1. Neuroscience

Perceptually relevant remapping of human somatotopy in 24 hours

  1. James Kolasinski  Is a corresponding author
  2. Tamar R Makin
  3. John Patrick Logan
  4. Saad Jbabdi
  5. Stuart Clare
  6. Charlotte J Stagg
  7. Heidi Johansen-Berg
  1. University of Oxford, United Kingdom
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17280
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. James Kolasinski
  2. Tamar R Makin
  3. John Patrick Logan
  4. Saad Jbabdi
  5. Stuart Clare
  6. Charlotte J Stagg
  7. Heidi Johansen-Berg
(2016)
Perceptually relevant remapping of human somatotopy in 24 hours
eLife 5:e17280.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17280
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

Experience-dependent reorganisation of functional maps in the cerebral cortex is well described in the primary sensory cortices. However, there is relatively little evidence for such cortical reorganisation over the short-term. Using human somatosensory cortex as a model, we investigated the effects of a 24-hour gluing manipulation in which the right index and right middle fingers (digits 2 & 3) were adjoined with surgical glue. Somatotopic representations, assessed with two 7 tesla fMRI protocols, revealed rapid off-target reorganisation in the non-manipulated fingers following gluing, with the representation of the ring finger (digit 4) shifted towards the little finger (digit 5) and away from the middle finger (digit 3). These shifts were also evident in two behavioural tasks conducted in an independent cohort, showing reduced sensitivity for discriminating the temporal order of stimuli to the ring and little fingers, and increased substitution errors across this pair on a speeded reaction time task.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. James Kolasinski

    Oxford Centre for fMRI of the Brain, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    james.kolasinski@ndcn.ox.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1599-6440

  2. Tamar R Makin

    Oxford Centre for fMRI of the Brain, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5816-8979

  3. John Patrick Logan

    Oxford Centre for fMRI of the Brain, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4469-2948

  4. Saad Jbabdi

    Oxford Centre for fMRI of the Brain, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  5. Stuart Clare

    Oxford Centre for fMRI of the Brain, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  6. Charlotte J Stagg

    Oxford Centre for fMRI of the Brain, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  7. Heidi Johansen-Berg

    Oxford Centre for fMRI of the Brain, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Heidi Johansen-Berg, Reviewing editor, eLife.

Funding

University College, Oxford

  • James Kolasinski

Wellcome (104128/Z/14/Z)

  • Tamar R Makin

Wellcome (102584/Z/13/Z)

  • Charlotte J Stagg

Medical Research Council (MR/L009013/1)

  • Saad Jbabdi

Wellcome (110027/Z/15/Z)

  • Heidi Johansen-Berg

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: All data were acquired in accordance with local central university research ethics committee approval (University of Oxford MSD-IDREC-C2-2013-05). Eighteen participants were recruited, each providing written informed consent to take part in this study, and for the results of this study to be published.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Richard Ivry, University of California, Berkeley, United States

Version history

  1. Received: April 26, 2016
  2. Accepted: December 29, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: December 30, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: January 17, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2016, Kolasinski et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,570
    Page views
  • 484
    Downloads
  • 22
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, Scopus, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. James Kolasinski
  2. Tamar R Makin
  3. John Patrick Logan
  4. Saad Jbabdi
  5. Stuart Clare
  6. Charlotte J Stagg
  7. Heidi Johansen-Berg
(2016)
Perceptually relevant remapping of human somatotopy in 24 hours
eLife 5:e17280.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17280

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience

    Eelbrain, a Python toolkit for time-continuous analysis with temporal response functions

    Christian Brodbeck, Proloy Das ... Jonathan Z Simon
    Tools and Resources

    Even though human experience unfolds continuously in time, it is not strictly linear; instead, it entails cascading processes building hierarchical cognitive structures. For instance, during speech perception, humans transform a continuously varying acoustic signal into phonemes, words, and meaning, and these levels all have distinct but interdependent temporal structures. Time-lagged regression using temporal response functions (TRFs) has recently emerged as a promising tool for disentangling electrophysiological brain responses related to such complex models of perception. Here we introduce the Eelbrain Python toolkit, which makes this kind of analysis easy and accessible. We demonstrate its use, using continuous speech as a sample paradigm, with a freely available EEG dataset of audiobook listening. A companion GitHub repository provides the complete source code for the analysis, from raw data to group level statistics. More generally, we advocate a hypothesis-driven approach in which the experimenter specifies a hierarchy of time-continuous representations that are hypothesized to have contributed to brain responses, and uses those as predictor variables for the electrophysiological signal. This is analogous to a multiple regression problem, but with the addition of a time dimension. TRF analysis decomposes the brain signal into distinct responses associated with the different predictor variables by estimating a multivariate TRF (mTRF), quantifying the influence of each predictor on brain responses as a function of time(-lags). This allows asking two questions about the predictor variables: 1) Is there a significant neural representation corresponding to this predictor variable? And if so, 2) what are the temporal characteristics of the neural response associated with it? Thus, different predictor variables can be systematically combined and evaluated to jointly model neural processing at multiple hierarchical levels. We discuss applications of this approach, including the potential for linking algorithmic/representational theories at different cognitive levels to brain responses through computational models with appropriate linking hypotheses.

    1. Neuroscience

    Multisensory gaze stabilization in response to subchronic alteration of vestibular type I hair cells

    Louise Schenberg, Aïda Palou ... Mathieu Beraneck
    Research Article

    The functional complementarity of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) and optokinetic reflex (OKR) allows for optimal combined gaze stabilization responses (CGR) in light. While sensory substitution has been reported following complete vestibular loss, the capacity of the central vestibular system to compensate for partial peripheral vestibular loss remains to be determined. Here, we first demonstrate the efficacy of a 6-week subchronic ototoxic protocol in inducing transient and partial vestibular loss which equally affects the canal- and otolith-dependent VORs. Immunostaining of hair cells in the vestibular sensory epithelia revealed that organ-specific alteration of type I, but not type II, hair cells correlates with functional impairments. The decrease in VOR performance is paralleled with an increase in the gain of the OKR occurring in a specific range of frequencies where VOR normally dominates gaze stabilization, compatible with a sensory substitution process. Comparison of unimodal OKR or VOR versus bimodal CGR revealed that visuo-vestibular interactions remain reduced despite a significant recovery in the VOR. Modeling and sweep-based analysis revealed that the differential capacity to optimally combine OKR and VOR correlates with the reproducibility of the VOR responses. Overall, these results shed light on the multisensory reweighting occurring in pathologies with fluctuating peripheral vestibular malfunction.

    1. Neuroscience

    Circular and unified analysis in network neuroscience

    Mika Rubinov
    Review Article

    Genuinely new discovery transcends existing knowledge. Despite this, many analyses in systems neuroscience neglect to test new speculative hypotheses against benchmark empirical facts. Some of these analyses inadvertently use circular reasoning to present existing knowledge as new discovery. Here, I discuss that this problem can confound key results and estimate that it has affected more than three thousand studies in network neuroscience over the last decade. I suggest that future studies can reduce this problem by limiting the use of speculative evidence, integrating existing knowledge into benchmark models, and rigorously testing proposed discoveries against these models. I conclude with a summary of practical challenges and recommendations.