Abstract

Selective autophagy is mediated by cargo receptors that link the cargo to the isolation membrane via interactions with Atg8 proteins. Atg8 proteins are localized to the membrane in an ubiquitin-like conjugation reaction, but how this conjugation is coupled to the presence of the cargo is unclear. Here we show that the S. cerevisiae Atg19, Atg34 and the human p62, Optineurin and NDP52 cargo receptors interact with the E3-like enzyme Atg12∼Atg5-Atg16, which stimulates Atg8 conjugation. The interaction of Atg19 with the Atg12∼Atg5-Atg16 complex is mediated by its Atg8-interacting motifs (AIMs). We identify the AIM-binding sites in the Atg5 subunit and mutation of these sites impairs selective autophagy. In a reconstituted system the recruitment of the E3 to the prApe1 cargo is sufficient to drive accumulation of conjugated Atg8 at the cargo. The interaction of the Atg12∼Atg5-Atg16 complex and Atg8 with Atg19 is mutually exclusive, which may confer directionality to the system.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Dorotea Fracchiolla

    Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Justyna Sawa-Makarska

    Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Bettina Zens

    Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Anita de Ruiter

    Department of Structural and Computational Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Gabriele Zaffagnini

    Department of Structural and Computational Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Andrea Brezovich

    Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Julia Romanov

    Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Kathrin Runggatscher

    Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Claudine Kraft

    Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Bojan Zagrovic

    Department of Structural and Computational Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Sascha Martens

    Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    For correspondence
    sascha.martens@univie.ac.at
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3786-8199

Funding

European Research Council (260304)

  • Sascha Martens

European Research Council (646653)

  • Sascha Martens

European Research Council (279408)

  • Bojan Zagrovic

Austrian Science Fund (P25546-B20)

  • Sascha Martens

Austrian Science Fund (P25522-B20)

  • Claudine Kraft

Austrian Science Fund (P28113-B28)

  • Claudine Kraft

Austrian Science Fund (T724-B20)

  • Justyna Sawa-Makarska

Vienna Science and Technology Fund (VRG10-791 001)

  • Claudine Kraft

European Molecular Biology Organization (YIP)

  • Claudine Kraft
  • Sascha Martens

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2016, Fracchiolla et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,317
    views
  • 1,053
    downloads
  • 55
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Dorotea Fracchiolla
  2. Justyna Sawa-Makarska
  3. Bettina Zens
  4. Anita de Ruiter
  5. Gabriele Zaffagnini
  6. Andrea Brezovich
  7. Julia Romanov
  8. Kathrin Runggatscher
  9. Claudine Kraft
  10. Bojan Zagrovic
  11. Sascha Martens
(2016)
Mechanism of cargo-directed Atg8 conjugation during selective autophagy
eLife 5:e18544.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18544

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18544

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Alejandro J Brenes, Eva Griesser ... Angus I Lamond
    Research Article

    Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) have great potential to be used as alternatives to embryonic stem cells (hESCs) in regenerative medicine and disease modelling. In this study, we characterise the proteomes of multiple hiPSC and hESC lines derived from independent donors and find that while they express a near-identical set of proteins, they show consistent quantitative differences in the abundance of a subset of proteins. hiPSCs have increased total protein content, while maintaining a comparable cell cycle profile to hESCs, with increased abundance of cytoplasmic and mitochondrial proteins required to sustain high growth rates, including nutrient transporters and metabolic proteins. Prominent changes detected in proteins involved in mitochondrial metabolism correlated with enhanced mitochondrial potential, shown using high-resolution respirometry. hiPSCs also produced higher levels of secreted proteins, including growth factors and proteins involved in the inhibition of the immune system. The data indicate that reprogramming of fibroblasts to hiPSCs produces important differences in cytoplasmic and mitochondrial proteins compared to hESCs, with consequences affecting growth and metabolism. This study improves our understanding of the molecular differences between hiPSCs and hESCs, with implications for potential risks and benefits for their use in future disease modelling and therapeutic applications.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Jie Luo, Jeff Ranish
    Tools and Resources

    Dynamic conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes play a central and ubiquitous role in the regulation of protein function, yet it is very challenging to study these changes, especially for large protein complexes, under physiological conditions. Here, we introduce a novel isobaric crosslinker, Qlinker, for studying conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes using quantitative crosslinking mass spectrometry. Qlinkers are small and simple, amine-reactive molecules with an optimal extended distance of ~10 Å, which use MS2 reporter ions for relative quantification of Qlinker-modified peptides derived from different samples. We synthesized the 2-plex Q2linker and showed that the Q2linker can provide quantitative crosslinking data that pinpoints key conformational and structural changes in biosensors, binary and ternary complexes composed of the general transcription factors TBP, TFIIA, and TFIIB, and RNA polymerase II complexes.