The thylakoid proton motive force (pmf), the transmembrane electrochemical gradient of protons generated during the light reactions of photosynthesis, is a fundamental entity of bioenergetics, coupling light-driven electron transfer reactions to the phosphorylation of ADP via the ATP synthase (Avenson et al., 2004; Kramer and Evans, 2011). In oxygenic photosynthesis, light energy is captured by pigments in light-harvesting complexes and transferred to a subset of chlorophylls in photosystem I (PSI) and photosystem II (PSII), where it drives the extraction of electrons from water and their transfer through redox cofactors to ultimately reduce NADP⁺. The vectorial transfer of electrons across the membrane is tightly coupled with the generation of the pmf, composed of both electric field (Δψ) and pH (ΔpH) gradients.

In addition to its role in energy conservation, the pmf is also critical for feedback regulation of photosynthesis (Cruz et al., 2005). Acidification of the thylakoid lumen activates the photoprotective energy-dependent exciton quenching (q_E) process, which dissipates excess absorbed light energy in the photosynthetic antenna complexes by the activation of violaxanthin deepoxidase (Demmig-Adams and Adams, 1992) and protonation of PsbS (Li et al., 2004). Lumen acidification also regulates the oxidation of plastoquinol by the cytochrome b₆f complex, slowing electron transfer from PSII and preventing the accumulation of electrons on PSI, which can otherwise lead to photodamage (Nishio and Whitmarsh, 1993; Hope et al., 1994). In vitro work has shown that excessive lumen acidification can inactivate PSII (Krieger and Weis, 1993), decrease the stability of plastocyanin (Gross et al., 1994) and severely restrict electron flow through the cytochrome b₆f complex (Kramer et al., 1999). Taken together, the in vivo and in vitro evidence of the susceptibility of photosynthetic components to acidification has led to the proposal that the extent of pmf and its partitioning into Δψ and ΔpH components is regulated to maintain the lumen pH above about 5.8, where it can regulate photoprotection. However, under environmental stresses the regulation of photosynthesis may become overwhelmed, leading to PSII damage, or photoinhibition, from lumen over-acidification, although this has not been shown to occur in vivo (Kramer et al., 1999).

PSII photoinhibition can be a major contributor to loss of photosynthetic productivity (Raven, 2011), particularly under rapid fluctuations in environmental conditions experienced in the field (Kulheim et al., 2002). However, the mechanisms and regulation of photoinhibition remain highly debated (Keren and Krieger-Liszkay, 2011; Tyystjärvi, 2013). Though several mechanisms have been proposed for the photodamage process, it is not known which of these operate in vivo under diverse environmental conditions. In addition, there are differing views on whether the extent of photoinhibition is governed by the rate of photodamage to PSII or by regulation of PSII repair (Takahashi et al., 2007). Answering these questions is essential to understanding how plants respond to rapidly changing conditions and thus of critical importance to improving plant productivity.

The extent of the pmf can be modulated by altering the light-driven influx of protons into the lumen, i.e. by changing the rates of linear electron flow (LEF) or cyclic electron flow, or the efflux of protons through the ATP synthase (reviewed in Kramer et al., 2004). This latter mode of regulation is important for co-regulation of the light reactions with downstream metabolic processes. For example, under CO₂ limitations (Kanazawa and Kramer, 2002) as well as during stromal P_i limited conditions (Takizawa et al., 2008) the chloroplast ATP synthase activity is strongly down-regulated, decreasing the proton conductivity (g_H⁺) of the thylakoid, leading to buildup of pmf and activation of q_E. Similar decreases in g_H⁺ and increases in pmf are seen when ATP synthase protein content is decreased (Rott et al., 2011) or in mutants with an altered ATP synthase γ-subunit (Kohzuma et al., 2012).

We took advantage of the effects of the ATP synthase on the photosynthetic proton circuit to probe how the pmf influences photoinhibition in vivo. We constructed a series of Arabidopsis thaliana mutants, which we termed minira (minimum recapitulation of ATPC2), in which we complemented a γ₁-subunit (ATPC1) T-DNA knockout line (Dal Bosco et al., 2004) with γ-coding sequences containing site-directed mutations to specifically incorporate amino acid changes around the redox regulatory cysteines present in ATPC2 into ATPC1 (Figure 1A) (Inohara et al., 1991). Each minira line is designated numerically based on amino acid position and independent transformation events; for example minira 4–1, minira 4–2, and minira 4–3 represent three independent transformation events of the same I201V mutation. The minira library was originally developed as part of an on-going 'domain swapping' approach to assess functional differences in the two ATPC paralogs in Arabidopsis, ATPC1 and ATPC2, but the minira mutants also shows a range of ATP synthase activities useful to the present work. As described below, we also confirmed key aspects of the work using previously characterized ATPC1 tobacco antisense lines (Rott et al., 2011). However, variations in ATP synthase suppression in the antisense lines between leaves and plant generations limited their experimental utility. The current mutagenesis approach was preferable as it allowed repeatable analyses of multiple photosynthetic parameters in stable, identical genetic backgrounds within each mutant line.

Figure 1

Download asset Open asset

We assessed the effects of minira modifications on g_H⁺ and the extent of the light-driven pmf in vivo based on the decay kinetics of the electrochromic shift (ECS), which reports changes in the thylakoid electric field (Sacksteder and Kramer, 2000). The minira lines displayed a range of ATP synthase activities (Figure 1C), from about 30–120% that of wild type (Wassilewskija-2, Ws-2), resulting in similar variations in light-driven pmf (Figure 1D). Multiple independent transformations were utilized for the same minira mutation, as the g_H⁺ changes likely reflect both intrinsic ATP synthase activity changes due to the mutations, as well as changes due to protein expression level or stability of the mutated subunit within the complex (Figure 1B). While some minira mutants display an increase in g_H⁺ relative to the wild type and will acidify the lumen at a slower rate, others have a large decrease in total ATP synthase content. For the purpose of understanding how a high pmf impacts photosynthesis we have primarily focused on those mutants that modified g_H⁺ while maintaining an ATP synthase content similar to wild type levels.

The minira library was then screened for photosynthetic phenotypes using whole plant chlorophyll fluorescence imaging (Cruz et al., 2016) over a consecutive three-day photoperiod (Figure 2A). Photosynthetic parameters were calculated from these images (videos are shown in videos 1–9) and shown as kinetic traces (Figure 2—figure supplements 1–15) or as log-fold changes compared to wild type (Figure 2B–D). Under 'standard' laboratory growth chamber lighting on day one, most minira lines showed relatively small differences from wild type in LEF (Figure 2B), q_E (Figure 2C), and photoinhibitory quenching (q_I) (Figure 2D), with the exceptions of minira 3–1 and 11–1, which also showed the most severe decreases in g_H⁺ (Figure 1C). Stronger photosynthetic phenotypes appeared on days two and three, implying that the decreased g_H⁺ and pmf effects were enhanced by intense or fluctuating illumination.

Figure 2 with 16 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Video 1

Download asset

Video 2

Download asset

Video 3

Download asset

Video 4

Download asset

Video 5

Download asset

Video 6

Download asset

Video 7

Download asset

Video 8

Download asset

Video 9

Download asset

In general, LEF decreased with decreasing g_H⁺ (Figure 2B, rows are ordered by increasing g_H+) while q_E increased (Figure 2C). The increases in q_E were especially pronounced at higher light intensities on days two and three. These effects can be explained by slowing of proton efflux through the ATP synthase in the mutants that results in increased pmf for a given LEF. This is reflected in the higher lumen pH-sensitive q_E response for a given LEF (Figure 2E), which is strikingly similar to that attributed to ATP synthase regulation in wild type plants during limitations in carbon fixation (Kanazawa and Kramer, 2002) or decreases in ATP synthase content (Rott et al., 2011). The q_E sensitivities for the mutants remained similar throughout the experiments, i.e. the data for each mutant followed similar curves, implying that the ATP synthase activities were relatively constant within a particular line, consistent with a lack of light-dependent modulation of g_H⁺ that has previously been observed (Avenson et al., 2005). The extents of q_E did not exceed about 3.5 units in any of the lines, suggesting that either the lumen pH was restricted to a moderate acidity or that the capacity of the q_E response was saturated as light intensities increased.

We also observed a strong correlation between increased q_E and q_I, (for quantitative comparisons, see Figure 2—figure supplement 2), implying that decreases in ATP synthase activity in the mutants led to not only higher photoprotection but also higher rates of PSII photoinhibition. This result appears counterintuitive, in that we would expect the photoprotective q_E response to prevent photoinhibition. Particularly striking was the relative loss in q_E near the peak light intensities on days two and three in the most strongly affected minira lines (Figure 2C). We attribute this effect to strong accumulation of PSII photoinhibition (Figure 2D) leading to the loss of photosynthetic capacity (see Figure 2B) that limited acidification of the thylakoid lumen.

The observed increases in photoinhibition at high pmf could be caused by several mechanisms. It has been proposed that photoinhibition is primarily controlled by modulating the rate of PSII repair, i.e. the rate of damage is dependent solely on light intensity but repair being inhibited by stress-induced ROS production (Nishiyama and Murata, 2014). However, blocking PSII repair with the chloroplast translation inhibitor lincomycin (Tyystjarvi and Aro, 1996) revealed that, when compared to wild type or minira lines with wild type like g_H⁺ (e.g. minira 6–1), minira lines with low g_H⁺ and high pmf (e.g. minira 3–1, Figure 1C, Figure 3) had higher rates of photodamage as reflected in both decreased maximal PSII quantum efficiency and loss of t capacity to perform charge separation in PSII (Joliot and Delosme, 1974; Joliot et al., 1977; Bailleul et al., 2010) and significantly decreased levels of D1 protein (Figure 3C–E). Thus, decreasing ATP synthase activity led to increased PSII photodamage rather than decreased rates of repair, in contradiction with strict control of photoinhibition by repair (Takahashi et al., 2007).

Figure 3

Download asset Open asset

Photodamage can be induced in vitro by excitation of PSII centers with previously reduced primary quinone acceptor (Q_A) leading to the formation of the doubly-reduced Q_AH₂ state (Keren and Krieger-Liszkay, 2011). This situation might be expected if a high pmf slowed electron transfer through the b₆f complex, resulting in the accumulation of electrons on PSII acceptors. When data at a range of light intensities are compared, the relationship between the Q_A redox state (q_L) (Kramer et al., 2004) and q_I is statistically significant (ANOVA, p=2 × 10⁻¹⁶) (Figure 4). However, both the light intensity (p=3 × 10⁻⁵) and q_E (p=7 × 10⁻³) are significant interacting factors. At any one light intensity, q_L was relatively stable, whereas q_I was strongly dependent upon the mutant background and underlining pmf changes, indicating that while Q_A reduction may be a contributing factor, it cannot by itself explain the observed extents of photoinhibition in the minira lines. On the other hand, this dependence is also consistent with an alternative model, proposed below, that involves effects on PSII recombination rates.

Figure 4

Download asset Open asset

Changes in chlorophyll content have also been correlated with increases in PSII photoinhibition (Pätsikkä et al., 2002), likely due to less light being absorbed at the leaf surface and the subsequent increased light penetration into the leaf reaching more PSII centers. While the leaf chlorophyll content was altered in the minira mutants from wild type levels (Supplementary file 3), the leaf chlorophyll content does not fall below where (Pätsikkä et al., 2002) observed correlations between a lack of chlorophyll content and photoinhibition.

We next hypothesized that the most probable explanation for the increased photoinhibition is direct sensitization of PSII to photodamage by pmf. In the 'acid-damage' model (Kramer et al., 1999), it was proposed that excessive lumen acidification at high ΔpH (i.e. low lumen pH) could sensitize PSII centers to photodamage. To test this possibility, we compared the rates of photoinhibition with the extents of the ΔpH and Δψ components of the pmf by measuring the relaxation kinetics of the ECS signal (Takizawa et al., 2007). Surprisingly, increased extents of photoinhibition in low g_H⁺ lines were not correlated with ΔpH, but were with Δψ (Figure 5), contrary to what was expected with the acid-damage model. Consistent with this result, the rates of P₇₀₀⁺ reduction, which reflect the lumen pH-sensitive turnover of the cytochrome b₆f complex remained in a range consistent with a lumen pH above or near the pK_a for b₆f down-regulation, i.e. above about 6.0 (Figure 5—figure supplement 1).

Figure 5 with 3 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

These results are consistent with an increase in the partitioning of pmf into Δψ as the total pmf increased (Figure 5—figure supplement 2), as have been observed previously (Avenson et al., 2004), and are likely caused by alterations in ion movements across both the thylakoid and chloroplast envelope membranes (Avenson et al., 2004; Armbruster et al., 2014; Kunz et al., 2014). Our results suggest that pmf partitioning acts to maintain a permissible lumen pH during large pmf increases.

We observed similar results throughout the range of minira mutants with low g_H⁺ as well as with tobacco γ-subunit antisense plants (Rott et al., 2011) with reduced ATP synthase complexes, finding that a large increase in total pmf was accompanied by increased partitioning of pmf into Δψ (Figure 5—figure supplement 3), and increased rates of photodamage in the presence and absence of lincomycin (Figure 5—figure supplement 3). These results suggest that low g_H⁺ or high pmf-related PSII damage is a more general phenomenon, which is related to excess Δψ and likely to be independent of such factors as changes in the protein or supercomplex content (see also discussion in Rott et al., 2011).

As described in Figure 8, we hypothesize that high Δψ accelerates photodamage by favoring recombination reactions within PSII (de Grooth and van Gorkom, 1981; Diner and Joliot, 1976; Satoh and Katoh, 1983; Rappaport et al., 1999) that lead to the formation of chlorophyll triplet states that in turn generate ¹O₂ (Johnson et al., 1995).

To test this model, we studied the relationship between elevated Δψ and PSII charge recombination in isolated spinach thylakoids (Figure 6), which unlike Arabidopsis can be isolated as highly intact chloroplasts and tightly coupled thylakoids. Consistent with our model, we found that elevated Δψ, produced by artificial decyl-ubiquinol mediated cyclic electron flow through PSI, increased the rate of charge recombination from the S₂Q_A⁻ state compared to samples treated with gramicidin to dissipate Δψ (Figure 6A). This recombination reaction can also occur in vivo during normal turnover when the S₂Q_A⁻ state is formed given that the equilibrium constant for sharing of electrons between Q_A and Q_B is small (Robinson and Crofts, 1983). The extent of Δψ generated in these experiments was similar to that observed in minira leaves under photoinhibitory conditions (Figure 6B), suggesting similar increases in recombination rates should occur in vivo.

Figure 6

Download asset Open asset

We next tested the predicted connection between elevated Δψ and singlet oxygen (¹O₂) generation (Figure 7D). In wild type leaves, moderate illumination (30 min of 300 μmol photons m⁻²s⁻¹) resulted in no detectable light dependent changes in ¹O₂ (Figure 7D) using Singlet Oxygen Sensor Green (SOSG) dye fluorescence (Dall'Osto et al., 2012; Ramel et al., 2013; Shumbe et al., 2016). In contrast, the low g_H⁺minira 3–1 line showed a strong induction of SOSG fluorescence within the first 10 min of illumination, which saturated by about 30 min. Infiltration of leaves with valinomycin, a potassium ionophore that decreases the Δψ component of pmf (Satoh and Katoh, 1983), partially inhibited the rise in in SOSG fluorescence (Figure 7—figure supplement 1). While care must be taken making quantitative estimates of ¹O₂ from SOSG fluorescence (Koh and Fluhr, 2016), within the limits of these experiments the Δψ-dependence of the SOSG fluorescence increases strongly support a role for Δψ-induced ¹O₂ production from photosynthesis.

Figure 7 with 2 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Singlet oxygen is produced by the interaction of O₂ with triplet excited states of pigments, most likely from the ³P₆₈₀ chlorophyll within the PSII reaction centers generated by recombination reactions (Krieger-Liszkay et al., 2008; Telfer, 2014), as further discussed below. It is unlikely that such triplets could be generated in the bulk light harvesting pigments because high NPQ in the mutants will decrease the lifetime of antenna excited states, and chlorophyll triplets generated in light harvesting complexes are efficiently quenched by carotenoids (Telfer et al., 2008). We thus propose that elevated Δψ induces ¹O₂ production by accelerating PSII recombination in low g_H⁺ mutants when pmf is large. Keren et al. (Keren et al., 1997) suggested that recombination-induced triplet formation could explain the photoinhibitory effects of very low light, when PSII charge recombination is preferred over the forward electron transfer reactions. Our work implies that this type of phenomenon is greatly accelerated by high Δψ, potentially making it relevant to photosynthesis under growth light conditions.

The effects of high Δψ would be expected to alter the rates of PSII recombination through P⁺Pheo⁻ (where P⁺ is the oxidized primary chlorophyll donor and Pheo the D1 subunit pheophytin) in an increasing dependence upon the fraction of Q_A⁻, consistent with the observed correlation between q_I and q_L as the light intensity increased (Figure 4). To test this relationship, we estimated the recombination rates from S₂Q_A⁻ through the P⁺Pheo⁻ pathway, considering Q_A redox state (estimated by 1-q_L) and the expected impact of Δψ on the equilibrium constant for sharing electrons between Pheo and Q_A (based on ECS_ss and the position of Q_A in the structure relative to the membrane dielectric). The basis of this estimate is described in more detail in Materials and methods. As shown in Figure 5C, we see a positive correlation between q_I and estimated recombination through P⁺Pheo⁻ over both mutant variants and light intensities, indicating that the combined effects of Δψ and Q_A redox state can explain a large fraction of the observed extents of photoinhibition. While it is likely that multiple mechanisms of photoinhibition exist, which may also explain some of the q_I variation, overall the greatest impact upon photoinhibition under these conditions can be explained by Δψ-mediated changes in PSII electron recombination.

The obvious questions are: does Δψ-induced photoinhibition occur in wild type plants and if so under what conditions? Photosynthesis is known to be particularly sensitive to rapid fluctuations in light intensity (Kulheim et al., 2002), at least some of this sensitivity is associated with photoinhibition of PSI, especially in cyanobacteria (Allahverdiyeva et al., 2015). However, such fluctuations should also result in large transient changes in Δψ, as the thylakoid membrane has a low electrical capacitance and low permeability to counter-ions, while the lumen and stroma have high proton buffering capacity (Cruz et al., 2001). The slow onset of q_E and other down-regulatory processes in photosynthesis should exacerbate these effects and allow for large fluxes of electrons when light levels are rapidly increased, resulting in large, transient Δψ 'pulses'.

We therefore hypothesized that Δψ-induced photodamage may contribute to the increased photodamage seen under fluctuating light. To test this possibility, we measured light-driven pmf (Δψ and ΔpH) and ¹O₂ generation in wild type Arabidopsis under fluctuating light conditions (Figure 7A, replicating the first 8 hr of Figure 2A day three). The initial dark-to-light transition resulted in an immediate, transient 'spike'in Δψ, even though the light intensity was low (39 μmol photons m⁻²s⁻¹, Figure 7B). The spike was transient, and decreased to steady-state levels within tens of seconds, as shown in the blue trace in Figure 7B. Spikes in Δψ of similar amplitudes were also seen upon each increase in light at the onset of each fluctuation, though the recovery kinetics tended to be more rapid than those seen at the first dark-light transient. An example of these transients, taken at the transition between 167 and 333 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹ is shown in (Figure 7B). A more complete set of transient kinetics, over the entire course of the experiment is presented in Figure 7—figure supplement 2. The amplitudes of these Δψ transients were similar to or larger than those seen in the minira 3–1 line under constant 300 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹ light, which also induced ¹O₂ generation (see red horizontal bars in Figure 7B). These spikes reflect increases in Δψ above that already produced by steady-state photosynthesis, so the true extent of Δψ is likely considerably higher, and based on estimates of the calibration of the ECS signal likely range between 150–260 mV (see Figure 7—figure supplement 2).

By contrast, wild type plants under constant 300 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹ produced much lower Δψ extents (Figure 7B green bars) and had no detectible ¹O₂ generation (Figure 7D). These results suggest that even low amplitude light fluctuations are capable of inducing Δψ large enough to produce ¹O₂ and PSII photodamage. Supporting this interpretation, wild type leaves under these fluctuating light conditions produced substantial amounts of ¹O₂ during the first hour of fluctuating conditions compared to higher intensity, but constant illumination (Figure 7D).

The above results lead us to conclude that fluctuating light likely induces strong effects through Δψ-induced recombination reactions in PSII (see below for considerations of potential contributions to PSI). In addition to direct damage to the enzymes of photosynthesis, ¹O₂ can also activate plant light stress-related gene expression and programmed cell death (Zhang et al., 2014), suggesting a possible physiological linkage between pmf-enhanced recombination and plant regulatory pathways that may result in long-term acclimation to fluctuating light.

At a mechanistic level, we propose that imposing a large Δψ across the PSII complex will decrease the standard free energy gap between the vectorial electron transfer steps and thus the back-reaction will be accelerated in competition with forward (energy-storing) reactions (de Grooth and van Gorkom, 1981; Vos et al., 1991; Johnson et al., 1995) (Figure 8). It is known that decreasing the energy gap between Pheo and Q_A favors recombination from P⁺Q_A⁻ via Pheo⁻ (de Grooth and van Gorkom, 1981; Johnson et al., 1995) rather than directly from Q_A⁻ to P⁺ (Johnson et al., 1995; Krieger-Liszkay and Rutherford, 1998; Rutherford et al., 2012). The observed increased recombination rates in vitro (Figure 6) when Δψ is present, combined with ¹O₂ production under high Δψ conditions in vivo suggest that the fraction of electrons recombining to P⁺ through a Pheo⁻ intermediate is greatly increased, as the recombination pathway via the Pheo⁻ has a high yield for formation of the triplet state of P (³P) that in turn can interact with O₂ to produce ¹O₂ (Johnson et al., 1995; Keren and Krieger-Liszkay, 2011; Rutherford et al., 2012).

Figure 8

Download asset Open asset

This proposed mechanism of Δψ-mediated photoinhibition has broad implications for the energy limitations of photosynthesis. Although the two components of pmf are energetically equivalent for driving ATP synthesis (Hangarter and Good, 1982), they have distinct effects on the regulation of photosynthesis (Kramer et al., 1999; 2004; Finazzi et al., 2015). It has thus been proposed that the partitioning of pmf into Δψ and ΔpH is regulated to maintain a balance between efficient energy storage and regulation of light capture (Cruz et al., 2005). We demonstrate here another important constraint on this balance: the avoidance of photodamage caused by recombination reactions in PSII, and this may explain the need for complex ion balancing systems in chloroplasts (Cruz et al., 2001; Armbruster et al., 2014; Kunz et al., 2014).

The effect of Δψ on recombination and ¹O₂ production may, at least in part, explain the severe effects of fluctuating light on photosynthesis, and thus could constitute a significant limitation to photosynthetic productivity. In the absence of a large Δψ, the energy gap between the P⁺Pheo⁻ and P⁺Q_A⁻ appears to be sufficient to keep detrimental recombination to a manageable level when the usual regulatory mechanisms are functional (Rutherford et al., 2012). During photosynthesis, and especially under fluctuating light, though, the energy gaps between the photo-generated radical pairs vary dynamically under the influence of the pmf, so that high Δψ renders the charge-separated states in the photosystems considerably less stable. The Δψ is also expected to influence the trap depth (i.e. the energy level between P^* and the first radical pair(s), the most relevant probably being P⁺Pheo⁻) and this could potentially affect the quantum yield of charge separation and the yield of radiative recombination (luminescence).

Transthylakoid electric fields also influence recombination reactions in PSI reaction centers (van Gorkom, 1996). It is thought that P₇₀₀ triplet formation is minimized in PSI by the presence of the higher potential quinone in PsaA, making this side of the reaction center the safe charge recombination pathway (Rutherford et al., 2012). In light of the present findings, it is worth considering whether a transiently large Δψ could make this protective mechanism less efficient, though this question has yet to be addressed experimentally.

Over evolutionary time scales, the Δψ-effect may have constrained other bioenergetics features of photosynthesis. It has long been known that oxygenic photosynthesis is limited, in most organisms, to wavelength ranges shorter than about 700 nm (the 'red limit'), resulting in the loss of a large fraction of the light energy hitting the plant (Blankenship et al., 2011). (Gust et al., 2008) proposed that the red limit may be the result of certain limitations imposed in part by key biochemical properties of life (e.g. the properties of energy storage molecules NAD(P)H and ATP, the use of certain biochemical pathways, etc.) that evolved before the advent of photosynthesis. Milo (Milo, 2009) came to a different conclusion based on estimates of the theoretical wavelength dependence of energy conversion efficiency for plant photosynthesis, based on the Shockley and Queisser equation (Shockley and Queisser, 1961). The maximum efficiency was about 700 nm, similar to the red limit of oxygenic photosynthesis, suggesting that evolution has selected for photosynthetic energetics based on this fundamental limit, rather than any biological imperative. However, the predicted wavelength-dependence of the energy efficiency is very broad, with only about a 15% decrease from the peak at wavelengths out to 800 nm, far beyond the red limit, even in organisms with red-shifted reaction centers. Marosvolgyi and van Gorkom (Marosvolgyi and van Gorkom, 2010) drew a similar conclusion but with additional restraints and suggested a narrower maximum more closely overlapping with the red absorption of chlorophyll a.

Rutherford et al. (Rutherford et al., 2012) took a different view based on an analysis of the bioenergetics of reaction centers. They noted that PSII was in a uniquely difficult situation in energy terms: (1) it does multi-electron chemistry (at both sides of the reaction center) and so cannot prevent back reactions by kinetic control, (2) it has a very energy demanding reaction to do: water oxidation and quinone reduction with a ∆E ~920 meV in functional conditions, and requires a significant over-potential not just for attaining a high quantum yield of photochemistry but also for achieving water oxidation and quinol release, and (3) its chlorophyll cation chemistry is uniquely oxidizing and thus it cannot use carotenoids to protect itself from chlorophyll triplet formation at the heart of the reaction center. This situation means that unlike other type-II reaction centers, PSII is unable to prevent electrons from the bound semiquinones getting back to the Pheo and then recombining with P⁺ and forming ³P.

This lack of energy 'headroom' was seen not only as a major factor in PS II’s susceptibility to photodamage but also as a reason why oxygenic photosynthesis is pinned to chlorophyll a photochemistry at around 680 nm as the red limit. The existence of efficient oxygenic photosynthesis at longer wavelengths seemed to question that view (Miyashita et al., 1996; Kuhl et al., 2005; Gan et al., 2014; Behrendt et al., 2015). However, it was pointed out that these species seem to exist in very stable environments that have very little variation in light conditions (Cotton et al., 2015). Under such a narrow range of illumination conditions it is not unreasonable that less energy 'headroom' is required (Cotton et al., 2015).

Clearly, these specific energy limitations of PSII will be exacerbated by spikes in the Δψ reported here. Indeed, it seems reasonable to suggest that the existing 'energy headroom' postulated in normal chlorophyll a-containing PSII, while too small to avoid photodamage altogether, exists quite specifically to mitigate the extra photodamage from back-reactions enhanced by spikes in Δψ due to variable light intensities. In this way, the extent of the variable light-induced Δψ may be considered to contribute to the position of the red limit of oxygenic photosynthesis.

The need to prevent Δψ-induced recombination may also have guided the evolution of other photosynthetic components. Recent mechanistic models of the ATP synthase suggest that the ratio of protons passed through the ATP synthase per ATP synthesized depends on the number of subunits in the c-ring (Silverstein, 2014). The chloroplasts of green plants and algae thus far studied possess ATP synthase complexes with larger c-ring stoichiometries than their mitochondrial and bacterial homologues (Seelert et al., 2000), imposing higher fluxes of protons to generate ATP and necessitating the engagement of additional bioenergetic processes, including cyclic electron flow, to make up the ATP deficit needed to sustain photosynthesis (Kramer et al., 2004; Avenson et al., 2005). While this increased H⁺ demand is often viewed as a bioenergetic limitation to photosynthetic electron and proton transfer, a high H⁺/ATP ratio decreases the pmf needed to maintain a given ATP free energy state (ΔG_ATP), thus allowing photosynthesis to operate at a decreased steady-state pmf. In this context, the deleterious electron recombination effects of a high pmf may have favored the evolution of ATP synthase complexes with high H⁺/ATP ratios in chloroplasts.

1. 1. Allahverdiyeva Y
   2. Suorsa M
   3. Tikkanen M
   4. Aro EM

   (2015) Photoprotection of photosystems in fluctuating light intensities

   Journal of Experimental Botany 66:2427–2436.

   https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru463

   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Armbruster U
   2. Carrillo LR
   3. Venema K
   4. Pavlovic L
   5. Schmidtmann E
   6. Kornfeld A
   7. Jahns P
   8. Berry JA
   9. Kramer DM
   10. Jonikas MC

   (2014) Ion antiport accelerates photosynthetic acclimation in fluctuating light environments

   Nature Communications 5:5439.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6439

   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Avenson TJ
   2. Cruz JA
   3. Kanazawa A
   4. Kramer DM

   (2005) Regulating the proton budget of higher plant photosynthesis

   PNAS 102:9709–9713.

   https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0503952102

   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Avenson TJ
   2. Cruz JA
   3. Kramer DM

   (2004) Modulation of energy-dependent quenching of excitons in antennae of higher plants

   PNAS 101:5530–5535.

   https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0401269101

   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Bailleul B
   2. Cardol P
   3. Breyton C
   4. Finazzi G

   (2010) Electrochromism: a useful probe to study algal photosynthesis

   Photosynthesis Research 106:179–189.

   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-010-9579-z

   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Baker NR
   2. Harbinson J
   3. Kramer DM

   (2007) Determining the limitations and regulation of photosynthetic energy transduction in leaves

   Plant, Cell & Environment 30:1107–1125.

   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01680.x

   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Behrendt L
   2. Brejnrod A
   3. Schliep M
   4. Sørensen SJ
   5. Larkum AW
   6. Kühl M
   7. Kuhl M

   (2015) Chlorophyll f-driven photosynthesis in a cavernous cyanobacterium

   ISME Journal 9:2108–2111.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2015.14

   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Blankenship RE
   2. Tiede DM
   3. Barber J
   4. Brudvig GW
   5. Fleming G
   6. Ghirardi M
   7. Gunner MR
   8. Junge W
   9. Kramer DM
   10. Melis A
   11. Moore TA
   12. Moser CC
   13. Nocera DG
   14. Nozik AJ
   15. Ort DR
   16. Parson WW
   17. Prince RC
   18. Sayre RT

   (2011) Comparing photosynthetic and photovoltaic efficiencies and recognizing the potential for improvement

   Science 332:805–809.

   https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1200165

   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Cazzaniga S
   2. Dall' Osto L
   3. Kong SG
   4. Wada M
   5. Bassi R

   (2013) Interaction between avoidance of photon absorption, excess energy dissipation and zeaxanthin synthesis against photooxidative stress in Arabidopsis

   Plant Journal 76:568–579.

   https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12314

   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Clough SJ
    2. Bent AF

    (1998) Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana

     Plant Journal 16:735–743.

    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.x

    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Cotton CA
    2. Douglass JS
    3. De Causmaecker S
    4. Brinkert K
    5. Cardona T
    6. Fantuzzi A
    7. Rutherford AW
    8. Murray JW

    (2015) Photosynthetic constraints on fuel from microbes

    Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 3:36.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2015.00036

    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Cruz JA
    2. Avenson TJ
    3. Kanazawa A
    4. Takizawa K
    5. Edwards GE
    6. Kramer DM

    (2005) Plasticity in light reactions of photosynthesis for energy production and photoprotection

    Journal of Experimental Botany 56:395–406.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eri022

    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Cruz JA
    2. Sacksteder CA
    3. Kanazawa A
    4. Kramer DM

    (2001) Contribution of Electric Field (Δψ) to Steady-State Transthylakoid Proton Motive Force ( pmf ) in Vitro and in Vivo. Control of pmf Parsing into Δψ and ΔpH by Ionic Strength †

    Biochemistry 40:1226–1237.

    https://doi.org/10.1021/bi0018741

    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Cruz JA
    2. Savage LJ
    3. Zegarac R
    4. Hall CC
    5. Satoh-Cruz M
    6. Davis GA
    7. Kovac WK
    8. Chen J
    9. Kramer DM

    (2016) Dynamic environmental photosynthetic imaging reveals emergent phenotypes

    Cell Systems 2:365–377.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2016.06.001

    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Dal Bosco C
    2. Lezhneva L
    3. Biehl A
    4. Leister D
    5. Strotmann H
    6. Wanner G
    7. Meurer J

    (2004) Inactivation of the chloroplast ATP synthase gamma subunit results in high non-photochemical fluorescence quenching and altered nuclear gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 279:1060–1069.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M308435200

    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Dall'Osto L
    2. Holt NE
    3. Kaligotla S
    4. Fuciman M
    5. Cazzaniga S
    6. Carbonera D
    7. Frank HA
    8. Alric J
    9. Bassi R

    (2012) Zeaxanthin protects plant photosynthesis by modulating chlorophyll triplet yield in specific light-harvesting antenna subunits

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 287:41820–41834.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.405498

    • Google Scholar
17. 1. De Grooth BG
    2. Van Gorkom HJ

    (1981) External electric field effects on prompt and delayed fluorescence in chloroplasts

    Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta 635:445–456.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-2728(81)90104-3

    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Demmig-Adams B
    2. Adams WW

    (1992) Photoprotection and other responses of plants to high light stress

    Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 43:599–626.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.43.060192.003123

    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Diner B
    2. Joliot P

    (1976) Effect of the transmembrane electric field on the photochemical and quenching properties of Photosystem II in vivo

    Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta  423:479–498.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-2728(76)90202-4

    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Finazzi G
    2. Petroutsos D
    3. Tomizioli M
    4. Flori S
    5. Sautron E
    6. Villanova V
    7. Rolland N
    8. Seigneurin-Berny D

    (2015) Ions channels/transporters and chloroplast regulation

    Cell Calcium 58:86–97.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceca.2014.10.002

    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Gan F
    2. Zhang S
    3. Rockwell NC
    4. Martin SS
    5. Lagarias JC
    6. Bryant DA

    (2014) Extensive remodeling of a cyanobacterial photosynthetic apparatus in far-red light

    Science 345:1312–1317.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1256963

    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Gross EL
    2. Pan B
    3. Li B
    4. Brown L

    (1994)

    Stability of plastocyanin to acid pH

     Biophysical Journal 66:A272.

    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Gust D
    2. Kramer D
    3. Moore A
    4. Moore TA
    5. Vermaas W

    (2008) Engineered and artificial photosynthesis: human ingenuity enters the game

    MRS Bulletin 33:383–387.

    https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs2008.78

    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Hadi MZ
    2. Kemper E
    3. Wendeler E
    4. Reiss B

    (2002) Simple and versatile selection of Arabidopsis transformants

    Plant Cell Reports 21:130–135.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-002-0473-9

    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Hall CC
    2. Cruz J
    3. Wood M
    4. Zegarac R
    5. DeMars D
    6. Carptenter J
    7. Kramer DM

    (2013)

    Photosynthesis Research for Food, Fuel and Future (15th International Conference on Photosynthesis)

    184–188,  Photosynthetic measurements with the Idea Spec: an integrated diode emitter array spectrophotometer/fluorometer, Photosynthesis Research for Food, Fuel and Future (15th International Conference on Photosynthesis), Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Hangarter RP
    2. Good NE

    (1982) Energy thresholds for ATP synthesis in chloroplasts

    Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta  681:397–404.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-2728(82)90181-5

    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Hope AB
    2. Valente P
    3. Matthews DB

    (1994) Effects of pH on the kinetics of redox reactions in and around the cytochromebf complex in an isolated system

    Photosynthesis Research 42:111–120.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02187122

    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Inohara N
    2. Iwamoto A
    3. Moriyama Y
    4. Shimomura S
    5. Maeda M
    6. Futai M

    (1991)

    Two genes, atpC1 and atpC2, for the gamma subunit of Arabidopsis thaliana chloroplast ATP synthase

     Journal of Biological Chemistry 266:7333–7338.

    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Johnson GN
    2. Rutherford AW
    3. Krieger A

    (1995) A change in the midpoint potential of the quinone QA in Photosystem II associated with photoactivation of oxygen evolution

    Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta 1229:202–207.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-2728(95)00003-2

    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Joliot P
    2. Delosme R
    3. Joliot A

    (1977) 515nm absorption changes in Chlorella at short times (4–100 μs) after a flash

    Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta  459:47–57.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-2728(77)90007-X

    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Joliot P
    2. Delosme R

    (1974) Flash-induced 519 nm absorption change in green algae

    Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta  357:267–284.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-2728(74)90066-8

    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Kanazawa A
    2. Kramer DM

    (2002) In vivo modulation of nonphotochemical exciton quenching (NPQ) by regulation of the chloroplast ATP synthase

    PNAS 99:12789–12794.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.182427499

    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Keren N
    2. Berg A
    3. van Kan PJM
    4. Levanon H
    5. Ohad I

    (1997) Mechanism of photosystem II photoinactivation and D1 protein degradation at low light: The role of back electron flow

    PNAS 94:1579–1584.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.4.1579

    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Keren N
    2. Krieger-Liszkay A

    (2011) Photoinhibition: molecular mechanisms and physiological significance

    Physiologia Plantarum 142:1–5.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2011.01467.x

    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Koh E
    2. Fluhr R

    (2016) Singlet oxygen detection in biological systems: Uses and limitations

    Plant Signaling & Behavior 11:e1192742.

    https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2016.1192742

    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Kohzuma K
    2. Dal Bosco C
    3. Kanazawa A
    4. Dhingra A
    5. Nitschke W
    6. Meurer J
    7. Kramer DM

    (2012) Thioredoxin-insensitive plastid ATP synthase that performs moonlighting functions

    PNAS 109:3293–3298.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1115728109

    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Kramer DM
    2. Avenson TJ
    3. Edwards GE

    (2004) Dynamic flexibility in the light reactions of photosynthesis governed by both electron and proton transfer reactions

    Trends in Plant Science 9:349–357.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2004.05.001

    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Kramer DM
    2. Evans JR

    (2011) The importance of energy balance in improving photosynthetic productivity

    Plant Physiology 155:70–78.

    https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.166652

    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Kramer DM
    2. Johnson G
    3. Kiirats O
    4. Edwards GE

    (2004) New fluorescence parameters for the determination of QA redox state and excitation energy fluxes

    Photosynthesis Research 79:209–218.

    https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PRES.0000015391.99477.0d

    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Kramer DM
    2. Sacksteder CA
    3. Cruz JA

    (1999) How acidic is the lumen?

    Photosynthesis Research 60:151–163.

    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006212014787

    • Google Scholar
41. Book

    1. Krause GH
    2. Jahns P

    (2003)

    Pulse amplitude modulated chlorophyll fluorometry and its application in plant science

    In: Green BR, Parson WW, editors. Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration, Vol 13. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic. pp. 373–399.

    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Krieger A
    2. Weis E

    (1993) The role of calcium in the pH-dependent control of Photosystem II

    Photosynthesis Research 37:117–130.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02187470

    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Krieger-Liszkay A
    2. Fufezan C
    3. Trebst A

    (2008) Singlet oxygen production in photosystem II and related protection mechanism

    Photosynthesis Research 98:551–564.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-008-9349-3

    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Krieger-Liszkay A
    2. Rutherford AW

    (1998) Influence of herbicide binding on the redox potential of the quinone acceptor in photosystem II: relevance to photodamage and phytotoxicity

    Biochemistry 37:17339–17344.

    https://doi.org/10.1021/bi9822628

    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Kühl M
    2. Chen M
    3. Ralph PJ
    4. Schreiber U
    5. Larkum AW

    (2005) Ecology: a niche for cyanobacteria containing chlorophyll d

    Nature 433:820.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/433820a

    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Külheim C
    2. Agren J
    3. Jansson S

    (2002) Rapid regulation of light harvesting and plant fitness in the field

    Science 297:91–93.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1072359

    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Kunz H-H
    2. Gierth M
    3. Herdean A
    4. Satoh-Cruz M
    5. Kramer DM
    6. Spetea C
    7. Schroeder JI

    (2014) Plastidial transporters KEA1, -2, and -3 are essential for chloroplast osmoregulation, integrity, and pH regulation in Arabidopsis

    PNAS 111:7480–7485.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1323899111

    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Li XP
    2. Gilmore AM
    3. Caffarri S
    4. Bassi R
    5. Golan T
    6. Kramer D
    7. Niyogi KK

    (2004) Regulation of photosynthetic light harvesting involves intrathylakoid lumen pH sensing by the PsbS protein

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 279:22866–22874.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M402461200

    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Livingston AK
    2. Cruz JA
    3. Kohzuma K
    4. Dhingra A
    5. Kramer DM

    (2010) An Arabidopsis mutant with high cyclic electron flow around photosystem I (hcef) involving the NADPH dehydrogenase complex

     Plant Cell 22:221–233.

    https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.109.071084

    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Livingston AK
    2. Kanazawa A
    3. Cruz JA
    4. Kramer DM

    (2010) Regulation of cyclic electron flow in C₃ plants: differential effects of limiting photosynthesis at ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase

    Plant, Cell & Environment 33:1779–1788.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02183.x

    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Marosvölgyi MA
    2. van Gorkom HJ

    (2010) Cost and color of photosynthesis

    Photosynthesis Research 103:105–109.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-009-9522-3

    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Milo R

    (2009) What governs the reaction center excitation wavelength of photosystems I and II?

    Photosynthesis Research 101:59–67.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-009-9465-8

    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Miyashita H
    2. Ikemoto H
    3. Kurano N
    4. Adachi K
    5. Chihara M
    6. Miyachi S

    (1996) Chlorophyll d as a major pigment

    Nature 383:402.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/383402a0

    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Nishio JN
    2. Whitmarsh J

    (1993)

    Dissipation of the proton electrochemical potential in intact chloroplasts (II. The pH gradient monitored by cytochrome f reduction kinetics)

    Plant Physiology 101:89–96.

    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Nishiyama Y
    2. Murata N

    (2014) Revised scheme for the mechanism of photoinhibition and its application to enhance the abiotic stress tolerance of the photosynthetic machinery

    Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 98:8777–8796.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-6020-0

    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Pätsikkä E
    2. Kairavuo M
    3. Sersen F
    4. Aro EM
    5. Tyystjärvi E

    (2002) Excess copper predisposes photosystem II to photoinhibition in vivo by outcompeting iron and causing decrease in leaf chlorophyll

    Plant Physiology 129:1359–1367.

    https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.004788

    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Porra RJ
    2. Thompson WA
    3. Kriedemann PE

    (1989) Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a and b extracted with four different solvents: verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy

    Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta 975:384–394.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-2728(89)80347-0

    • Google Scholar
58. 1. Ragàs X
    2. Jiménez-Banzo A
    3. Sánchez-García D
    4. Batllori X
    5. Nonell S

    (2009) Singlet oxygen photosensitisation by the fluorescent probe Singlet Oxygen Sensor Green

    Chemical Communications 20:2920–2922.

    https://doi.org/10.1039/b822776d

    • Google Scholar
59. 1. Ramel F
    2. Ksas B
    3. Akkari E
    4. Mialoundama AS
    5. Monnet F
    6. Krieger-Liszkay A
    7. Ravanat JL
    8. Mueller MJ
    9. Bouvier F
    10. Havaux M

    (2013) Light-induced acclimation of the Arabidopsis chlorina1 mutant to singlet oxygen

    Plant Cell 25:1445–1462.

    https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.113.109827

    • Google Scholar
60. 1. Rappaport F
    2. Finazzi G
    3. Pierre Y
    4. Bennoun P

    (1999) A new electrochemical gradient generator in thylakoid membranes of green algae

    Biochemistry 38:2040–2047.

    https://doi.org/10.1021/bi982351k

    • Google Scholar
61. 1. Raven JA

    (2011) The cost of photoinhibition

    Physiologia Plantarum 142:87–104.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2011.01465.x

    • Google Scholar
62. 1. Robinson HH
    2. Crofts AR

    (1983) Kinetics of the oxidation-reduction reactions of the photosystem II quinone acceptor complex, and the pathway for deactivation

    FEBS Letters 153:221–226.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(83)80152-5

    • Google Scholar
63. 1. Rott M
    2. Martins NF
    3. Thiele W
    4. Lein W
    5. Bock R
    6. Kramer DM
    7. Schöttler MA

    (2011) ATP synthase repression in tobacco restricts photosynthetic electron transport, CO2 assimilation, and plant growth by overacidification of the thylakoid lumen

    Plant Cell 23:304–321.

    https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.110.079111

    • Google Scholar
64. 1. Rutherford AW
    2. Osyczka A
    3. Rappaport F

    (2012) Back-reactions, short-circuits, leaks and other energy wasteful reactions in biological electron transfer: redox tuning to survive life in O(2)

    FEBS Letters 586:603–616.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2011.12.039

    • Google Scholar
65. 1. Sacksteder CA
    2. Kramer DM

    (2000) Dark-interval relaxation kinetics (DIRK) of absorbance changes as a quantitative probe of steady-state electron transfer

    Photosynthesis Research 66:145–158.

    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010785912271

    • Google Scholar
66. 1. Satoh K
    2. Katoh S

    (1983)

    Induction kinetics of millisecond-delayed luminescence in intact Bryopsis chloroplasts

    Plant and Cell Physiology 24:953–962.

    • Google Scholar
67. 1. Seelert H
    2. Poetsch A
    3. Dencher NA
    4. Engel A
    5. Stahlberg H
    6. Müller DJ

    (2000) Structural biology. Proton-powered turbine of a plant motor

    Nature 405:418–419.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/35013148

    • Google Scholar
68. 1. Seigneurin-Berny D
    2. Salvi D
    3. Joyard J
    4. Rolland N

    (2008) Purification of intact chloroplasts from Arabidopsis and spinach leaves by isopycnic centrifugation

    Current Protocols in Cell Biology 3:3–30.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/0471143030.cb0330s40

    • Google Scholar
69. 1. Shockley W
    2. Queisser HJ

    (1961) Detailed balance limit of efficiency of p-n junction solar cells

    Journal of Applied Physics 32:510.

    https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1736034

    • Google Scholar
70. 1. Shumbe L
    2. Chevalier A
    3. Legeret B
    4. Taconnat L
    5. Monnet F
    6. Havaux M

    (2016) Singlet oxygen-induced cell death in Arabidopsis under high-light stress is controlled by OXI1 kinase

    Plant Physiology 170:1757–1771.

    https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.01546

    • Google Scholar
71. 1. Silverstein TP

    (2014) An exploration of how the thermodynamic efficiency of bioenergetic membrane systems varies with c-subunit stoichiometry of F₁F₀ ATP synthases

    Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembranes 46:229–241.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10863-014-9547-y

    • Google Scholar
72. 1. Takahashi S
    2. Bauwe H
    3. Badger M

    (2007) Impairment of the photorespiratory pathway accelerates photoinhibition of photosystem II by suppression of repair but not acceleration of damage processes in Arabidopsis

    Plant Physiology 144:487–494.

    https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.107.097253

    • Google Scholar
73. 1. Takizawa K
    2. Cruz JA
    3. Kanazawa A
    4. Kramer DM

    (2007) The thylakoid proton motive force in vivo. Quantitative, non-invasive probes, energetics, and regulatory consequences of light-induced pmf

    Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta 1767:1233–1244.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2007.07.006

    • Google Scholar
74. 1. Takizawa K
    2. Kanazawa A
    3. Kramer DM

    (2008) Depletion of stromal P(i) induces high 'energy-dependent' antenna exciton quenching (q(E)) by decreasing proton conductivity at CF(O)-CF(1) ATP synthase

    Plant, Cell & Environment 31:235–243.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01753.x

    • Google Scholar
75. Book

    1. Telfer A
    2. Pascal A
    3. Gall A

    (2008)

    Carotenoids in Photosynthesis

    In: Britton G, Liaaen-Jensen S, Pfander H, editors. Carotenoids, Vol 4 . Birkhäuser Basel. pp. 265–308.

    • Google Scholar
76. 1. Telfer A

    (2014) Singlet oxygen production by PSII under light stress: mechanism, detection and the protective role of β-carotene

    Plant and Cell Physiology 55:1216–1223.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcu040

    • Google Scholar
77. 1. Tyystjarvi E
    2. Aro EM

    (1996) The rate constant of photoinhibition, measured in lincomycin-treated leaves, is directly proportional to light intensity

    PNAS 93:2213–2218.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.5.2213

    • Google Scholar
78. 1. Tyystjärvi E

    (2013) Photoinhibition of Photosystem II

    International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology 300:243–303.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-405210-9.00007-2

    • Google Scholar
79. 1. Umena Y
    2. Kawakami K
    3. Shen JR
    4. Kamiya N

    (2011) Crystal structure of oxygen-evolving photosystem II at a resolution of 1.9 Å

    Nature 473:55–60.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09913

    • Google Scholar
80. 1. van Gorkom HJ

    (1996) Electroluminescence

    Photosynthesis Research 48:107–116.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00041001

    • Google Scholar
81. 1. Vos MH
    2. van Gorkom HJ
    3. van Leeuwen PJ

    (1991) An electroluminescence study of stabilization reactions in the oxygen-evolving complex of Photosystem II

    Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta  1056:27–39.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-2728(05)80069-6

    • Google Scholar
82. 1. Zhang S
    2. Apel K
    3. Kim C

    (2014) Singlet oxygen-mediated and EXECUTER-dependent signalling and acclimation of Arabidopsis thaliana exposed to light stress

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 369:20130227.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0227

    • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Geoffry A Davis

   1. Department of Energy Plant Research Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States
   2. Graduate Program of Cell and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States

   Contribution

   GAD, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared.

2. Atsuko Kanazawa

   1. Department of Energy Plant Research Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States
   2. Department of Chemistry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States

   Contribution

   AK, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared.

3. Mark Aurel Schöttler

   Max-Planck-Institut für Molekulare Pflanzenphysiologie, Potsdam-Golm, Germany

   Contribution

   MAS, Conception and design, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared.

4. Kaori Kohzuma

   Department of Energy Plant Research Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States

   Present address

   Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan

   Contribution

   KK, Conception and design, Drafting or revising the article

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared.

5. John E Froehlich

   Department of Energy Plant Research Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States

   Contribution

   JEF, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared.

6. A William Rutherford

   Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom

   Contribution

   AWR, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared.

7. Mio Satoh-Cruz

   Department of Energy Plant Research Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States

   Contribution

   MS-C, Conception and design, Analysis and interpretation of data

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared.

8. Deepika Minhas

   Department of Horticulture, Washington State University, Pullman, United States

   Contribution

   DM, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Drafting or revising the article

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared.

9. Stefanie Tietz

   Department of Energy Plant Research Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States

   Contribution

   ST, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared.

10. Amit Dhingra

    Department of Horticulture, Washington State University, Pullman, United States

    Contribution

    AD, Conception and design, Drafting or revising the article

    Competing interests

    No competing interests declared.

11. David M Kramer

    1. Department of Energy Plant Research Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States
    2. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States

    Contribution

    DMK, Conception and design, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article

    For correspondence

    kramerd8@msu.edu

    Competing interests

    DMK: Founder and stock holder in Phenometrics, Inc. and a founder of the PhotosynQ.org project, these entities manufacture and distribute instrumentation for plant and algal phenotyping. However, neither of these technologies are used in the current work.

    "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2181-6888

• 3,868

  views

• 697

  downloads

• 91

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.