Abstract

Selective autophagy is mediated by cargo receptors that link the cargo to the isolation membrane via interactions with Atg8 proteins. Atg8 proteins are localized to the membrane in an ubiquitin-like conjugation reaction, but how this conjugation is coupled to the presence of the cargo is unclear. Here we show that the S. cerevisiae Atg19, Atg34 and the human p62, Optineurin and NDP52 cargo receptors interact with the E3-like enzyme Atg12∼Atg5-Atg16, which stimulates Atg8 conjugation. The interaction of Atg19 with the Atg12∼Atg5-Atg16 complex is mediated by its Atg8-interacting motifs (AIMs). We identify the AIM-binding sites in the Atg5 subunit and mutation of these sites impairs selective autophagy. In a reconstituted system the recruitment of the E3 to the prApe1 cargo is sufficient to drive accumulation of conjugated Atg8 at the cargo. The interaction of the Atg12∼Atg5-Atg16 complex and Atg8 with Atg19 is mutually exclusive, which may confer directionality to the system.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Dorotea Fracchiolla

    Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Justyna Sawa-Makarska

    Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Bettina Zens

    Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Anita de Ruiter

    Department of Structural and Computational Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Gabriele Zaffagnini

    Department of Structural and Computational Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Andrea Brezovich

    Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Julia Romanov

    Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Kathrin Runggatscher

    Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Claudine Kraft

    Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Bojan Zagrovic

    Department of Structural and Computational Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Sascha Martens

    Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    For correspondence
    sascha.martens@univie.ac.at
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3786-8199

Funding

European Research Council (260304)

  • Sascha Martens

European Research Council (646653)

  • Sascha Martens

European Research Council (279408)

  • Bojan Zagrovic

Austrian Science Fund (P25546-B20)

  • Sascha Martens

Austrian Science Fund (P25522-B20)

  • Claudine Kraft

Austrian Science Fund (P28113-B28)

  • Claudine Kraft

Austrian Science Fund (T724-B20)

  • Justyna Sawa-Makarska

Vienna Science and Technology Fund (VRG10-791 001)

  • Claudine Kraft

European Molecular Biology Organization (YIP)

  • Claudine Kraft
  • Sascha Martens

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Hong Zhang, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China

Version history

  1. Received: June 6, 2016
  2. Accepted: November 21, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: November 23, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: December 8, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2016, Fracchiolla et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,278
    views
  • 1,049
    downloads
  • 55
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Dorotea Fracchiolla
  2. Justyna Sawa-Makarska
  3. Bettina Zens
  4. Anita de Ruiter
  5. Gabriele Zaffagnini
  6. Andrea Brezovich
  7. Julia Romanov
  8. Kathrin Runggatscher
  9. Claudine Kraft
  10. Bojan Zagrovic
  11. Sascha Martens
(2016)
Mechanism of cargo-directed Atg8 conjugation during selective autophagy
eLife 5:e18544.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18544

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18544

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Plant Biology
    Henning Mühlenbeck, Yuko Tsutsui ... Cyril Zipfel
    Research Article

    Transmembrane signaling by plant receptor kinases (RKs) has long been thought to involve reciprocal trans-phosphorylation of their intracellular kinase domains. The fact that many of these are pseudokinase domains, however, suggests that additional mechanisms must govern RK signaling activation. Non-catalytic signaling mechanisms of protein kinase domains have been described in metazoans, but information is scarce for plants. Recently, a non-catalytic function was reported for the leucine-rich repeat (LRR)-RK subfamily XIIa member EFR (elongation factor Tu receptor) and phosphorylation-dependent conformational changes were proposed to regulate signaling of RKs with non-RD kinase domains. Here, using EFR as a model, we describe a non-catalytic activation mechanism for LRR-RKs with non-RD kinase domains. EFR is an active kinase, but a kinase-dead variant retains the ability to enhance catalytic activity of its co-receptor kinase BAK1/SERK3 (brassinosteroid insensitive 1-associated kinase 1/somatic embryogenesis receptor kinase 3). Applying hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) analysis and designing homology-based intragenic suppressor mutations, we provide evidence that the EFR kinase domain must adopt its active conformation in order to activate BAK1 allosterically, likely by supporting αC-helix positioning in BAK1. Our results suggest a conformational toggle model for signaling, in which BAK1 first phosphorylates EFR in the activation loop to stabilize its active conformation, allowing EFR in turn to allosterically activate BAK1.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Ya-Juan Wang, Xiao-Jing Di ... Ting-Wei Mu
    Research Article Updated

    Protein homeostasis (proteostasis) deficiency is an important contributing factor to neurological and metabolic diseases. However, how the proteostasis network orchestrates the folding and assembly of multi-subunit membrane proteins is poorly understood. Previous proteomics studies identified Hsp47 (Gene: SERPINH1), a heat shock protein in the endoplasmic reticulum lumen, as the most enriched interacting chaperone for gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptors. Here, we show that Hsp47 enhances the functional surface expression of GABAA receptors in rat neurons and human HEK293T cells. Furthermore, molecular mechanism study demonstrates that Hsp47 acts after BiP (Gene: HSPA5) and preferentially binds the folded conformation of GABAA receptors without inducing the unfolded protein response in HEK293T cells. Therefore, Hsp47 promotes the subunit-subunit interaction, the receptor assembly process, and the anterograde trafficking of GABAA receptors. Overexpressing Hsp47 is sufficient to correct the surface expression and function of epilepsy-associated GABAA receptor variants in HEK293T cells. Hsp47 also promotes the surface trafficking of other Cys-loop receptors, including nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and serotonin type 3 receptors in HEK293T cells. Therefore, in addition to its known function as a collagen chaperone, this work establishes that Hsp47 plays a critical and general role in the maturation of multi-subunit Cys-loop neuroreceptors.