Repeated social defeat stress enhances glutamatergic synaptic plasticity in the VTA and cocaine place conditioning
Abstract
Enduring memories of sensory cues associated with drug intake drive addiction. It is well known that stressful experiences increase addiction vulnerability. However, it is not clear how repeated stress promotes learning of cue-drug associations, as repeated stress generally impairs learning and memory processes unrelated to stressful experiences. Here, we show that repeated social defeat stress in rats causes persistent enhancement of long-term potentiation (LTP) of NMDA receptor-mediated glutamatergic transmission in the ventral tegmental area (VTA). Protein kinase A-dependent increase in the potency of inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate-induced Ca2+ signaling underlies LTP facilitation. Notably, defeated rats display enhanced learning of contextual cues paired with cocaine experience assessed using a conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm. Enhancement of LTP in the VTA and cocaine CPP in behaving rats both require glucocorticoid receptor activation during defeat episodes. These findings suggest that enhanced glutamatergic plasticity in the VTA may contribute, at least partially, to increased addiction vulnerability following repeated stressful experiences.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15448.001eLife digest
Daily stress increases the likelihood that people who take drugs will become addicted. A very early step in the development of addiction is learning that certain people, places, or paraphernalia are associated with obtaining drugs. These ‘cues’ – drug dealers, bars, cigarette advertisements, etc. – become powerful motivators to seek out drugs and can trigger relapse in recovering addicts. It is thought that learning happens when synapses (the connections between neurons in the brain) that relay information about particular cues become stronger. However, it is not clear how stress promotes the learning of cue-drug associations.
Stelly et al. investigated whether repeated episodes of stress make it easier to strengthen synapses on dopamine neurons, which are involved in processing rewards and addiction. For the experiments, rats were repeatedly exposed to a stressful situation – an encounter with an unfamiliar aggressive rat – every day for five days. Stelly et al. found that these stressed rats formed stronger associations between the drug cocaine and the place where they were given the drug (the cue). Furthermore, a mechanism that strengthens synapses was more sensitive in the stressed rats than in unstressed rats. These changes persisted for 10-30 days after the stressful situation, suggesting that stress might begin a period of time during which the individual is more vulnerable to addiction.
The experiments also show that a hormone called corticosterone – which is released during stressful experiences – is necessary for stress to trigger the changes in the synapses and behavior of the rats. However, corticosterone must work with other factors because giving this hormone to unstressed rats was not sufficient to trigger the changes seen in the stressed rats. Future experiments will investigate what these other stress factors are and how they work together with corticosterone.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15448.002Introduction
Humans with a history of stressful or traumatic experiences are more prone to develop substance use disorders (Sinha, 2008). Adverse experience recruits the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis stress response, culminating in release of glucocorticoids that enables the body to cope with insults to homeostasis (Munck et al., 1984). In rodent models, repeated activation of the stress response typically disrupts learning and cognition [e.g., spatial learning (Conrad et al., 1996), working memory (Mizoguchi et al., 2000), and cognitive flexibility (Liston et al., 2006)]. In contrast to these deficits, prior stress enhances the learning of Pavlovian cue-outcome associations driven by rewarding stimuli, assessed with conditioned place preference (CPP) (Kreibich et al., 2009; Burke et al., 2011; Chuang et al., 2011), or aversive/stressful stimuli, assessed with fear conditioning (Conrad et al., 1999; Sandi et al., 2001; Suvrathan et al., 2014). These effects of stress may have arisen from evolutionary pressure to rapidly acquire information predicting food, shelter, and predator threat during periods of duress. Augmented Pavlovian reward learning mechanisms in stressed individuals may also heighten susceptibility to addiction, as acquisition of cue-drug associations is a crucial early step in drug use, and powerful, enduring memories of drug-associated cues trigger craving and relapse as recreational use progresses to addiction (Hyman et al., 2006). However, it is not clear how repeated stressful experience promotes the learning of cue-drug/reward associations, as repeated stress is generally detrimental to synaptic plasticity underlying learning and memory unrelated to stressful events (Kim and Diamond, 2002; Joels et al., 2006; Schwabe et al., 2012; Chattarji et al., 2015).
The mesolimbic dopamine system originating in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) is critical for reward processing. VTA dopamine neurons tonically fire action potentials (APs) at 1–5 Hz, while responding to unexpected rewards with phasic burst firing (2–10 APs at 10–50 Hz). These dopamine neuron responses are hypothesized to drive the learning of Pavlovian cue-reward associations (Tsai et al., 2009; Darvas et al., 2014). Intriguingly, over the course of repeated cue-reward pairing, dopamine neurons acquire a conditioned burst response to reward-predictive cues, which is thought to encode the positive motivational valence of those cues and to invigorate reward-seeking behavior (Schultz, 1998; Berridge et al., 2009; Bromberg-Martin et al., 2010).
Glutamatergic inputs activating NMDA receptors (NMDARs) drive the transition from tonic firing to bursting in dopamine neurons (Overton and Clark, 1997; Zweifel et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2011); therefore, potentiation of cue-driven NMDAR inputs may contribute to the acquisition of conditioned bursting. Indeed, NMDAR-mediated transmission undergoes long-term potentiation (LTP) when cue-like glutamatergic input stimulation is repeatedly paired with reward-like bursting in dopamine neurons (Harnett et al., 2009). LTP induction requires amplification of burst-evoked Ca2+ signals by preceding activation of group I metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs; more specifically mGluR1) coupled to the generation of inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate (IP3). Here, IP3 receptors (IP3Rs) detect the coincidence of IP3 generated by glutamatergic input activating mGluRs and burst-driven Ca2+ entry. IP3 enhances Ca2+-induced activation of IP3Rs by promoting access to the stimulatory Ca2+ sites, thereby promoting Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release from intracellular stores (Taylor and Laude, 2002). In this study, we demonstrate that repeated social defeat stress (1) enhances NMDAR LTP in the VTA via an increase in IP3 sensitivity of IP3Rs and (2) promotes acquisition of cocaine CPP in behaving rats, and both of these effects require glucocorticoid action during defeat stress.
Results
Repeated social stress increases mGluR-dependent facilitation of burst-evoked Ca2+ signals
NMDAR LTP induction requires mGluR/IP3-induced facilitation of burst-evoked Ca2+ signals (Harnett et al., 2009). Therefore, we first examined the effect of the group I mGluR agonist DHPG (1 µM; 5-min perfusion) on burst-evoked Ca2+ signals, assessed by the size of Ca2+-activated SK currents (termed burst IK(Ca)) in control and stressed animals. Rats were unhandled, handled, or socially defeated (at the end of the dark cycle) for 1, 5, or 10 consecutive days, and VTA slices were prepared 1–2 days after the final handling/defeat session. The magnitude of DHPG effect on IK(Ca) was significantly larger in animals that underwent 5 or 10 days of defeat stress compared to unhandled and handled controls, whereas a single defeat session failed to alter the DHPG effect (Figures 1A and B). There was no significant difference between unhandled and handled controls. The effect of stress plateaued by 5 days, as comparable enhancement of DHPG effect was observed after 10-day defeat. Basal burst IK(Ca) was consistent across groups (Figure 1C), suggesting no alterations in AP-evoked Ca2+ influx. DHPG-induced inward currents, which are independent of Ca2+ signaling (Guatteo et al., 1999), were not affected (Figure 1D); thus the stress-induced increase in IK(Ca) facilitation results from changes in IP3 signaling downstream of mGluRs.
Next, to examine the persistence of repeated stress effect, the interval between the last social defeat session and recording was prolonged to 10 and 30 days. Although stress-induced enhancement displayed gradual recovery, DHPG effect was still elevated after 30 days compared to age-matched controls (Figure 1E). Subsequent electrophysiology experiments were performed in 5-day defeated rats (with 1–2 day interval) and controls (unhandled and handled controls combined).
Protein kinase a mediates IP3R sensitization in socially defeated animals
To directly examine alterations in IP3 signaling, we applied different concentrations of IP3 (expressed in µM·µJ; see Methods and materials) into the cytosol using flash photolysis of caged IP3, and IP3R-mediated Ca2+ release was assessed by flash-evoked SK currents(IIP3) (Figure 2A). The average IP3 concentration-response curve displayed a leftward shift in defeated rats compared to controls (Figure 2B). Accordingly, the average EC50 valuewas significantly smaller in the defeated group (Figure 2C). Maximal IIP3 amplitude did not differ between groups (Figure 2D), indicating a change in the potency, but not the efficacy, of IP3 in eliciting Ca2+ release.
Protein kinase A (PKA)-dependent phosphorylation of IP3Rs increases their IP3 sensitivity (Wagner et al., 2008). To determine the involvement of PKA in stress-induced IP3R sensitization, the effect of a selective peptide inhibitor of PKA, PKI-(6–22)-amide (PKI; 200 µM, loaded into the cytosol via the whole-cell pipette for >15–20 min after break-in), was tested. PKI reversed the leftward shift in IP3 concentration-response curve, and thus the decrease in EC50 value, in stressed animals, while having no significant effect on maximal IIP3 amplitude (Figures 2B–D). PKI had no effect in the control group, suggesting low basal PKA activity in non-stressed animals. It should be noted that PKI eliminated the difference in IP3 potency between the two groups. These data indicate that repeated social stress sensitizes IP3Rs via a PKA-dependent mechanism.
Repeated social stress enhances NMDAR LTP
We next examined whether repeated social defeat affects NMDAR LTP induction, which requires mGluR/IP3-dependent facilitation of burst-evoked Ca2+ signals and is gated by PKA (Harnett et al., 2009). Application of a low concentration of IP3 preceding APs can effectively facilitate IK(Ca) (Cui et al., 2007; Ahn et al., 2010; Bernier et al., 2011). Thus, the LTP induction protocol consisted of applying a low concentration of IP3 (250 µM·µJ) 50 ms prior to simultaneous pairing of a burst with a brief train of synaptic stimuli (Figure 3A), the latter being necessary to activate NMDARs at stimulated synapses at the time of burst for LTP induction (Harnett et al., 2009; Whitaker et al., 2013). This induction protocol produced little LTP in control animals, while large LTP was induced in defeated animals (Figure 3B and C). IP3 application, which caused little IIP3 by itself, caused facilitation of burst IK(Ca) (assessed immediately before LTP induction), which was significantly larger in cells from defeated animals (Figure 3D). Furthermore, the magnitude of LTP was positively correlated with that of IP3-induced facilitation of IK(Ca) across neurons from both groups (Figure 3E). Robust LTP was induced in control rats when a higher IP3 concentration (500 µM·µJ), which produced larger IK(Ca) facilitation, was used during induction (Figure 3—figure supplement 1). These results suggest that the enhanced LTP in defeated rats is a consequence of increased IP3R sensitivity enabling greater facilitation of burst-evoked Ca2+ signals.
It has been reported that repeated stress alters NMDAR expression in certain brain areas (Fitzgerald et al., 1996; Yuen et al., 2012; Costa-Nunes et al., 2014; Chattarji et al., 2015). We found that bath application of NMDA (10 µM) produced comparable inward currents in control and defeated rats (Figure 4); thus repeated defeat stress caused no significant changes in global NMDAR-mediated excitation.
Repeated stress appears to differentially modulate tonic firing of VTA dopamine neurons recorded in vivo, as both an increase and decrease have been reported with different stress paradigms (Cao et al., 2010; Valenti et al., 2012; Tye et al., 2013). However, repeated social defeat failed to alter tonic firing measured in ex vivo slices (Figure 5A). Furthermore, the amplitude of hyperpolarization-activated cationic currents (Ih), which contribute to intrinsic dopamine neuron pacemaker activity (Neuhoff et al., 2002), was not affected (Figure 5B).
Glucocorticoid receptor activation is necessary but not sufficient for stress-induced IP3R sensitization
A major consequence of stress-induced HPA axis activation is the secretion of glucocorticoids (corticosterone in rodents) into the blood (Munck et al., 1984). Thus, we sought to determine whether corticosterone, which readily crosses the blood-brain barrier, is involved in the increase in IP3R sensitivity with repeated stress. Corticosterone activates both glucocorticoid receptors (GRs) and mineralocorticoid receptors (MRs); however, MRs are typically saturated by circadian fluctuations in corticosterone, while lower-affinity GRs are activated by levels attained with stress (Joels and de Kloet, 1994). Therefore, the role of GRs was examined by treating rats with the antagonist mifepristone (40 mg/kg, i.p.) or vehicle 30 min prior to each defeat session. The DHPG effect on burst IK(Ca) was significantly enhanced by repeated defeat in the vehicle-treated group, while there was no effect of stress in the mifepristone-treated group (Figure 6A). Thus, blockade of GRs during defeat sessions prevented IP3R sensitization. Next, rats were treated with corticosterone (2.5, 5, or 15 mg/kg, i.p.; at the end of the dark cycle) for 5 days (no social defeat). The lowest dose (2.5 mg/kg) produces elevation in blood corticosterone concentration comparable to that evoked by a moderate stressor (Graf et al., 2013), while higher doses (≥10 mg/kg) have been used to simulate severe stress levels (Akirav et al., 2004). None of the tested doses significantly altered the DHPG effect on burst IK(Ca) (Figure 6B). Together, these results show that GR signaling is necessary, but not sufficient, for IP3R sensitization.
It has been shown that repeated psychostimulant treatment sensitizes IP3Rs and enhances NMDAR LTP (Ahn et al., 2010). As addictive drugs, including psychostimulants, stimulate corticosterone secretion (Armario, 2010), we next examined the role of GR signaling in psychostimulant-induced IP3R sensitization. Rats were treated with mifepristone (40 mg/kg, i.p.) 30 min prior to injection of cocaine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) or saline for 5 days. The effect of DHPG on burst IK(Ca) was significantly larger in cocaine-treated animals, which was not affected by mifepristone pretreatment (Figure 6C). Thus, GR signaling is not involved in psychostimulant-induced IP3R sensitization.
Repeated social stress promotes learning of cocaine-associated cues in a GR-dependent manner
Next, the effect of social defeat stress was tested on acquisition of cocaine CPP, in which animals learn to associate a particular context with drug reward. Acquisition of psychostimulant CPP is inhibited by mGluR1 or NMDAR antagonist in the VTA, while CPP expression is attenuated by NMDAR antagonist, but not by mGluR1 antagonist, in the VTA (Whitaker et al., 2013), supporting the potential role of NMDAR LTP in driving CPP. Rats underwent stress or control procedures for 5 days, then underwent 1-day CPP conditioning with cocaine (5 mg/kg, i.p.). It should be noted that a single psychostimulant treatment does not cause IP3R sensitization (Ahn et al., 2010; Whitaker et al., 2013). Stressed rats displayed robust preference for the cocaine-paired side after 1-day conditioning, while unhandled and handled controls showed small preference (Figure 7A). The 1-day CPP score was significantly larger in stressed rats compared to unhandled and handled controls (Figure 7B). Control rats developed significant cocaine CPP comparable to that observed in stressed rats after 3-day conditioning with the same dose of cocaine (Figure 7—figure supplement 1). These data suggest that repeated defeat experience promotes the rate of learning of cocaine-associated cues.
Finally, we asked whether GR signaling, which is necessary for IP3R sensitization, also plays a role in promoting cocaine CPP. As in the electrophysiology experiments, rats were treated with mifepristone (40 mg/kg, i.p.) or vehicle 30 min before each social defeat session. An additional group received mifepristone followed by control handling procedure. We found that mifepristone suppressed cocaine CPP in stressed rats to a level comparable to that observed in mifepristone-treated controls (Figure 7C and D). Therefore, GR activation during stress is required for CPP enhancement.
Discussion
Repeated stressful experience leads to metaplasticity, i.e., experience-dependent changes in the capacity of synapses to undergo activity-dependent plasticity (Abraham, 2008), in different brain areas (Kim and Diamond, 2002; Joels et al., 2006; Schwabe et al., 2012; Chattarji et al., 2015). The present study demonstrates that repeated social defeat facilitates the induction of LTP of NMDAR-mediated transmission in VTA dopamine neurons while causing no alterations in global NMDAR-mediated excitation or intrinsic firing activity. Importantly, socially defeated animals display enhanced acquisition of cocaine CPP, a form of Pavlovian conditioning that requires NMDAR-dependent bursting in the VTA (Zweifel et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2011; Whitaker et al., 2013).
Repeated social defeat results in increased sensitivity of IP3Rs, which serve as a coincidence detector of presynaptic activity (causing mGluR-dependent IP3 generation) and postsynaptic bursting (driving Ca2+ influx) during NMDAR LTP induction (Harnett et al., 2009). Inhibition of PKA completely reversed the increase in the potency of IP3, indicating the role of PKA-dependent phosphorylation in stress-induced IP3R sensitization, as has been suggested in previous studies demonstrating similar changes following repeated drug exposure (Ahn et al., 2010; Bernier et al., 2011). It is of note that dopamine neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta, in contrast to VTA neurons recorded in the present study, display significant PKA-dependent regulation of IP3-induced Ca2+ signaling and NMDAR LTP induction in control rats, which cannot be further enhanced by repeated drug exposure (Harnett et al., 2009; Ahn et al., 2010).
It has been reported that repeated social defeat (10 days) in mice leads to long-lasting (>4 weeks) alterations in gene expression and behavior (e.g., reduced social contact), with little recovery unless treated with antidepressants (Berton et al., 2006; Tsankova et al., 2006). In the present study, mGluR/IP3 action on burst-evoked Ca2+ signals remained elevated for 10–30 days following the 5-day defeat paradigm in rats, although displaying gradual decline during the 30-day stress-free period. It remains to be determined how this recovery is affected by different stress paradigms (e.g., duration or type/severity) and treatments following stress experience.
Mouse studies have also shown that individual animals display different susceptibility to repeated social defeat when assessed by the degree of social avoidance, which correlates with biochemical and physiological changes in the mesolimbic system (Krishnan et al., 2007; Cao et al., 2010). In particular, these studies observed hyperactivity of VTA dopamine neurons, assessed in vivo or ex vivo, associated with an increase in Ih, after 10-day defeat in susceptible mice. However, these parameters were not affected by 5-day social defeat in the current study conducted in rats.
How could repeated stress lead to increased PKA activity regulating IP3Rs in the VTA? Stress, including social defeat, promotes bursting in a subpopulation of VTA dopamine neurons, causing increased dopamine transients in the nucleus accumbens (Anstrom et al., 2009; Brischoux et al., 2009). Bursting also releases dopamine locally from the soma and dendrites, activating somatodendritic D2 autoreceptors (Beckstead et al., 2004). Chronic stimulation of Gi-coupled receptors, such as D2 receptors, is known to upregulate the cAMP-PKA pathway (Hyman et al., 2006), which may contribute to stress-induced IP3R sensitization. Interestingly, intra-VTA blockade of NMDARs during each social defeat episode, which would suppress dopamine neuron bursting, has been shown to prevent repeated stress-induced increases in cocaine self-administration (Covington et al., 2008).
GR signaling during defeat sessions is necessary for the enhancement of IP3R sensitivity. Stress-induced activation of the mesolimbic dopamine system is regulated by glucocorticoids (Marinelli and Piazza, 2002). Recent evidence implicates GRs expressed in projection areas, not in the VTA, in long-term glucocorticoid regulation of dopamine neuron activity (Ambroggi et al., 2009; Butts et al., 2011; Barik et al., 2013). Furthermore, glucocorticoids can also enhance synthesis of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), a major stress-related neuropeptide, and activation of CRF neurons in brain areas providing major CRF inputs to the VTA (Makino et al., 1994; Rodaros et al., 2007; Kolber et al., 2008). GR blockade may therefore attenuate CRF-induced excitation of dopamine neurons during stress (Kalivas et al., 1987; Ungless et al., 2003; Wanat et al., 2008; Holly et al., 2015). We found that GR activation alone is not sufficient for IP3R sensitization. Thus, the potential GR mechanisms described above may act to amplify glutamatergic input-driven bursting activity during stress episodes, likely further enhanced by stress-induced activation of noradrenergic inputs stimulating dopamine neurons via α1 adrenergic receptors (Grenhoff et al., 1995; Paladini et al., 2001; Morilak et al., 2005), thereby enabling large local dopamine release in the VTA. In this regard, it is interesting that repeated cocaine treatment was capable of causing similar enhancement of mGluR/IP3 action in a GR-independent manner. Dopamine levels in the VTA caused by cocaine alone are likely sufficient to induce D2-mediated upregulation of the cAMP-PKA pathway.
Increased IP3R sensitivity drives the enhancement of NMDAR LTP induction in socially defeated animals. Our recent study demonstrated the involvement of L-type Ca2+ channels (LTCCs) in NMDAR LTP (Degoulet et al., 2015). Although glucocorticoid-induced upregulation of LTCCs has been reported in the hippocampus and amygdala (Karst et al., 2002; Chameau et al., 2007), pharmacological activation of these channels does not enhance NMDAR LTP in dopamine neurons (Degoulet et al., 2015); thus changes in LTCCs are unlikely to play a role in LTP enhancement.
CPP experiments showed that repeated social defeat promoted acquisition of the preference for contextual cues paired with cocaine experience, in accordance with previous studies demonstrating enhanced drug CPP following a period of repeated stress (Kreibich et al., 2009; Burke et al., 2011). Blockade of the critical components regulating NMDAR LTP induction (i.e., NMDARs, group I mGluRs, PKA, or LTCCs) in the VTA during conditioning has been shown to suppress CPP acquisition (Harnett et al., 2009; Ahn et al., 2010; Whitaker et al., 2013; Degoulet et al., 2015). In the present study, systemic GR blockade during defeat episodes prevented both the enhancement of the LTP induction mechanism and that of cocaine CPP acquisition, consistent with the potential role of NMDAR plasticity in this form of Pavlovian learning. However, enhanced CPP acquisition observed in defeated rats may well be caused by an increase in the primary rewarding action of cocaine itself. The relative contribution of these two possibilities, i.e., enhanced learning mechanism vs. enhanced cocaine reward, remains to be determined.
It is well known that repeated stress impairs LTP of AMPAR-mediated transmission in the hippocampus (Foy et al., 1987; Shors et al., 1989), an effect that requires GR activation during stress (Xu et al., 1998). LTP is similarly impaired in the prefrontal cortex (Goldwater et al., 2009). By contrast, repeated stress leads to enhancement of AMPAR LTP in the lateral amygdala, which underlies Pavlovian fear conditioning driven by stressful/aversive stimuli (Rodriguez Manzanares et al., 2005; Suvrathan et al., 2014). Alterations in the function/expression of NMDARs are implicated in these forms of metaplasticity, as NMDARs play a key role in AMPAR LTP induction (Kim and Diamond, 2002; Chattarji et al., 2015). Here, we described a distinct form of stress-induced metaplasticity in the VTA, i.e., enhancement of mGluR/IP3-dependent NMDAR LTP, which may, at least in part, contribute to the enhanced drug reward-based Pavlovian learning. This may illuminate a key mechanism by which stressful experience increases vulnerability to addiction, a chronic relapsing disorder perpetuated by memories of drug-associated stimuli.
Materials and methods
Animals
Sprague-Dawley rats (Harlan Laboratories, Houston, Texas) were housed in groups of 2–3 on a 12 hr light/dark cycle with food and water available ad libitum. All procedures were approved by the University of Texas Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Resident-intruder social defeat paradigm
Request a detailed protocolTwelve week-old male resident rats were vasectomized and pair-housed with 6 week-old females. Residents (used for ~8–10 months) were screened for aggression (biting or pinning within 1 min) by introducing a male intruder to the home cage. Intruders and controls were young males (4–5 weeks old at the beginning) housed in groups of 2–3. For defeat sessions, residents and intruders were taken to a darkened procedure room at the end of the dark cycle. Intruders were introduced to residents’ home cages after removing females. Following 5 min of direct contact, a perforated Plexiglass barrier was inserted for 25 min to allow sensory contact. For repeated defeat, intruders underwent one session daily with a novel resident. Handled controls were taken to a darkened procedure room and placed in novel cages for 30 min. Unhandled controls remained undisturbed in the colony. Intruders and controls were housed separately.
In vivo drug treatments
Request a detailed protocolAll drug and vehicle solutions were administered via i.p. injections (1 ml/kg). Mifepristone and corticosterone (both from Tocris Bioscience, Ellisville, Missouri) were dissolved in 30% propylene glycol plus 1% Tween-20 in 0.9% saline. Cocaine-HCl (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri) was dissolved in 0.9% saline.
Electrophysiology
Request a detailed protocolMidbrain slices were prepared and recordings were made in the lateral VTA located 50–150 μm from the medial border of the medial terminal nucleus of the accessory optic tract, as in our previous studies (Ahn et al., 2010; Whitaker et al., 2013; Degoulet et al., 2015). Tyrosine hydroxylase-positive neurons in this area (i.e., lateral part of the parabrachial pigmented nucleus) largely project to the ventrolateral striatum (Ikemoto, 2007) and show little VGluT2 coexpression (Trudeau et al., 2014). Putative dopamine neurons in the lateral VTA were identified by spontaneous firing of broad APs (>1.2 ms) at 1–5 Hz in cell-attached configuration and large Ih currents (>200 pA; evoked by a 1.5 s hyperpolarizing step of 50 mV) in whole-cell configuration (Ford et al., 2006; Lammel et al., 2008; Margolis et al., 2008). Cells were voltage-clamped at –62 mV (corrected for –7 mV liquid junction potential).
A 2 ms depolarizing pulse of 55 mV was used to elicit an unclamped AP. For bursts, 5 APs were evoked at 20 Hz. The time integral of the outward tail current, termed IK(Ca) (calculated after removing the 20 ms window following each depolarizing pulse; expressed in pC), was used as a readout of AP-evoked Ca2+ transients, as it is eliminated by TTX and also by apamin, a blocker of Ca2+-activated SK channels (Cui et al., 2007).
Flash photolysis
Request a detailed protocolCells were loaded with caged IP3 (50–400 µM; generous gift from Dr. Kamran Khodakhah) through the recording pipette. A UV flash (~1 ms) was applied with a xenon arc lamp driven by a photolysis system (Cairn Research, Faversham, UK). The UV flash was focused through a 60× objective onto a ~350 μm area surrounding the recorded neuron. Photolysis of caged compounds is proportional to the UV flash intensity; therefore, the concentration of IP3 was defined as the product of caged IP3 concentration in the pipette (µM) and flash intensity (µJ) measured at the focal plane of the objective (expressed in µM·µJ).
NMDAR LTP experiments
Request a detailed protocolSynaptic stimuli were delivered with a bipolar tungsten electrode placed ~50–100 μm rostral to the recorded neuron. To isolate NMDAR EPSCs, recordings were performed in DNQX (10 µM), picrotoxin (100 µM), CGP54626 (50 nM), and sulpiride (100 nM) to block AMPA/kainate, GABAA, GABAB, and D2 dopamine receptors, and in glycine (20 µM) and low Mg2+ (0.1 mM) to enhance NMDAR activation. NMDAR EPSCs were monitored every 20 s. The LTP induction protocol consisted of photolytic application of IP3 (250 µM·µJ) 50 ms prior to the simultaneous delivery of synaptic stimulation (20 stimuli at 50 Hz) and a burst (5 APs at 20 Hz), repeated 10 times every 20 s. LTP magnitude was determined by comparing the average EPSC amplitude 30 min post-induction with the average EPSC amplitude pre-induction (each from a 5 min window).
Place conditioning
Request a detailed protocolA CPP box (Med Associates, St. Albans, Vermont) consisting of two distinct compartments separated by a small middle chamber was used for conditioning. One compartment had a mesh floor with white walls, while the other had a grid floor with black walls. A discrete cue (painted ceramic weight) was placed in the rear corner of each compartment (black one in the white wall side, white one in the black wall side; Figure 7—figure supplement 3) for further differentiation. One day after undergoing repeated stress or control procedures, rats were pretested for initial side preference by exploring the entire CPP box for 15 min. The percentage of time spent in each compartment was determined after excluding the time spent in the middle chamber. Rats with initial side preference >60% were excluded. Starting the next day, rats were subjected to 1-day or 3-day conditioning, in which they were given a saline injection in the morning and confined to one compartment, then in the afternoon given cocaine (5 mg/kg) and confined to the other compartment (10 min each). Compartment assignment was counterbalanced such that animals had, on average, ~50% initial preference for the cocaine-paired side. A 15 min posttest was performed 1 day after the last conditioning session. The CPP score was determined by subtracting the preference for the cocaine-paired side during pretest from that during posttest. The experimenter performing CPP experiments was blind to animal treatments.
Data analysis
Request a detailed protocolData are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by Student's t-test or ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test. Normality of data distribution was confirmed by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The difference was considered significant at p<0.05.
References
-
Metaplasticity: tuning synapses and networks for plasticityNature Reviews Neuroscience 9:387.https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2356
-
Activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis by addictive drugs: different pathways, common outcomeTrends in Pharmacological Sciences 31:318–325.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2010.04.005
-
Dissecting components of reward: 'liking', 'wanting', and learningCurrent Opinion in Pharmacology 9:65–73.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2008.12.014
-
Phasic excitation of dopamine neurons in ventral VTA by noxious stimuliProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106:4894–4899.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0811507106
-
Glucocorticoid receptors in the prefrontal cortex regulate stress-evoked dopamine efflux and aspects of executive functionProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108:18459–18464.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1111746108
-
Neighborhood matters: divergent patterns of stress-induced plasticity across the brainNature Neuroscience 18:1364–1375.https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4115
-
Ghrelin mediates stress-induced food-reward behavior in miceThe Journal of Clinical Investigation 121:2684–2692.https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI57660
-
Dopamine dependency for acquisition and performance of Pavlovian conditioned responseProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111:2764–2769.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1400332111
-
Drugs of abuse and stress increase the expression of GluR1 and NMDAR1 glutamate receptor subunits in the rat ventral tegmental area: common adaptations among cross-sensitizing agentsJournal of Neuroscience 16:274–282.
-
Properties and opioid inhibition of mesolimbic dopamine neurons vary according to target locationJournal of Neuroscience 26:2788–2797.https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4331-05.2006
-
Behavioral stress impairs long-term potentiation in rodent hippocampusBehavioral and Neural Biology 48:138–149.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-1047(87)90664-9
-
Alpha 1-adrenergic effects on dopamine neurons recorded intracellularly in the rat midbrain sliceThe European Journal of Neuroscience 7:1707–1713.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.1995.tb00692.x
-
Group I metabotropic glutamate receptors mediate an inward current in rat substantia nigra dopamine neurons that is independent from calcium mobilizationJournal of Neurophysiology 82:1974–1981.
-
Neural mechanisms of addiction: the role of reward-related learning and memoryAnnual Review of Neuroscience 29:565–598.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.113009
-
Learning under stress: how does it work?Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10:152–158.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.02.002
-
Neurochemical and behavioral effects of corticotropin-releasing factor in the ventral tegmental area of the ratThe Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 242:757–763.
-
Glucocorticoids alter calcium conductances and calcium channel subunit expression in basolateral amygdala neuronsThe European Journal of Neuroscience 16:1083–1089.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.02172.x
-
The stressed hippocampus, synaptic plasticity and lost memoriesNature Reviews. Neuroscience 3:453–462.https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn849
-
Central amygdala glucocorticoid receptor action promotes fear-associated CRH activation and conditioningProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105:12004–12009.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803216105
-
Stress-induced potentiation of cocaine reward: a role for CRF R1 and CREBNeuropsychopharmacology 34:2609–2617.https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2009.91
-
Interaction between glucocorticoid hormones, stress and psychostimulant drugsThe European Journal of Neuroscience 16:387–394.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.02089.x
-
Chronic stress induces impairment of spatial working memory because of prefrontal dopaminergic dysfunctionThe Journal of Neuroscience 20:1568–1574.
-
Role of brain norepinephrine in the behavioral response to stressProgress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry 29:1214–1224.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2005.08.007
-
I(h) channels contribute to the different functional properties of identified dopaminergic subpopulations in the midbrainThe Journal of Neuroscience 22:1290–1302.
-
Burst firing in midbrain dopaminergic neuronsBrain Research. Brain Research Reviews 25:312–334.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0173(97)00039-8
-
Amphetamine selectively blocks inhibitory glutamate transmission in dopamine neuronsNature Neuroscience 4:275–281.https://doi.org/10.1038/85124
-
Stress effects on memory: an update and integrationNeuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 36:1740–1749.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.07.002
-
Chronic stress, drug use, and vulnerability to addictionAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1141:105–130.https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1441.030
-
Stress enhances fear by forming new synapses with greater capacity for long-term potentiation in the amygdalaPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 369:20130151.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0151
-
The multilingual nature of dopamine neuronsProgress in Brain Research 211:141–164.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63425-2.00006-4
-
Different stressors produce excitation or inhibition of mesolimbic dopamine neuron activity: response alteration by stress pre-exposureThe European Journal of Neuroscience 35:1312–1321.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08038.x
-
Regulation of single inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor channel activity by protein kinase A phosphorylationThe Journal of Physiology 586:3577–3596.https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2008.152314
-
Glucocorticoid receptor and protein/RNA synthesis-dependent mechanisms underlie the control of synaptic plasticity by stressProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 95:3204–3208.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.6.3204
-
Disruption of NMDAR-dependent burst firing by dopamine neurons provides selective assessment of phasic dopamine-dependent behaviorProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106:7281–7288.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0813415106
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
National Institutes of Health (AA007471)
- Jason B Cook
National Institutes of Health (DA015687)
- Hitoshi Morikawa
National Institutes of Health (AA015521)
- Hitoshi Morikawa
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by NIH grants DA015687 and AA015521. JBC was supported by NIH training grant AA007471. We thank Dr. Kamran Khodakhah for the generous gift of caged IP3 made in his lab at Albert Einstein College of Medicine. We also thank Dr. Michela Marinelli for comments on this manuscript and Dr. Kevin Lominac and Nhi Le for assistance with CPP experiment.
Ethics
Animal experimentation: All animal procedures were approved by the University of Texas Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Protocol ID: AUP-2013-00177).
Copyright
© 2016, Stelly et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 2,341
- views
-
- 448
- downloads
-
- 42
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
The relation between neural activity and behaviorally relevant variables is at the heart of neuroscience research. When strong, this relation is termed a neural representation. There is increasing evidence, however, for partial dissociations between activity in an area and relevant external variables. While many explanations have been proposed, a theoretical framework for the relationship between external and internal variables is lacking. Here, we utilize recurrent neural networks (RNNs) to explore the question of when and how neural dynamics and the network’s output are related from a geometrical point of view. We find that training RNNs can lead to two dynamical regimes: dynamics can either be aligned with the directions that generate output variables, or oblique to them. We show that the choice of readout weight magnitude before training can serve as a control knob between the regimes, similar to recent findings in feedforward networks. These regimes are functionally distinct. Oblique networks are more heterogeneous and suppress noise in their output directions. They are furthermore more robust to perturbations along the output directions. Crucially, the oblique regime is specific to recurrent (but not feedforward) networks, arising from dynamical stability considerations. Finally, we show that tendencies toward the aligned or the oblique regime can be dissociated in neural recordings. Altogether, our results open a new perspective for interpreting neural activity by relating network dynamics and their output.
-
- Neuroscience
In this paper, we provide an overview and analysis of the BRAIN Initiative data-sharing ecosystem. First, we compare and contrast the characteristics of the seven BRAIN Initiative data archives germane to data sharing and reuse, namely data submission and access procedures and aspects of interoperability. Second, we discuss challenges, benefits, and future opportunities, focusing on issues largely specific to sharing human data and drawing on N = 34 interviews with diverse stakeholders. The BRAIN Initiative-funded archive ecosystem faces interoperability and data stewardship challenges, such as achieving and maintaining interoperability of data and archives and harmonizing research participants’ informed consents for tiers of access for human data across multiple archives. Yet, a benefit of this distributed archive ecosystem is the ability of more specialized archives to adapt to the needs of particular research communities. Finally, the multiple archives offer ample raw material for network evolution in response to the needs of neuroscientists over time. Our first objective in this paper is to provide a guide to the BRAIN Initiative data-sharing ecosystem for readers interested in sharing and reusing neuroscience data. Second, our analysis supports the development of empirically informed policy and practice aimed at making neuroscience data more findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable.