Advances in X-ray free electron laser (XFEL) diffraction data processing applied to the crystal structure of the synaptotagmin-1 / SNARE complex

Abstract

X-ray free electron lasers (XFELs) reduce the effects of radiation damage on macromolecular diffraction data and thereby extend the limiting resolution. Previously, we adapted classical post-refinement techniques to XFEL diffraction data to produce accurate diffraction data sets from a limited number of diffraction images (Uervirojnangkoorn et al., 2015), and went on to use these techniques to obtain a complete data set from crystals of the synaptotagmin-1 / SNARE complex and to determine the structure at 3.5 Å resolution (Zhou et al., 2015). Here, we describe new advances in our methods and present a reprocessed XFEL data set of the synaptotagmin-1 / SNARE complex. The reprocessing produced small improvements in electron density maps and the refined atomic model. The maps also contained more information than those of a lower resolution (4.1 Å) synchrotron data set. Processing a set of simulated XFEL diffraction images revealed that our methods yield accurate data and atomic models.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Artem Y Lyubimov

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Monarin Uervirojnangkoorn

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Oliver B Zeldin

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Qiangjun Zhou

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Minglei Zhao

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Aaron S Brewster

    Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Tara Michels-Clark

    Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. James M Holton

    Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Nicholas K Sauter

    Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. William I Weis

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, United States
    For correspondence
    weis@stanford.edu
    Competing interests
    William I Weis, Reviewing editor for eLife.
  11. Axel T Brunger

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, United States
    For correspondence
    brunger@stanford.edu
    Competing interests
    Axel T Brunger, Reviewing editor for eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5121-2036

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute (Collaborative Innovation Award)

  • William I Weis
  • Axel T Brunger

National Institutes of Health (R01GM102520)

  • Nicholas K Sauter

National Institutes of Health (R01GM117126)

  • Nicholas K Sauter

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P41 GM103403)

  • Axel T Brunger

National Institutes of Health (S10 RR029205)

  • Axel T Brunger

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Stephen C. Harrison, Harvard Medical School, United States

Version history

  1. Received: June 12, 2016
  2. Accepted: October 11, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: October 12, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: November 3, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2016, Lyubimov et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,534
    views
  • 545
    downloads
  • 29
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Artem Y Lyubimov
  2. Monarin Uervirojnangkoorn
  3. Oliver B Zeldin
  4. Qiangjun Zhou
  5. Minglei Zhao
  6. Aaron S Brewster
  7. Tara Michels-Clark
  8. James M Holton
  9. Nicholas K Sauter
  10. William I Weis
  11. Axel T Brunger
(2016)
Advances in X-ray free electron laser (XFEL) diffraction data processing applied to the crystal structure of the synaptotagmin-1 / SNARE complex
eLife 5:e18740.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18740

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18740

Further reading

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Hitendra Negi, Aravind Ravichandran ... Ranabir Das
    Research Article

    The proteasome controls levels of most cellular proteins, and its activity is regulated under stress, quiescence, and inflammation. However, factors determining the proteasomal degradation rate remain poorly understood. Proteasome substrates are conjugated with small proteins (tags) like ubiquitin and Fat10 to target them to the proteasome. It is unclear if the structural plasticity of proteasome-targeting tags can influence substrate degradation. Fat10 is upregulated during inflammation, and its substrates undergo rapid proteasomal degradation. We report that the degradation rate of Fat10 substrates critically depends on the structural plasticity of Fat10. While the ubiquitin tag is recycled at the proteasome, Fat10 is degraded with the substrate. Our results suggest significantly lower thermodynamic stability and faster mechanical unfolding in Fat10 compared to ubiquitin. Long-range salt bridges are absent in the Fat10 structure, creating a plastic protein with partially unstructured regions suitable for proteasome engagement. Fat10 plasticity destabilizes substrates significantly and creates partially unstructured regions in the substrate to enhance degradation. NMR-relaxation-derived order parameters and temperature dependence of chemical shifts identify the Fat10-induced partially unstructured regions in the substrate, which correlated excellently to Fat10-substrate contacts, suggesting that the tag-substrate collision destabilizes the substrate. These results highlight a strong dependence of proteasomal degradation on the structural plasticity and thermodynamic properties of the proteasome-targeting tags.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Amy H Andreotti, Volker Dötsch
    Editorial

    The articles in this special issue highlight how modern cellular, biochemical, biophysical and computational techniques are allowing deeper and more detailed studies of allosteric kinase regulation.