Live-cell single-molecule tracking reveals co-recognition of H3K27me3 and DNA targets polycomb Cbx7-PRC1 to chromatin

Abstract
Introduction
Results
Discussion
Materials and methods
References
Article and author information
Metrics

Abstract

The Polycomb PRC1 plays essential roles in development and disease pathogenesis. Targeting of PRC1 to chromatin is thought to be mediated by the Cbx family proteins (Cbx2/4/6/7/8) binding to histone H3 with a K27me3 modification (H3K27me3). Despite this prevailing view, the molecular mechanisms of targeting remain poorly understood. Here, by combining live-cell single-molecule tracking (SMT) and genetic engineering, we reveal that H3K27me3 contributes significantly to the targeting of Cbx7 and Cbx8 to chromatin, but less to Cbx2, Cbx4, and Cbx6. Genetic disruption of the complex formation of PRC1 facilitates the targeting of Cbx7 to chromatin. Biochemical analyses uncover that the CD and AT-hook-like (ATL) motif of Cbx7 constitute a functional DNA-binding unit. Live-cell SMT of Cbx7 mutants demonstrates that Cbx7 is targeted to chromatin by co-recognizing of H3K27me3 and DNA. Our data suggest a novel hierarchical cooperation mechanism by which histone modifications and DNA coordinate to target chromatin regulatory complexes.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17667.001

Introduction

Chemical covalent modification of histones and DNA regulates the chromatin structure states that play central roles in chromatin-templated biological processes (Jenuwein and Allis, 2001; Li et al., 2007a; Luco et al., 2011; Ruthenburg et al., 2007). This is exemplified by Polycomb group (PcG) proteins that function as histone-modifying enzymes and regulate gene expression via modulating higher order chromatin structures (Simon and Kingston, 2013). PcG proteins were initially identified as a body structure specification in Drosophila (Lewis, 1978). In mammals, PcG orthologs are essential for normal embryonic development and disease pathogenesis (Helin and Dhanak, 2013). For example, PcG subunits are frequently overexpressed or mutated in cancer, and perturbing PcG interactions can suppress cancer growth (Helin and Dhanak, 2013). Because of their clinical significance, enormous efforts have been devoted to develop drugs for targeting PcG subunits (Helin and Dhanak, 2013). However, the molecular mechanisms by which PcG proteins establish and maintain repressive Polycomb domains are still incompletely understood.

PcG proteins are generally found in one of two major protein complexes, the Polycomb repressive complex 1 or 2 (PRC1 or PRC2) (Simon and Kingston, 2013). PRC2 is a methyltransferase that catalyzes di- and tri-methylation of lysine 27 on histone H3 (H3K27me2/3) by the SET domain of Ezh2 (or Ezh1) (Cao et al., 2002; Czermin et al., 2002; Kuzmichev et al., 2002; Margueron et al., 2008; Muller et al., 2002; Shen et al., 2008). Unlike most SET domain methyltransferases, Ezh2 requires Suz12 and Eed for enzymatic activity (Cao and Zhang, 2004; Martin et al., 2006; Montgomery et al., 2005; Pasini et al., 2004). Additionally, Rbbp4 and Rbbp7 are stoichiometric subunits of PRC2 (Cao et al., 2002; Cao and Zhang, 2004; Margueron and Reinberg, 2011). In contrast, PRC1 is an ubiquitin ligase that monoubiquitylates histone H2A on lysine 119 (H2AK119ub1) (de Napoles et al., 2004; Wang et al., 2004a). PRC1 complexes form around Ring1b (or Ring1a) subunits with which one of the six Pcgf proteins (Pcgf1-6) associates (Gao et al., 2012; Gil and O'Loghlen, 2014; Tavares et al., 2012). The Ring-Pcgf2 (Mel18) or Pcgf4 (Bmi1) heterodimers are incorporated in canonical PRC1 (Cbx-PRC1; the functional homolog to Drosophila PRC1) and the other Ring-Pcgf heterodimers are assembled in variant PRC1 (vPRC1). The Cbx-PRC1 complex is composed of one of each of four different core subunits, Ring1 (Ring1a/Ring1b), Pcgf (Mel18/Bmi1), Phc (Phc1/2/3), and Cbx (Cbx2/4/6/7/8). In contrast, the vPRC1 complexes contain Rybp or Yaf instead of Cbx and Phc.

Several mechanisms underlying the targeting of PRC1 to chromatin have been documented (Blackledge et al., 2015; Simon and Kingston, 2013). Initial studies of Drosophila PcG (dPcG) proteins have suggested a mechanism of the PRC2-mediated recruitment of PRC1 (Cao et al., 2002; Min et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2004b). dPRC2 is recruited to Polycomb response elements (PRE) by its interaction with sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins and then modifies chromatin with H3K27me3 that recruits dPRC1. Consistent with the notion, genetic analyses have demonstrated that dPRC1 and dPRC2 co-regulate PcG target genes and dPRC1 is displaced from chromatin in dPRC2 mutants (Cao et al., 2002; Wang et al., 2004b). Genome-wide studies have shown that dPRC1 and dPRC2 co-occupy many PcG target genes (Schwartz et al., 2006).

In mammals, the recruitment of PRC1 is enigmatic and complicated, and has been broadly defined as H3K27me3-dependent and –independent recruitment mechanisms (Blackledge et al., 2015; Farcas et al., 2012; He et al., 2013; Tavares et al., 2012). An additional layer of complexity is added when considering that PRC1, in some cases, recruits PRC2 (Blackledge et al., 2014; Cooper et al., 2014; Kalb et al., 2014). The H3K27me3-dependent recruitment of mammalian PRC1 originates from the Drosophila model and is based on the facts that the Cbx family members and dPc both contain a conserved chromodomain (CD) (Blackledge et al., 2015). The model is consistent with studies demonstrating a link between H3K27me3 and PRC1 recruitment (Agger et al., 2007; Boyer et al., 2006; Lee et al., 2007; Mujtaba et al., 2008). Although the model for the mammalian Cbx-PRC1 recruitment is prevalent, several lines of evidence argue against the proposed model as a general mechanism of action. First, unlike to the dPc CD, the Cbx CDs have a much weaker affinity for H3K27me3 (Bernstein et al., 2006; Kaustov et al., 2011; Tardat et al., 2015). The Cbx2 CD shows preference for H3K27me3 while the Cbx4 and Cbx7 CDs exhibit preference for H3K9me3 (Bernstein et al., 2006; Kaustov et al., 2011; Tardat et al., 2015). The affinity of the Cbx6 and Cbx8 CDs for H3K27me3 is nearly undetectable (Bernstein et al., 2006; Kaustov et al., 2011). One question is whether the recognition of H3K27me3 by the Cbx CDs is required for the targeting of Cbx proteins to chromatin. Likewise, genome-wide approaches have demonstrated that H3K27me3 forms a broad domain and the binding PRC1 is sharply localized within the H3K27me3 domain, and that a subset of H3K27me3 domains corresponds to PRC1 binding sites (Ku et al., 2008). Thus, there are missing molecular links between genetic, biochemical, and genome-wide analysis for our understanding of how the Cbx-PRC1 complexes are targeted to chromatin.

Single-molecule techniques have been widely applied to study DNA- and chromatin-templated processes in vitro and provide insights into genetic information flow in vivo (Bell and Kowalczykowski, 2016; Dangkulwanich et al., 2014; Duzdevich et al., 2014; Geertsema and van Oijen, 2013; Harada et al., 2016; Herbert et al., 2008; Li et al., 2004; Ngo et al., 2015; Ren et al., 2003; Ren et al., 2006; Tatavosian et al., 2015). Recent advances in single-molecule imaging allow measuring the quantitative kinetics of gene control in living mammalian cells (Chen et al., 2014; Coleman et al., 2015; Gebhardt et al., 2013; Grimm et al., 2015; Izeddin et al., 2014; Katz et al., 2016; Knight et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2015, 2014; Mazza et al., 2012, 2013; Morisaki et al., 2014; Normanno et al., 2015; Swinstead et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2014). Here, we combine live-cell SMT and genetic engineering to determine whether H3K27me3 is required for the targeting of Cbx proteins to chromatin and to dissect the targeting mechanisms. Single-molecule quantitative measurement is used to determine the kinetics and dynamics of the Cbx protein interactions with chromatin in living mouse embryonic stem (mES) cells. The analyses demonstrate a new functional role of the Cbx-PRC1 complex formation in the targeting of Cbx7 to chromatin and uncover the molecular mechanism underlying the targeting of Cbx7 to chromatin and fill in the knowledge gap between genetic, biochemical, and genome-wide analyses. These results contribute significantly to our quantitative understanding of kinetics and dynamics of the Cbx-PRC1 proteins in living cells, allowing us to suggest the molecular mechanisms underlying how the Cbx-PRC1 complexes are targeted to chromatin.

Results

Validation of live-cell SMT using HaloTag and histone H2A fused to HaloTag

To investigate the Cbx proteins binding dynamics at endogenous genomic loci, we performed SMT to determine diffusion and chromatin binding properties of individually fluorescently labeled Cbx molecules within living mES cells. HaloTag was fused at the N-terminus of Cbx proteins under an inducible, tetracycline response element (TRE)-tight promoter (Figure 1A). These fusion genes were stably integrated into the genome of wild-type (PGK12.1) mES cells. We used highly inclined thin illumination (HILO) to avoid stray-light reflection and to reduce background from cell auto-fluorescence (Tokunaga et al., 2008) (Figure 1B). The HaloTag ligand of the bright, photostable fluorophore Janelia Fluor 549 (JF₅₄₉) allowed for visualization of single HaloTag-Cbx molecules at their basal expression level without doxycycline induction (Grimm et al., 2015) (Figure 1C).

Figure 1 with 3 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

The Cbx family members exhibit distinct dynamics in living mES cells.

(A) The sequences encoding the five Cbx proteins were fused with HaloTag to generate the HaloTag-Cbx fusions that were stably expressed in wild-type (PGK12.1) mES cells. The expression level of HaloTag-Cbx fusions was controlled by Tet-responsive element (TRE). HaloTag is shown in yellow, CD (chromodomain) in red, AT (AT-hook) motif in light blue; ATL (AT-hook-like) motif in cyan, and Cbox (chromobox) in emerald. (B) Schematic representation of highly inclined and laminated optical sheet (HILO) microscopy. (C) Live-cell single-molecule visualization of HaloTag-Cbx7 molecules in mES cells during a 30-ms exposure. Oval white dash circle outlines the nucleus of the cell. The individual white points represent single HaloTag-Cbx7 molecules. Scale bar, 2 µm. (D) Normalized histograms of the log maximum likelihood diffusion coefficient $D_{m}$ for H2A-HaloTag (N = 19 cells, n = 2675 trajectories) and HaloTag-NLS (N = 69 cells, n = 2087 trajectories) in wild-type mES cells. The H2A-HaloTag histogram was fitted with a three-component Gaussian and the HaloTag-NLS histogram a two-component Gaussian. The color bars indicate that the fraction of proteins in the chromatin-bound (CB, red), intermediate (ID, cyan), and fast diffusion (FD, green) population. NLS, nuclear localization sequence. (E) Normalized histograms of the log maximum likelihood diffusion coefficient $D_{m}$ for HaloTag-Cbx2 (N = 44 cells, n = 2833 trajectories), HaloTag-Cbx4 (N = 34 cells, n = 11,343 trajectories), HaloTag-Cbx6 (N = 33 cells, n = 7457 trajectories), HaloTag-Cbx7 (N = 51 cells, n = 3097 trajectories), and HaloTag-Cbx8 (N = 36 cells, n = 3351 trajectories) in wild-type mES cells. The histograms were fitted with a three-component Gaussian. (F) Fraction of the CB (red), ID (cyan), and FD (green) population for H2A-HaloTag, HaloTag-NLS, HaloTag-Cbx2, HaloTag-Cbx4, HaloTag-Cbx6, HaloTag-Cbx7, and HaloTag-Cbx8. The data were obtained from Figure 1D and E fitted with a Gaussian. Results are means ± SD.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17667.002

Figure 1—source data 1 Source data for Figure 1D–Eand Figure 1—figure supplement 1B and 2A.: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17667.003
Download elife-17667-fig1-data1-v1.xlsx

To validate our live-cell SMT system, we investigated HaloTag-NLS (NLS, nucleus localization sequence) and H2A-HaloTag. A visual inspection of single-molecule imaging tracks showed HaloTag-NLS and H2A-HaloTag exhibited obvious differences (Video 1 and 2). The majority of H2A-HaloTag molecules were stationary while almost every HaloTag-NLS molecules were mobile. Analysis of the distributions of track length for HaloTag labelled molecules indicated that ∼15–35% of the tracks have a frame number ≤ 3 (Figure 1—figure supplement 1A). To avoid bias toward slowly moving molecules, we calculated the maximum likelihood diffusion coefficient ( $D_{m}$ ) per track during a fixed time interval of 30 ms and constructed the $l o g D_{m}$ distributions for HaloTag-NLS and H2A-HaloTag (Figure 1D and Figure 1—source data 1). The histograms for H2A-HaloTag were fitted with three populations (see Materials and methods): F₁ ( $D_{m 1}$ ), F₂ ( $D_{m 2}$ ), and F₃ ( $D_{m 3}$ ). We measured F₁ = (72 ± 1)% ( $D_{m 1}$ = 0.032 ± 0.001 µm²s^-1), F₂ = (14 ± 2)% ( $D_{m 2}$ = 0.50 ± 0.06 µm²s^-1), and F₃ = (14 ± 2)% ( $D_{m 3}$ = 2.4 ± 0.2 µm²s^-1) (Figure 1F and Supplementary file 1). The histograms for HaloTag-NLS were fitted with two populations since the fitting with a three-component Gaussian function using the fixed value $D_{m 1}$ = 0.032 µm²s^-1 did not converge (see Materials and methods): F₂ ( $D_{m 2}$ ) and F₃ ( $D_{m 3}$ ). We measured F₂ = (71 ± 1)% ( $D_{m 2}$ = 0.24 ± 0.03 µm²s^-1) and F₃ = (29 ± 2)% ( $D_{m 3}$ = 2.5 ± 0.1 µm²s^-1) (Figure 1F and Supplementary file 1). We designated the F₁ component as the chromatin-bound (CB) population, whose slow motion reflects the chromosomal dynamics and measurement uncertainties, F₂ as the intermediate diffusion (ID) population, whose motion reflects non-specific interaction with chromatin or confined movement, and F₃ as the fast diffusion (FD) population, whose motion reflects freely diffusing molecules. Experimental evidence supports the assignment of the F₁ component as the CB population because (1) the CB population of HaloTag-NLS is almost undetectable, (2) ∼70% of H2A-HaloTag molecules are incorporated into chromatin, which is consistent with the reported results from fluorescence photobleaching after recovery (Ren et al., 2008), and (3) the diffusion constant and fractional size of the CB population of H2A-HaloTag agree with recent single-molecule reports (Gebhardt et al., 2013; Mazza et al., 2012).

Video 1

Download asset

posterframe for video — H2A-HaloTag in wild-type mES cells (Fractional studies).
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17667.007

Video 2

Download asset

The above $D_{m}$ analysis involves averaging over independent pairs of the squared jump distance of a single trajectory with a 30-ms interval. Such averaging might obscure transitions between chromatin-binding, confined, and Brownian motion for the single trajectory of a particle within the observation time. To investigate whether the averaging affects resolving the kinetic fractions, we calculated $D_{f 1}$ based on the squared jump distance between the initial position $r_{0}$ and the first position $D_{m}$ of a single-trajectory with a 30-ms interval, and constructed the $l o g D_{f 1}$ distribution (Figure 1—figure supplement 1B and Figure 1—source data 1). Counting only the first displacement of each track has been reported previously for studying of transcription factors binding to DNA (Gebhardt et al., 2013). The fractional sizes of the individual populations obtained from the $D_{f 1}$ analysis were comparable to those obtained from the $D_{m}$ analysis (Figure 1—figure supplement 1C). Since a typical $D_{m}$ histogram visually resolved populations better than a typical $D_{f 1}$ histogram (Figure 1D–E and Figure 1—figure supplement 1B), we performed our analysis using the $D_{m}$ analysis throughout the text.

Distinct chromatin-binding behaviors among the Cbx proteins

At the single-molecule level, we quantitatively measured diffusion constants and chromatin-binding levels of the Cbx proteins in mES cells (Video 3—7). We fitted the histograms with a three-component Gaussian function and calculated the diffusion constants and the fractional sizes of the individual populations (Figure 1E and Figure 1—source data 1). Since the peak centers of the CB populations for the HaloTag-Cbx proteins were almost the same as that for H2A-HaloTag, we fixed $l o g D_{m 1}$ to be the value −1.5 ( $D_{m 1}$ = 0.032 µm²s^-1)(see Materials and methods). We measured F₁ = (30 ± 1)%, F₂ = (61 ± 1)%, and F₃ = (9 ± 4)% for HaloTag-Cbx2, F₁ = (10 ± 1)%, F₂ = (50 ± 1)%, and F₃ = (40 ± 2)% for HaloTag-Cbx4, F₁ = (17 ± 1)%, F₂ = (47 ± 2)%, and F₃ = (36 ± 3)% for HaloTag-Cbx6, F₁ = (29 ± 1)%, F₂ = (49 ± 1)%, and F₃ = (22 ± 3)% for HaloTag-Cbx7, and F₁ = (26 ± 1)%, F₂ = (50 ± 2)%, and F₃ = (24 ± 4)% for HaloTag-Cbx8 (Figure 1F and Supplementary file 1). To complement the $D_{m}$ analysis, we also performed the $D_{f 1}$ analysis for HaloTag-Cbx7 (Figure 1—figure supplement 1B and Figure 1—source data 1). The fractional sizes obtained from the $D_{f 1}$ analysis were comparable to those obtained from the $D_{m}$ analysis (Figure 1—figure supplement 1C). These data provided a few novel observations: (1) the Cbx proteins exhibit distinct chromatin-associating capacities, (2) Cbx2, Cbx7, and Cbx8 exhibit the highest chromatin-bound level while Cbx4 has the lowest one, (3) the fractional sizes of the FD components are distinct among the Cbx family proteins, (4) except for Cbx2, the fractional sizes of the ID components are similar among the Cbx proteins, and (5) among the Cbx proteins, the diffusion constants are distinct for the ID components, but similar for the FD components. Altogether, our results demonstrate that the Cbx proteins employ distinct ways to interact with chromatin and to explore the nucleus.

Video 3

Download asset

Video 4

Download asset

Video 5

Download asset

Video 6

Download asset

Video 7

Download asset

The above SMT experiments were performed in wild-type mES cells where the endogenous and exogenous (fusion) proteins co-exist. HaloTag may make the fusion proteins less-equal competition with their endogenous counterparts. Given that Cbx7 is the major Cbx protein within mES cells (Morey et al., 2013; Morey et al., 2012), we integrated HaloTag-Cbx7 to the genome of Cbx7^−/− mES cells and performed SMT (Video 8). We measured F₁ = (30 ± 1)%, F₂ = (46 ± 1)%, and F₃ = (24 ± 2)% for HaloTag-Cbx7, which are comparable to those obtained from HaloTag-Cbx7 in wild-type mES cells (Figure 1—figure supplement 2A–B, Supplementary file 1, and Figure 1—source data 1). Next, we performed biochemical analysis of Cbx7. Immunoblotting indicated that the level of HaloTag-Cbx7 protein was less than that of its endogenous counterpart (Figure 1—figure supplement 3A). Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysis indicated that HaloTag antibody greatly precipitated promoters of Polycomb target genes from HaloTag-Cbx7/Cbx7^−/− mES cells, but much less from wild-type mES cells (Figure 1—figure supplement 3B), suggesting that the HaloTag-Cbx7 protein binds to Polycomb target genes.

Video 8

Download asset

H3K27me3 is important for the targeting of Cbx7 and Cbx8 to chromatin, but plays a less important role for Cbx2, Cbx4, and Cbx6

To investigate if H3K27me3 is required for the targeting of Cbx proteins to chromatin within mES cells (Figure 2—figure supplement 1A), we integrated HaloTag-Cbx fusion genes into the genome of Eed^−/− mES cells. Eed is a core component of PRC2 (Margueron and Reinberg, 2011). H3K27me3 was almost undetectable in Eed^−/− mES cells (Figure 2E). We performed SMT of HaloTag-Cbx proteins in Eed^−/− mES cells (Video 9—13). The $l o g D_{m}$ histograms for HaloTag-Cbx2, HaloTag-Cbx4, HaloTag-Cbx6, and HaloTag-Cbx8 were fitted with three populations (Figure 2A and Figure 2—source data 1). The $l o g D_{m}$ histograms for HaloTag-Cbx7 were fitted with two populations rather than three populations since the fitting with a three-component Gaussian function using the fixed value $D_{m 1}$ = 0.032 µm²s⁻¹ did not converge (see Materials and methods). We measured F₁ = (26 ± 1)%, F₂ = (54 ± 1)%, and F₃ = (20 ± 2)% for HaloTag-Cbx2, F₁ = (14 ± 1)%, F₂ = (65 ± 1)%, and F₃ = (21 ± 2)% for HaloTag-Cbx4, F₁ = (13 ± 1)%, F₂ = (52 ± 1)%, and F₃ = (35 ± 2)% for HaloTag-Cbx6, F₂ = (65 ± 3)% and F₃ = (35 ± 6)% for HaloTag-Cbx7, and F₁ = (8 ± 2)%, F₂ = (40 ± 1)% and F₃ = (52 ± 1)% for HaloTag-Cbx8 (Figure 2D and Supplementary file 1). By comparing these results to those obtained from wild-type mES cells, two conclusions could be made: (1) the CB components of Cbx7 and Cbx8 are either nearly undetectable or significantly reduced, suggesting that H3K27me3 contributes significantly to the targeting of Cbx7 and Cbx8 to chromatin, and (2) the levels of the CB components for Cbx2, Cbx4, and Cbx6 are similar or slightly reduced, suggesting that in contrast to Cbx7 and Cbx8, H3K27me3 plays a less important role in the targeting of Cbx2, Cbx4, and Cbx6 to chromatin. Taken together, our results demonstrate that H3K27me3 has distinct roles in the dynamic behaviors of the Cbx proteins and is important for the targeting of Cbx7 and Cbx8 to chromatin in mES cells, but plays a less important role for Cbx2, Cbx4, and Cbx6.

Figure 2 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

H3K27me3 is important for the targeting of Cbx7 and Cbx8 to chromatin, but plays a less important role for Cbx2, Cbx4, and Cbx6.

(A) Normalized histograms of the log maximum likelihood diffusion coefficient $l o g D_{m}$ for HaloTag-Cbx2 (N = 27 cells, n = 2471 trajectories), HaloTag-Cbx4 (N = 21 cells, n = 3254 trajectories), HaloTag-Cbx6 (N = 11 cells, n = 4860 trajectories), HaloTag-Cbx7 (N = 25 cells, n = 453 trajectories), and HaloTag-Cbx8 (N = 47 cells, n = 5825 trajectories) in *Eed^−/−* mES cells. The distributions for HaloTag-Cbx2, HaloTag-Cbx4, HaloTag-Cbx6, and HaloTag-Cbx8 were fitted with three populations while the distribution for HaloTag-Cbx7 with two populations. (B) Normalized histograms of the log maximum likelihood diffusion coefficient $l o g D_{m}$ for HaloTag-Cbx7 (N = 26 cells, n = 3874 trajectories) and HaloTag-Cbx8 (N = 42 cells, n = 9220 trajectories) in *Ezh2^−/−* mES cells. The distributions were fitted with three components. (C) Normalized histograms of the log maximum likelihood diffusion coefficient $l o g D_{m}$ for HaloTag-Cbx7 in *Y-Eed/Eed^−/−* (N = 16 cells, n = 1733 trajectories) and *Y-Ezh2/Ezh2^−/−* (N = 14 cells, n = 846 trajectories) mES cells. The histograms were fitted with a three-component Gaussian. (D) Chromatin-bound fraction for HaloTag-Cbx2, HaloTag-Cbx4, HaloTag-Cbx6, HaloTag-Cbx7, and HaloTag-Cbx8 in wild-type (red solid), *Eed^−/−* (red strip), and *Ezh2^−/−* (red cross-strip) mES cells, and for HaloTag-Cbx7 and HaloTag-Cbx8 in *Y-Eed/Eed^−/−* (yellow solid) andY-Ezh2/Ezh2^−/− (dark yellow solid) mES cells. The data were obtained from Figure 1E, Figure 2A–C, and Figure 2—figure supplement 1B–C fitted with a Gaussian function. Results are means ± SD. (E) Immunostaining of H3K27me3 in wild-type, *Eed^−/−, Ezh2^−/−, Y-Eed/Eed^−/−*, and *Y-Ezh2/Ezh2^−/−* mES cells by using antibody directed against H3K27me3 (green). DNA was stained with hoechst (red). Overlay images are shown. Note that H3K27me3 staining is visible in *Ezh2^−/−* mES cells because of the redundancy of Ezh1. Scale bar is 5 µm.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17667.015

Figure 2—source data 1 Source data for Figure 2A–C and Figure 2—figure supplementary 1B–C.: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17667.016
Download elife-17667-fig2-data1-v1.xlsx

Video 9

Download asset

Video 10

Download asset

Video 11

Download asset

Video 12

Download asset

Video 13

Download asset

To further investigate the role of H3K27me3 in the targeting of the Cbx proteins to chromatin, we integrated HaloTag-Cbx fusion genes into the genome of Ezh2^−/− mES cells. Ezh2 is the catalytic subunit of PRC2 (Margueron and Reinberg, 2011). The level of H3K27m3 was greatly reduced in Ezh2^−/−mES cells in comparison with wild-type mES cells (Figure 2E). The residual level of H3K27me3 was most likely contributed by Ezh1 (Margueron et al., 2008; Shen et al., 2008). We performed SMT of HaloTag-Cbx proteins in Ezh2^−/− mES cells (Video 14–18). The CB levels of HaloTag-Cbx2, HaloTag-Cbx4, and HaloTag-Cbx6 in Ezh2^−/− mES cells were similar to that in wild-type mES cells (Figure 2D, Figure 2—figure supplement 1B, Supplementary file 1, and Figure 2—source data 1). The fractional sizes of the CB components for HaloTag-Cbx7 and HaloTag-Cbx8 in Ezh2^−/− mES cells were greatly reduced, in comparison with that in wild-type mES cells (Figure 2B and D, Supplementary file 1, and Figure 2—source data 1). Thus, our data further suggest that H3K27me3 is important for the targeting of Cbx7 and Cbx8 to chromatin, but plays a less important role for Cbx2, Cbx4, and Cbx6.

Video 14

Download asset

Video 15

Download asset

Video 16

Download asset

Video 17

Download asset

Video 18

Download asset

To dissect whether H3K27me3 has a direct role in the targeting of Cbx7 and Cbx8 to chromatin, we integrated HaloTag-Cbx7/YFP-Eed and HaloTag-Cbx8/YFP-Eed into the genome of Eed^−/−mES cells and performed SMT of HaloTag-Cbx7 and HaloTag-Cbx8 (Video 19 and 20). The introduction of YFP-Eed fusion gene into Eed^−/−mES cells restored the defective H3K27me3 level (Figure 2E). We measured F₁ = (29 ± 1)% for HaloTag-Cbx7 and F₁ = (27 ± 1)% for HaloTag-Cbx8, both of which are comparable to those obtained from wild-type mES cells (Figure 2C and D, Figure 2—figure supplement 1C, Supplementary file 1, and Figure 2—source data 1). Next, we integrated HaloTag-Cbx7/YFP-Ezh2 and HaloTag-Cbx8/YFP-Ezh2 into the genome of Ezh2^−/−mES cells. The introduction of YFP-Ezh2 into Ezh2^−/−mES cells restored both the defective H3K27me3 level and the defective CB levels of HaloTag-Cbx7 and HaloTag-Cbx8 (Figure 2C–2E, Figure 2—figure supplement 1C, Supplementary file 1, Video 21 and 22, and Figure 2—source data 1). Altogether, our results demonstrate that H3K27me3 contributes significantly to the targeting of Cbx7 and Cbx8 to chromatin in mES cells.

Video 19

Download asset

Video 20

Download asset

Video 21

Download asset

Video 22

Download asset

The Cbx7 CD contributes to, but is not efficient for the targeting of Cbx7 to chromatin

Our data indicate that among the Cbx family members, H3K27me3 is important for the targeting of Cbx7 and Cbx8 to chromatin, which seemingly does not reconcile with in vitro kinetic data where the Cbx7 CD (CD_Cbx7) has preference for H3K9me3 and the Cbx8 CD (CD_Cbx8) exhibit a weak affinity for both H3K27me3 and H3K9me3 (Bernstein et al., 2006; Kaustov et al., 2011; Tardat et al., 2015). In the following studies, we focused on the Cbx7 protein since (1) Cbx7 is smaller than Cbx8 (Figure 1A and Figure 3A); (2) Cbx7 contains three conserved domains while Cbx8 has four (Figure 1A and Figure 3A); (3) Cbx7-PRC1 is the major canonical PRC1 in mES cells (Morey et al., 2013; Morey et al., 2012); and (4) the expression of Cbx8 is nearly undetectable in mES cells (Morey et al., 2013; Morey et al., 2012). To test whether CD_Cbx7 binds to chromatin in living mES cells, we generated CD_Cbx7 fused with HaloTag (Figure 3A). The fusion was stably expressed in wild-type mES cells. We measured F₁ = (8 ± 1)%, F₂ = (54 ± 2)%, and F₃ = (38 ± 2)% (Figure 3B and C, Video 23, Supplementary file 1, and Figure 3—source data 1). These data indicated that the fractional size of the CB component of HaloTag-CD_Cbx7 is below 30% of HaloTag-Cbx7, suggesting that CD_Cbx7 binds to chromatin less efficiently than Cbx7. Next, we generated Cbx7^F11A and Cbx7^△CD fused with HaloTag, respectively (Figure 3A). The F11A mutation has been shown to disrupt the interaction of CD_Cbx7 and H3K27me3 (Kaustov et al., 2011). The two fusions were stably and correctly expressed in wild-type mES cells (Figure 3—figure supplement 1). We measured F₁ = (17 ± 1)%, F₂ = (42 ± 3)%, and F₃ = (41 ± 4)% for HaloTag-Cbx7^F11A, and F₁ = (13 ± 1)%, F₂ = (44 ± 1)%, and F₃ = (43 ± 2)% for Cbx7^△CD (Figure 3B and C, Video 24 and 25, Supplementary file 1, and Figure 3—source data 1), indicating that the CB fractional levels of Cbx7^F11A and Cbx7^△CD are less than that of HaloTag-Cbx7, but more than that of CD_Cbx7. Taken together, our results imply that CD_Cbx7 is required, but not efficient for the targeting of Cbx7 to chromatin and that additional targeting mechanism(s) exist(s).

Video 23

Download asset

Figure 3 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

The Cbx7 CD is not efficient for the targeting of Cbx7 to chromatin.

(A) Schematic representation of Cbx7 variants. (B) Normalized histograms of the log maximum likelihood diffusion coefficient $D_{m}$ for HaloTag-Cbx7 replicated from Figure 1E and for HaloTag-CD_Cbx7 (N = 24 cells, n = 6600 trajectories), HaloTag-Cbx7^F11A(N = 22 cells, n = 1882 trajectories), and HaloTag-Cbx7^△CD (N = 15 cells, n = 5215 trajectories) in wild-type mES cells. The histograms of HaloTag-CD_Cbx7, HaloTag-Cbx7^F11A, and HaloTag-Cbx7^△CD were fitted with a three-component Gaussian. (C) Fraction of the CB, ID, and FD population for HaloTag-Cbx7 replicated from Figure 1F, HaloTag-CD_Cbx7, HaloTag-Cbx7^F11A, and HaloTag-Cbx7^△CD. The data were obtained from Figure 3B fitted with a Gaussian. Results are means ± SD.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17667.033

Figure 3—source data 1 Source data for Figure 3B: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17667.034
Download elife-17667-fig3-data1-v1.xlsx

Video 24

Download asset

Video 25

Download asset

Effects of the Cbx7 CD on the residence time of Cbx7 at chromatin

To determine the binding kinetics, we measured the in vivo residence time of Cbx7 molecules bound to chromatin. To reduce the photobleaching of JF₅₄₉, we performed time-lapse experiments at an integration time, τ_int, of 30 ms interspersed with a dark time, τ_d, of 170 ms (Figure 4A and Video 26). We calculated diffusion coefficients of individual HaloTag-Cbx7 molecules and considered molecules to be bound to chromatin if their $D_{m}$ was < 0.10 µm²/s. The dwell times of individual stationary Cbx7 molecules were directly measured as the lifetime of the fluorescence spots. The cumulative frequency distributions of dwell times were fitted with a two-component exponential decay function (see Materials and methods) (Figure 4B and Figure 4—source data 1), generating two populations: the transient chromatin-bound population (F_1tb and τ_tb) and the stable chromatin-bound population (F_1sb and τ_sb). We measured F_1tb = (23.4 ± 1.1)% (τ_tb = 0.79 ± 0.01 s) and F_1sb = (5.3 ± 0.4)% (τ_sb = 7.3 ± 0.1 s) (Figure 4C and 4D, Figure 4—figure supplement 1, Supplementary file 2, and Figure 4—source data 1). We then investigated the residence times of the Cbx7 variants at chromatin (Video 27–29). The residence times of the stable chromatin-bound populations were determined for HaloTag-CD_Cbx7 (τ_sb = 4.7 ± 0.1 s), HaloTag-Cbx7^F11A (τ_sb = 5.8 ± 0.1 s), and HaloTag-Cbx7^△CD (τ_sb = 4.7 ± 0.1 s) (Figure 4C and Supplementary file 2). Thus, the residence times of the stable chromatin-bound molecules of HaloTag-Cbx7^F11A was longer than that of HaloTag-CD_Cbx7 and HaloTag-Cbx7^△CD, but shorter than that of HaloTag-Cbx7 (Figure 4C and Supplementary file 2). The F_1sb level of HaloTag-Cbx7^F11A was higher than that of HaloTag-CD_Cbx7 and HaloTag-Cbx7^△CD, but was less than that of HaloTag-Cbx7 (Figure 4D and Supplementary file 2). To allow visual comparison among Cbx7 and its variants, we plotted their survival probability in the same figure (Figure 4E and Figure 4—source data 1). We observed that HaloTag-Cbx7^F11A stays a longer time at chromatin than HaloTag-CD_Cbx7 and HaloTag-Cbx7^△CD, but a shorter time than HaloTag-Cbx7 (Figure 4E). Altogether, our results suggest that the interaction of H3K27me3 and CD_Cbx7 is not enough for the stabilizing of Cbx7 at chromatin.

Figure 4 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Effects of the Cbx7 CD on the residence time of Cbx7 at chromatin.

(A) Time-lapse imaging of HaloTag-Cbx7 at constant integration (τ_int = 30 ms) and dark (τ_d = 170 ms) time in wild-type mES cells. The red arrow indicates a molecule that binds to chromatin. The green arrow indicates a diffusing molecule. Molecules with $D_{m}$ < 0.10 µm²/s were selected to calculate residence time and survival probability. (B) Cumulative frequency distribution of the dwell times for HaloTag-Cbx7 (N = 17 cells, n = 2169 trajectories), HaloTag-CD_Cbx7(N = 18 cells, n = 790 trajectories), HaloTag-Cbx7^F11A (N = 25 cells, n = 3956 trajectories), and HaloTag-Cbx7^△CD(N = 21 cells, n = 3471 trajectories) in wild-type mES cells. The histograms were fitted with a two-component exponential decay model. (C) Residence time (τ_sb) of the stable chromatin-bound population for HaloTag-Cbx7, HaloTag-CD_Cbx7, HaloTag-Cbx7^F11A, and HaloTag-Cbx7^△CD in wild-type mES cells. (D) Fraction (F_1sb) of the stable chromatin-bound population for HaloTag-Cbx7, HaloTag-CD_Cbx7, HaloTag-Cbx7^F11A, and HaloTag-Cbx7^△CD in wild-type mES cells. (E) Survival probability for HaloTag-Cbx7, HaloTag-CD_Cbx7, HaloTag-Cbx7^F11A, and HaloTag-Cbx7^△CD in wild-type mES cells.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17667.038

Figure 4—source data 1 Source data for Figure 4B and Figure 4—figure supplementary 1: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17667.039
Download elife-17667-fig4-data1-v1.xlsx

Video 26

Download asset

Video 27

Download asset

Video 28

Download asset

Video 29

Download asset

Disruption of the complex formation of Cbx7-PRC1 facilitates the targeting of Cbx7 to chromatin

To search for factor(s) that contribute(s) to the targeting of Cbx7 to chromatin, we investigated whether individual components of Cbx7-PRC1 affect the targeting of Cbx7 to chromatin. We integrated HaloTag-Cbx7 into the genome of Ring1a^−/−/Ring1b^−/− mES cells. Ring1a and Ring1b are the assemblage of PRC1 complexes and the depletion of Ring1b disrupts the complex formation of PRC1 (Leeb and Wutz, 2007). The $l o g D_{m}$ histograms indicated three components (Figure 5A, Video 30, and Figure 5—source data 1). We measured F₁ = (44 ± 1)%, F₂ = (32 ± 2)%, and F₃ = (24 ± 2)% (Figure 5B and Supplementary file 1), indicating that the fractional size of the CB component is ∼1.5 fold of that obtained from wild-type mES cells. Ring1a and Ring1b are not only core components of Cbx-PRC1, but also core components of vPRC1 (Gao et al., 2012; Tavares et al., 2012). To disrupt the complex formation of Cbx-PRC1, we established Bmi1^−/−/Mel18^−/− mES cells stably expressing HaloTag-Cbx7. Bmi1 and Mel18 are assembled into the Cbx-PRC1 complexes (Gao et al., 2012). We performed SMT of HaloTag-Cbx7 in Bmi1^−/−/Mel18^−/− mES cells (Video 31). The $l o g D_{m}$ histograms indicated three populations (Figure 5A and Figure 5—source data–1). We measured F₁ = (40 ± 1)%, F₂ = (44 ± 1)%, and F₃ = (16 ± 5)% (Figure 5B and Supplementary file 1), indicating that the fractional size of the CB component is ∼1.4 fold of that obtained from wild-type mES cells. Thus, these data suggest that the disruption of the complex formation of Cbx7-PRC1 facilitates the targeting of Cbx7 to chromatin.

Figure 5 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Disruption of the complex formation of Cbx7-PRC1 facilitates the targeting of Cbx7 to chromatin.

(A) Normalized histograms of the log maximum likelihood diffusion coefficient $D_{m}$ for HaloTag-Cbx7 in wild-type mES cells replicated from Figure 1E and for HaloTag-Cbx7 in *Ring1a^−/−/Ring1b^−/−* (N = 29 cells, n = 2600 trajectories) and *Bmi1^−/−/Mel18^−/−* (N = 27 cells, n = 6859 trajectories) mES cells. The histograms were fitted with a three-component Gaussian. (B) Fraction of the CB (red), ID (cyan), and FD (green) population for HaloTag-Cbx7 in wild-type mES cells replicated from Figure 1F and for HaloTag-Cbx7 in *Ring1a^−/−/Ring1b^−/−* and *Bmi1^−/−/Mel18^−/−* mES cells. Results are means ± SD. (C–D) Residence time (C) and fraction (D) of the stable chromatin-bound population for HaloTag-Cbx7 in wild-type mES cells replicated from Figure 4C and D and for HaloTag-Cbx7 in *Ring1a^−/−/Ring1b^−/−* (N = 18 cells, n = 4849 trajectories) and *Bmi1^−/−/Mel18^−/−* (N = 27 cells, n = 3484 trajectories) mES cells. (E) Survival probability for HaloTag-Cbx7 in wild-type mES cells replicated from Figure 4E, and for HaloTag-Cbx7 in *Ring1a^−/−/Ring1b^−/−* and *Bmi1^−/−/Mel18^−/−* mES cells.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17667.045

Figure 5—source data 1 Source data for Figure 5A and Figure 5—figure supplementary 1: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17667.046
Download elife-17667-fig5-data1-v1.xlsx

Video 30

Download asset

Video 31

Download asset

To investigate whether the increased level of Cbx7 at chromatin upon the depletion of PRC1 components is caused by the dissociation rate, we measured the residence times of HaloTag-Cbx7 in Ring1a^−/−/Ring1b^−/− and Bmi1^−/−/Mel18^−/− mES cells, respectively (Video 32 and 33). The cumulative frequency distributions of dwell times were fitted with a two-component exponential decay model (Figure 5—figure supplement 1, and Figure 5—source data 1)). We measured τ_tb = 1.06 ± 0.02 s and τ_sb = 10.6 ± 0.2 s for HaloTag-Cbx7 in Ring1a^−/−/Ring1b^−/− mES cells and τ_tb = 1.08 ± 0.02 s and τ_sb = 10.9 ± 0.1 s for HaloTag-Cbx7 in Bmi1^−/−/Mel18^−/− mES cells (Figure 5C and Supplementary file 2), indicating that HaloTag-Cbx7 stays a longer time at chromatin in Ring1a^−/−/Ring1b^−/−and Bmi1^−/−/Mel18^−/− mES cells than in wild-type mES cells. The F_1tb and F_1sb levels for HaloTag-Cbx7 in Ring1a^−/−/Ring1b^−/−and Bmi1^−/−/Mel18^−/− mES cells were higher than that in wild-type mES cells (Figure 5D and Supplementary file 2). A survival probability plot showed that HaloTag-Cbx7 stays a shorter time at chromatin in wild-type mES cells than in Ring1a^−/−/Ring1b^−/− and Bmi1^−/−/Mel18^−/−mES cells (Figure 5E and Figure 5—source data 1). Thus, our data demonstrate that genetic depletion of PRC1 components facilitates the stabilizing of Cbx7 at chromatin.

Video 32

Download asset

Video 33

Download asset

CD_Cbx7 and ATL_Cbx7 together constitute a DNA-binding unit

Since the Cbx-PRC1 components tested are not required for the targeting of Cbx7 to chromatin, we turned our attention into Cbx7 itself. In addition to the conserved CD, Cbx7 harbors an ATL motif adjacent to CD (Senthilkumar and Mishra, 2009) (Figure 6A). Since the Cbx7 ATL (ATL_Cbx7) contains 6 basic amino acids out of 16, we postulated that the ATL motif may be involved in nucleic acid-binding. To test this hypothesis, we generated Cbx7 variants (Figure 6—figure supplement 1) and performed electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) (Figure 6B). EMSA analysis indicated that CD_Cbx7 has no DNA-binding activity, consistent with early studies (Bernstein et al., 2006). Although ATL_Cbx7 contains a high content of basic amino acids, EMSA analysis demonstrated that ATL_Cbx7 has undetectable DNA-binding activity, consistent with previous report that ATL does not bind to DNA (Reeves and Nissen, 1990). However, under the same conditions, CD-ATL_Cbx7 showed clear DNA-binding activity, suggesting that the DNA-binding activity requires both CD_Cbx7 and ATL_Cbx7. To test whether the basic amino acids of ATL_Cbx7 affect the DNA-binding activity, we substituted these basic amino acids with alanine or glycine to generate CD-ATLm_Cbx7. EMSA analysis showed that the substitution abolishes the DNA-binding activity of CD-ATL_Cbx7. As a control, GST did not bind to DNA. The DNA-binding capacity of CD-ATL_Cbx7 is concentration-dependent (Figure 6C). The K_d was determined to be ∼1.0 µM, which is much smaller than the CD_Cbx7 binding to H3K27me3 peptide (Bernstein et al., 2006; Kaustov et al., 2011; Tardat et al., 2015).

Figure 6 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

CD_Cbx7 and ATL_Cbx7 together constitute a DNA-binding entity.

(A) Schematic representation of Cbx7. The sequence of amino acids of ATL motif is shown. The basic amino acids are underlined and mutated to alanine to generate ATLm. (B) EMSA for the determination of Cbx7 variants binding to dsDNA-1. dsDNA-1 was labelled with Alexa Fluor 488 dye. Left: short-time exposure. Right: long-time exposure. B: bound DNA-protein complex. F: free DNA. (C) EMSA for the determination of the dissociation constant (*K_d*) of the CD-ATL_Cbx7 cassette binding to dsDNA-1. Bottom: binding curve for the CD-ATL_Cbx7 cassette. (D–G) EMSA for the determination of the relative affinities for the CD-ATL_Cbx7 cassette binding to dsDNA-2, ssDNA, dsRNA, and ssRNA. dsDNA-1 within dsDNA-1/CD-ATL_Cbx7 complexes was competed with competitors, dsDNA-2 (D), ssDNA (E), dsRNA (F), and ssRNA (G), respectively. ds: double-strand. ss: single-strand.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17667.052

Previous studies have shown that CD_Cbx7 binds to RNA with affinity of ∼50 µM (Bernstein et al., 2006; Yap et al., 2010). To compare the relative affinity of CD-ATL_Cbx7 binding to DNA versus RNA, we performed competitive assays. 0.5 µM of double-stranded DNA-2 (dsDNA-2), with sequence being different from dsDNA-1, completely dissociated the fluorescently labeled dsDNA-1 (0.1 µM) from CD-ATL_Cbx7 (Figure 6D). At 4.0 µM, single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) could not completely dissociate dsDNA-1 from CD-ATL_Cbx7 (Figure 6E). Under the identical conditions, 10 µM of double-stranded RNA could not completely dissociate dsDNA-1 from CD-ATL_Cbx7 (Figure 6F). Likewise, 40 µM of single-stranded RNA had no noticeable effects on the association CD-ATL_Cbx7 with dsDNA-1 (Figure 6G). Altogether, our results demonstrate that CD-ATL_Cbx7 preferentially recognizes dsDNA rather than ssDNA, dsRNA and ssRNA.

CD_Cbx7 and ATL_Cbx7 together control the targeting of Cbx7 to chromatin

To investigate whether the in vitro capacity of the binding of CD-ATL_Cbx7 to DNA has a functional role in the targeting of Cbx7 to chromatin in vivo, we made Cbx7 variants lacking DNA-binding ability and stably expressed these variants in wild-type mES cells (Figure 7A and Figure 3—figure supplement 1). The histograms for HaloTag-Cbx7^△ATL were fitted with three populations (Figure 7B, Video 34, and Figure 7—source data 1). We measured F₁ = (16 ± 1)%, F₂ = (44 ± 2)%, and F₃ = (40 ± 3)% (Figure 7C and Supplementary file 1), indicating that the fractional size of the CB component of HaloTag-Cbx7^△ATL is about half of that of HaloTag-Cbx7. The histograms for HaloTag-Cbx7^ATLm indicated three components (Figure 7B, Video 35, and Figure 7—source data 1). We measured F₁ = (16 ± 1)%, F₂ = (60 ± 1)%, and F₃ = (24 ± 3)% (Figure 7C and Supplementary file 1), indicating that the fractional size of the CB component of HaloTag-Cbx7^ATLm is comparable to that of HaloTag-Cbx7^△ATL. Thus, our data indicate that the ATL_Cbx7 motif is required for the efficient targeting of Cbx7 to chromatin.

Figure 7 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

CD_Cbx7 and ATL_Cbx7 together control the targeting of Cbx7 to chromatin.

(A) Schematic representation of Cbx7 variants. The underlined ATL amino acids were mutated into alanine or glycine. (B) Normalized histograms of the log maximum likelihood diffusion coefficient $D_{m}$ for HaloTag-Cbx7 replicated from Figure 1E and for HaloTag-Cbx7^△ATL(N = 12 cells, n = 3065 trajectories), HaloTag-Cbx7^ATLm(N = 13 cells, n = 2257 trajectories), and HaloTag-Cbx7^△CD-ATL(N = 35 cells, n = 8329 trajectories) in wild-type mES cells. The histograms were fitted with a three-component Gaussian. (C) Fraction of the CB, ID, and FD population for HaloTag-Cbx7 replicated from Figure 1F, HaloTag-Cbx7^△ATL, HaloTag-Cbx7^ATLm, and HaloTag-Cbx7^△CD-ATL. The data were obtained from Figure 7B fitted with a Gaussian. Results are means ± SD. (D–E) Residence time (D) and fraction (E) of the stable chromatin-bound population for HaloTag-Cbx7 replicated from Figure 4C and D, HaloTag-Cbx7^△ATL(N = 17 cells, n = 2384 trajectories), HaloTag-Cbx7^ATLm(N = 24 cells, n = 2957 trajectories), and HaloTag-Cbx7^△CD-ATL(N = 22 cells, n = 4908 trajectories). Results are means ± SD. (F) Survival probability for HaloTag-Cbx7 replicated from Figure 4D, HaloTag-Cbx7^△ATL, HaloTag-Cbx7^ATLm, and HaloTag-Cbx7^△CD-ATL.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17667.054

Figure 7—source data 1 Source data for Figure 7B and Figure 7—figure supplementary 1.: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17667.055
Download elife-17667-fig7-data1-v1.xlsx

Video 34

Download asset

Video 35

Download asset

Given that CD_Cbx7 and ATL_Cbx7 constitute an H3K27me3- and DNA-binding unit, we tested the role of CD-ATL_Cbx7 in the targeting of Cbx7 to chromatin. We deleted both CD_Cbx7 and ATL_Cbx7 to generate HaloTag-Cbx7^△CD-ATL that was stably expressed in wild-type mES cells (Figure 7A and Figure 3—figure supplement 1). The histograms for HaloTag-Cbx7^△CD-ATL were fitted with three populations (Figure 7B, Video 36, and Figure 7—source data 1). We measured F₁ = (8 ± 3)%, F₂ = (46 ± 1)%, and F₃ = (46 ± 1)% for HaloTag-Cbx7^△CD-ATL (Figure 7C and Supplementary file 1), indicating that the F₁ level was lower than that for HaloTag-Cbx7^△CD and HaloTag-Cbx7^△ATL (Supplementary file 1). Thus, our data suggest that CD_Cbx7 and ATL_Cbx7 function together as a unit to mediate the targeting of Cbx7 to chromatin.

Video 36

Download asset

Next, we investigated the residence times of the Cbx7 variants at chromatin (Figure 7—figure supplement 1, Video 37–39, and Figure 7—source data 1). The residence time of the stable chromatin-bound population was reduced for HaloTag-Cbx7^ALTm (τ_sb = 6.0 ± 0.2 s), HaloTag-Cbx7^△ATL (τ_sb = 5.8 ± 0.1 s), and HaloTag-Cbx7^△CD-ATL (τ_sb = 4.6 ± 0.1 s), in comparison with HaloTag-Cbx7 (τ_sb = 7.3 ± 0.1 s) (Figure 7D and Supplementary file 2). The F_1sb levels for HaloTag-Cbx7^ALTm and HaloTag-Cbx7^△ATL were less than that for HaloTag-Cbx7 (Figure 7E and Supplementary file 2). The F_1sb level for HaloTag-Cbx7^△CD-ATL was almost undetectable (Figure 7E and Supplementary file 2). A survival probability plot demonstrated that these HaloTag-Cbx7 variants stay a shorter time period at chromatin than HaloTag-Cbx7 (Figure 7F and Figure 7—source data 1). Thus, our data demonstrate that CD-ATL_Cbx7 is a functional unit that regulates the targeting of Cbx7 to chromatin.

Video 37

Download asset

Video 38

Download asset

Video 39

Download asset

Discussion

In this study, we have elucidated the recruitment mechanism for the Cbx-PRC1 complexes by integrating approaches from live-cell SMT, genetic engineering, and biochemistry. We have demonstrated that H3K27me3 has a central and a direct role in the recruitment of Cbx7 and Cbx8 to chromatin in vivo, while plays a less important role in the targeting of Cbx2, Cbx4, and Cbx6 to chromatin. We have identified that the CD-ATL_Cbx7 cassette functions as a unit that co-recognizes H3K27me3 and DNA and regulates the targeting of Cbx7 to chromatin. These results challenge the prevailing view that all Cbx family members require H3K27me3 for the targeting of them to chromatin and provide new insights into the genetic, biochemical, and genome-wide analysis for our understanding of the Cbx-PRC1 targeting mechanisms. We propose that a hierarchical cooperation between a low-affinity H3K27me3-binding CD_Cbx7 and a high-affinity DNA-binding CD-ATL_Cbx7 targets Cbx7-PRC1 to chromatin.

Targeting the Cbx family members with and without dependence on PRC2 and H3K27me3

During evolution, the number of genes encoding Cbx proteins has increased, which has resulted in structural and functional diversification (Cheng et al., 2014; Klauke et al., 2013; Morey et al., 2012; Ren and Kerppola, 2011; Ren et al., 2008; Tatavosian et al., 2015; Vincenz and Kerppola, 2008; Whitcomb et al., 2007; Zhen et al., 2014). At the single-molecule level, we quantified the kinetic fractions of the Cbx proteins within living mES cells and revealed that ∼ 30% of Cbx2, Cbx7, and Cbx8 associate with chromatin at a given time period while ∼10–15% of Cbx4 and Cbx6 bind to chromatin. The fractional sizes and diffusion constants of the ID populations among the Cbx family members are distinct, suggesting that the Cbx proteins employ distinct mechanisms to explore the nucleus of the cell.

At the single-molecule sensitivity, we demonstrated that Cbx7 and Cbx8 are displaced from chromatin in Eed^−/− and Ezh2^−/− mES cells. The introduction of Eed into Eed^−/− mES cells and of Ezh2 into Ezh2^−/− mES cells restored the Cbx7 and Cbx8 association with chromatin and the H3K27me3 level. Thus, it is likely that H3K27me3 directly controls the association of Cbx7 and Cbx8 with chromatin. Consistent with this notion, previous genome-wide ChIP-Seq analysis demonstrated that Cbx7 is displaced from chromatin in Eed^−/− mES cells (Morey et al., 2013). We found that the removal of H3K27me3 has no or small effects on the association of Cbx2, Cbx4, and Cbx6 with chromatin. No effects on the Cbx6 association with chromatin is consistent with previous studies where Cbx6 does not interact with Ring1b and only 5% of Cbx6 target genes are occupied by H3K27me3 in mES cells (Morey et al., 2012). In contrast to Cbx6, Cbx2 and Cbx4 form the Cbx-PRC1 complex and overlap with H3K27me3 Polycomb domains (Gao et al., 2012; Mardaryev et al., 2016). Cbx4 is a SUMO E3 ligase and can function as the H3K27me3-dependent or –independent way (Kagey et al., 2003; Li et al., 2014; Mardaryev et al., 2016; Roscic et al., 2006). Our recent study has shown that Cbx2 is targeted to mitotic chromosomes independently of PRC1 and PRC2, and directly recruits the canonical PRC1 components to mitotic chromosomes (Zhen et al., 2014). Another study has demonstrated that Cbx2 targets the canonical PRC1 to constitutive heterochromatin by directly recognizing pericentromeric chromatin during early mouse development (Tardat et al., 2015). Additionally, in vitro study has shown that Cbx2 can directly bind to and compact reconstituted nucleosomes (Grau et al., 2011). Thus, these studies suggest additional mechanisms exist to target Cbx2, Cbx4, and Cbx6 to chromatin.

Targeting of the Cbx7 protein to chromatin by co-recognition of H3K27me3 and DNA

We observed that the level of CD_Cbx7 at chromatin is less than 30% of Cbx7 and that the residence time of the stable chromatin-bound population of CD_Cbx7 is about 65% of Cbx7. Mutational analysis demonstrated that Cbx7^F11A and Cbx7^△CD both remain associating with chromatin. These data imply that additional factor(s) exist(s) to target the Cbx7 protein to chromatin. Cbx7 contains two conserved domains: CD and ATL (Senthilkumar and Mishra, 2009). Consistent with previous reports, our data showed that CD_Cbx7 and ATL_Cbx7 do not bind to DNA, respectively (Bernstein et al., 2006; Reeves and Nissen, 1990). Interestingly, our results demonstrated that CD_Cbx7 and ATL_Cbx7 together function as a DNA-binding unit. CD-ATL_Cbx7 exhibited much higher affinity for dsDNA than for ssDNA, dsRNA, and ssRNA. The DNA-binding capacity of CD-ATL_Cbx7 was functionally significant. Perturbation of the DNA-binding capacity of CD-ATL_Cbx7 impaired the level of Cbx7 at chromatin and reduced the Cbx7 residence time. Deletion of both CD_Cbx7 and ATL _Cbx7 results in the significantly reduced level of the stable chromatin-bound population. Thus, our data demonstrate that the co-recognition of H3K27me3 and DNA by the CD-ATL_Cbx7 module contributes significantly to the targeting of Cbx7 to chromatin.

Since histone-modifying enzymes typically reside in protein complexes, components within the protein complexes often contribute to targeting of them to chromatin by multivalent engagement of chromatin (Lalonde et al., 2014; Rando, 2012; Ruthenburg et al., 2007). Given that previous studies have shown that Mel18 binds DNA directly in vitro (Akasaka et al., 1996) and the Ring1b-Mel18 ubiquitin module recognizes reconstituted nucleosome (McGinty et al., 2014), we test whether subunits of the Cbx7-PRC1 complex contribute to the binding of Cbx7 to chromatin. Interestingly, our single-molecule approaches demonstrated that depletion of Ring1a/Ring1b and Bmi1/Mel18 results in the increased chromatin-bound levels and the increased residence times of Cbx7. Further studies are needed to understand whether the Cbx-PRC1 complex formation is required for the targeting specificity of Cbx7.

Hierarchical cooperation between DNA and H3K27me3

Hierarchical cooperation within chromatin regulatory proteins or complexes between unmodified DNA and histone markers is emerging as a mechanism for gene control. For example, SWR1 is recruited to promoter regions containing nucleosome free region > 50 bp and an adjoining nucleosome by the nanomolar DNA-binding affinity of Swc2, a subunit of SWR1. Once bound, the micromolar affinity of Bdf1 bromodomains for acetylated histones directs SWR1 binding to the +1 nucleosome over the -1 nucleosome (Ranjan et al., 2013). Thus, hierarchical cooperation between DNA and histone modifications could underpin the SWR1’s role in promoting H2A.Z replacement. Another example is that the Rpd3S histone deacetylase complex binds to H3K36-methylated dinucleosome with 100 pM affinity by multiple engagements of histone modifications and DNA (Huh et al., 2012; Li et al., 2007b). The DNA- and histone-binding abilities of Eaf3, a subunit of Rpd3S, are self-contained and allosterically regulated by Rco1, another subunit of Rpd3S (Ruan et al., 2015).

Our results suggest that the mechanism of targeting of Cbx7 to chromatin is dependent on hierarchical cooperation via co-recognition of DNA and H3K27me3 by the CD-ATL_Cbx7 entity (Figure 8). We propose that Cbx7-PRC1 is recruited to chromatin by the CD_Cbx7 recognition of H3K27me3. We hypothesize that the interaction between H3K27me3 and CD_Cbx7 triggers conformational changes of the Cbx7-PRC1 complex, which drive the high-affinity interaction between DNA and CD-ATL_Cbx7. This hypothesis is consistent with our observation that the removal of H3K27me3 significantly reduces the targeting of Cbx7 and Cbx8 to chromatin. Implicit in this model is that the binding of CD-ATL_Cbx7 to DNA is auto-inhibited by unknown mechanisms and allosterically regulated by the CD_Cbx7 interaction with H3K27me3. Previous studies have shown that H3K27me3 allosterically activates the methyltransferase activity of the PRC2 complex by its interaction with the C-terminus of Eed (Jiao and Liu, 2015; Margueron et al., 2009). The allosteric activation facilitates the progression of the H3K27me3 mark on chromatin. Thus, our results unite previous biochemical studies and genetic analysis and provide a novel example of control gene expression via integration of genetic DNA and histone modifications. The novel and testable hypothesis should inspire future research of PRC1 function and regulation. The experimental strategy of a combination of genetic engineering, biochemistry, and live-cell SMT should prove widely useful for mechanistic analysis of other chromatin regulatory complexes in living cells.

Figure 8

Download asset Open asset

Proposed models for the targeting of Cbx-PRC1 to chromatin.

(A) The Cbx7-PRC1 and Cbx8-PRC1 complexes are targeted to chromatin by co-recognition of H3K27me3 and DNA. The Cbx7- and Cbx8-PRC1 complexes are guided to genomic loci by the CD interaction with H3K27me3. The interaction triggers conformational changes of the Cbx7- and Cbx8-PRC1 complexes and induces the CD-ATL cassette interaction with DNA. Multivalent engagement of DNA and H3K27me3 by the CD-ATL cassette stabilizes the Cbx7- and Cbx8-PRC1 complexes at chromatin. (B) Molecular mechanisms for the targeting of Cbx2-PRC1, Cbx4-PRC1, and Cbx6-PRC1 complexes to chromatin remain unknown.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17667.063

Materials and methods

Cell culture

Request a detailed protocol

The Eed^−/−(Endoh et al., 2008), Ring1a^−/−/Ring1b^fl/fl; Rosa26::CreERT2 (Endoh et al., 2008), Bmi1^–/–/Mel18^–/– (Bmi1 and Mel18 double knockout) (Elderkin et al., 2007) mES cells were obtained from Dr. Haruhiko Koseki (RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Japan). The Ezh2^−/− mES cells (Shen et al., 2009) were obtained from Dr. Stuart Orkin (Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA). The Cbx7^−/− mES cells (Cheng et al., 2014) and HEK293T cells were obtained from Dr. Tom Kerppola (University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan). The PGK12.1 (Penny et al., 1996) mES cells were obtained from Dr. Neil Brockdorff (University of Oxford, UK). The KO mES cell lines have been authenticated by immunoblotting and IF for identity. Other cell lines used in this study have not been authenticated for identity. All cell lines were tested negative for mycoplasma contamination by using DAPI DNA staining. These mES cells were maintained in mES medium (DMEM (D5796; Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO) supplemented with 15% FBS (F0926; Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO), 2 mM glutamine (25030–081; Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA), 100 units/ml penicillin-streptomycin (15140–122; Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA), 0.1 mM β-mercaptoethanol (21985–023; Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA), 10³ units/ml leukemia inhibitor factor (LIF) and 0.1 mM non-essential amino acids (1114050; Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA)) at 37°C in 5% CO₂. 4-hydroxytamoxifen (OHT; H7904; Sigma-Aldrich Inc, St Louis, MO) was administrated to deplete the Ring1b alleles of the Ring1a^−/−/Ring1b^fl/fl; Rosa26::CreERT2 mES cells (Tatavosian et al., 2015; Zhen et al., 2014). HEK293T cells were maintained as described previously (Tatavosian et al., 2015; Zhen et al., 2014).

Plasmids

The plasmids pTRIPZ (M)-YFP-Ezh2 and pTRIPZ (M)-YFP-Eed have been described previously (Tatavosian et al., 2015). The YFP sequence in the plasmids pTRIPZ (M)-YFP-Cbx2 (Zhen et al., 2014), pTRIPZ (M)-YFP-Cbx4 (Zhen et al., 2014), pTRIPZ (M)-YFP-Cbx6 (Zhen et al., 2014), pTRIPZ (M)-YFP-Cbx7 (Zhen et al., 2014), pTRIPZ (M)-YFP-Cbx8 (Zhen et al., 2014), and pTRIPZ (M)-YFP-H2A (Zhen et al., 2014) was replaced with the HaloTag sequence amplified from the plasmid ENTR4-HaloTag (w876-1) (Addgene), generating pTRIPZ (M)-HT-Cbx2, pTRIPZ (M)-HT-Cbx4, pTRIPZ (M)-HT-Cbx6, pTRIPZ (M)-HT-Cbx7, pTRIPZ (M)-HT-Cbx8, and pTRIPZ (M)-H2A-HT. The sequence encoding NLS (nucleus localization sequence) was chemically synthesized and inserted downstream of the HaloTag sequence, generating the pTRIPZ (M)-HT-NLS plasmid. To generate Cbx7 variants fused with HaloTag, the Cbx7 sequence in the plasmid pTRIPZ (M)-HT-Cbx7 was replaced with the Cbx7 variant sequences. The Cbx7 variants were as follows: (1) CD_Cbx7, amino acids 8–62; (2) Cbx7^F11A, point mutation of F11 to A11; (3) Cbx7^△CD, deletion of amino acids 1–62; (4) Cbx7^ATLm, mutation of RKR70-72, K75, and KR77-78 to AGA70-72, A75, and AG77-78); (5) Cbx7^△ATL, deletion of amino acids 66–83; and (6) Cbx7^△CD-ATL, deletion of amino acids 1–83. To generate plasmids for expressing Cbx7 variants in E.coli, the sequence encoding the Cbx7 variants was amplified by PCR and inserted downstream of the GST sequence within the pGEX-6P-1-GST vector (GE Healthcare, Pittsburg, PA), generating pGEX-6P-1-GST-CD_Cbx7(CD_Cbx7; amino acids 1–62), pGEX-6P-1-GST-ATL_Cbx7 (ATL_Cbx7; amino acids 66–81), pGEX-6P-1-GST-CD-ATL_Cbx7 (CD-ATL_Cbx7; amino acids 1–84), and pGEX-6P-1-GST-CD-ATLm_Cbx7 (CD-ATLm_Cbx7; amino acids 1–84 with mutation of RKR70-72, K75, and KR77-78 to AGA70-72, A75, and AG77-78). The sequences encoding the fusion genes have been verified by DNA sequencing and the plasmids will be deposited to Addgene (https://www.addgene.org/).

Generation of transgenic mES cell lines by lentivirus transduction

Request a detailed protocol

Establishing the mES cell lines stably expressing the Polycomb and H2A genes was performed as described previously (Tatavosian et al., 2015; Zhen et al., 2014). HEK293T cells at 85–90% confluency were co-transfected with 21 μg pTRIPZ (M) containing the fusion gene, 21 μg psPAX2, and 10.5 μg pMD2.G by using calcium phosphate precipitation. At the time of 12 hr after transfection, the medium was replaced with 10 ml DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 units/ml penicillin G sodium, and 0.1 mM β-mercaptoethanol. At the time of 48–50 hr after medium change, the medium was harvested to transduce mES cells in the presence of 8 µg/ml polybrene (H9268; Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO) and LIF. For co-transducing multiple genes, lentiviruses were produced separately and mixed at the time of transduction. At the time of 72 hr after transduction, infected cells were selected by using 1.0–2.0 μg/ml of puromycin (P8833; Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO). Unless otherwise indicated, for live-cell single-molecule imaging experiments, the fusions were expressed at the basal level without administrating doxycycline.

Producing GST-fusion proteins from E. coli

View detailed protocol

The pGEX-6P-1-GST plasmids encoding the Cbx7 variants were transformed into BL21 competent cells. The gene expression was induced by isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside (AC121; Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA) for 5 hr at 37°C. After centrifugation, the cells were resuspended in cold PBS buffer containing 0.1 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (PMSF; 93482; Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO) and protease inhibitor cocktail (P8340; Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO), and then lysed by sonication using Vibra-CellTM sonicator (VCX130; Newtown, CT). To the mixture, 1% Triton X-100 was added. After centrifugation, the supernatant was mixed with pre-washed Glutathione Sepharose beads (17-0756-01; GE Healthcare, Pittsburgh, PA). After 4 times washing with PBS containing 1% Triton X-100, the GST-Cbx7 variant fusion proteins were eluted by 20 mM reduced glutathione (G4251; Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO). After dialysis against PBS, the purity and identity of the GST-Cbx7 variant fusions were assayed by SDS-PAGE.

EMSA

Request a detailed protocol

Alexa Fluor 488-labelled dsDNA-1, dsDNA-2, and ssDNA were purchased from IDT. dsRNA and ssRNA were kindly provided by Dr. Marino Resendiz (University of Colorado Denver). The GST-Cbx7 fusion proteins were mixed with Alexa Fluor 488-labelled dsDNA-1 in binding buffer (20 mM HEPES pH 7.9, 100 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA pH 8, 5 µM DTT, 0.05 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, and 0.1% NP-40). For competitive assay, DNA and RNA were added to the reaction mixture. After incubation at room temperature for 15 min, 20% glycerol was added to the reaction. The mixtures were then loaded to the wells of Novex 10% Tris-Glycine Mini Protein Gels (EC6075BOX; Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). The gels were run for 90 min at 100 V and 400 mA at 4°C in the dark. The gels were imaged using ChemiDoc XRS system (Bio-Rad). The intensities of bands were quantified using ImageJ (http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/).

IF

Request a detailed protocol

IF was performed as described previously (Tatavosian et al., 2015; Zhen et al., 2014). Wild-type (PGK12.1), Eed^−/−, Ezh2^−/−, Y-Eed/Eed^−/−, and Y-Ezh2/Ezh2^−/− mES cells were cultured on coverslips and fixed using 2.0% paraformaldehyde. After permeabilizing with 0.2% Triton X-100, the cells were washed with basic blocking buffer (10 mM PBS pH 7.2, 0.1% Triton X-100, and 0.05% Tween 20) and then blocked with blocking buffer (the basic blocking buffer plus 3% goat serum and 3% bovine serum albumin). Anti-H3K27me3 antibody (07–449; Millipore, Billerica, MA) was incubated with the cells for 2 hr at room temperature. After washing with the basic blocking buffer, Alexa Fluor 488-labelled goat anti–rabbit antibody (A-11008; Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) was incubated with the cells for 1 hr. After incubating with 0.1 μg/ml hoechst, the cells were washed and then mounted on slides with ProLong Antifade reagents (P7481; Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). The images were taken and processed as described previously (Tatavosian et al., 2015; Zhen et al., 2014).

Immunoblotting

Request a detailed protocol

Immunoblotting was performed as described previously (Tatavosian et al., 2015; Zhen et al., 2014). Nuclei were lysed in buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 2.0% NP-40, 500 mM NaCl, 0.25 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM Na₃VO₄, 0.1 mM PMSF, and protease inhibitors. Proteins were resolved using NuPAGE 4–12% Bis-Tris Gel (NPO322BOX; Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) and transferred to 0.45 μm Immobilon-FL PVDF membrane (IPFL00010; EMD Millipore Corporation, Massachusetts, MA). Membranes were probed with anti-Cbx7 (ab21873; Abcam, MA) and anti-HaloTag (G9281; Promega, Sunnyvale, CA). After incubating with HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit antibody (NA934V; GE Healthcare, Pittsburgh, PA), proteins were detected using ECL Plus detection reagents (RPN2106; GE Healthcare, Pittsburgh, PA). Membranes were imaged using a ChemiDoc XRS system (BioRad).

ChIP

Request a detailed protocol

ChIP was performed as described previously (Tatavosian et al., 2015). HaloTag-Cbx7/Cbx7^−/− and wild-type mES cells were crosslinked with 1.2% formaldehyde (28908; Thermo Fischer Scientific, Waltham, MA) and quenched with 125 mM glycine (G8898; Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO). Nuclei were prepared and washed with LBI buffer (50 mM HEPES pH 7.9, 140 mM NaCl, 1.0 mM EDTA pH 8.0, 10% glycerol, 0.5% NP-40, and 0.25% Triton X-100), LBII buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 200 mM NaCl, and 1.5 mM EDTA pH 8.0), and LBIII buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM EDTA pH 8.0, 0.1% sodium deoxycholate, and 0.5% N-lauroylsarcosine). Chromatin was fragmented to 200–1000 bp by sonication (Sonic Vibra Cell model (VCX130)). To the sonicated mixture, 1% Triton X-100 was added. After centrifugation, chromatin was precipitated with anti-HaloTag antibody (G9281; Promega, Sunnyvale, CA). Beads were washed with the RIPA buffer (50 mM HEPES pH 7.9, 500 mM LiCl, 1.0 mM EDTA pH 8.0, 1% NP-40, and 0.7% sodium deoxycholate). The immunoprecipitated DNA were quantified using LightCycler 480 SYBR Green I Master (04707516001; Roche, Indianapolis, IN) with AB Applied Biosystem. Three qPCR replicates were performed. The sequences of the primers used for qPCR have been described previously (Cheng et al., 2014; Ren and Kerppola, 2011; Tatavosian et al., 2015).

Labelling HaloTag fusion proteins with HaloTag ligand in living cells

View detailed protocol

24 hr prior to imaging, mES cells stably expressing HaloTag fusion proteins were seeded to gelatin-coated cover glass dish. Several concentrations (5 nM, 15 nM, and 30 nM) of Janelia Fluor 549 (JF₅₄₉) HaloTag ligand were used to treat cells for 15 min at 37°C in 5% CO₂. Cells were washed with the mES cell medium once and then incubated in the mES cell medium at 37°C in 5% CO₂ for 30 min. After replacing with the live-cell imaging medium (A1896701, FluoroBrite DMEM, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA), cells were maintained at 37°C using a heater controller (TC-324; Warner Instrument, Hamden, CT) during imaging. Each dish was used for a maximum of 1.5 hr after placing them on the microscope. The number of individual fluorescent spots was typically ∼10–50 spots per nucleus by controlling the HaloTag ligand concentration.

Single-molecule optical setup and image acquisition

Request a detailed protocol

Live-cell single molecule tracking was conducted by using a Zeiss Axio Observer D1 Manual Microscopy (Zeiss, Germany) equipped with an Alpha Plan-Apochromatic 100×/1.46 NA Oil-immersion Objective (Zeiss, Germany) and an Evolve 512 × 512 EMCCD camera (Photometrics, Tucson, AZ). Additional magnification of 2.5× was placed on the emission pathway and thus the overall magnification was 250×. The pixel size of the EMCCD was 16 µm. A laser beam from solid state laser (Intelligent Imaging Innovations, CO) was focused on a rotating mirror, which allows to choose wild-field or inclined excitation configuration. The inclined excitation was used to avoid stray-light reflection and reduce background from cell auto-fluorescence (Tokunaga et al., 2008). JF₅₄₉ was excited at 552 nm. A Brightline single-band laser filter set (Semrock; excitation filter: FF01-561/14, emission filter: FF01-609/54, and dichroic mirror: Di02-R561-25) was used to filter the excitation and emission wavelength. The microscope and the EMCCD camera were controlled by Slidebook 6.0 software. A laser power intensity of ~15 mW was used to study diffusion components and a power intensity of ~5 mW for residence times (dissociation constants).

Single-molecule localization and tracking

Request a detailed protocol

U-track algorithm was used for tracking and linking single particles (Jaqaman et al., 2008). Before analysis, stacks of images were visually checked and stacks with movement and drift were discarded. About two-thirds of stacks were discarded. The particle localization (x, y) was obtained through 2D Gaussian fitting based on a u-track algorithm using Matlab. A 10-pixel search radius upper limit was allowed for frame-to-frame linking. The detailed localization and tracking parameters were listed in the Supplementary file 3. A Matlab script was developed to process the output of 2D tracking from the u-track and to convert the trajectories into a matrix form.

Extraction of diffusion components

Request a detailed protocol

Our SMT was the 2-dimensional projection of the 3-dimensional motion of HaloTag labelled molecules. We assumed that the HaloTag-labelled molecules diffuse isotopically along the three-dimensional axes X, Y, and Z. Thus, the XY projection data reflect the 3-dimensional motion of the molecules. We performed 30-ms integration time without interval. To count labelled molecules from short tracks and to avoid bias toward slowly moving particles that remain visible for longer times, we calculated two kinds of diffusion coefficients: the maximum likelihood diffusion coefficient $(D_{m})$ per track and the diffusion coefficient of the first step $(D_{f 1})$ per track.

D_{m} = \frac{1}{4 τ} ⟨ r_{i}^{2} ⟩

D_{f 1} = \frac{1}{4 τ} r_{f 1}^{2}

where $r_{i}^{2}$ and $r_{f 1}^{2}$ are the mean squared step size and the squared first-step size, respectively, and $τ$ equals 30 ms. The underlying assumption for this analysis was that particles undergo the lateral Brownian motion. An R script was developed to calculate $D_{m}$ and $D_{f 1}$ diffusion coefficients from SMT data (https://gist.github.com/dododas/fb34dc8d9ee5f7d30ebc). The resulting distributions of the logarithm of diffusion coefficients $l o g D_{m}$ were pooled from data generated from three independent imaging dishes. We assumed that the chromatin-bound HaloTag-Cbx7 molecules are stationary at chromatin. Thus, the diffusion constant of the chromatin-bound population of the HaloTag-Cbx proteins approximately equals that of the nucleosomal H2A-HaloTag. To estimate the diffusion coefficient of the chromatin-bound component of the HaloTag-Cbx proteins, the distributions of $l o g D_{m}$ from the control H2A-HaloTag in wild-type mES cells were fitted with a three-component Gaussian function by OriginLab (OriginLab Corporation).

y = y_{0} + \sum_{i = 1}^{n} (\frac{A_{i}}{w_{i} \sqrt{\frac{π}{2}}}) \exp (\frac{- 2 {(x - x_{i})}^{2}}{w_{i}^{2}})

where $l o g D_{m}$ is offset, $x_{i}$ is the center of the peak, $A_{i}$ is the area of the peak, and $w_{i}$ is the full width at half maximum. The diffusion coefficient of the nucleosomal H2A-HaloTag was determined to be $D_{m 1}$ = 0.032 µm²s^-1. To systematically compare the CB levels, the subsequent distributions of the HaloTag-Cbx proteins and their variants were fitted with a three-component Gaussian function using the fixed value $D_{m 1}$ = 0.032 µm²s^-1 while other parameters were set free. There was no convergence if the distributions for HaloTag-NLS in PGK12.1 mES cells and HaloTag-Cbx7 in Eed^−/− mES cells were fitted with a three-component Gaussian function. Thus, a two-component Gaussian function was used for the two distributions. The distributions of the logarithm of diffusion coefficient have previously been used to separate individual populations and to estimate their diffusion coefficients and relative abundance (Liu et al., 2014; Normanno et al., 2015; Saxton, 1997). Fractions of diffusion components were calculated as follows.

F_{i} = (\frac{A_{i}}{\sum_{i = 1}^{n} A_{i}}) \times 100 %

We denoted the F₁ component as the chromatin-bound (CB) population, F₂ as the intermediate diffusion (ID) population, and F₃ as the fast diffusion (FD) population. Errors were calculated as the s.d. of parameters obtained from fits.

Determination of residence time

Request a detailed protocol

To calculate residence time and survival probability of molecules on chromatin, we performed 30-ms integration time and 170-ms dark time. The track lengths and diffusion coefficients were calculated as described above. We selected molecules for at least two consecutive frames with the maximum likelihood diffusion coefficient $l o g D_{m}$ < 0.10 µm²/s as chromatin-bound molecules. 97% of H2A-HaloTag molecules had diffusion coefficient below this threshold. The duration of individual tracks (apparent residence time) was directly calculated based on the track length. We estimated the residence times of Cbx7 and its variants using the cumulative frequency distribution of dwell times as described in (Mazza et al., 2012; Mazza et al., 2013; Morisaki et al., 2014). To determine the photobleaching rate of JF₅₄₉, mES cells stably expressing H2A-HaloTag were incubated with 500 nM JF₅₄₉ as described above. Live-cell image stacks were taken using the same power and integration and dark time as that for the studying residence times. 9 curves have been obtained. The curves were normalized to 1 and averaged. The averaged curve of photobleaching decay was better described with a two-component exponential decay function based on the F-test implemented in OriginLab.

B (τ) = y_{0} + f_{b 1} e^{(- τ / τ_{b 1})} + f_{b 2} e^{(- τ / τ_{b 2})}

where $y_{0}$ is offset, $f_{b 1}$ and $f_{b 2}$ are amplitude, and $\frac{1}{τ_{b 1}}$ and $\frac{1}{τ_{b 2}}$ are photobleaching rates. The cumulative frequency distributions of dwell times were normalized for photobleaching by dividing by $B (τ)$ as described in (Mazza et al., 2012; Mazza et al., 2013; Morisaki et al., 2014). The normalized cumulative frequency distributions were better fitted with a two-component exponential decay function based the F-test implemented in OriginLab.

y = y_{0} + B_{1} e^{- τ / τ_{t b}} + B_{2} e^{- τ / τ_{s b}}

where $y_{0}$ is offset, B₁ and B₂ are amplitude, and $τ_{t b}$ and $τ_{s b}$ are residence times of the transient chromatin-bound component and the stable chromatin-bound component, respectively. Among the chromatin-bound population, fractions of the transient chromatin-bound component (F_1tb) and the stable chromatin-bound component (F_1sb) were calculated as follows.

\begin{array}{ll} F_{1 t b} = & F_{1} \times \frac{B_{1}}{B_{1} + B_{2}} \\ F_{1 s b} = & F_{1} \times \frac{B_{2}}{B_{1} + B_{2}} \end{array}

where F₁ is the chromatin-bound fraction obtained from fitting the distribution of the logarithm of diffusion coefficient.

References

1. Agger K
2. Cloos PA
3. Christensen J
4. Pasini D
5. Rose S
6. Rappsilber J
7. Issaeva I
8. Canaani E
9. Salcini AE
10. Helin K
(2007) UTX and JMJD3 are histone H3K27 demethylases involved in HOX gene regulation and development
Nature 449:731–734.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06145
- Google Scholar
1. Akasaka T
2. Kanno M
3. Balling R
4. Mieza MA
5. Taniguchi M
6. Koseki H
(1996)
A role for mel-18, a Polycomb group-related vertebrate gene, during theanteroposterior specification of the axial skeleton

Development 122:1513–1522.
- Google Scholar
1. Bell JC
2. Kowalczykowski SC
(2016) Mechanics and Single-Molecule Interrogation of DNA Recombination
Annual Review of Biochemistry 85:193–226.

https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-034352
- Google Scholar
1. Bernstein E
2. Duncan EM
3. Masui O
4. Gil J
5. Heard E
6. Allis CD
(2006) Mouse polycomb proteins bind differentially to methylated histone H3 and RNA and are enriched in facultative heterochromatin
Molecular and Cellular Biology 26:2560–2569.

https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.26.7.2560-2569.2006
- Google Scholar
1. Blackledge NP
2. Farcas AM
3. Kondo T
4. King HW
5. McGouran JF
6. Hanssen LL
7. Ito S
8. Cooper S
9. Kondo K
10. Koseki Y
11. Ishikura T
12. Long HK
13. Sheahan TW
14. Brockdorff N
15. Kessler BM
16. Koseki H
17. Klose RJ
(2014) Variant PRC1 complex-dependent H2A ubiquitylation drives PRC2 recruitment and polycomb domain formation
Cell 157:1445–1459.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.004
- Google Scholar
(2015) Targeting Polycomb systems to regulate gene expression: modifications to a complex story
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 16:643–649.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm4067
- Google Scholar
1. Boyer LA
2. Plath K
3. Zeitlinger J
4. Brambrink T
5. Medeiros LA
6. Lee TI
7. Levine SS
8. Wernig M
9. Tajonar A
10. Ray MK
11. Bell GW
12. Otte AP
13. Vidal M
14. Gifford DK
15. Young RA
16. Jaenisch R
(2006) Polycomb complexes repress developmental regulators in murine embryonic stem cells
Nature 441:349–353.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04733
- Google Scholar
1. Cao R
2. Wang L
3. Wang H
4. Xia L
5. Erdjument-Bromage H
6. Tempst P
7. Jones RS
8. Zhang Y
(2002) Role of histone H3 lysine 27 methylation in Polycomb-group silencing
Science 298:1039–1043.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1076997
- Google Scholar
1. Cao R
2. Zhang Y
(2004) SUZ12 is required for both the histone methyltransferase activity and the silencing function of the EED-EZH2 complex
Molecular Cell 15:57–67.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2004.06.020
- Google Scholar
1. Chen J
2. Zhang Z
3. Li L
4. Chen BC
5. Revyakin A
6. Hajj B
7. Legant W
8. Dahan M
9. Lionnet T
10. Betzig E
11. Tjian R
12. Liu Z
(2014) Single-molecule dynamics of enhanceosome assembly in embryonic stem cells
Cell 156:1274–1285.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.062
- Google Scholar
(2014) KAP1 represses differentiation-inducible genes in embryonic stem cells through cooperative binding with PRC1 and derepresses pluripotency-associated genes
Molecular and Cellular Biology 34:2075–2091.

https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01729-13
- Google Scholar
1. Coleman RA
2. Liu Z
3. Darzacq X
4. Tjian R
5. Singer RH
6. Lionnet T
(2015) Imaging Transcription: Past, Present, and Future
Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 80:1–8.

https://doi.org/10.1101/sqb.2015.80.027201
- Google Scholar
1. Cooper S
2. Dienstbier M
3. Hassan R
4. Schermelleh L
5. Sharif J
6. Blackledge NP
7. De Marco V
8. Elderkin S
9. Koseki H
10. Klose R
11. Heger A
12. Brockdorff N
(2014) Targeting polycomb to pericentric heterochromatin in embryonic stem cells reveals a role for H2AK119u1 in PRC2 recruitment
Cell Reports 7:1456–1470.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2014.04.012
- Google Scholar
1. Czermin B
2. Melfi R
3. McCabe D
4. Seitz V
5. Imhof A
6. Pirrotta V
(2002) Drosophila enhancer of Zeste/ESC complexes have a histone H3 methyltransferase activity that marks chromosomal Polycomb sites
Cell 111:185–196.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00975-3
- Google Scholar
(2014) Molecular mechanisms of transcription through single-molecule experiments
Chemical Reviews 114:3203–3223.

https://doi.org/10.1021/cr400730x
- Google Scholar
1. de Napoles M
2. Mermoud JE
3. Wakao R
4. Tang YA
5. Endoh M
6. Appanah R
7. Nesterova TB
8. Silva J
9. Otte AP
10. Vidal M
11. Koseki H
12. Brockdorff N
(2004) Polycomb group proteins Ring1A/B link ubiquitylation of histone H2A to heritable gene silencing and X inactivation
Developmental Cell 7:663–676.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2004.10.005
- Google Scholar
(2014) DNA dynamics and single-molecule biology
Chemical Reviews 114:3072–3086.

https://doi.org/10.1021/cr4004117
- Google Scholar
1. Elderkin S
2. Maertens GN
3. Endoh M
4. Mallery DL
5. Morrice N
6. Koseki H
7. Peters G
8. Brockdorff N
9. Hiom K
(2007) A phosphorylated form of Mel-18 targets the Ring1B histone H2A ubiquitin ligase to chromatin
Molecular Cell 28:107–120.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2007.08.009
- Google Scholar
1. Endoh M
2. Endo TA
3. Endoh T
4. Fujimura Y
5. Ohara O
6. Toyoda T
7. Otte AP
8. Okano M
9. Brockdorff N
10. Vidal M
11. Koseki H
(2008) Polycomb group proteins Ring1A/B are functionally linked to the core transcriptional regulatory circuitry to maintain ES cell identity
Development 135:1513–1524.

https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.014340
- Google Scholar
1. Farcas AM
2. Blackledge NP
3. Sudbery I
4. Long HK
5. McGouran JF
6. Rose NR
7. Lee S
8. Sims D
9. Cerase A
10. Sheahan TW
11. Koseki H
12. Brockdorff N
13. Ponting CP
14. Kessler BM
15. Klose RJ
(2012) KDM2B links the Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1) to recognition of CpG islands
eLife 1:e00205.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00205
- Google Scholar
1. Gao Z
2. Zhang J
3. Bonasio R
4. Strino F
5. Sawai A
6. Parisi F
7. Kluger Y
8. Reinberg D
(2012) PCGF homologs, CBX proteins, and RYBP define functionally distinct PRC1 family complexes
Molecular Cell 45:344–356.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2012.01.002
- Google Scholar
1. Gebhardt JC
2. Suter DM
3. Roy R
4. Zhao ZW
5. Chapman AR
6. Basu S
7. Maniatis T
8. Xie XS
(2013) Single-molecule imaging of transcription factor binding to DNA in live mammalian cells
Nature Methods 10:421–426.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2411
- Google Scholar
1. Geertsema HJ
2. van Oijen AM
(2013) A single-molecule view of DNA replication: the dynamic nature of multi-protein complexes revealed
Current Opinion in Structural Biology 23:788–793.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2013.06.018
- Google Scholar
1. Gil J
2. O'Loghlen A
(2014) PRC1 complex diversity: where is it taking us?
Trends in Cell Biology 24:632–641.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2014.06.005
- Google Scholar
(2011) Compaction of chromatin by diverse Polycomb group proteins requires localized regions of high charge
Genes & Development 25:2210–2221.

https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.17288211
- Google Scholar
1. Grimm JB
2. English BP
3. Chen J
4. Slaughter JP
5. Zhang Z
6. Revyakin A
7. Patel R
8. Macklin JJ
9. Normanno D
10. Singer RH
11. Lionnet T
12. Lavis LD
13. Zhang Z
14. Lionnet T
15. Lavis LD
(2015) A general method to improve fluorophores for live-cell and single-molecule microscopy
Nature Methods 12:244–250.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3256
- Google Scholar
(2016) Stepwise nucleosome translocation by RSC remodeling complexes
eLife 5:e10051.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10051
- Google Scholar
1. He J
2. Shen L
3. Wan M
4. Taranova O
5. Wu H
6. Zhang Y
(2013) Kdm2b maintains murine embryonic stem cell status by recruiting PRC1 complex to CpG islands of developmental genes
Nature Cell Biology 15:373–384.

https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2702
- Google Scholar
1. Helin K
2. Dhanak D
(2013) Chromatin proteins and modifications as drug targets
Nature 502:480–488.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12751
- Google Scholar
(2008) Single-molecule studies of RNA polymerase: motoring along
Annual Review of Biochemistry 77:149–176.

https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.073106.100741
- Google Scholar
1. Huh JW
2. Wu J
3. Lee CH
4. Yun M
5. Gilada D
6. Brautigam CA
7. Li B
(2012) Multivalent di-nucleosome recognition enables the Rpd3S histone deacetylase complex to tolerate decreased H3K36 methylation levels
The EMBO Journal 31:3564–3574.

https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2012.221
- Google Scholar
1. Izeddin I
2. Récamier V
3. Bosanac L
4. Cissé II
5. Boudarene L
6. Dugast-Darzacq C
7. Proux F
8. Bénichou O
9. Voituriez R
10. Bensaude O
11. Dahan M
12. Darzacq X
(2014) Single-molecule tracking in live cells reveals distinct target-search strategies of transcription factors in the nucleus
eLife 3:02230.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02230
- Google Scholar
1. Jaqaman K
2. Loerke D
3. Mettlen M
4. Kuwata H
5. Grinstein S
6. Schmid SL
7. Danuser G
(2008) Robust single-particle tracking in live-cell time-lapse sequences
Nature Methods 5:695–702.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1237
- Google Scholar
1. Jenuwein T
2. Allis CD
(2001) Translating the histone code
Science 293:1074–1080.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1063127
- Google Scholar
1. Jiao L
2. Liu X
(2015) Structural basis of histone H3K27 trimethylation by an active polycomb repressive complex 2
Science 350:aac4383.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4383
- Google Scholar
(2003) The polycomb protein Pc2 is a SUMO E3
Cell 113:127–137.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00159-4
- Google Scholar
1. Kalb R
2. Latwiel S
3. Baymaz HI
4. Jansen PW
5. Müller CW
6. Vermeulen M
7. Müller J
(2014) Histone H2A monoubiquitination promotes histone H3 methylation in Polycomb repression
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 21:569–571.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2833
- Google Scholar
1. Katz ZB
2. English BP
3. Lionnet T
4. Yoon YJ
5. Monnier N
6. Ovryn B
7. Bathe M
8. Singer RH
(2016) Mapping translation 'hot-spots' in live cells by tracking single molecules of mRNA and ribosomes
eLife 5:e10415.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10415
- Google Scholar
1. Kaustov L
2. Ouyang H
3. Amaya M
4. Lemak A
5. Nady N
6. Duan S
7. Wasney GA
8. Li Z
9. Vedadi M
10. Schapira M
11. Min J
12. Arrowsmith CH
(2011) Recognition and specificity determinants of the human cbx chromodomains
Journal of Biological Chemistry 286:521–529.

https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.191411
- Google Scholar
1. Klauke K
2. Radulović V
3. Broekhuis M
4. Weersing E
5. Zwart E
6. Olthof S
7. Ritsema M
8. Bruggeman S
9. Wu X
10. Helin K
11. Bystrykh L
12. de Haan G
(2013) Polycomb Cbx family members mediate the balance between haematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and differentiation
Nature Cell Biology 15:353–362.

https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2701
- Google Scholar
1. Knight SC
2. Xie L
3. Deng W
4. Guglielmi B
5. Witkowsky LB
6. Bosanac L
7. Zhang ET
8. El Beheiry M
9. Masson JB
10. Dahan M
11. Liu Z
12. Doudna JA
13. Tjian R
(2015) Dynamics of CRISPR-Cas9 genome interrogation in living cells
Science 350:823–826.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac6572
- Google Scholar
1. Ku M
2. Koche RP
3. Rheinbay E
4. Mendenhall EM
5. Endoh M
6. Mikkelsen TS
7. Presser A
8. Nusbaum C
9. Xie X
10. Chi AS
11. Adli M
12. Kasif S
13. Ptaszek LM
14. Cowan CA
15. Lander ES
16. Koseki H
17. Bernstein BE
(2008) Genomewide analysis of PRC1 and PRC2 occupancy identifies two classes of bivalent domains
PLoS Genetics 4:e1000242.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000242
- Google Scholar
(2002) Histone methyltransferase activity associated with a human multiprotein complex containing the Enhancer of Zeste protein
Genes & Development 16:2893–2905.

https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1035902
- Google Scholar
(2014) Histone target selection within chromatin: an exemplary case of teamwork
Genes & Development 28:1029–1041.

https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.236331.113
- Google Scholar
1. Lee MG
2. Villa R
3. Trojer P
4. Norman J
5. Yan KP
6. Reinberg D
7. Di Croce L
8. Shiekhattar R
(2007) Demethylation of H3K27 regulates polycomb recruitment and H2A ubiquitination
Science 318:447–450.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1149042
- Google Scholar
1. Leeb M
2. Wutz A
(2007) Ring1B is crucial for the regulation of developmental control genes and PRC1 proteins but not X inactivation in embryonic cells
Journal of Cell Biology 178:219–229.

https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200612127
- Google Scholar
1. Lewis EB
(1978) A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila
Nature 276:565–570.

https://doi.org/10.1038/276565a0
- Google Scholar
1. Li B
2. Carey M
3. Workman JL
(2007a) The role of chromatin during transcription
Cell 128:707–719.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.015
- Google Scholar
1. Li B
2. Gogol M
3. Carey M
4. Lee D
5. Seidel C
6. Workman JL
(2007b) Combined action of PHD and chromo domains directs the Rpd3S HDAC to transcribed chromatin
Science 316:1050–1054.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1139004
- Google Scholar
1. Li H
2. Ren X
3. Ying L
4. Balasubramanian S
5. Klenerman D
(2004) Measuring single-molecule nucleic acid dynamics in solution by two-color filtered ratiometric fluorescence correlation spectroscopy
PNAS 101:14425–14430.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0404295101
- Google Scholar
1. Li J
2. Xu Y
3. Long XD
4. Wang W
5. Jiao HK
6. Mei Z
7. Yin QQ
8. Ma LN
9. Zhou AW
10. Wang LS
11. Yao M
12. Xia Q
13. Chen GQ
(2014) Cbx4 governs HIF-1α to potentiate angiogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma by its SUMO E3 ligase activity
Cancer Cell 25:118–131.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2013.12.008
- Google Scholar
1. Liu Z
2. Lavis LD
3. Betzig E
(2015) Imaging live-cell dynamics and structure at the single-molecule level
Molecular Cell 58:644–659.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2015.02.033
- Google Scholar
1. Liu Z
2. Legant WR
3. Chen B-C
4. Li L
5. Grimm JB
6. Lavis LD
7. Betzig E
8. Tjian R
(2014b) 3D imaging of Sox2 enhancer clusters in embryonic stem cells
eLife 3:e04236.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04236
- Google Scholar
1. Luco RF
2. Allo M
3. Schor IE
4. Kornblihtt AR
5. Misteli T
(2011) Epigenetics in alternative pre-mRNA splicing
Cell 144:16–26.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.11.056
- Google Scholar
1. Mardaryev AN
2. Liu B
3. Rapisarda V
4. Poterlowicz K
5. Malashchuk I
6. Rudolf J
7. Sharov AA
8. Jahoda CA
9. Fessing MY
10. Benitah SA
11. Xu GL
12. Botchkarev VA
(2016) Cbx4 maintains the epithelial lineage identity and cell proliferation in the developing stratified epithelium
The Journal of Cell Biology 212:77–89.

https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201506065
- Google Scholar
1. Margueron R
2. Justin N
3. Ohno K
4. Sharpe ML
5. Son J
6. Drury WJ
7. Voigt P
8. Martin SR
9. Taylor WR
10. De Marco V
11. Pirrotta V
12. Reinberg D
13. Gamblin SJ
(2009) Role of the polycomb protein EED in the propagation of repressive histone marks
Nature 461:762–767.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08398
- Google Scholar
1. Margueron R
2. Li G
3. Sarma K
4. Blais A
5. Zavadil J
6. Woodcock CL
7. Dynlacht BD
8. Reinberg D
(2008) Ezh1 and Ezh2 maintain repressive chromatin through different mechanisms
Molecular Cell 32:503–518.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2008.11.004
- Google Scholar
1. Margueron R
2. Reinberg D
(2011) The Polycomb complex PRC2 and its mark in life
Nature 469:343–349.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09784
- Google Scholar
1. Martin C
2. Cao R
3. Zhang Y
(2006) Substrate preferences of the EZH2 histone methyltransferase complex
Journal of Biological Chemistry 281:8365–8370.

https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M513425200
- Google Scholar
1. Mazza D
2. Abernathy A
3. Golob N
4. Morisaki T
5. McNally JG
(2012) A benchmark for chromatin binding measurements in live cells
Nucleic Acids Research 40:e119.

https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks701
- Google Scholar
(2013) Monitoring dynamic binding of chromatin proteins in vivo by single-molecule tracking
Methods in Molecular Biology 1042:117–137.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-526-2_9
- Google Scholar
(2014) Crystal structure of the PRC1 ubiquitylation module bound to the nucleosome
Nature 514:591–596.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13890
- Google Scholar
1. Min J
2. Zhang Y
3. Xu RM
(2003) Structural basis for specific binding of Polycomb chromodomain to histone H3 methylated at Lys 27
Genes & Development 17:1823–1828.

https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.269603
- Google Scholar
1. Montgomery ND
2. Yee D
3. Chen A
4. Kalantry S
5. Chamberlain SJ
6. Otte AP
7. Magnuson T
(2005) The murine polycomb group protein Eed is required for global histone H3 lysine-27 methylation
Current Biology 15:942–947.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.04.051
- Google Scholar
1. Morey L
2. Aloia L
3. Cozzuto L
4. Benitah SA
5. Di Croce L
(2013) RYBP and Cbx7 define specific biological functions of polycomb complexes in mouse embryonic stem cells
Cell Reports 3:60–69.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2012.11.026
- Google Scholar
1. Morey L
2. Pascual G
3. Cozzuto L
4. Roma G
5. Wutz A
6. Benitah SA
7. Di Croce L
(2012) Nonoverlapping functions of the Polycomb group Cbx family of proteins in embryonic stem cells
Cell Stem Cell 10:47–62.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2011.12.006
- Google Scholar
1. Morisaki T
2. Müller WG
3. Golob N
4. Mazza D
5. McNally JG
(2014) Single-molecule analysis of transcription factor binding at transcription sites in live cells
Nature Communications 5:4456.

https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5456
- Google Scholar
1. Mujtaba S
2. Manzur KL
3. Gurnon JR
4. Kang M
5. Van Etten JL
6. Zhou MM
(2008) Epigenetic transcriptional repression of cellular genes by a viral SET protein
Nature Cell Biology 10:1114–1122.

https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1772
- Google Scholar
1. Müller J
2. Hart CM
3. Francis NJ
4. Vargas ML
5. Sengupta A
6. Wild B
7. Miller EL
8. O'Connor MB
9. Kingston RE
10. Simon JA
(2002) Histone methyltransferase activity of a Drosophila Polycomb group repressor complex
Cell 111:197–208.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00976-5
- Google Scholar
1. Ngo TT
2. Zhang Q
3. Zhou R
4. Yodh JG
5. Ha T
(2015) Asymmetric unwrapping of nucleosomes under tension directed by DNA local flexibility
Cell 160:1135–1144.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.001
- Google Scholar
1. Normanno D
2. Boudarène L
3. Dugast-Darzacq C
4. Chen J
5. Richter C
6. Proux F
7. Bénichou O
8. Voituriez R
9. Darzacq X
10. Dahan M
(2015) Probing the target search of DNA-binding proteins in mammalian cells using TetR as model searcher
Nature Communications 6:.

https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8357
- Google Scholar
(2004) Suz12 is essential for mouse development and for EZH2 histone methyltransferase activity
The EMBO Journal 23:4061–4071.

https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600402
- Google Scholar
(1996) Requirement for Xist in X chromosome inactivation
Nature 379:131–137.

https://doi.org/10.1038/379131a0
- Google Scholar
1. Rando OJ
(2012) Combinatorial complexity in chromatin structure and function: revisiting the histone code
Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 22:148–155.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2012.02.013
- Google Scholar
1. Ranjan A
2. Mizuguchi G
3. FitzGerald PC
4. Wei D
5. Wang F
6. Huang Y
7. Luk E
8. Woodcock CL
9. Wu C
(2013) Nucleosome-free region dominates histone acetylation in targeting SWR1 to promoters for H2A.Z replacement
Cell 154:1232–1245.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.005
- Google Scholar
1. Reeves R
2. Nissen MS
(1990)
The A.T-DNA-binding domain of mammalian high mobility group I chromosomal proteins. A novel peptide motif for recognizing DNA structure

The Journal of Biological Chemistry 265:8573–8582.
- Google Scholar
1. Ren X
2. Gavory G
3. Li H
4. Ying L
5. Klenerman D
6. Balasubramanian S
(2003) Identification of a new RNA.RNA interaction site for human telomerase RNA (hTR): structural implications for hTR accumulation and a dyskeratosis congenita point mutation
Nucleic Acids Research 31:6509–6515.

https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg871
- Google Scholar
1. Ren X
2. Kerppola TK
(2011) REST interacts with Cbx proteins and regulates polycomb repressive complex 1 occupancy at RE1 elements
Molecular and Cellular Biology 31:2100–2110.

https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.05088-11
- Google Scholar
1. Ren X
2. Li H
3. Clarke RW
4. Alves DA
5. Ying L
6. Klenerman D
7. Balasubramanian S
(2006) Analysis of human telomerase activity and function by two color single molecule coincidence fluorescence spectroscopy
Journal of the American Chemical Society 128:4992–5000.

https://doi.org/10.1021/ja056613z
- Google Scholar
(2008) Changes in the distributions and dynamics of polycomb repressive complexes during embryonic stem cell differentiation
Molecular and Cellular Biology 28:2884–2895.

https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00949-07
- Google Scholar
1. Roscic A
2. Möller A
3. Calzado MA
4. Renner F
5. Wimmer VC
6. Gresko E
7. Lüdi KS
8. Schmitz ML
9. Ludi KS
(2006) Phosphorylation-dependent control of Pc2 SUMO E3 ligase activity by its substrate protein HIPK2
Molecular Cell 24:77–89.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2006.08.004
- Google Scholar
1. Ruan C
2. Lee CH
3. Cui H
4. Li S
5. Li B
(2015) Nucleosome contact triggers conformational changes of Rpd3S driving high-affinity H3K36me nucleosome engagement
Cell Reports 10:204–215.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2014.12.027
- Google Scholar
1. Ruthenburg AJ
2. Li H
3. Patel DJ
4. Allis CD
(2007) Multivalent engagement of chromatin modifications by linked binding modules
Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology 8:983–994.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2298
- Google Scholar
1. Saxton MJ
(1997) Single-particle tracking: the distribution of diffusion coefficients
Biophysical Journal 72:1744–1753.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78820-9
- Google Scholar
1. Schwartz YB
2. Kahn TG
3. Nix DA
4. Li XY
5. Bourgon R
6. Biggin M
7. Pirrotta V
(2006) Genome-wide analysis of Polycomb targets in Drosophila melanogaster
Nature Genetics 38:700–705.

https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1817
- Google Scholar
1. Senthilkumar R
2. Mishra RK
(2009) Novel motifs distinguish multiple homologues of Polycomb in vertebrates: expansion and diversification of the epigenetic toolkit
BMC Genomics 10:549.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-549
- Google Scholar
1. Shen X
2. Kim W
3. Fujiwara Y
4. Simon MD
5. Liu Y
6. Mysliwiec MR
7. Yuan GC
8. Lee Y
9. Orkin SH
(2009) Jumonji modulates polycomb activity and self-renewal versus differentiation of stem cells
Cell 139:1303–1314.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.12.003
- Google Scholar
1. Shen X
2. Liu Y
3. Hsu YJ
4. Fujiwara Y
5. Kim J
6. Mao X
7. Yuan GC
8. Orkin SH
(2008) EZH1 mediates methylation on histone H3 lysine 27 and complements EZH2 in maintaining stem cell identity and executing pluripotency
Molecular Cell 32:491–502.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2008.10.016
- Google Scholar
1. Simon JA
2. Kingston RE
(2013) Occupying chromatin: Polycomb mechanisms for getting to genomic targets, stopping transcriptional traffic, and staying put
Molecular Cell 49:808–824.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2013.02.013
- Google Scholar
1. Swinstead EE
2. Miranda TB
3. Paakinaho V
4. Baek S
5. Goldstein I
6. Hawkins M
7. Karpova TS
8. Ball D
9. Mazza D
10. Lavis LD
11. Grimm JB
12. Morisaki T
13. Grøntved L
14. Presman DM
15. Hager GL
(2016) Steroid Receptors Reprogram FoxA1 Occupancy through Dynamic Chromatin Transitions
Cell 165:593–605.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.067
- Google Scholar
1. Tardat M
2. Albert M
3. Kunzmann R
4. Liu Z
5. Kaustov L
6. Thierry R
7. Duan S
8. Brykczynska U
9. Arrowsmith CH
10. Peters AH
(2015) Cbx2 targets PRC1 to constitutive heterochromatin in mouse zygotes in a parent-of-origin-dependent manner
Molecular Cell 58:157–171.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2015.02.013
- Google Scholar
1. Tatavosian R
2. Zhen CY
3. Duc HN
4. Balas MM
5. Johnson AM
6. Ren X
(2015) Distinct Cellular Assembly Stoichiometry of Polycomb Complexes on Chromatin Revealed by Single-molecule Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Imaging
Journal of Biological Chemistry 290:28038–28054.

https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M115.671115
- Google Scholar
1. Tavares L
2. Dimitrova E
3. Oxley D
4. Webster J
5. Poot R
6. Demmers J
7. Bezstarosti K
8. Taylor S
9. Ura H
10. Koide H
11. Wutz A
12. Vidal M
13. Elderkin S
14. Brockdorff N
(2012) RYBP-PRC1 complexes mediate H2A ubiquitylation at polycomb target sites independently of PRC2 and H3K27me3
Cell 148:664–678.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.12.029
- Google Scholar
(2008) Highly inclined thin illumination enables clear single-molecule imaging in cells
Nature Methods 5:159–161.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth1171
- Google Scholar
1. Vincenz C
2. Kerppola TK
(2008) Different polycomb group CBX family proteins associate with distinct regions of chromatin using nonhomologous protein sequences
PNAS 105:16572–16577.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805317105
- Google Scholar
1. Wang H
2. Wang L
3. Erdjument-Bromage H
4. Vidal M
5. Tempst P
6. Jones RS
7. Zhang Y
(2004a) Role of histone H2A ubiquitination in Polycomb silencing
Nature 431:873–878.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02985
- Google Scholar
1. Wang L
2. Brown JL
3. Cao R
4. Zhang Y
5. Kassis JA
6. Jones RS
(2004b) Hierarchical recruitment of polycomb group silencing complexes
Molecular Cell 14:637–646.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2004.05.009
- Google Scholar
(2007) Polycomb Group proteins: an evolutionary perspective
Trends in Genetics 23:494–502.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2007.08.006
- Google Scholar
1. Yap KL
2. Li S
3. Muñoz-Cabello AM
4. Raguz S
5. Zeng L
6. Mujtaba S
7. Gil J
8. Walsh MJ
9. Zhou MM
(2010) Molecular interplay of the noncoding RNA ANRIL and methylated histone H3 lysine 27 by polycomb CBX7 in transcriptional silencing of INK4a
Molecular Cell 38:662–674.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.03.021
- Google Scholar
1. Zhang Z
2. Revyakin A
3. Grimm JB
4. Lavis LD
5. Tjian R
(2014) Single-molecule tracking of the transcription cycle by sub-second RNA detection
eLife 3:e01775.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01775
- Google Scholar
1. Zhen CY
2. Duc HN
3. Kokotovic M
4. Phiel CJ
5. Ren X
(2014) Cbx2 stably associates with mitotic chromosomes via a PRC2- or PRC1-independent mechanism and is needed for recruiting PRC1 complex to mitotic chromosomes
Molecular Biology of the Cell 25:3726–3739.

https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E14-06-1109
- Google Scholar

Article and author information

Author details

Chao Yu Zhen

Department of Chemistry, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, United States

Contribution
CYZ, Established transgenic mES cell lines, Performed SMT, western blotting and immunofluorescence, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data

Contributed equally with
Roubina Tatavosian, Thao Ngoc Huynh and Huy Nguyen Duc

Competing interests
No competing interests declared.
Roubina Tatavosian

Department of Chemistry, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, United States

Contribution
RT, Performed SMT and ChIP assay, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data

Contributed equally with
Chao Yu Zhen, Thao Ngoc Huynh and Huy Nguyen Duc

Competing interests
No competing interests declared.
Thao Ngoc Huynh

Department of Chemistry, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, United States

Contribution
TNH, Constructed plasmids, Generated mutants, Established transgenic mES cell lines, Performed EMSA, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data

Contributed equally with
Chao Yu Zhen, Roubina Tatavosian and Huy Nguyen Duc

Competing interests
No competing interests declared.
Huy Nguyen Duc

Department of Chemistry, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, United States

Contribution
HND, Constructed plasmids, Established mES cell lines, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data

Contributed equally with
Chao Yu Zhen, Roubina Tatavosian and Thao Ngoc Huynh

Competing interests
No competing interests declared.
Raibatak Das

Department of Integrative Biology, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, United States

Contribution
RD, Programming support

Competing interests
No competing interests declared.
Marko Kokotovic

Department of Chemistry, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, United States

Contribution
MK, Constructed plasmids, Performed SMT, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data

Competing interests
No competing interests declared.
Jonathan B Grimm

Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States

Contribution
JBG, Contributed reagents, Provided the JF549 dye

Competing interests
JBG: Filed patent application on the Janelia Fluor (JF) dyes (PCT/US2015/023953).
Luke D Lavis

Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States

Contribution
LDL, Contributed reagents, Provided the JF549 dye

Competing interests
LDL: Filed patent application on the Janelia Fluor (JF) dyes (PCT/US2015/023953).
Jun Lee

Department of Chemistry, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, United States

Contribution
JL, Constructed plasmids, Performed SMT, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data

Competing interests
No competing interests declared.
Frances J Mejia

Department of Chemistry, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, United States

Contribution
FJM, Constructed plasmids, Performed SMT, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data

Competing interests
No competing interests declared.
Yang Li

Department of Chemistry, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, United States

Contribution
YL, Performed SMT, Acquisition of data

Competing interests
No competing interests declared.
Tingting Yao

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, United States

Contribution
TY, Contributed reagents

Competing interests
No competing interests declared.
Xiaojun Ren

Department of Chemistry, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, United States

Contribution
XR, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article

For correspondence
xiaojun.ren@ucdenver.edu

Competing interests
No competing interests declared.

"This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3931-7625

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

Jonathan B Grimm
Luke D Lavis

National Cancer Institute (R03CA191443)

Xiaojun Ren

American Cancer Society (IRG 57-001-53)

Xiaojun Ren

University of Colorado Denver (Office Research Service)

Xiaojun Ren

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Haruhiko Koseki for providing Eed^−/−, Ring1a^−/−/Ring1b^fl/fl; Rosa26::CreERT2, and Bmi1^–/–/Mel18^–/– mES cell lines, and Dr. Stuart Orkin and Dr. Xiaohua Shen for providing Ezh2^−/− mES cell line. We thank Dr. Marino Resendiz for providing RNAs and Dr. Christopher Phiel for sharing instruments. We thank Dr. Aaron M Johnson and Dr. David Engelke for their constructive suggestion and criticism. This work was supported, in whole or in part, by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R03CA191443 (to XR). This work was also supported by grants from the CU-Denver Office Research Service (to XR), the American Cancer Society Grant IRG 57-001-53 subaward (to XR), and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (LDL and JBG).

Copyright

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

5,928

views
854

downloads
94

citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Mendeley

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Chao Yu Zhen
Roubina Tatavosian
Thao Ngoc Huynh
Huy Nguyen Duc
Raibatak Das
Marko Kokotovic
Jonathan B Grimm
Luke D Lavis
Jun Lee
Frances J Mejia
Yang Li
Tingting Yao
Xiaojun Ren

(2016)

Live-cell single-molecule tracking reveals co-recognition of H3K27me3 and DNA targets polycomb Cbx7-PRC1 to chromatin

eLife 5:e17667.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17667

Share this article

Cite this article

The Cbx family members exhibit distinct dynamics in living mES cells.

Figure 1—source data 1

H2A-HaloTag in wild-type mES cells (Fractional studies).

HaloTag-NLS in wild-type mES cells (Fractional studies).

HaloTag-Cbx2 in wild-type mES cells (Fractional studies).

HaloTag-Cbx4 in wild-type mES cells (Fractional studies).

HaloTag-Cbx6 in wild-type mES cells (Fractional studies).

HaloTag-Cbx7 in wild-type mES cells (Fractional studies).

HaloTag-Cbx8 in wild-type mES cells (Fractional studies).

HaloTag-Cbx7 in Cbx7 KO mES cells (Fractional studies).

H3K27me3 is important for the targeting of Cbx7 and Cbx8 to chromatin, but plays a less important role for Cbx2, Cbx4, and Cbx6.

Figure 2—source data 1

HaloTag-Cbx2 in Eed KO mES cells (Fractional studies).

HaloTag-Cbx4 in Eed KO mES cells (Fractional studies).

HaloTag-Cbx6 in Eed KO mES cells (Fractional studies).

HaloTag-Cbx7 in Eed KO mES cells (Fractional studies)

HaloTag-Cbx8 in Eed KO mES cells (Fractional studies).

HaloTag-Cbx2 in Ezh2 KO mES cells (Fractional studies).

HaloTag-Cbx4 in Ezh2 KO mES cells (Fractional studies).

HaloTag-Cbx6 in Ezh2 KO mES cells (Fractional studies).

HaloTag-Cbx7 in Ezh2 KO mES cells (Fractional studies).

HaloTag-Cbx8 in Ezh2 KO mES cells (Fractional studies).

HaloTag-Cbx7/Y-Eed in Eed KO mES cells (Fractional studies).

HaloTag-Cbx8/Y-Eed in Eed KO mES cells (Fractional studies).

HaloTag-Cbx7/Y-Ezh2 in Ezh2 KO mES cells (Fractional studies).

HaloTag-Cbx8/Y-Ezh2 in Ezh2 KO mES cells (Fractional studies).

HaloTag-CDCbx7 in wild-type mES cells (Fractional studies).

The Cbx7 CD is not efficient for the targeting of Cbx7 to chromatin.

Figure 3—source data 1

HaloTag-Cbx7F11A in wild-type mES cells (Fractional studies).

HaloTag-Cbx7△CD in wild-type mES cells (Fractional studies).

Effects of the Cbx7 CD on the residence time of Cbx7 at chromatin.

Figure 4—source data 1

HaloTag-Cbx7 in wild-type mES cells (Residence time studies).

HaloTag-CDCbx7 in wild-type mES cells (Residence time studies).

HaloTag-Cbx7F11A in wild-type mES cells (Residence time studies).

HaloTag-Cbx7△CD in wild-type mES cells (Residence time studies).

Disruption of the complex formation of Cbx7-PRC1 facilitates the targeting of Cbx7 to chromatin.

Figure 5—source data 1

HaloTag-Cbx7 in Ring1a/Ring1b dKO mES cells (Fractional studies).

HaloTag-Cbx7 in Bmi1/Mel18 dKO mES cells (Fractional studies).

HaloTag-Cbx7 in Ring1a/Ring1b dKO mES cells (Residence time studies).

HaloTag-Cbx7 in Bmi1/Mel18 dKO mES cells (Residence time studies).

CDCbx7 and ATLCbx7 together constitute a DNA-binding entity.

CDCbx7 and ATLCbx7 together control the targeting of Cbx7 to chromatin.

Figure 7—source data 1

HaloTag-Cbx7△ATL in wild-type mES cells (Fractional studies).

HaloTag-Cbx7ATLm in wild-type mES cells (Fractional studies).

HaloTag-Cbx7△CD-ATL in wild-type mES cells (Fractional studies).

HaloTag-Cbx7△ATL in wild-type mES cells (Residence time studies).

HaloTag-Cbx7ATLm in wild-type mES cells (Residence time studies).

HaloTag-Cbx7△CD-ATL in wild-type mES cells (Residence time studies).

Proposed models for the targeting of Cbx-PRC1 to chromatin.

Author details

Chao Yu Zhen

Contribution

Contributed equally with

Competing interests

Roubina Tatavosian

Contribution

Contributed equally with

Competing interests

Thao Ngoc Huynh

Contribution

Contributed equally with

Competing interests

Huy Nguyen Duc

Contribution

Contributed equally with

Competing interests

Raibatak Das

Contribution

Competing interests

Marko Kokotovic

Contribution

Competing interests

Jonathan B Grimm

Contribution

HaloTag-CD_Cbx7 in wild-type mES cells (Fractional studies).

HaloTag-Cbx7^F11A in wild-type mES cells (Fractional studies).

HaloTag-Cbx7^△CD in wild-type mES cells (Fractional studies).

HaloTag-CD_Cbx7 in wild-type mES cells (Residence time studies).

HaloTag-Cbx7^F11A in wild-type mES cells (Residence time studies).

HaloTag-Cbx7^△CD in wild-type mES cells (Residence time studies).

CD_Cbx7 and ATL_Cbx7 together constitute a DNA-binding entity.

CD_Cbx7 and ATL_Cbx7 together control the targeting of Cbx7 to chromatin.

HaloTag-Cbx7^△ATL in wild-type mES cells (Fractional studies).

HaloTag-Cbx7^ATLm in wild-type mES cells (Fractional studies).

HaloTag-Cbx7^△CD-ATL in wild-type mES cells (Fractional studies).

HaloTag-Cbx7^△ATL in wild-type mES cells (Residence time studies).

HaloTag-Cbx7^ATLm in wild-type mES cells (Residence time studies).

HaloTag-Cbx7^△CD-ATL in wild-type mES cells (Residence time studies).