages has remained elusive hitherto. This study reveals that STREAMs are a radio-resistant subset that coexists in steady state with other skin macrophages of radio-sensitive nature. In this regard, the radio-resistant macrophages described in (Haniffa et al., 2009) might be the human homolog of this mouse subset, extending the generality and impact of our findings. The chimerism, parabiosis and fate mapping experiments also indicate that STREAMs are maintained locally in the skin throughout adult life independently of circulatory precursors, as opposed to radio-sensitive macrophages that are renewed at a low rate from blood in steady state and replaced by donor BM progenitors after a genotoxic insult. Thus, our data further extent the previous knowledge on the minimal blood exchange experienced by tissue-resident macrophages in other tissues (Hashimoto et al., 2013; Yona et al., 2013).
The renewal potential and the lifespan of tissue-resident macrophages are still controversial. Somes studies have described the potential of macrophages to be self-perpetuated under certain conditions (for example, in the presence of IL-4 during a parasitic infection [Jenkins et al., 2011] or in a M-CSF- or GM-CSF-dependent manner after macrophage depletion [Hashimoto et al., 2013]). STREAMs are unable to self-renew in steady-state and their turnover from a Bmi1+ adult progenitor occurs at a low basal rate, becoming outcompeted over time by other skin-resident macrophages with faster turnover. Hence, our results concur with previous studies reporting a dual origin for skin macrophages with a prenatally-derived CCR2-independent subset and a postnatal BM-derived CCR2-dependent subset, being the prenatally-derived subset displaced by the BM-derived subset with age (Jakubzick et al., 2013; Tamoutounour et al., 2013). Interestingly, this dual origin has been also observed in other tissues such as heart (Molawi et al., 2014).
Unraveling the ontogenetic source for tissue-resident macrophages is another complex matter. There are several landmark studies describing the existence of different macrophage precursors during development. The yolk sac-derived Myb-independent F4/80bright macrophages seeded in the embryonic skin prior to birth and renewed independently of definitive hematopoiesis (Schulz et al., 2012) might correspond to the developmental precursor for STREAMs and the c-Myb dependent fetal liver monocytes that give rise to macrophages with self-renewal capacity (Hoeffel et al., 2015) might be the precursors of the radiosensitive macrophages (those susceptible of replenishment by BM precursors after a genotoxic insult). However, the elucidation of skin macrophage ontogeny deserves further thorough investigation in future studies.
Regarding phenotypic characterization, a classification of the skin mononuclear phagocyte system based on phenotypic markers has recently identified heterogeneity among the skin-resident macrophages, although not related to radio-sensitivity. These authors distinguish two distinct skin-resident macrophage subsets defined both as CD11b+ CD11c- CD64+ MerTK+ Ly6Clow CCR2- but differing on the expression of MHC-II (Tamoutounour et al., 2013). They suggest that both subsets possess analogous transcriptional profiles, share functions, are radio-sensitive and equally dependent on BM supply, and could represent sequential stages of differentiation (the MHC-IIlow subset (P4) maturing into MHC-IIhigh (P5) macrophages). As demonstrated in Figure 6A and Figure 6—figure supplement 1B, the expression of MHC-II in skin macrophages cannot precisely discriminate the two independent subsets of macrophages with distinct radio-sensitivity, different polarization profiles and non-overlapping functions described in our work. Therefore, the classification criteria used in this work allows better resolution of the skin macrophage subsets, compared to classifications relying on subset-defining markers that might not adequately reflect the existing heterogeneity within the skin niche.
Metabolic adaptation is a key feature in macrophage activation, instrumental for their function in homeostasis, immunity, and inflammation (Martinez et al., 2013). In this regard, the GSEA of our RNASeq data highlight clear differences in the metabolic gene profiles of host radio-resistant and BM-derived macrophages. We found an enrichment in genes involved in glycerolipid, glycerophospholipid and linoleic acid metabolism, as well as in glycosphingolipid biosynthesis in the gene profile of radio-resistant macrophages. These results are compatible with the energetic requirements and the regulation of membrane fluidity needed for phagocytosis and are also crucial for tissue remodeling (Biswas and Mantovani, 2012). Other genes enriched in this subset are related to fibrogenesis and tissue repair such as Tgfb1 and genes of the Hedgehog signaling pathway, as well as genes related to taurine and hypotaurine metabolism, being consistent this with an antioxidant protective role. Conversely, the transcriptional profile of the BM-derived macrophages includes an over-representation of genes associated with the carbohydrate and retinol metabolisms such as the pentose phosphate pathway, with the ABC transporters and the JAK-STAT and WNT signaling pathways, in accordance with their pro-inflammatory potential. Moreover, a gene encoding a regulator of the metabolic switch from oxidative phosphorylation to aerobic glycolysis (Trap1) (Yoshida et al., 2013) is specifically expressed in BM-derived macrophages.
Our study in the homeostatic skin along with others describing the existence of polarized macrophages already in steady state in heart, testis and pancreas (Calderon et al., 2015; DeFalco et al., 2014; Pinto et al., 2012) help to reformulate the long-held paradigm of macrophage polarization, which defined the functional specialization of macrophages from a steady-state non polarized status mainly as a consequence of integrating external stimuli (Gordon and Pluddemann, 2013; Sica and Mantovani, 2012). Interestingly, the study by Calderon and colleagues (Calderon et al., 2015) highlights the imprinting of distinct features in macrophages by their anatomical localization within the steady-state pancreas. The macrophages in the islets possess a pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype and protrude into the fenestrated vessels, whereas the stromal milieu sets the response of the macrophages in favor of the M2 phenotype. This pattern of regional specialization might not be applicable to the skin where, e.g., perivascular macrophages with pro-inflammatory (Abtin et al., 2014) and anti-inflammatory (STREAMs) phenotypes coexist in the same areas. However, although both subsets mostly share environmental stimuli, STREAMs can get access to the intravascular milieu and might receive selective signals that could contribute to maintain their phenotype. Therefore, the essential role of the environment in controlling tissue-specific macrophage identities cannot be dismissed as highlighted in recent epigenetics studies (Gosselin et al., 2014; Lavin et al., 2014).
The preferential depletion of anti-inflammatory STREAMs has a deleterious impact in the wounded skin, indicating that they could participate in orchestrating the pro-reparative functions traditionally associated to the so-called alternatively activated (M2) macrophages (Das et al., 2015). Conversely, we observed that the rate of wound closure was neither affected in the Ccr2-/- animals (as previously reported by Willenborg et al., 2012) nor in chimeric Ccr2-/-/Ccr2+/+ mice, indicating that infiltrating monocytes and radiosensitive tissue-resident macrophages could be mostly dispensable for the reparative phase of the healing process in the skin. Thus, the coexistence of macrophage subsets performing non-redundant roles in homeostatic skin highlights the need of maintaining equilibrium between both pools to preserve the skin fitness. The lack of functional redundancy could be of clinical significance, and may contribute to better understand concomitant skin pathologies arising from radio-induced bone marrow ablation therapies and certain inflammatory skin disorders, particularly those aggravated with age.
Materials and methods
Mice
Male either littermates or age-matched (8-to-12-week-old) mice on the C57BL/6J background were used for intravital imaging, phenotypic characterization, transcriptional analysis and functional experiments. Chimeric animals were generated as follows: 8-to-12-week-old C57BL/6 wt male mice (CD45.2 haplotype), were lethally γ-irradiated with 2 doses of 6.5 Gy and transplanted with a mixture of 5 x 106 BM cells from either B6 SJL mice (CD45.1 haplotype), or B6 ACTB-eGFP mice. Alternatively, irradiated B6 SJL mice (CD45.1+) were reconstituted with BM from Ccr2+/+ or Ccr2-/- (CD45.2+) mice. Animals were used for experimental procedures after 12 to 18 weeks of reconstitution. Details of the generation and characterization of the gene-targeted mouse expressing VE-cadherin-α-catenin protein can be found in (Schulte et al., 2011). Inducible Bmi1-IRES-Cre-ERT2 Rosa26 YFP mice were generated by crossing the Bmi1CreER/+ strain (Sangiorgi and Capecchi, 2008) with Rosa26YFP/+ reporter mice. Bmi1-IRES-Cre-ERT2 Rosa26 YFP double heterozygous mice were injected with tamoxifen 5d prior to analysis. Tamoxifen (Sigma-Aldrich [St Louis, MO]) was dissolved in corn oil (Sigma-Aldrich) to a final concentration of 20 mg/ml, and mice were i.p. injected every 24 hr on three consecutive days with tamoxifen at a concentration of 9 mg per 40 g body weight. The nestin-eGFP reporter strain was a kind gift from Dr. G. Enikolopov (Mignone et al., 2004). DPE-GFP mice were generated as described in (Mempel et al., 2006). Langerin-eGFP, Cx3cr1-GFP, Lyz2-Cre:Rosa26YFP and Ccr2-/- mice were kindly provided by Dr. B. Malissen, Dr A. Hidalgo, Dr. M. Ricote and Dr. C. Ardavin, respectively. Mice were kept in pathogen-free conditions in the CNIC Animal Unit, Madrid. Animal studies were approved by the local ethics committee and by the Division of Animal Protection of Comunidad de Madrid (approved protocols PROEX 159/15 and 160/15). All animal procedures conformed to EU Directive 2010/63EU and Recommendation 2007/526/EC regarding the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes, enforced in Spanish law under Real Decreto 1201/2005.
Intravital imaging
Request a detailed protocolEars were taped to the center of a coverslip and attached with high vacuum grease. Hairless areas were examined using a HCX PL APO lambda blue 20.0X 0.70 IMM UV objective (multi-immersion, glycerol) coupled to an inverted microscope (DMI6000; Leica Microsystems GmbH [Wetzlar, Germany]) equipped with a confocal laser-scanning unit (TCS-SP5; Leica). Non-invasive intravital imaging procedures were carried out in a thermostatic chamber at 37ºC. For short-term studies (1–2 hr), animals were first anesthetized by i.p. injection of ketamine (50 mg/kg), xylazine (10 mg/kg), and acepromazine (1.7 mg/kg), and repeated half-doses were administered when needed over the course of the experiments. For long-term studies (time-lapse imaging > 2 hr), animals were first anesthetized by i.p. injection of urethane (1.2 gr/kg) dissolved in PBS, followed by s.c. injection of 1/10 of the initial dose dissolved in 200 μl PBS for rehydration after several hours. As vascular tracers, 100 μl of 2 MDa FITC- or TRITC-dextran (1% w/v, which corresponds to a concentration of 5 μM; anionic lysine fixable [Molecular Probes, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA]), or 25 μg Vivotag (VisEn Medical, PerkinElmer [Waltham, MA]) dissolved in PBS were i.v injected. For in vivo staining of the vasculature, an anti-CD31 antibody (Fitzgerald Industries [North Acton, MA]) was labeled in house with an Alexa Fluor 647 monoclonal antibody labeling kit (Molecular Probes), and 25 μg were injected i.v. 16 hr after dextran administration. Images were obtained using bidirectional scanning mode and the acquisition of the different channels was sequential to avoid fluorescence bleed-through artifacts. Z-stack images were acquired with optimal confocal sectioning (spaced 0.63 μm along the z-axis). For time-lapse acquisition, z-sections were obtained at 10 μm intervals up to a depth of 70–100 μm, using a pinhole aperture > airy 1 (confocal acquisition). The acquisition rate was ~2–3 sec/z-stack.
Whole-mount staining of skin samples
Request a detailed protocolLive mice anesthetized with a mixture of zoletil and dontor were surgically opened and perfused with 1% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS at a continuous infusion rate of 7 ml/min, using a programmable syringe (Harvard Aparatus). Different parts of the skin were collected and post-fixed in 1% PFA for 1 hr at room temperature (RT). Tissues were stained as described in (Baluk et al., 2007). Briefly, tissues were incubated overnight (O/N) at RT with PBS containing 0.3% Triton X-100, 5% goat serum (Jackson ImmunoResearch Europe Ltd. [Suffolk, UK]) and primary antibodies. The anti-murine primary antibodies used were hamster anti-CD31 clone 2H8 (Chemicon, EMD Millipore [Billerica, MA]), rat anti-CD68 clone FA-11 and polyclonal rabbit anti-collagen IV (Abd Serotec, Bio-rad [Hercules, CA]), polyclonal rabbit anti-CD31 and polyclonal chicken anti-GFP (Abcam [Cambridge, UK]), polyclonal rabbit anti-LYVE-1 (ReliaTech [Wolfenbüttel, Germany]), and biotin-conjugated CD45.2 clone 104 (BD Pharmingen, BD Biosciences [San Diego, CA]). Samples were then thoroughly washed with 0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS and stained with appropriate secondary antibodies O/N at RT. Secondary antibodies used were DyLight 405 donkey anti-rat, Cy3 donkey anti-chicken and Alexa Fluor 647 or 488 goat anti-armenian hamster (Jackson Immunoresearch), Rhodamine-X goat anti-rabbit, Alexa 647 goat anti-rabbit, Alexa 647 chicken-anti-rat, Alexa 488 donkey-anti-rat and Alexa 647 or 488 goat-anti-mouse (Molecular Probes). After the last round of washing, labeled samples were fixed in 1% PFA for 30 min and mounted for microscopy analysis in Prolong Gold antifade reagent (Molecular Probes). Confocal z-stacks up to a depth of 100 μm (including epidermis and upper dermis) were obtained using a LSM 700 laser scanning microscope equipped with a LD LCI Plan/Apochromat 25x/0.8 Imm Korr DIC M27 objective (Carl Zeiss AG [Oberkochen, Germany]).
Image processing and analysis
Request a detailed protocolConfocal z-stack images from fixed samples or intravital experiments were processed to obtain maximal projections, orthogonal sectionings, 3D reconstructions or isosurface renderings, fluorescence intensity profiles, colocalization analyses and 3D computational analyses of distances using Imaris 7.3.1 (Bitplane [Belfast, UK]), Volocity 5.5.1 (PerkinElmer), and ImageJ 1.42q (NIH, [Bethesda, MD]). Images from in vivo time-lapse acquisitions were analyzed and videosequences set up and edited either with Imaris or Volocity softwares.
Dextran 'pulse-chase' assay
Request a detailed protocolAnimals were injected i.v. with 100 μl 1% HMw TRITC-dextran and, after a lapse of 24 hr, with 100 μl 1% HMw FITC-dextran. Animals were sacrificed 24 hr after the last injection and ears were processed for imaging.
In vivo staining of intraluminal protrusions of macrophages
Request a detailed protocolMice were injected retro-orbitally with 10 μg of Alexa 488 anti-CD206 (clone C068C2, BioLegend [San Diego, CA]) or Alexa 488 control isotype antibody (rat IgG2b, κ) and sacrificed 3 min later. Then, animals were perfused with PBS and ear skin was processed for flow cytometry. Counter-staining of CD206 was performed with Alexa 647 anti-CD206 clone MR5D3 (BioLegend).
Flow cytometry analysis and sorting strategies
Request a detailed protocolSkin samples (ears and hind footpads) were digested either with 2 mg/ml crude collagenase type IA (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific [Waltham, MA]) in PBS for 2 hr or with 0.25 μg/ml Liberase TM Research Grade (Roche Holding AG [Basel, Switzerland]) in RPMI medium for 1 hr at 37°C. Samples were then mechanically disrupted, washed and filtered. Single-cell suspensions were incubated with anti-mouse FcRII/III (clone 2.4G2) for 10 min at 4°C in PBS containing 0.05% BSA and 0.05 mM EDTA, and then stained with the following antibodies: Pecy7 anti-F4/80 clone BM8, APC or APC-eFluor 780 anti-CD45.2 clone 104, PE anti-CD115 clone AFS98, PE anti-Tie-2 clone Tek4, and APC-eFluor 780 Streptavidin (eBioscience [San Diego, CA]); v450 Horizon anti-CD45 Clone 30-F11, v450 Horizon or PerCP-Cy5.5 anti-CD45.1 clone A.20, PE anti-CD11c clone HL3, FITC or APC or APCCy7 anti-MHC-II clone M5/114.15.2, APC anti-MHC-I clone AF6-88.5, PE anti-Ly6C clone HK1.4, PECy7 or Alexa Fluor 647 anti-CD64 clone X54-5/7.1, PE anti-CD70 clone FR70, PE anti-CD86 clone GL-1, FITC anti-CD40 clone 3/23, and FITC anti-CD11b clone M1/70 (BD Pharmingen); APC anti-CCR2 and biotinylated MertK (R&D Systems Inc. [Minneapolis, MN]); Streptavidin Alexa Fluor 350 (Molecular Probes); APC or PerCP-Cy5.5 anti-CD68 clone FA-11, and Alexa Fluor 647 CD326 clone G8.8 (BioLegend); Alexa Fluor 647 anti-CD206 (AbD serotec); and rabbit polyclonal anti-Tomm20 clone FL-145 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology [Dallas, Tx]). For intracellular staining, samples were first fixed and permeabilized with Fix & Perm before antibody incubations in Wash & Perm buffer (BD Biosciences [San Diego, CA]). For Ki-67 staining, samples were treated following manufacturer’s protocol (Alexa Fluor 647 anti-Ki-67, BD Pharmingen). Single-cell suspensions were analyzed with a FACSCanto II HTS cytometer or a FACSAria II SORP sorter (BD Biosciences), and data were processed with FlowJo 7.6.3 and BD FACSDiva v.6.1.3. softwares. In some cases, sorted samples were further analyzed by combining flow cytometry and imaging with Flowsight (Amnis, EMD Millipore [Billerica, MA]).
Parabiosis surgery
Request a detailed protocolFor parabiosis, gender- and weight-matched mice were anesthetized i.p. with a mixture of ketamine (100 mg/kg), xylazine (10 mg/kg), and acepromazine (3 mg/kg). Hair was removed from the lateral aspects of the mice by shaving and hair removal cream. A longitudinal skin incision was made from the olecranon to the knee joint on opposing sides of each mouse of the parabiotic pair. Animals were placed side-by-side and the right olecranon of one animal was attached to the left olecranon of the other by a double suture. The equivalent procedure was performed for the knee joints to further secure the parabiotic pair. The dorsal and ventral skins were then approximated continuous 6–0 suture and by staples along the lateral abdominal aspect of the mice. Parabiosis was maintained for 6 months and, then, one of the partners in the parabiotic pair was injected retro-orbitally with 200 μl of HMw TRITC-dextran (5 μM) and animals were sacrificed 3d later. Chimerism in skin-resident macrophages was determined as well as the capture of intraluminal dextran by host and partner macrophages.
Solar-simulated UV radiation
Request a detailed protocolAnimals were exposed to UV irradiation using a 1000 watt xenon arc solar simulator (Oriel by Newport [Irvine, CA] ) equipped with an Oriel 81,017 filter (Colipa [Oudergem, Belgium]). UVB and UVA irradiance measurements were performed using an IL-1700 radiometer (International Light Technologies Inc. [Peabody, MA]) equipped with SED240/UVB-1/TD and SED033/UVA/TD photodetectors. The radiometer was calibrated with a Solar-Scope spectroradiometer (Solatell [Croydon, UK]). Animals were irradiated with 5 J/cm2 UVA-UVB except for their left ear that was covered to be used as non-treated control. Then, they were allowed to recover for 1 month before sacrifice.
Clodronate liposome-mediated depletion of skin macrophages
Request a detailed protocolClodronate (Roche) or PBS liposomes were injected s.c. (20 μl/hind footpad). Skin samples were processed for flow cytometry analysis after 24 hr or 7d.
In vivo BrdU treatment
Request a detailed protocolMice were allowed to drink BrdU-treated water (0.8 mg/ml) for 8d and then were sacrificed. BrdU incorporation in skin cell subsets was analyzed by flow cytometry (FITC BrdU Flow Kit, BD Pharmingen).
Measurement of mitochondria function
Request a detailed protocolEx vivo staining of mitochondria activity was conducted by flow cytometry following a previous protocol (Johnson and Rabinovitch, 2012). Briefly, ears were excised and split in half. The tissue was immediately incubated in the staining solution (20 nM of MitoTracker Orange CMTMRos [Molecular Probes] diluted in HBSS1X with 5% FBS) for 20 min at 37°C, 5% CO2. Then tissues were digested and dye was maintained at 10 nM in all the following steps before FACS analysis.
RNA-Seq library production
Request a detailed protocolcDNA was synthesized and amplified directly from cells using the Smarter Ultra Low RNA kit (Clontech Laboratories Inc. [Mountain View, CA]). Amplified cDNAs (10 ng) were fragmented using Covaris E220 (Covaris [Woburn, MA]) to an average fragment size of approximately 150 pb. Index-tagged sequencing libraries were generated from the fragmented cDNAs using the TruSeq RNA Sample Preparation v2 Kit (Illumina Inc. [San Diego, CA]), starting from the End Repair step. Libraries were quantified using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific [Waltham, MA]) and their size distributions were determined using the Bioanalyzer DNA-1000 Kit (Agilent). Libraries were sequenced on the Genome Analyzer IIx (Illumina) following the standard sequencing protocol with the TruSeq SBS Kit v5 (Illumina). Fastq files containing the sequencing reads for each library were extracted and demultiplexed using Casava v1.8.2 (Illumina).
RNA-Seq analysis
Request a detailed protocolReads were pre-processed with Cutadapt (Martin, 2011), to remove both TruSeq adaptor and SMARTer primer sequences. The resulting reads were mapped on the mouse transcriptome (Ensembl gene-build GRCm38.v70) and genome, using RSEM v1.2.3 (Li and Dewey, 2011) and Bowtie2 v2.0.6 (Langmead and Salzberg, 2012), respectively. The observation that a significant fraction of reads could be mapped on the genome, but not on the transcriptome, in close proximity to dA/dT-rich sequences, suggested that traces of contaminant genomic DNA could have been artifactually amplified by poly (A) priming. To avoid overestimation of transcript read counts, read clusters mapped on the genome at less than 50 bp downstream of dT-rich or upstream dA-rich regions were discarded. Filtered reads were mapped again on the transcriptome, and quantified, with RSEM. Only genes with at least 2 counts per million in at least 2 samples were considered for statistical analysis. Data were then normalized and differential expression tested using the Bioconductor package EdgeR (Robinson et al., 2010). Hierarchical Clustering was run using Genesis Software (Sturn et al., 2002) on the normalized expression profiles of the subset of genes with a p-value smaller than 0.05 and similar behavior in the two replicates of each cell type. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) (Subramanian et al., 2005) was run on the list of genes expressed in at least one cell type. The RNASeq dataset is available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?token=gzijkssyjraldqd&acc=GSE50566 (authors: Francisco Sanchez-Madrid and Olga Barreiro; year of publication: Sep 4th 2013; title: Homeostatic skin contains two different subsets of resident macrophages with distinct origin and gene profile; GEO Accession Number GSE50566).
RNA extraction and immune gene profile analysis
Request a detailed protocolRNA was extracted from sorted macrophage populations obtained from chimeric CD45.1 (donor)-CD45.2 (host) animals using the Absolutely RNA Nanoprep Kit (Agilent Technologies [Santa Clara, CA]). RNA quantity and quality were determined using a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies) and a Nanodrop-1000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Each RNA sample was amplified using the MessageAmp II aRNA Amplification Kit (Ambion). Total amplified mRNA (30 ng) was converted to cDNA and loaded on a TaqMan Array Micro Fluidic Card (Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies, Thermo Fisher Scientific [Foster City, CA]). Relative gene expression was calculated with the ABI Prism 7900 HT Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems) and Qbase software (Biogazelle [Gent, Belgium]), using Actb, B2m, Hprt1, Gusb and Gapdh genes as reference targets for the analysis of the immune system and inflammation gene signature array and 18S, Raf1, Ctnnb1, Eef1a1 for the analysis of the stem cell gene signature array. A comparative gene expression analysis was carried out by calculating ΔlogCt from the average logCt for every gene from each type of tissue-resident macrophages.
Analysis of cytokine secretion by FACs and ELISA
Request a detailed protocolSorted skin anti- and pro-inflammatory macrophage populations were obtained from the skin of C57BL6 mice. Cells were seeded (40,000 cells/100 µl RPMI medium) and stimulated in vitro with LPS (1 µg/ml) for 24 hr. Supernatants were used for analysis of cytokine secretion using Mouse Inflammation (17-Plex) multiplex kit (ANTIGENIX AMERICA Inc [Huntington Station, NY]). TGF-β and IL-10 secretion were analyzed with an ELISA kit (eBioscience).
Cytospin and staining
Request a detailed protocolSorted donor and host skin macrophages of quimeric mice were diluted in PBS containing 0.5% BSA and centrifuged in a cytospin centrifuge for 10 min at 800 rpm. Samples were stained with rabbit polyclonal anti-arginase I clone H-52 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or rabbit polyclonal anti-heme oxygenase-1 (Chemicon) following a standard immunofluorescence protocol. Then, samples were analyzed in the LSM 700 laser scanning microscope described above.
In vivo uptake of particulate OVA
Request a detailed protocolFITC fluospheres (Ø 0.2 μm) (Fluospheres, sulfate microspheres, Molecular Probes) were diluted in PBS to a final concentration of 0.5% solids and adsorbed with 1 mg/ml endotoxin-free OVA (Calbiochem, EMD Millipore [Billerica, MA]) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Then, 200 μl of the colloidal dissolution were injected i.v. in either untreated, lethally γ-irradiated or splenectomized animals. Seventy-two hours later, animals were sacrificed and manually perfused with PBS to eliminate remaining fluospheres from the vasculature. In some cases, hind footpads were treated with clodronate or PBS liposomes 72 hr before the injection of fluospheres. Clodronate or PBS liposomes (ClodronateLiposomes.org) were injected s.c. (20 μl/hind footpad). For splenectomy, animals were anesthetized with a mixture of ketamine/xylazine (100/10 mg/Kg), the left lateral side was depilated and a small incision was made to remove the organ after ligation of the splenic vessels. Then, animals were allowed to recover from surgery for 1 month before proceeding with experiments.
Selective depletion of STREAMs in skin
Request a detailed protocolHome-made ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (Groult et al., 2015) (abbreviated as NPs, 1 ml, 3 mg Fe/ml) with 10 nm of core, 40 nm of hydrodynamic size and −35 mV of ζ-potential were incubated with endotoxin-free OVA (500 μl, 10 mg/ml) for 1 hr at R.T. Non-adsorbed OVA remnants were washed out and further incubation of OVA-NP with diphtheria toxin (DT) (50 μl, 1 mg/ml) (3 hr at R.T.) were carried out, followed by extensive washing. Then, mice were injected i.v. with 1 dose (2.5 μl/g) or 2 doses (spaced 3d apart) of this colloidal suspension and skin samples were analyzed by FACS and immunohistochemistry at different time-points.
Wound healing assay
Request a detailed protocolThe back of mice was depilated and left to recover homeostasis (24 hr). Then, animals were anesthetized with isoflurane by inhalation. Four skin excisions of 5 mm in diameter were carried out using a bio-punch (Kai Industries Co., ltd [Seki, Japan]). Wounds were routinely measured every 24 hr until the sacrifice of the animals. Animals were injected i.v. either DT-OVA-NP or OVA-NP before or during the wound healing assay. After sacrifice, wounded tissue was embedded in paraffin and processed for histological analysis.
Histological analysis
Request a detailed protocolStandard Hematoxylin-Eosin and Masson trichrome stainings were performed in wound sections. Alternatively, samples were processed for standard immunohistochemistry staining using anti-αSMA (clone 1A4, Sigma-Aldrich) or for immunofluorescence using anti-Mac-3 (clone M3/84, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-CD31 (rabbit polyclonal anti-mouse/human, Abcam), and DAPI. Stained samples were analyzed on a Leica DM2500 microscope coupled to a Leica DFC420 camera using 5x, 10x and 20x objectives. Intensity quantification of collagen deposition and quantification of macrophages and vessels in the granulation tissue were performed using ImageJ 1.42q.
Statistical analysis
Request a detailed protocolNormality of data distribution was assessed with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Statistical significance was calculated either with an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test, one-sample t-test, one-way ANOVA followed by either Tukey’s or Dunnett’s post-tests or two-way ANOVA followed by Sidak’s or Bonferroni post-test as indicated. All statistical analyses were carried out with GraphPad Prism v5 (GraphPad Software Inc. [La Jolla, CA]).
Data availability
-
Homeostatic skin contains two different subsets of resident macrophages with distinct origin and gene profilePublicly available at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (Accession no: GSE50556).
References
-
Functionally specialized junctions between endothelial cells of lymphatic vesselsJournal of Experimental Medicine 204:2349–2362.https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20062596
-
Extravascular CX3CR1+ cells extend intravascular dendritic processes into intact central nervous system vessel lumenMicroscopy and Microanalysis : The Official Journal of Microscopy Society of America, Microbeam Analysis Society, Microscopical Society of Canada 19:778–790.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927613000482
-
Orchestration of metabolism by macrophagesCell Metabolism 15:432–437.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2011.11.013
-
Identification of a radio-resistant and cycling dermal dendritic cell population in mice and menJournal of Experimental Medicine 203:2627–2638.https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20060667
-
Impaired monocyte migration and reduced type 1 (Th1) cytokine responses in C-C chemokine receptor 2 knockout miceJournal of Clinical Investigation 100:2552–2561.https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI119798
-
The pancreas anatomy conditions the origin and properties of resident macrophagesThe Journal of Experimental Medicine 212:1497–1512.https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20150496
-
The central role of antigen presentation in islets of Langerhans in autoimmune diabetesCurrent Opinion in Immunology 26:32–40.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coi.2013.10.011
-
Dendritic cells in islets of Langerhans constitutively present beta cell-derived peptides bound to their class II MHC moleculesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105:6121–6126.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0801973105
-
Langerhans cell (LC) proliferation mediates neonatal development, homeostasis, and inflammation-associated expansion of the epidermal LC networkThe Journal of Experimental Medicine 206:3089–3100.https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20091586
-
Monocyte and macrophage plasticity in tissue repair and regenerationThe American Journal of Pathology 185:2596–2606.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.06.001
-
Yolk-sac-derived macrophages regulate fetal testis vascularization and morphogenesisProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111:E2384–2393.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1400057111
-
Metabolic reprograming in macrophage polarizationFrontiers in Immunology 5:420.https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2014.00420
-
Tissue macrophage heterogeneity: issues and prospectsSeminars in Immunopathology 35:533–540.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00281-013-0386-4
-
Parallel multifunctionalization of nanoparticles: a one-step modular approach for in vivo imagingBioconjugate Chemistry 26:153–160.https://doi.org/10.1021/bc500536y
-
Differential rates of replacement of human dermal dendritic cells and macrophages during hematopoietic stem cell transplantationJournal of Experimental Medicine 206:371–385.https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20081633
-
Disentangling the complexity of the skin dendritic cell networkImmunology and Cell Biology 88:366–375.https://doi.org/10.1038/icb.2010.34
-
Ex vivo imaging of excised tissue using vital dyes and confocal microscopyCurrent Protocols in Cytometry 61:39.
-
Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2Nature Methods 9:357–359.https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1923
-
Langerhans cells renew in the skin throughout life under steady-state conditionsNature Immunology 3:1135–1141.https://doi.org/10.1038/ni852
-
Neural stem and progenitor cells in nestin-GFP transgenic miceJournal of Comparative Neurology 469:311–324.https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.10964
-
Progressive replacement of embryo-derived cardiac macrophages with ageJournal of Experimental Medicine 211:2151–2158.https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20140639
-
Protective and pathogenic functions of macrophage subsetsNature Reviews. Immunology 11:723–737.https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3073
-
Mechanisms regulating skin immunity and inflammationNature Reviews. Immunology 14:289–301.https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3646
-
Bmi1 is expressed in vivo in intestinal stem cellsNature Genetics 40:915–920.https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.165
-
Macrophage plasticity and polarization: in vivo veritasThe Journal of Clinical Investigation 122:787–795.https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI59643
-
Polycomb group protein Bmi1 negatively regulates IL-10 expression in activated macrophagesImmunology and Cell Biology 89:812–816.https://doi.org/10.1038/icb.2010.160
-
Genesis: cluster analysis of microarray dataBioinformatics 18:207–208.https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/18.1.207
-
Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profilesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102:15545–15550.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506580102
-
Macrophages: development and tissue specializationAnnual Review of Immunology 33:643–675.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-immunol-032414-112220
-
RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomicsNature Reviews Genetics 10:57–63.https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2484
-
Expression and function of the mannose receptor CD206 on epidermal dendritic cells in inflammatory skin diseasesJournal of Investigative Dermatology 118:327–334.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.01665.x
-
Molecular chaperone TRAP1 regulates a metabolic switch between mitochondrial respiration and aerobic glycolysisProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110:E1604–1612.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1220659110
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
Fundación Alfonso Martín Escudero
- Olga Barreiro
European Research Council (ERC-2011-AdG294340-GENTRIS)
- Olga Barreiro
- Francisco Sánchez Madrid
National Institutes of Health (RO1 AR068383)
- Olga Barreiro
- Ulrich H von Andrian
Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad España (SAF2011-25834)
- Danay Cibrian
- Francisco Sánchez Madrid
Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad España (SAF 2014-55579-R)
- Francisco Sánchez Madrid
- Danay Cibrian
Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad España (SAF2011-27330)
- Pilar Martín
Comunidad de Madrid (INDISNET-S2011/BMD-2332)
- Pilar Martín
- Francisco Sánchez Madrid
Instituto Salud Carlos III (Red Cardiovascular RD 12-0042-0056)
- Francisco Sánchez Madrid
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. M Vicente-Manzanares and S Bartlett for English editing, and Dr. I Mazo, Dr. Hortensia de la Fuente, Ana Domínguez and Raquel Sánchez for technical assistance. We also thank the Microscopy, Cellomics, Genomics, Bioinformatics, Advanced Imaging and Comparative Medicine Units at CNIC and the HMS Center for Immune Imaging for technical support. This work was funded by grants from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (SAF2011-27330 to PM; and SAF2011-25834 and SAF 2014-55579-R to FS-M); grant INDISNET-S2011/BMD-2332 from the Comunidad de Madrid to PM and FS-M; Red Cardiovascular RD 12-0042-0056 from Instituto Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), and ERC-2011-AdG294340-GENTRIS to FS-M; and National Institutes of Health grant RO1 AR068383 to UHvA. OB is supported by a fellowship from Fundacion Alfonso Martin Escudero, ERC and RO1 grants. DC is supported by SAF grant. The CNIC is supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and the Pro CNIC Foundation.
Ethics
Animal experimentation: Animal studies were approved by the local ethics committee and by the Division of Animal Protection of Comunidad de Madrid (approved protocols PROEX 159/15 and 160/15). All animal procedures conformed to EU Directive 2010/63EU and Recommendation 2007/526/EC regarding the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes, enforced in Spanish law under Real Decreto 1201/2005
Copyright
© 2016, Barreiro et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 4,388
- views
-
- 776
- downloads
-
- 39
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Genetics and Genomics
- Immunology and Inflammation
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease, the pathophysiology and genetic basis of which are incompletely understood. Using a forward genetic screen in multiplex families with SLE, we identified an association between SLE and compound heterozygous deleterious variants in the non-receptor tyrosine kinases (NRTKs) ACK1 and BRK. Experimental blockade of ACK1 or BRK increased circulating autoantibodies in vivo in mice and exacerbated glomerular IgG deposits in an SLE mouse model. Mechanistically, NRTKs regulate activation, migration, and proliferation of immune cells. We found that the patients’ ACK1 and BRK variants impair efferocytosis, the MERTK-mediated anti-inflammatory response to apoptotic cells, in human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived macrophages, which may contribute to SLE pathogenesis. Overall, our data suggest that ACK1 and BRK deficiencies are associated with human SLE and impair efferocytosis in macrophages.
-
- Immunology and Inflammation
The adaptive T cell response is accompanied by continuous rewiring of the T cell’s electric and metabolic state. Ion channels and nutrient transporters integrate bioelectric and biochemical signals from the environment, setting cellular electric and metabolic states. Divergent electric and metabolic states contribute to T cell immunity or tolerance. Here, we report in mice that neuritin (Nrn1) contributes to tolerance development by modulating regulatory and effector T cell function. Nrn1 expression in regulatory T cells promotes its expansion and suppression function, while expression in the T effector cell dampens its inflammatory response. Nrn1 deficiency in mice causes dysregulation of ion channel and nutrient transporter expression in Treg and effector T cells, resulting in divergent metabolic outcomes and impacting autoimmune disease progression and recovery. These findings identify a novel immune function of the neurotrophic factor Nrn1 in regulating the T cell metabolic state in a cell context-dependent manner and modulating the outcome of an immune response.