Studies in Drosophila revealed the segregation of core PCP proteins to opposite sides of epithelial cells (Goodrich and Strutt, 2011; Peng and Axelrod, 2012). This mutually exclusive localization has been preserved in vertebrate tissues and is thought to be essential for multiple morphogenetic processes, including gastrulation and neurulation (Gray et al., 2011; Sokol, 2015; Tada and Heisenberg, 2012; Wallingford, 2012). Polarity cues causing the segregation of PCP complexes remain largely unknown (McNeill, 2010; Wang and Nathans, 2007). Wnt proteins have been proposed as candidates for these cues due to their involvement in many PCP-dependent processes (Gao et al., 2011; Mahaffey et al., 2013; Ossipova et al., 2015b; Qian et al., 2007; Wu et al., 2013; Yang and Mlodzik, 2015). However, whether vertebrate Wnt ligands play a permissive or instructive role in PCP remains controversial. While Wnt proteins can instruct PCP in the Drosophila wing and orient myocytes in chick somites (Gros et al., 2009; Matis et al., 2014; Wu et al., 2013), Wnt11 has been argued to act permissively in convergent extension during zebrafish gastrulation (Heisenberg et al., 2000).

The Xenopus larval epidermis contains multiciliated cells (MCCs) that are coordinately aligned to generate a unidirectional fluid flow (Konig and Hausen, 1993; Werner and Mitchell, 2012). This alignment is controlled by PCP proteins during gastrulation and neurulation (Butler and Wallingford, 2015; Mitchell et al., 2009; Yasunaga et al., 2011). Nevertheless, it has been challenging to document core PCP protein polarization in the ectoderm before late neurula stages (Butler and Wallingford, 2015; Chien et al., 2015; Ciruna et al., 2006; Ossipova et al., 2015b). In this study, we demonstrate that ectodermal PCP visualized by exogenous Prickle3 (Pk3)/Vangl2 complex in the epidermis and endogenous Vangl2 in the neuroectoderm can be instructed by Wnt ligands during gastrulation.

To establish early PCP markers, we examined the subcellular localization of GFP-tagged Pk3, one of the core PCP proteins predominantly expressed in the epidermal ectoderm (Ossipova et al., 2015a). When supplied to the ectodermal tissue by RNA microinjection, GFP-Pk3 was homogeneously distributed in the cytoplasm and at the cell junctions (Figure 1A,B). We hypothesized that Pk3 is not polarized because another PCP component is limiting. Given that Drosophila Prickle physically associates with Van Gogh (Bastock et al., 2003; Jenny et al., 2003), we suspected that the limiting factor is a Van Gogh homologue. Indeed, when GFP-Pk3 was coexpressed with Vangl2, its binding partner (Chu et al., 2016), epidermal PCP became evident by the beginning of neurulation with GFP fluorescence enriched at the anterior cell boundary (Figure 1C). In early gastrula ectoderm, GFP-Pk3 was visible as multiple membrane patches (Figure 1D–D") but, at later stages, formed a single Vangl2-positive crescent- or chevron-shaped domain near the anterior cell vertex, i. e. the junction of more than two cells, with a ventral bias (Figure 1E–H). The anterior localization of GFP-Pk3 was confirmed by the analysis of mosaically-expressing cell clones (Figure 1E,F). This distribution might reflect biased stabilization of PCP proteins noted in a recent study (Chien et al., 2015). At the doses used, the exogenous PCP complexes did not cause any visible morphological defects. These findings establish the Pk3/Vangl2 complex as a sensor that allows direct visualization of PCP in Xenopus epidermal ectoderm by the end of gastrulation. This anteroposterior PCP is similar to the one observed in the Xenopus neural plate (Ossipova et al., 2015b) and other vertebrate embryonic tissues (Antic et al., 2010; Borovina et al., 2010; Ciruna et al., 2006; Davey et al., 2016; Devenport and Fuchs, 2008; Hashimoto et al., 2010; Nishimura et al., 2012; Roszko et al., 2015; Yin et al., 2008).

Figure 1 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

To further analyze the interaction between Pk3 and Vangl2 that is essential for their polarization, we assessed which domain is responsible for Pk3 polarity. We generated a series of Pk3 deletion mutants and examined their subcellular localization in the presence of Vangl2 (Figure 1—figure supplement 1). Similar to full-length Pk3, the mutated proteins did not polarize in the absence of Vangl2 (data not shown). While the N terminus of Pk3 was dispensable for its polarization, the C-terminal domain was required for Pk3 membrane recruitment, in agreement with its ability to bind Vangl2 (Chu et al., 2016). By contrast, Pk3 C-terminus (Pk3-C) was recruited to the plasma membrane but failed to polarize, consistent with the previous study of Drosophila Prickle (Jenny et al., 2003). A Pk3 mutant lacking the LIM domains (Pk3ΔLIM) was also unable to polarize despite being associated with the cell membrane. Of note, deletion of the CAAX motif, previously implicated in Drosophila Prickle polarization and stability (Lin and Gubb, 2009; Strutt et al., 2013), did not interfere with Pk3 polarization. Removal of the PET domain had a partial effect (Figure 1—figure supplement 1A,B), contrary to the data obtained for Prickle2 (Butler and Wallingford, 2015). These data show that the C-terminus is both necessary and sufficient for Vangl2-dependent membrane recruitment of Pk3, which is a prerequisite for its polarization. Notably, Pk3-C overexpression inhibited the incorporation of MCCs into the superficial epidermal cell layer at tailbud stages (data not shown), confirming the involvement of Pk3 in radial cell intercalation (Ossipova et al., 2015a).

Having established the utility of Pk3/Vangl2 complex as a polarity sensor, we next wanted to determine a role of Wnt signaling in ectodermal PCP. Since several Wnt ligands, including Wnt3a, Wnt5a and Wnt11b, are expressed in Xenopus early embryos (Hikasa and Sokol, 2013; Kiecker and Niehrs, 2001; Ku and Melton, 1993; Moon et al., 1993), we monitored GFP-Pk3/Vangl2 complex polarization in embryos, in which Wnt signaling was downregulated. Expression of the extracellular domain of Fz8 (ECD8), a potent Wnt inhibitor (Itoh and Sokol, 1999), disrupted Pk3/Vangl2 complex polarization in 85% of injected embryos (n = 41), whereas only 40% of control embryos lacked Pk3/Vangl2 polarity (n = 29) (Figure 2—figure supplement 1). Since ECD8 inhibits the majority of Wnt proteins (Itoh and Sokol, 1999), we utilized more selective Wnt antagonists, DN-Wnt11 and the dominant negative ROR2 receptor Ror2-TM, both of which specifically interfere with Wnt5- and Wnt11-like signals (Bai et al., 2014; Hikasa et al., 2002; Oishi et al., 2003; Tada and Smith, 2000). The majority of cells expressing DN-Wnt11 and Ror2-TM lacked GFP-Pk3 polarity in 89% (n= 28) and 88% (n= 25) of injected embryos, respectively (Figure 2A–C). This loss of polarity was unlikely caused by Pk3 and Vangl2 degradation, judged by immunoblotting (Figure 2D). Together, these experiments suggest that Wnt5- and/or Wnt11-like proteins function to establish PCP in early ectoderm.

Figure 2 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

We next studied whether Wnt5a can induce ectopic Pk3 polarization in gastrula ectoderm. RNAs encoding GFP-Pk3 and Vangl2 were injected into one ventral animal blastomere of the 32-cell embryo, whereas Wnt5a RNA was coinjected with TurboFP635 (TFP) RNA as a tracer into the adjacent blastomere across the midline (Figure 3A,B,“L-R”). At stage 11.5, GFP-Pk3 patches formed at the cell membrane without apparent planar polarity in control embryos (Figure 3C). Remarkably, Wnt5a promoted early formation of polarized GFP-Pk3/Vangl2 crescents that were oriented away from the Wnt-expressing clone in 73% of injected embryos (Figure 3D,I,J, n = 40). These data demonstrate that Wnt5a can induce an exogenous PCP axis in non-polarized ectoderm.

Figure 3 with 2 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

To further assess whether Pk3 polarization is defined by the location of the Wnt source, we generated Wnt5a-expressing clones to the anterior of the Pk3/Vangl2-expressing clone (Figure 3A,E, “A-P”). By comparing the effects of Wnt5a at the lateral and anterior locations, we found that the majority of GFP-Pk3 crescents were oriented away from the Wnt5a-expressing clone regardless of its position in the ectoderm (Figure 3B-G,I-L). Moreover, this effect of Wnt5a persisted until neurula stages, leading to reversal of Pk3 orientation in 77% of embryos expressing Wnt5a (Figure 3H,M,N, n = 30). Together, these findings support the instructive role of Wnt5a in ectodermal PCP.

To find out whether the observed effect on PCP is specific to Wnt5a or can be mediated by other Wnt ligands, we evaluated the ability of Wnt3a, Wnt11 and Wnt11b, known to be expressed in the early embryo, to modulate PCP in a similar assay (Figure 4A). Wnt3a had little effect on GFP-Pk3 polarity (Figure 4B,E,F). By contrast, Wnt11 and Wnt11b behaved similarly to Wnt5a by orienting the Pk3/Vangl2 crescents away from the Wnt-expressing clone (Figure 4C–F). GFP-Pk3 was reoriented in 57%, 36% and 36% of the examined embryos expressing Wnt5a, Wnt11, or Wnt11b RNA, respectively (n >10). These results suggest that PCP can be instructed by these Wnt ligands, but less so by Wnt3a that acts preferentially through the β-catenin-dependent pathway (Kikuchi et al., 2009; Semenov et al., 2007).

Figure 4

Download asset Open asset

We next attempted to find an endogenous marker or morphological structure that would provide additional evidence of early ectodermal PCP manifested by the exogenous GFP-Pk3/Vangl2 complex. Since microtubules play a critical role in PCP (Chien et al., 2015; Matis et al., 2014; Vladar et al., 2012), we examined the microtubule orientation at midgastrula stages by monitoring the movement of CLIP-170-GFP and EB1-GFP, two microtubule plus-end-binding proteins (Akhmanova and Steinmetz, 2008). In a similar experimental setting (Figure 4A), control embryos showed a weak alignment of CLIP170-GFP traces along the TFP clone border (Figure 3—figure supplement 1, Video 1). A slight reorientation of CLIP170-GFP traces was detected towards the border of the Wnt5a clone, yet the difference was insignificant (Figure 3—figure supplement 1). In addition, neither live imaging of EB1-GFP nor analysis of stable microtubules visualized by the microtubule-binding protein Ensconsin-GFP revealed a significant effect of Wnt5a on microtubule alignment (data not shown). Thus, Wnt signaling might regulate core PCP proteins without reorganizing microtubules in this system, as opposed to the Drosophila wing (Matis et al., 2014). Similarly, there was no detectable bias in the position of centrosomes marked by γ-tubulin staining (data not shown). Since core PCP proteins likely represent an early response to Wnt signaling, morphological manifestations of PCP may not be fully apparent until later developmental stages.

Video 1

Download asset

To demonstrate the effect of Wnts on an endogenous PCP marker, we evaluated Vangl2 that is polarized in neuroectoderm but is poorly detectable in the epidermis (Ossipova et al., 2015b). Compared to its anterior polarization in control neuroectodermal cells, Vangl2 was reoriented away from a source of Wnt5a (Figure 5A–D). Such effect was observed in 90% of injected embryos (n = 46), but it was only visible in cells located one to four cell diameters away from the border of the Wnt5a clone. This finding supports our conclusions obtained for ectopic Pk3/Vangl2 complexes and suggests that the anterior polarization of Vangl2 results from endogenous Wnt proteins secreted from the posterior end of the embryo. To elucidate which Wnt ligands might be responsible, we knocked down Wnt5a and Wnt11b, two non-canonical Wnt ligands expressed at the posterior region of gastrula embryos (Ku and Melton, 1993; Moon et al., 1993), using previously characterized morpholino oligonucleotides (Pandur et al., 2002; Schambony and Wedlich, 2007). Whereas Vangl2 was accumulated at the anterior borders of cells in control embryos (87%, n = 24) and Wnt5a-depleted embryos (90%, n = 28), this polarity was retained only in 59% of embryos depleted of Wnt11b (n = 32) (Figure 5E,F and data not shown). These observations suggest the involvement of Wnt11b in anteroposterior PCP, consistent with its proposed activity in the gastrocoel roof plate (Walentek et al., 2013). Taken together, our gain- and loss-of-function assays support the idea that Wnt11b acts from the posterior region to establish an anteroposterior PCP across many cell diameters. Nevertheless, since the morpholino injection into vegetal blastomeres might partially interfere with the local production of Wnt11b in the neural plate, currently we cannot discriminate between long-range diffusion and local effects of Wnt proteins propagated by a signal relay system or cell division (Alexandre et al., 2014; Farin et al., 2016; Zecca et al., 1996).

Figure 5

Download asset Open asset

Our findings support a function of Wnt5- and/or Wnt11-like proteins as biochemical polarity cues. With the demonstration that Frizzled proteins function as Wnt receptors (Bhanot et al., 1996), Wnt ligands were proposed to control PCP (Adler et al., 1997), yet no conclusion has been reached regarding the underlying mechanism (Gros et al., 2009; Lawrence et al., 2002; Wu et al., 2013). Wnt signaling may directly affect core PCP proteins by regulating PCP protein post-translational modifications (Gao et al., 2011) or stability (Chien et al., 2015; Strutt et al., 2011). Wnt ligands were also proposed to function in PCP by blocking the Frizzled-Van Gogh interaction (Wu and Mlodzik, 2008). The latter explanation is less likely, because ECD8, expected to compete with Frizzled for Vangl2 binding, interfered with Pk3 polarization, instead of instructing it similar to Wnt5a (Figure 2—figure supplement 1, Figure 3—figure supplement 2). Alternatively, given the role of Wnt signaling in gastrulation (Habas et al., 2001), Wnt proteins might generate mechanical strains to modulate PCP (Aigouy et al., 2010; Chien et al., 2015; Heisenberg and Bellaiche, 2013). While the effect of mechanical forces on PCP is thought to require microtubule reorganization (Chien et al., 2015), we did not detect a significant change of microtubule orientation in response to Wnt5a. Although our results demonstrate that Wnt proteins can instruct Pk3 polarization in our specific experimental conditions, the immediate morphological manifestations of this activity remain obscure and whether such function involves mechanical or chemical signaling should be established by future studies.

Our observations provide support to the instructive role of Wnt proteins in PCP. By contrast, ubiquitously expressed Wnt11 can partially rescue zebrafish embryos with a mutation in the wnt11 gene (Heisenberg et al., 2000). Whereas this finding suggests a permissive effect, lack of complete rescue may be also explained by the absence of proper instructions. At present, it is still unclear whether the proposed instructive mechanism operates to direct PCP during normal embryonic development.

1. 1. Adler PN
   2. Krasnow RE
   3. Liu J

   (1997) Tissue polarity points from cells that have higher Frizzled levels towards cells that have lower Frizzled levels

   Current Biology 7:940–949.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00413-1

   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Aigouy B
   2. Farhadifar R
   3. Staple DB
   4. Sagner A
   5. Röper JC
   6. Jülicher F
   7. Eaton S

   (2010) Cell flow reorients the axis of planar polarity in the wing epithelium of Drosophila

   Cell 142:773–786.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.07.042

   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Akhmanova A
   2. Steinmetz MO

   (2008) Tracking the ends: a dynamic protein network controls the fate of microtubule tips

   Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 9:309–322.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2369

   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Alexandre C
   2. Baena-Lopez A
   3. Vincent JP

   (2014) Patterning and growth control by membrane-tethered Wingless

   Nature 505:180–185.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12879

   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Antic D
   2. Stubbs JL
   3. Suyama K
   4. Kintner C
   5. Scott MP
   6. Axelrod JD

   (2010) Planar cell polarity enables posterior localization of nodal cilia and left-right axis determination during mouse and Xenopus embryogenesis

   PLoS One 5:e8999.

   https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008999

   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Bai Y
   2. Tan X
   3. Zhang H
   4. Liu C
   5. Zhao B
   6. Li Y
   7. Lu L
   8. Liu Y
   9. Zhou J

   (2014) Ror2 receptor mediates Wnt11 ligand signaling and affects convergence and extension movements in zebrafish

   Journal of Biological Chemistry 289:20664–20676.

   https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M114.586099

   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Bastock R
   2. Strutt H
   3. Strutt D

   (2003) Strabismus is asymmetrically localised and binds to Prickle and Dishevelled during Drosophila planar polarity patterning

   Development 130:3007–3014.

   https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.00526

   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Bhanot P
   2. Brink M
   3. Samos CH
   4. Hsieh JC
   5. Wang Y
   6. Macke JP
   7. Andrew D
   8. Nathans J
   9. Nusse R

   (1996) A new member of the frizzled family from Drosophila functions as a Wingless receptor

   Nature 382:225–230.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/382225a0

   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Borovina A
   2. Superina S
   3. Voskas D
   4. Ciruna B

   (2010) Vangl2 directs the posterior tilting and asymmetric localization of motile primary cilia

   Nature Cell Biology 12:407–412.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2042

   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Butler MT
    2. Wallingford JB

    (2015) Control of vertebrate core planar cell polarity protein localization and dynamics by Prickle 2

    Development 142:3429–3439.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.121384

    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Chien YH
    2. Keller R
    3. Kintner C
    4. Shook DR

    (2015) Mechanical strain determines the axis of planar polarity in ciliated epithelia

    Current Biology 25:2774–2784.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.09.015

    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Chu CW
    2. Ossipova O
    3. Ioannou A
    4. Sokol SY

    (2016) Prickle3 synergizes with Wtip to regulate basal body organization and cilia growth

    Scientific Reports 6:24104.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/srep24104

    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Ciruna B
    2. Jenny A
    3. Lee D
    4. Mlodzik M
    5. Schier AF

    (2006) Planar cell polarity signalling couples cell division and morphogenesis during neurulation

    Nature 439:220–224.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04375

    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Davey CF
    2. Mathewson AW
    3. Moens CB

    (2016) PCP signaling between migrating neurons and their planar-polarized neuroepithelial environment controls filopodial dynamics and directional migration

    PLoS Genetics 12:e1005934.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005934

    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Devenport D
    2. Fuchs E

    (2008) Planar polarization in embryonic epidermis orchestrates global asymmetric morphogenesis of hair follicles

    Nature Cell Biology 10:1257–1268.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1784

    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Dollar GL
    2. Weber U
    3. Mlodzik M
    4. Sokol SY

    (2005) Regulation of lethal giant larvae by dishevelled

    Nature 437:1376–1380.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04116

    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Farin HF
    2. Jordens I
    3. Mosa MH
    4. Basak O
    5. Korving J
    6. Tauriello DV
    7. de Punder K
    8. Angers S
    9. Peters PJ
    10. Maurice MM
    11. Clevers H

    (2016) Visualization of a short-range Wnt gradient in the intestinal stem-cell niche

    Nature 530:340–343.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16937

    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Gao B
    2. Song H
    3. Bishop K
    4. Elliot G
    5. Garrett L
    6. English MA
    7. Andre P
    8. Robinson J
    9. Sood R
    10. Minami Y
    11. Economides AN
    12. Yang Y

    (2011) Wnt signaling gradients establish planar cell polarity by inducing Vangl2 phosphorylation through Ror2

    Developmental Cell 20:163–176.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2011.01.001

    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Garriock RJ
    2. D'Agostino SL
    3. Pilcher KC
    4. Krieg PA

    (2005) Wnt11-R, a protein closely related to mammalian Wnt11, is required for heart morphogenesis in Xenopus

    Developmental Biology 279:179–192.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.12.013

    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Goodrich LV
    2. Strutt D

    (2011) Principles of planar polarity in animal development

    Development 138:1877–1892.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.054080

    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Gray RS
    2. Roszko I
    3. Solnica-Krezel L

    (2011) Planar cell polarity: coordinating morphogenetic cell behaviors with embryonic polarity

    Developmental Cell 21:120–133.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2011.06.011

    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Gros J
    2. Serralbo O
    3. Marcelle C

    (2009) WNT11 acts as a directional cue to organize the elongation of early muscle fibres

    Nature 457:589–593.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07564

    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Habas R
    2. Kato Y
    3. He X

    (2001) Wnt/Frizzled activation of Rho regulates vertebrate gastrulation and requires a novel Formin homology protein Daam1

    Cell 107:843–854.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00614-6

    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Hashimoto M
    2. Shinohara K
    3. Wang J
    4. Ikeuchi S
    5. Yoshiba S
    6. Meno C
    7. Nonaka S
    8. Takada S
    9. Hatta K
    10. Wynshaw-Boris A
    11. Hamada H

    (2010) Planar polarization of node cells determines the rotational axis of node cilia

    Nature Cell Biology 12:170–176.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2020

    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Heisenberg CP
    2. Bellaïche Y

    (2013) Forces in tissue morphogenesis and patterning

    Cell 153:948–962.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.008

    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Heisenberg CP
    2. Tada M
    3. Rauch GJ
    4. Saúde L
    5. Concha ML
    6. Geisler R
    7. Stemple DL
    8. Smith JC
    9. Wilson SW

    (2000) Silberblick/Wnt11 mediates convergent extension movements during zebrafish gastrulation

    Nature 405:76–81.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/35011068

    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Hikasa H
    2. Shibata M
    3. Hiratani I
    4. Taira M

    (2002)

    The Xenopus receptor tyrosine kinase Xror2 modulates morphogenetic movements of the axial mesoderm and neuroectoderm via Wnt signaling

    Development 129:5227–5239.

    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Hikasa H
    2. Sokol SY

    (2013) Wnt signaling in vertebrate axis specification

    Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 5:a007955.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a007955

    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Itoh K
    2. Krupnik VE
    3. Sokol SY

    (1998) Axis determination in Xenopus involves biochemical interactions of axin, glycogen synthase kinase 3 and beta-catenin

    Current Biology 8:591–594.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(98)70229-5

    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Itoh K
    2. Sokol SY

    (1999) Axis determination by inhibition of Wnt signaling in Xenopus

    Genes & Development 13:2328–2336.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.13.17.2328

    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Jenny A
    2. Darken RS
    3. Wilson PA
    4. Mlodzik M

    (2003) Prickle and Strabismus form a functional complex to generate a correct axis during planar cell polarity signaling

    The EMBO Journal 22:4409–4420.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/cdg424

    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Kiecker C
    2. Niehrs C

    (2001)

    A morphogen gradient of Wnt/beta-catenin signalling regulates anteroposterior neural patterning in Xenopus

    Development 128:4189–4201.

    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Kikuchi A
    2. Yamamoto H
    3. Sato A

    (2009) Selective activation mechanisms of Wnt signaling pathways

    Trends in Cell Biology 19:119–129.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2009.01.003

    • Google Scholar
34. 1. König G
    2. Hausen P

    (1993) Planar polarity in the ciliated epidermis of Xenopus embryos

    Developmental Biology 160:355–368.

    https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.1993.1312

    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Ku M
    2. Melton DA

    (1993)

    Xwnt-11: a maternally expressed Xenopus wnt gene

    Development 119:1161–1173.

    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Lawrence PA
    2. Casal J
    3. Struhl G

    (2002)

    Towards a model of the organisation of planar polarity and pattern in the Drosophila abdomen

    Development 129:2749–2760.

    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Lin YY
    2. Gubb D

    (2009) Molecular dissection of Drosophila Prickle isoforms distinguishes their essential and overlapping roles in planar cell polarity

    Developmental Biology 325:386–399.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.10.042

    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Mahaffey JP
    2. Grego-Bessa J
    3. Liem KF
    4. Anderson KV

    (2013) Cofilin and Vangl2 cooperate in the initiation of planar cell polarity in the mouse embryo

    Development 140:1262–1271.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.085316

    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Matis M
    2. Russler-Germain DA
    3. Hu Q
    4. Tomlin CJ
    5. Axelrod JD

    (2014) Microtubules provide directional information for core PCP function

    eLife 3:e02893.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02893

    • Google Scholar
40. 1. McNeill H

    (2010) Planar cell polarity: keeping hairs straight is not so simple

    Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 2:a003376.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a003376

    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Mitchell B
    2. Stubbs JL
    3. Huisman F
    4. Taborek P
    5. Yu C
    6. Kintner C

    (2009) The PCP pathway instructs the planar orientation of ciliated cells in the Xenopus larval skin

    Current Biology 19:924–929.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.04.018

    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Moon RT
    2. Campbell RM
    3. Christian JL
    4. McGrew LL
    5. Shih J
    6. Fraser S

    (1993)

    Xwnt-5A: a maternal Wnt that affects morphogenetic movements after overexpression in embryos of Xenopus laevis

    Development 119:97–111.

    • Google Scholar
43. Book

    1. Nieuwkoop PD
    2. Faber J

    (1994)

    Normal Table of Xenopus Laevis (Daudin) : A Systematical and Chronological Survey of the Development From the Fertilized Egg Till the End of Metamorphosis

    New York: Garland Pub.

    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Nishimura T
    2. Honda H
    3. Takeichi M

    (2012) Planar cell polarity links axes of spatial dynamics in neural-tube closure

    Cell 149:1084–1097.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.021

    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Oishi I
    2. Suzuki H
    3. Onishi N
    4. Takada R
    5. Kani S
    6. Ohkawara B
    7. Koshida I
    8. Suzuki K
    9. Yamada G
    10. Schwabe GC
    11. Mundlos S
    12. Shibuya H
    13. Takada S
    14. Minami Y

    (2003) The receptor tyrosine kinase Ror2 is involved in non-canonical Wnt5a/JNK signalling pathway

    Genes to Cells 8:645–654.

    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2443.2003.00662.x

    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Ossipova O
    2. Kim K
    3. Lake BB
    4. Itoh K
    5. Ioannou A
    6. Sokol SY

    (2014) Role of Rab11 in planar cell polarity and apical constriction during vertebrate neural tube closure

    Nature Communications 5:3734.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4734

    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Ossipova O
    2. Chu C-W
    3. Fillatre J
    4. Brott BK
    5. Itoh K
    6. Sokol SY

    (2015a) The involvement of PCP proteins in radial cell intercalations during Xenopus embryonic development

    Developmental Biology 408:316–327.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.06.013

    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Ossipova O
    2. Kim K
    3. Sokol SY

    (2015b) Planar polarization of Vangl2 in the vertebrate neural plate is controlled by Wnt and Myosin II signaling

    Biology Open 4:722–730.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.201511676

    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Pandur P
    2. Läsche M
    3. Eisenberg LM
    4. Kühl M

    (2002) Wnt-11 activation of a non-canonical Wnt signalling pathway is required for cardiogenesis

    Nature 418:636–641.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature00921

    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Peng Y
    2. Axelrod JD

    (2012) Asymmetric protein localization in planar cell polarity: mechanisms, puzzles, and challenges

    Current Topics in Developmental Biology 101:33–53.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394592-1.00002-8

    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Qian D
    2. Jones C
    3. Rzadzinska A
    4. Mark S
    5. Zhang X
    6. Steel KP
    7. Dai X
    8. Chen P

    (2007) Wnt5a functions in planar cell polarity regulation in mice

    Developmental Biology 306:121–133.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.03.011

    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Roszko I
    2. S Sepich D
    3. Jessen JR
    4. Chandrasekhar A
    5. Solnica-Krezel L

    (2015) A dynamic intracellular distribution of Vangl2 accompanies cell polarization during zebrafish gastrulation

    Development 142:2508–2520.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.119032

    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Schambony A
    2. Wedlich D

    (2007) Wnt-5A/Ror2 regulate expression of XPAPC through an alternative noncanonical signaling pathway

    Developmental Cell 12:779–792.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2007.02.016

    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Semenov MV
    2. Habas R
    3. Macdonald BT
    4. He X

    (2007) SnapShot: Noncanonical Wnt signaling pathways

    Cell 131:1378.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.12.011

    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Sokol SY

    (2015) Spatial and temporal aspects of Wnt signaling and planar cell polarity during vertebrate embryonic development

    Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 42:78–85.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2015.05.002

    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Strutt H
    2. Thomas-MacArthur V
    3. Strutt D

    (2013) Strabismus promotes recruitment and degradation of farnesylated prickle in Drosophila melanogaster planar polarity specification

    PLoS Genetics 9:e1003654.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003654

    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Strutt H
    2. Warrington SJ
    3. Strutt D

    (2011) Dynamics of core planar polarity protein turnover and stable assembly into discrete membrane subdomains

    Developmental Cell 20:511–525.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2011.03.018

    • Google Scholar
58. 1. Tada M
    2. Heisenberg CP

    (2012) Convergent extension: using collective cell migration and cell intercalation to shape embryos

    Development 139:3897–3904.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.073007

    • Google Scholar
59. 1. Tada M
    2. Smith JC

    (2000)

    Xwnt11 is a target of Xenopus Brachyury: regulation of gastrulation movements via Dishevelled, but not through the canonical Wnt pathway

    Development 127:2227–2238.

    • Google Scholar
60. 1. Vladar EK
    2. Bayly RD
    3. Sangoram AM
    4. Scott MP
    5. Axelrod JD

    (2012) Microtubules enable the planar cell polarity of airway cilia

    Current Biology 22:2203–2212.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.09.046

    • Google Scholar
61. 1. Walentek P
    2. Schneider I
    3. Schweickert A
    4. Blum M

    (2013) Wnt11b is involved in cilia-mediated symmetry breakage during Xenopus left-right development

    PLoS One 8:e73646.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073646

    • Google Scholar
62. 1. Wallingford JB

    (2012) Planar cell polarity and the developmental control of cell behavior in vertebrate embryos

    Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 28:627–653.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154208

    • Google Scholar
63. 1. Wang Y
    2. Nathans J

    (2007) Tissue/planar cell polarity in vertebrates: new insights and new questions

    Development 134:647–658.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.02772

    • Google Scholar
64. 1. Werner ME
    2. Hwang P
    3. Huisman F
    4. Taborek P
    5. Yu CC
    6. Mitchell BJ

    (2011) Actin and microtubules drive differential aspects of planar cell polarity in multiciliated cells

    Journal of Cell Biology 195:19–26.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201106110

    • Google Scholar
65. 1. Werner ME
    2. Mitchell BJ

    (2012) Understanding ciliated epithelia: the power of Xenopus

    Genesis 50:176–185.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/dvg.20824

    • Google Scholar
66. 1. Wolda SL
    2. Moody CJ
    3. Moon RT

    (1993) Overlapping expression of Xwnt-3A and Xwnt-1 in neural tissue of Xenopus laevis embryos

    Developmental Biology 155:46–57.

    https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.1993.1005

    • Google Scholar
67. 1. Wu J
    2. Mlodzik M

    (2008) The frizzled extracellular domain is a ligand for Van Gogh/Stbm during nonautonomous planar cell polarity signaling

    Developmental Cell 15:462–469.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2008.08.004

    • Google Scholar
68. 1. Wu J
    2. Roman AC
    3. Carvajal-Gonzalez JM
    4. Mlodzik M

    (2013) Wg and Wnt4 provide long-range directional input to planar cell polarity orientation in Drosophila

    Nature Cell Biology 15:1045–1055.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2806

    • Google Scholar
69. 1. Yang Y
    2. Mlodzik M

    (2015) Wnt-Frizzled/planar cell polarity signaling: cellular orientation by facing the wind (Wnt)

    Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 31:623–646.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100814-125315

    • Google Scholar
70. 1. Yasunaga T
    2. Itoh K
    3. Sokol SY

    (2011) Regulation of basal body and ciliary functions by Diversin

    Mechanisms of Development 128:376–386.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mod.2011.07.004

    • Google Scholar
71. 1. Yin C
    2. Kiskowski M
    3. Pouille PA
    4. Farge E
    5. Solnica-Krezel L

    (2008) Cooperation of polarized cell intercalations drives convergence and extension of presomitic mesoderm during zebrafish gastrulation

    The Journal of Cell Biology 180:221–232.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200704150

    • Google Scholar
72. 1. Zecca M
    2. Basler K
    3. Struhl G

    (1996) Direct and long-range action of a wingless morphogen gradient

    Cell 87:833–844.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81991-1

    • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Chih-Wen Chu

   Department of Developmental and Regenerative Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States

   Contribution

   C-WC, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

2. Sergei Y Sokol

   Department of Developmental and Regenerative Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States

   Contribution

   SYS, Conception and design, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article

   For correspondence

   sergei.sokol@mssm.edu

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3963-9202

• 3,214

  views

• 738

  downloads

• 61

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.